<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-24T08:26:05Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/313055" metadataPrefix="uketd_dc">https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/313055</identifier><datestamp>2024-06-26T13:47:04Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1810_274</setSpec><setSpec>com_1810_256063</setSpec><setSpec>col_1810_221739</setSpec></header><metadata><uketd_dc:uketddc xmlns:uketd_dc="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:uketdterms="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/ http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/uketd_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>A Post-Colonial View of Thrace: Thracian-Greek Interactions From the Early Iron Age to the Early Hellenistic Period</dc:title>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:DOI">10.17863/CAM.60155</dc:identifier>
   <dc:creator>Dimova, Bela</dc:creator>
   <dcterms:abstract>The way we see relations between ‘Greeks’ and ‘Barbarians’ in the 1st millennium BC&#xd;
Mediterranean has changed dramatically over the past 20 years. Under the influence of&#xd;
post-colonial theory, the narrative has shifted from colonial conquest to multiple histories&#xd;
of diverse encounters. This thesis examines the case of ancient Thrace: an under-explored&#xd;
region, which offers a unique perspective on Greek-Non-Greek relations. Geography&#xd;
endows Thrace with a long-lived history of interactions with Greece and very different&#xd;
possibilities for connectivity, compared to the Mediterranean. The aim of this thesis is to&#xd;
explore what forms interactions between communities in Thrace and Greece took in&#xd;
different geographical settings, and how they changed over the 1st millennium BC. I trace&#xd;
how indigenous people adopted and used imported objects and technologies in different&#xd;
social contexts in Thrace. This enquiry sheds light on the indigenous perspective, which&#xd;
has been often left off the pages of history.&#xd;
&#xd;
The evidence is synthesised and discussed in three core chapters. Chapter II takes a&#xd;
regional-wide and long-term perspective. I review the settlement dynamics, burial and&#xd;
religious practices across Thrace through the Iron Age, and I examine the place of imports&#xd;
in each of these spheres. Chapters III and IV focus on two contact-zone cities: Apollonia&#xd;
on the Black Sea, and Adzhiiska Vodenitsa on River Hebros, near modern Vetren. At&#xd;
Apollonia – a classic example of a coastal Greek colony, we can follow how a community&#xd;
of diverse origins constructed a unified community identity as a Pontic Ionian city.&#xd;
Apollonia’s trade and diplomatic relations with neighbouring communities started from its&#xd;
establishment and unfolded prosperously. Vetren is also considered a colony – a Thasian&#xd;
emporion – but after re-assessing the epigraphic, historical, and archaeological evidence, I&#xd;
argue that this identification is unconvincing. The site is better understood as a market&#xd;
town with a mixed population, under Thracian authority. Vetren therefore invites us to rethink&#xd;
the rise of indigenous urbanism, and particularly the role of imports in the&#xd;
constitution of early towns and urban economies.&#xd;
&#xd;
The two case studies and the regional review recuperate some of the diverse interactions&#xd;
between Thrace and Greece, including technological transfer, trade, migration, and elite&#xd;
contacts, among others. They offer a perspective on how aspects of Thracian society&#xd;
changed through cultural contact, on indigenous terms: by embracing and adapting some&#xd;
elements (coinage, wheel-made pottery), and showing limited interest in others (e.g.&#xd;
writing). In the processes of cultural contact and social change, people manipulated the&#xd;
boundaries of identity and alterity in more complex and historically meaningful ways than&#xd;
the binary classification of Greek and Thracian allows: by creating idiosyncratic local&#xd;
identities such as the Pontic Ionians at Apollonia; or by living an urban lifestyle, which&#xd;
had more in common with urban centres of the Aegean, than other Thracian settlements, as&#xd;
at Vetren.</dcterms:abstract>
   <uketdterms:institution>University of Cambridge</uketdterms:institution>
   <dcterms:issued>2015</dcterms:issued>
   <dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
   <uketdterms:qualificationlevel>doctoral</uketdterms:qualificationlevel>
   <uketdterms:qualificationname>PhD</uketdterms:qualificationname>
   <dc:language>en</dc:language>
   <dcterms:isReferencedBy xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/313055</dcterms:isReferencedBy>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/e3849e7c-f320-4a42-8766-5fe85e0f8c16/download</dc:identifier>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">831d8e7f8edeb346b4077eb62df25024</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dcterms:license>https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/5a96ea36-49e0-41a5-8666-2d85ec4c0b21/download</dcterms:license>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">87eda9de84448d1f82354d60eee3eb5f</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dc:rights>https://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/</dc:rights>
   <dc:subject>iron age</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Thrace</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Greece</dc:subject>
</uketd_dc:uketddc>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>