2026-09-23T23:04:13Zhttps://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request

oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/3993052026-03-03T01:43:03Zcom_1810_218811com_1810_256061col_1810_218812

The Catholic Calvin: A study on the satisfaction of Christ and the necessity of the cross in John Calvin’s theology https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.127884 Visk, Matthew Fergusson, David Scholarship on John Calvin has often assumed that he was an early architect of penal substitutionary atonement (PSA) in its most retributive form. This has often led to portrayals of Calvin as teaching that God the Father punished the Son to satisfy divine wrath. Such readings not only flatten Calvin’s theology but also project later seventeenth-century developments back onto him. This dissertation addresses that problem by recovering the historic concepts that shaped Calvin’s thought—particularly the Medieval doctrine of satisfaction and the distinction between absolute and hypothetical necessity. Employing a historical-theological method, this thesis surveys key Medieval figures (Augustine, Anselm, Aquinas, Scotus, Bernard, Abelard) to establish continuity in the tradition and then situates Calvin’s writings within that framework. It also engages in close exegetical analysis of biblical texts central to debates on the atonement (Gal. 3:13; 2 Cor. 5:21; Isa. 53; Matt. 26:39; the descent clause). The study finds that Calvin understood satisfaction in its classic sense: Christ’s obedience and self-offering were presented voluntarily to God as compensation that restores and heals, rather than as retribution. Likewise, Calvin affirmed the hypothetical necessity of the incarnation and cross, rejecting the view that God’s nature required punishment of sin either in sinners or in a substitute. These findings demonstrate that Calvin stands in continuity with a Medieval Augustinian tradition and not with later Reformed figures such as John Owen. The significance of this retrieval is twofold: it corrects persistent mischaracterizations of Calvin’s theology, and it offers a historically grounded framework for articulating non-retributive versions of penal substitution that remain faithful to the seriousness of sin and the self-giving love of Christ. University of Cambridge 2025-10-02 Thesis Doctoral Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) eng https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/399305 https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/2a679262-fecc-40b5-86b8-f63a7370a2df/download 0fb14ab00f42d86af578d056f6098efd https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/54b8ed08-e8b9-407f-a917-010c24ff2ac0/download 87eda9de84448d1f82354d60eee3eb5f http://purl.org/NET/rdflicense/allrightsreserved John Calvin Calvin Calvinism Reformed Theology Reformation Penal Substitution Penal Substitutionary Atonement Atonement Satisfaction Theories of Atonement