<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-18T18:16:54Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/276823" metadataPrefix="uketd_dc">https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/276823</identifier><datestamp>2019-01-30T13:09:45Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1810_219477</setSpec><setSpec>com_1810_256064</setSpec><setSpec>col_1810_219486</setSpec></header><metadata><uketd_dc:uketddc xmlns:uketd_dc="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:uketdterms="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/ http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/uketd_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Data-driven prediction of saltmarsh morphodynamics</dc:title>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:DOI">10.17863/CAM.24102</dc:identifier>
   <dc:creator>Evans, Ben Richard</dc:creator>
   <uketdterms:authoridentifier xsi:type="uketdterms:ORCID">000000030643526X</uketdterms:authoridentifier>
   <uketdterms:advisor>Möller, Iris</uketdterms:advisor>
   <uketdterms:authoridentifier xsi:type="uketdterms:ORCID">0000000319712932</uketdterms:authoridentifier>
   <uketdterms:advisor>Spencer, Thomas</uketdterms:advisor>
   <uketdterms:authoridentifier xsi:type="uketdterms:ORCID">0000000326106201</uketdterms:authoridentifier>
   <dcterms:abstract>Saltmarshes provide a diverse range of ecosystem services and are protected under a number
of international designations. Nevertheless they are generally declining in extent in the
United Kingdom and North West Europe. The drivers of this decline are complex and
poorly understood. When considering mitigation and management for future ecosystem
service provision it will be important to understand why, where, and to what extent decline
is likely to occur. Few studies have attempted to forecast saltmarsh morphodynamics at
a system level over decadal time scales. There is no synthesis of existing knowledge
available for specific site predictions nor is there a formalised framework for individual site
assessment and management. This project evaluates the extent to which machine learning
model approaches (boosted regression trees, neural networks and Bayesian networks) can
facilitate synthesis of information and prediction of decadal-scale morphological tendencies
of saltmarshes. Importantly, data-driven predictions are independent of the assumptions
underlying physically-based models, and therefore offer an additional opportunity to crossvalidate
between two paradigms. Marsh margins and interiors are both considered but are
treated separately since they are regarded as being sensitive to different process suites. The
study therefore identifies factors likely to control morphological trajectories and develops
geospatial methodologies to derive proxy measures relating to controls or processes. These
metrics are developed at a high spatial density in the order of tens of metres allowing for
the resolution of fine-scale behavioural differences. Conventional statistical approaches, as
have been previously adopted, are applied to the dataset to assess consistency with previous
findings, with some agreement being found. The data are subsequently used to train and
compare three types of machine learning model. Boosted regression trees outperform the
other two methods in this context. The resulting models are able to explain more than 95%
of the variance in marginal changes and 91% for internal dynamics. Models are selected
based on validation performance and are then queried with realistic future scenarios which
represent altered input conditions that may arise as a consequence of future environmental
change. Responses to these scenarios are evaluated, suggesting system sensitivity to all
scenarios tested and offering a high degree of spatial detail in responses. While mechanistic
interpretation of some responses is challenging, process-based justifications are offered for many of the observed behaviours, providing confidence that the results are realistic. The work
demonstrates a potentially powerful alternative (and complement) to current morphodynamic
models that can be applied over large areas with relative ease, compared to numerical
implementations. Powerful analyses with broad scope are now available to the field of coastal
geomorphology through the combination of spatial data streams and machine learning. Such
methods are shown to be of great potential value in support of applied management and
monitoring interventions.</dcterms:abstract>
   <uketdterms:institution>University of Cambridge</uketdterms:institution>
   <dcterms:issued>2018-07-20</dcterms:issued>
   <dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
   <uketdterms:qualificationlevel>Doctoral</uketdterms:qualificationlevel>
   <uketdterms:qualificationname>Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)</uketdterms:qualificationname>
   <dc:language>en</dc:language>
   <uketdterms:sponsor>European Commission FP7 Space project "Foreshore Assessment using Space Technology (FAST)" - Grant No. 607131</uketdterms:sponsor>
   <dcterms:isReferencedBy xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/276823</dcterms:isReferencedBy>
   <dcterms:license>https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/aa13a5b6-2eec-427a-9e38-0cc3728525dd/download</dcterms:license>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">87eda9de84448d1f82354d60eee3eb5f</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/c5ab3fb3-14e7-4b41-ae48-a2375ee2e064/download</dc:identifier>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">e36b4cb6be671ff80fefd6c743db972e</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/</dc:rights>
   <dc:subject>Coastal</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>wetland</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>morphodynamics</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>morphology</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>modelling</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>machine learning</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>data mining</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>data analytics</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>remote sensing</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>earth observation</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>spatial statistics</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>data-driven</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>empirical</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>spatial modelling</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>salt marsh</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>saltmarsh</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>big data</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>satellite</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>image analysis</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>coastal analytics</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>environmental</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>coastal protection</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>risk</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>prediction</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>forecasting</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>neural network</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>boosted regression tree</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>bayesian network</dc:subject>
</uketd_dc:uketddc>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>