<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-23T11:30:20Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/292110" metadataPrefix="uketd_dc">https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/292110</identifier><datestamp>2021-04-21T19:46:41Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1810_183645</setSpec><setSpec>com_1810_256063</setSpec><setSpec>col_1810_221901</setSpec></header><metadata><uketd_dc:uketddc xmlns:uketd_dc="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:uketdterms="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/ http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/uketd_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>A General Legal Right to Conscientious Exemption: Beyond Religious Privilege</dc:title>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:DOI">10.17863/CAM.39265</dc:identifier>
   <dc:creator>Adenitire, John</dc:creator>
   <uketdterms:advisor>Feldman, David</uketdterms:advisor>
   <dcterms:abstract>The thesis shows that there is a general legal right to exemption for conscientious objectors in the US, Canada and UK. It shows that it is a limited right: exemptions may be lawfully denied to protect the rights of others or important public interests. The thesis then investigates whether such a legal right is exclusively reserved for religious believers. The thesis shows that it is not: it is available to those that object on the basis of conscience, irrespective of whether their conscience is motivated by religious or non-religious beliefs. The thesis concludes by defending the existence of this general right by appealing to liberal values.</dcterms:abstract>
   <uketdterms:institution>University of Cambridge</uketdterms:institution>
   <dcterms:issued>2019-02-06</dcterms:issued>
   <dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
   <uketdterms:qualificationlevel>Doctoral</uketdterms:qualificationlevel>
   <uketdterms:qualificationname>Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)</uketdterms:qualificationname>
   <dc:language>en</dc:language>
   <uketdterms:sponsor>AHRC DTP</uketdterms:sponsor>
   <dcterms:isReferencedBy xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/292110</dcterms:isReferencedBy>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/10f5e614-3d75-4215-a9ee-35d61114b508/download</dc:identifier>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">b28077645e861c1cb2eb004a55f3f076</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dcterms:license>https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/3624f3dc-d5ce-4925-813f-dbc47c59b191/download</dcterms:license>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">87eda9de84448d1f82354d60eee3eb5f</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dc:rights>https://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/</dc:rights>
   <dc:subject>conscience</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>religion</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>human right</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>discrimination</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>conscientious objection</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>conscientious exemption</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>law</dc:subject>
</uketd_dc:uketddc>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>