<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-18T18:16:04Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/269035" metadataPrefix="uketd_dc">https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/269035</identifier><datestamp>2024-06-26T13:52:57Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1810_221740</setSpec><setSpec>com_1810_256063</setSpec><setSpec>col_1810_221742</setSpec></header><metadata><uketd_dc:uketddc xmlns:uketd_dc="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:uketdterms="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/ http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/uketd_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Imagining Modernity in the Uganda Prisons Service, 1945-1979</dc:title>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:DOI">10.17863/CAM.15241</dc:identifier>
   <dc:creator>Bruce-Lockhart, Katherine deVries</dc:creator>
   <uketdterms:authoridentifier xsi:type="uketdterms:ORCID">0000000210879077</uketdterms:authoridentifier>
   <uketdterms:advisor>Maxwell , David</uketdterms:advisor>
   <uketdterms:advisor>Hunter , Emma</uketdterms:advisor>
   <dcterms:abstract>This dissertation is a social history of the Uganda Prisons Service in the late &#xd;
colonial and early post-colonial periods. Focusing particularly on prison officers, it &#xd;
advances four key arguments. Firstly, it argues that global visions of the prison were &#xd;
crucial in shaping the Service’s development, its institutional culture, and the &#xd;
professional identities of its personnel. From the late colonial period onwards, this &#xd;
vision was anchored on notions of penal welfarism, which positioned the prison as a &#xd;
centre of rehabilitation, staffed by professionals who possessed technical expertise. &#xd;
Secondly, the penal welfare model was combined with an emphasis on the prison’s role &#xd;
as a driver of economic development and a source of public revenue – features that &#xd;
were seen as compatible with penal modernity. Thirdly, this vision of the prison gave &#xd;
the Service a particular imaginative capital, which prison officers used as an important &#xd;
resource. It provided them with a common set of principles and norms through which &#xd;
to define their professional role. Senior officers adopted it with alacrity, pursuing further &#xd;
professionalization through engagement with transnational penal reform networks. &#xd;
Others summoned it as a source of claim-making, using it to call on the state to provide&#xd;
them with greater benefits and treat them as respectable public servants. Finally, visions &#xd;
of penal modernity and professionalism were contested throughout the periods under &#xd;
study, leading officers to engage in boundary work. Officers were regularly defining &#xd;
their role in relation to other spaces of incarceration, such as local government prisons &#xd;
and informal detention sites. With the take-over of Idi Amin in 1971 and the &#xd;
militarization of the state, prison officers’ professional identities were profoundly&#xd;
challenged, but also became particularly important, providing them with a conceptual &#xd;
boundary that at least partially demarcated them from Amin’s regime. &#xd;
Ultimately, the case of the Uganda Prisons Service reminds us of the importance of studying prisons beyond their coercive capacities, paying attention to how such institutions became &#xd;
the focal point of debates over modernity, authority, and professionalism. More broadly, &#xd;
this study challenges the narrative of failure that has dominated popular and scholarly &#xd;
portrayals of state institutions on the African continent, rejecting generic depictions of &#xd;
the postcolony as a site of chaos and disorder.</dcterms:abstract>
   <uketdterms:institution>University of Cambridge</uketdterms:institution>
   <dcterms:issued>2017-11-01</dcterms:issued>
   <dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
   <uketdterms:qualificationlevel>Doctoral</uketdterms:qualificationlevel>
   <uketdterms:qualificationname>Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)</uketdterms:qualificationname>
   <dc:language>en</dc:language>
   <uketdterms:sponsor>Gates Cambridge Trust, Trinity External Research Studentship (Honorary), Smuts Memorial Fund</uketdterms:sponsor>
   <dcterms:isReferencedBy xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/269035</dcterms:isReferencedBy>
   <dcterms:license>https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/ced36c02-4175-487c-98a0-87b2a51e29d6/download</dcterms:license>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">87eda9de84448d1f82354d60eee3eb5f</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/fef0750f-53c9-45fd-8198-43618c6fb982/download</dc:identifier>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">cc250c80e20974bb9aac7c363294e1b5</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dc:rights>https://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>Permission acquired from The National Archives of the United Kingdom for use of image, permission to take photographs for research purposes from Uganda Prisons Service.</dc:rights>
   <dc:subject>Uganda</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Prisons</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Idi Amin</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Post-colonial</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Milton Obote</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Modernity</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Professionals</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Late colonial</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Punishment</dc:subject>
</uketd_dc:uketddc>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>