<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-24T04:46:35Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/395117" metadataPrefix="uketd_dc">https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/395117</identifier><datestamp>2026-01-10T01:40:24Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1810_194167</setSpec><setSpec>com_1810_256061</setSpec><setSpec>col_1810_219491</setSpec></header><metadata><uketd_dc:uketddc xmlns:uketd_dc="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:uketdterms="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/ http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/uketd_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Academic Women and the Institutionalisation of English at the University of Cambridge, 1898-1938</dc:title>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:DOI">https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.124735</dc:identifier>
   <dc:creator>Rogers, Lucy</dc:creator>
   <uketdterms:advisor>Abbott, Ruth</uketdterms:advisor>
   <dcterms:abstract>The development of ‘Cambridge English’ has become a fundamental part of the semi-
mythologised origin story of modern literary study. However, existing narratives of the
‘Rise of English’ rarely incorporate any substantial discussion of women who taught,
researched and studied at Cambridge in the early twentieth century. This thesis
suggests that the relationship of women with the embryonic English Tripos has been
overlooked largely because of the less straightforward ways they engaged with this
subject. Sidelined from important decision making and curricular design, deprived of
degrees and facing significant obstacles to publication, women adopted a notably wide
variety of methods for reading and writing about literary texts. To more fully understand
the nature of women’s engagement with the development of English (including the
ideas associated with ‘Cambridge English’) this thesis therefore investigates many
different forms of criticism, some conventionally academic and others less so. The
texts examined include lecture lists, examination papers, notebooks, scrapbooks,
novels, student magazines, memoirs, reference books, teaching notes, history books
and satirical poems, alongside essays, reviews and monographs. Many of the figures
and archival sources discussed have never previously received scholarly attention. The
thesis analyses these sources to reveal the critical approaches of both staff and
students and explore how these overlapped with creative practices and other
developing disciplinary methodologies.

The history of women and English at Cambridge runs parallel to the creation and early
years of the Tripos. Approaching this history through a diverse range of forms and
practices enables us to encounter women in the process of establishing what it meant
to read literary texts in a professional academic setting, as a woman. Not all the women
in this thesis taught English, or even studied it, but they all engaged critically with
literary works and with the ways in which their male colleagues were attempting to
institutionalise and professionalise the process of reading them. The thesis offers a
series of case studies, featuring individuals or small clusters of women, each centred
around a set of archival materials. Chapter One, ‘English Before the Tripos’, examines a
selection of models of literary scholarship and academic womanhood enacted at
Girton and Newnham before 1919. Chapter Two presents an ‘Alternative to the Tripos’
through historian Eileen Power’s uses of literary quotation. Chapter Three features
several generations of Girton women who used processes of ‘Reframing, Rewriting,
Reinterpreting the Tripos’ to assert a sense of control. Chapter Four goes ‘Beyond the
English Tripos’ to discuss extracurricular experimentation as a form of literary criticism,
focusing on the student magazine Thersites. Through these case studies, the project
aims to complicate existing metadiscourses and histories of English. Moving away from
polemicising and towards a more nuanced, practice-focused and archive-led approach
facilitates the inclusion of women scholars and centres their own writing. This provides
a greater insight into Cambridge women’s interactions with English than has hitherto
been possible.</dcterms:abstract>
   <uketdterms:institution>University of Cambridge</uketdterms:institution>
   <dcterms:issued>2025-08-11</dcterms:issued>
   <dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
   <uketdterms:qualificationlevel>Doctoral</uketdterms:qualificationlevel>
   <uketdterms:qualificationname>Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)</uketdterms:qualificationname>
   <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   <uketdterms:sponsor>Jebb Studentship, Sarah Squire Scholarship (Hughes Hall), Faculty of English</uketdterms:sponsor>
   <dcterms:isReferencedBy xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/395117</dcterms:isReferencedBy>
   <uketdterms:embargotype>embargo</uketdterms:embargotype>
   <uketdterms:embargodate>2027-01-09</uketdterms:embargodate>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/865bab9f-0954-4665-bf25-4a9d50d9979a/download</dc:identifier>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">c3a8e0ef8ddd247c8386fb02a4c4e7ed</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dcterms:license>https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/5f78f92e-0983-4fd7-933c-7e88b31a284d/download</dcterms:license>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">87eda9de84448d1f82354d60eee3eb5f</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dc:rights>http://purl.org/NET/rdflicense/allrightsreserved</dc:rights>
   <dc:subject>Cambridge English</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>disciplinary history</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>English</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>English Tripos</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>female scholars</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Institutionalisation of English</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>twentieth century</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>University history</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>University of Cambridge</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>women academics</dc:subject>
</uketd_dc:uketddc>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>