<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-22T19:01:59Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/384090" metadataPrefix="uketd_dc">https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/384090</identifier><datestamp>2025-05-16T00:44:20Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1810_219481</setSpec><setSpec>com_1810_256065</setSpec><setSpec>col_1810_219482</setSpec></header><metadata><uketd_dc:uketddc xmlns:uketd_dc="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:uketdterms="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/ http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/uketd_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Neuro-symbolic fact verification</dc:title>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:DOI">https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.118214</dc:identifier>
   <dc:creator>Aly, Rami</dc:creator>
   <uketdterms:advisor>Vlachos, Andreas</uketdterms:advisor>
   <dcterms:abstract>Fact-checking, the process of assessing the veracity of claims, is a time-consuming task that can potentially take hours or days for a single claim, incentivising the development of computational methods to automate (parts of) the fact-checking process. This challenge has been instantiated in the field of natural language processing as fact verification, and is typically modelled by systems which extract textual evidence from a knowledge source and reason about a claim’s veracity via neural entailment systems. However, the reasoning processes of these systems are inherently opaque, suffer from robustness issues, and fail at capturing well-formalised semantic concepts like monotonicity.

To address these issues, this thesis explores neuro-symbolic methods for fact verification, which integrate symbolic systems with neural representations. We focus in particular on natural logic, a framework of compositional entailment which operates directly on natural language by capturing the set-theoretic relation between parts of a claim and textual evidence. As a logical system designed to identify valid inferences via deterministic proofs, it is particularly suited for fact verification, where a claim needs to be entailed by evidence, while guaranteeing explainability properties like faithfulness and actionability.

The first contribution of this thesis is the development of FEVEROUS, a large-scale dataset which requires complex reasoning over retrieved textual and tabular evidence, such as arithmetic or multi-hop reasoning, to incentivise the development of neuro-symbolic methods. We then explore means of combining natural logic as a symbolic reasoning framework with advances in autoregressive language modelling to improve the explainability, robustness, and generalisability of fact verification systems. We propose systems that (i) integrate natural logic as a dynamic and transparent stopping criterion for autoregressive multi-hop document retrieval; (ii) obviate the need for large-scale annotated data for training natural logic proof systems; and (iii) extend natural logic to tabular evidence and arithmetic computations, thus addressing key challenges encountered in the verification of complex claims. Finally, we unify these three contributions into a single natural logic-based fact verification system towards reasoning over textual and tabular evidence while satisfying important explainability desiderata.</dcterms:abstract>
   <uketdterms:institution>University of Cambridge</uketdterms:institution>
   <dcterms:issued>2024-11-23</dcterms:issued>
   <dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
   <uketdterms:qualificationlevel>Doctoral</uketdterms:qualificationlevel>
   <uketdterms:qualificationname>Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)</uketdterms:qualificationname>
   <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   <uketdterms:sponsor>The research was supported by an EPSRC studentship.
The curation of the FEVEROUS dataset was funded by Amazon.</uketdterms:sponsor>
   <dcterms:isReferencedBy xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/384090</dcterms:isReferencedBy>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/c977a7b7-af8d-497e-9de2-3867ab812a54/download</dc:identifier>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">c656eae60901ad69c4f643a917edda73</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dcterms:license>https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/12901f69-c896-437e-a026-26d960b0a02e/download</dcterms:license>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">87eda9de84448d1f82354d60eee3eb5f</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dc:rights>http://purl.org/NET/rdflicense/allrightsreserved</dc:rights>
   <dc:subject>natural language processing</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>fact-checking</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>fact verification</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>explainable AI</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>information retrieval</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>neuro-symbolic AI</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>natural logic</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>compositional entailment</dc:subject>
</uketd_dc:uketddc>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>