<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-23T23:04:03Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/275349" metadataPrefix="uketd_dc">https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/275349</identifier><datestamp>2024-06-26T13:49:07Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1810_223975</setSpec><setSpec>com_1810_256061</setSpec><setSpec>col_1810_223976</setSpec></header><metadata><uketd_dc:uketddc xmlns:uketd_dc="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:uketdterms="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/ http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/uketd_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Marriage and Brotherhood in Muscovite Russia</dc:title>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:DOI">10.17863/CAM.22539</dc:identifier>
   <dc:creator>Mayhew, Nick</dc:creator>
   <uketdterms:advisor>Franklin, Simon</uketdterms:advisor>
   <dcterms:abstract>In Russia today, conservative views about gender are often promoted through reference to the
past, to show that supposedly ‘traditional’ gender roles are intrinsic to Russian history.
Frequently, this idea is upheld in scholarship. My work explores the historicity of commonly
held assumptions about gender.

This dissertation focusses on gender and sexuality in Russia from the sixteenth to early
eighteenth centuries. It shows that ideas about what constituted a virtuous marriage were
established by reference to ideas about brotherhood. Brotherhood here refers not to biological
siblings, but to a church rite of ‘spiritual brotherhood’ known in Russian as bratotvorenie. This
rite has not been studied in any depth before. Based on archival work, this dissertation offers a
detailed account of the tradition in Russia until its ban in 1650, when it was prohibited by
leading ecclesiastical figures for being too like marriage. One churchman complained: ‘The
priest, joining together these two men, unites them in matrimony’. The dissertation shows that
bratotvorenie was conceived of in premodern Russia as a form of same-sex union, and that it
was through banning this tradition that churchmen came to express in a coherent way which
kinds of partnership were legitimate and why.

The first chapter challenges the idea that marriage was always a monogamous union
between a man and a woman for the creation of children, an idea that is often encountered in
academic literature on Russian marriage history. It shows that the church rite of marriage was
edited in Russia during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, when ideas about the
sacramental nature of marriage changed. The second chapter builds on these observations,
suggesting that marriage and ‘spiritual brotherhood’ were understood as analogous in the
premodern period.

The final two chapters look at depictions of marriage and brotherhood in hagiography
and iconography respectively. They focus on Petr and Fevroniia, the first married couple to be
canonised in Russia in 1547. In 2008, their feast day was reworked into a state festival called
the ‘Day of Family, Love and Fidelity’, now widely celebrated across Russia. Petr and
Fevroniia have been cast as the patron saints of so-called ‘traditional moral-spiritual values’.

This view is generally upheld in existent scholarship on the saints. This dissertation responds
to the way the saints are being represented today, arguing that they were initially venerated for
subverting normative ideas about gender and sexuality—that they were queer. What is more,
their veneration paralleled the veneration of holy brothers. Their hagiography seems to have
been based on the Life of a monastic brotherhood, and icons depicting Petr and Fevroniia
standardly showed them in monastic robes.

Focussing on marriage and brotherhood in premodern Russia, each chapter of this
dissertation challenges a preconceived idea about the immutability of supposedly ‘traditional’
gender roles in Russian history.</dcterms:abstract>
   <uketdterms:institution>University of Cambridge</uketdterms:institution>
   <dcterms:issued>2018-07-01</dcterms:issued>
   <dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
   <uketdterms:qualificationlevel>Doctoral</uketdterms:qualificationlevel>
   <uketdterms:qualificationname>Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)</uketdterms:qualificationname>
   <dc:language>en</dc:language>
   <dcterms:isReferencedBy xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/275349</dcterms:isReferencedBy>
   <uketdterms:embargotype>controlled.access</uketdterms:embargotype>
   <dcterms:license>https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/864adc78-acaf-44b7-8c83-3b8ea6476347/download</dcterms:license>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">87eda9de84448d1f82354d60eee3eb5f</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/a8de8452-ad36-4756-85ec-142a81695e24/download</dc:identifier>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">2c26e92fdbb6950507f65f36f01162e8</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dc:rights>https://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/</dc:rights>
   <dc:subject>Russia</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Muscovy</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>History of Sexuality</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>History of Gender</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Orthodoxy</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Marriage</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Queer</dc:subject>
</uketd_dc:uketddc>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>