<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-21T03:46:28Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/397413" metadataPrefix="uketd_dc">https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/397413</identifier><datestamp>2026-02-10T01:41:35Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1810_183645</setSpec><setSpec>com_1810_256063</setSpec><setSpec>col_1810_221901</setSpec></header><metadata><uketd_dc:uketddc xmlns:uketd_dc="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:uketdterms="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/ http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/uketd_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Implied Obligations of Good Faith in English Contract Law</dc:title>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:DOI">https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.126559</dc:identifier>
   <dc:creator>Hose, Christopher</dc:creator>
   <uketdterms:advisor>Gardner, Jodi</uketdterms:advisor>
   <uketdterms:advisor>Tofaris, Stelios</uketdterms:advisor>
   <dcterms:abstract>The concept of ‘good faith’ in English contract law has been the subject of intensified debate in the last 
decade. This has been precipitated partly by developments in other jurisdictions, as well as being 
influenced by academic and extrajudicial writings. By far the most impactful driver of the discussion, 
however, has been the steady flow of thought-provoking decisions and obiter dicta from the courts 
themselves. This thesis approaches this live topic from a doctrinal perspective, which focuses on those 
judgments in order to understand how good faith is being used and understood in judicial decisions as 
an obligation.

The argument of this thesis does not depend on high-level abstractions of a ‘theory’, ‘concept’ or 
‘principle’ of good faith. Instead, its goal is to provide an interpretivist account of the common law, 
which explains how good faith is already being used in practice, in light of the orthodox values and 
mechanisms of the English common law of contract. It does so by focusing on the two areas where a 
good faith obligation is implied in accordance with the general law of contract: in relational contracts, 
and to limit contractual discretions. In this way, ‘English good faith’ is presented in the best possible 
light, and so prepared for a fair, accurate and constructive future critique.

This doctrinal analysis is combined with a theoretical approach, based on a restatement of the core 
propositions of the relational theory of contract. This restatement is used to explain how the good faith 
obligation in relational contracts and contractual discretions stems from a deeper tension, caused by 
contracting parties’ choices to deal with risks through systems of contract governance which are not 
adequately recognised by orthodox contract law. Ultimately, it is concluded that a good faith obligation 
exists to formalise parties’ unspoken commitment to proper purpose when using decision-making 
structures that are, by design, not fully circumscribed in advance.</dcterms:abstract>
   <uketdterms:institution>University of Cambridge</uketdterms:institution>
   <dcterms:issued>2025-06-10</dcterms:issued>
   <dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
   <uketdterms:qualificationlevel>Doctoral</uketdterms:qualificationlevel>
   <uketdterms:qualificationname>Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)</uketdterms:qualificationname>
   <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   <uketdterms:sponsor>J.C. Hall Scholarship, St John's College</uketdterms:sponsor>
   <dcterms:isReferencedBy xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/397413</dcterms:isReferencedBy>
   <uketdterms:embargotype>embargo</uketdterms:embargotype>
   <uketdterms:embargodate>2027-02-09</uketdterms:embargodate>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/c27dc624-1fff-4469-b391-b24a66f313b0/download</dc:identifier>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">32d5cfb5d9b0fef3931e06ebed1cd08f</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dcterms:license>https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/69970b14-5f3e-47aa-86e4-677ff8ac8113/download</dcterms:license>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">87eda9de84448d1f82354d60eee3eb5f</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
   <dc:subject>Contract Law</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Good Faith</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Relational Contracts</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Contractual Discretions</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Private Law</dc:subject>
</uketd_dc:uketddc>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>