<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-23T04:07:29Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/337879" metadataPrefix="uketd_dc">https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/337879</identifier><datestamp>2023-12-22T14:00:50Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1810_221740</setSpec><setSpec>com_1810_256063</setSpec><setSpec>col_1810_221742</setSpec></header><metadata><uketd_dc:uketddc xmlns:uketd_dc="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:uketdterms="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/ http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/uketd_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>The politics of the confessional imagination, from Calvin to Hobbes</dc:title>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:DOI">10.17863/CAM.85286</dc:identifier>
   <dc:creator>Reiter, Barret</dc:creator>
   <uketdterms:advisor>Brett, Annabel</uketdterms:advisor>
   <dcterms:abstract>In this dissertation, I consider the nature and application of theories of the imagination by, especially English, Protestants, over the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. I make four significant observations. First, I argue that English Protestant philosophical treatments of the imagination were largely continuous with the earlier mediaeval, scholastic tradition, despite advances in anatomy and the rediscovery of new classical sources. Second, I argue that English Protestants developed a distinctive (but not original) theological discourse reflecting on the effects of the Fall on the human imagination. Third, I argue that despite a robust commitment to predestination, English Protestants by no means repudiated the possibility for specifically human methods of ameliorating the fallen imagination. Finally, I contend that this theological reflection on the fallen imagination was widespread, colouring even non-theological discourses, such as (nominally) secular writing on natural philosophy, ethics and politics.

I explore these arguments over three large sections. First, I consider primarily philosophical reflections on the nature of the imagination, surveying works in the Aristotelian scientia de anima tradition, as well as early modern medicine. I also treat the revival of ancient Stoic theories of the imagination and their early modern promoters. Finally, I close off this section with an examination of the philosophy of Francis Bacon. In the second section, I turn to theological considerations. I first discuss the connection between idolatry and the imagination canvassed in Protestant theology and its sources in scholasticism and parallels in the Counter-Reformation Catholic Church. I then introduce the pessimistic account of the imagination which features prominently within English Protestant discourse. I conclude this section with another discussion of Francis Bacon, this time focussing on the religious dimension of his account of the “idols of the mind.” In the third section, I consider the language of psychological self-government as it focusses on the imagination. I consider the scholastic Aristotelian tradition of moral philosophy before returning to English Protestant theology and a brief excursus back into natural philosophy. The section ends with a detailed engagement with English political writing, focussing particularly on works written in the vernacular. I consider, in turn, Tyndale, Ponet, Goodman, Milton and, finally, the radical Civil War pamphleteer Gerrard Winstanley.</dcterms:abstract>
   <uketdterms:institution>University of Cambridge</uketdterms:institution>
   <dcterms:issued>2021-12</dcterms:issued>
   <dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
   <uketdterms:qualificationlevel>Doctoral</uketdterms:qualificationlevel>
   <uketdterms:qualificationname>Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)</uketdterms:qualificationname>
   <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   <dcterms:isReferencedBy xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/337879</dcterms:isReferencedBy>
   <uketdterms:embargotype>controlled.access</uketdterms:embargotype>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/80922b0e-8b3d-432a-a2eb-1956e820d7a8/download</dc:identifier>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">368e5a7f3a54aaf94d43605591e290b1</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dc:rights>https://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/</dc:rights>
   <dc:subject>Imagination</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Intellectual history</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>History of political thought</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>History of philosophy</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Early modern philosophy</dc:subject>
</uketd_dc:uketddc>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>