<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-23T04:07:18Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/226170" metadataPrefix="uketd_dc">https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/226170</identifier><datestamp>2024-06-27T12:32:40Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1810_218818</setSpec><setSpec>com_1810_256063</setSpec><setSpec>col_1810_218819</setSpec></header><metadata><uketd_dc:uketddc xmlns:uketd_dc="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:uketdterms="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/ http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/uketd_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>A reverse counterfactual analysis of causation</dc:title>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:DOI">10.17863/CAM.16166</dc:identifier>
   <dc:creator>Broadbent, Alex</dc:creator>
   <dcterms:abstract>Lewis’s counterfactual analysis of causation starts with the claim that c causes e if ~ C > ~ E, where c and e are events, C and E are the propositions that c and e respectively occur, ~ is negation and > is the counterfactual conditional. The purpose of my project is to provide a counterfactual analysis of causation which departs signigicantly from Lewis’s starting point, and thus can hope to solve several stubborn problems for that approach. Whereas Lewis starts with a sufficiency claim, my analysis claims that a certain counterfactual is necessary for causation. I say that, if c causes e, then ~ E > ~ C — I call the latter the Reverse Counterfactual. This will often, perhaps always, be a backtracking counterfactual, so two chapters are devoted to defending a conception of counterfactuals which allows backtracking. Thus prepared, I argue that the Reverse Counterfactual is true of causes, but not of mere conditions for an effect. This provides a neat analysis of the principles governing causal selection, which is extended in a discussion of causal transitivity. Standard counterfactual accounts suffer counterexamples from preemption, but I argue that the Reverse Counterfactual has resources to deal neatly with those too. Finally I argue that the Reverse counterfactual, as a necessary condition on
causation, is the most we can hope for: in principle, there can be no counterfactual sufficient condition for causation.</dcterms:abstract>
   <uketdterms:institution>University of Cambridge</uketdterms:institution>
   <dcterms:issued>2007-11-20</dcterms:issued>
   <dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
   <uketdterms:qualificationlevel>Doctoral</uketdterms:qualificationlevel>
   <uketdterms:qualificationname>Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)</uketdterms:qualificationname>
   <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   <uketdterms:sponsor>This work was supported by a Domestic Research Studentship.</uketdterms:sponsor>
   <dcterms:isReferencedBy xsi:type="dcterms:URI">http://www.dspace.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/226170</dcterms:isReferencedBy>
   <dcterms:isReferencedBy xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/226170</dcterms:isReferencedBy>
   <dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/18f37567-a1f3-4848-be1e-585763e70eac/download</dc:identifier>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">ec932a9c0c6c865d9cb4b36c6ee763ad</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dcterms:license>https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/5683239e-1317-4ccf-9177-028e83009fb1/download</dcterms:license>
   <uketdterms:checksum xsi:type="uketdterms:MD5">48dcdf38f646da27e5e4bc6c1893d4fc</uketdterms:checksum>
   <dc:rights>https://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/</dc:rights>
   <dc:subject>Causation</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Counterfactual</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Selection</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Explanation</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Preemption</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Backtracker</dc:subject>
</uketd_dc:uketddc>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>