<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-25T00:37:33Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/406056" metadataPrefix="uketd_dc">https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/406056</identifier><datestamp>2026-07-14T01:41:34Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1810_221740</setSpec><setSpec>com_1810_256063</setSpec><setSpec>col_1810_221742</setSpec></header><metadata><uketd_dc:uketddc xmlns:uketd_dc="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:uketdterms="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/ http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/uketd_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>John Dewey in American Thought and Culture, 1950-2000</dc:title>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:DOI">https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.132185</dc:identifier>
   <dc:creator>Selsdon Games, Fergus</dc:creator>
   <uketdterms:advisor>Gerstle, Gary</uketdterms:advisor>
   <dcterms:abstract>Historians have long regarded John Dewey (1859-1952) as a central theorist of American
democracy during the first half of the twentieth century. Yet, while historians have given much
attention to Dewey’s philosophy, they have neglected to examine his posthumous influence
on American thought and culture. This represents a major oversight, since Dewey’s thought
continued to resonate with multiple and varied groups of Americans, orienting their
participation in movements for social change in striking ways. Across divergent postwar
contexts, the figures examined in this dissertation enlisted Dewey’s thought as a set of critical
tools for thinking about intellectual engagement, civic reconstruction and the deepening of
American democracy.</dcterms:abstract>
   <uketdterms:institution>University of Cambridge</uketdterms:institution>
   <dcterms:issued>2026-02-28</dcterms:issued>
   <dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
   <uketdterms:qualificationlevel>Doctoral</uketdterms:qualificationlevel>
   <uketdterms:qualificationname>Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)</uketdterms:qualificationname>
   <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   <dcterms:isReferencedBy xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/406056</dcterms:isReferencedBy>
   <uketdterms:embargotype>embargo</uketdterms:embargotype>
   <uketdterms:embargodate>2027-07-13</uketdterms:embargodate>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/0a950841-dc76-483a-9a8e-c8ac53ed0197/download</dc:identifier>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">91337e667995a2e0f17bc696288e2315</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dcterms:license>https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/bc333b69-1749-4301-b09d-8190b43070e5/download</dcterms:license>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">87eda9de84448d1f82354d60eee3eb5f</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dc:rights>http://purl.org/NET/rdflicense/allrightsreserved</dc:rights>
   <dc:subject>American History</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>American Philosophy</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Education</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Intellectual History</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>John Dewey</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Political Thought</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Pragmatism</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Progressive Education</dc:subject>
</uketd_dc:uketddc>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>