<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-22T02:13:56Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/323664" metadataPrefix="uketd_dc">https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/323664</identifier><datestamp>2025-12-19T22:53:45Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1810_219479</setSpec><setSpec>com_1810_34581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1810_219488</setSpec></header><metadata><uketd_dc:uketddc xmlns:uketd_dc="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:uketdterms="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/ http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/uketd_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Methods for Data Management in Multi-Centre MRI Studies and Applications to Traumatic Brain Injury</dc:title>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:DOI">10.17863/CAM.71122</dc:identifier>
   <dc:creator>Winzeck, Stefan</dc:creator>
   <uketdterms:advisor>Menon, David</uketdterms:advisor>
   <uketdterms:advisor>Morgado Correia, Marta</uketdterms:advisor>
   <uketdterms:authoridentifier xsi:type="uketdterms:ORCID">0000000232317040</uketdterms:authoridentifier>
   <dcterms:abstract>Neuroimaging studies are becoming increasingly bigger, and multi-centre collaborations to collect  data  under  similar  protocols,  but  different  scanning  sites,  are  now  commonplace.However,  with  increasing  sample  size  the  complexity  of  databases  and  the  entailed  data management  as  well  as  computational  burden  are  growing.   This  thesis  aims  to  highlight and address challenges faced by large multi-centre magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) studies.   The  methods  implemented  are  then  applied  to traumatic  brain  injury (TBI)  data.Firstly, a pre-processing pipeline for both anatomical and diffusion MRI was proposed, that allows for a high throughput of MRI scans.  After describing the choices for processing tools,the performance of the integrated quality assurance was assessed based on the results from a large multi-centre dataset for TBI. Secondly, the applicability of the pipelines for processing mild TBI (mTBI) data from three sites was shown in a case study.  For this, volumetric and diffusion  metrics  in  the  acute  phase  are  analysed  for  their  prognostic  potential.   Further-more, the cohort was examined for longitudinal changes.  Thirdly, independent scan-rescan datasets are examined to gain a better understanding of the degree of reproducibility which can be achieved in imaging studies.  This involves analysing the robustness of brain parcellations based on structural or diffusion imaging.  The effect of using different MRI scanners or imaging protocols was also assessed and discussed.  Fourthly,  sources of diffusion MRI variability and different approaches to cope with these are reviewed.  Using this foundation,state-of-the art methods for diffusion MRI harmonisation were compared against each other using both a benchmark dataset and mTBI cohort.  Lastly, a solution to localise brain lesions was proposed.  Its implications for lesion analysis, are assessed in the light of an application to  a  more  severe  TBI  patient  cohort,  imaged  on  two  different  scanners.   Furthermore,  a lesion matching algorithm was introduced to automatically examine lesion evolution with time post-injury.  In summary, this thesis explored different options for MRI data analysis in the context of large multi-centre studies.  Different approaches are studied and compared using a number of different MRI datasets, including scan-rescan data across different MRI scanners  and  imaging  protocols.   The  potential  of  the  optimised  solutions  was  illustrated through applications to TBI data.</dcterms:abstract>
   <uketdterms:institution>University of Cambridge</uketdterms:institution>
   <dcterms:issued>2020-11-25</dcterms:issued>
   <dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
   <uketdterms:qualificationlevel>Doctoral</uketdterms:qualificationlevel>
   <uketdterms:qualificationname>Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)</uketdterms:qualificationname>
   <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   <uketdterms:sponsor>CENTER-TBI</uketdterms:sponsor>
   <dcterms:isReferencedBy xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/323664</dcterms:isReferencedBy>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/d0699f7b-04c0-4269-b38d-dfd13c58cfb8/download</dc:identifier>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">3986c291815cf4091b26b688eac75d29</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dcterms:license>https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/bf618b51-681f-46a2-82ba-1490514567c5/download</dcterms:license>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">353adac0d1ebdfd65ab16480263c3c87</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dc:rights>https://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/</dc:rights>
   <dc:subject>MRI</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>TBI</dc:subject>
</uketd_dc:uketddc>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>