OCCASIONAL PAPERS IN SOCIOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGY VOLUME 10 Observations on the Changing Societal Mosaic ofNepal EDITORS Ram Bahadur Chhetri Laya Prasad Uprety Central Department of Sociology and Anthropology TRIBHUVAN UNIVERSITY Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal 2007 CONTENTS 1. Editorial: Observations on the Changing Societal Mosaic of Nepal Ram B. Chhetri and Laya P. Uprety 6. All in the Family: Money, Kinship and Theravada 141 Monasticism in Nepal David N. Gel/ner and Sarah Le Vine 5. Outcastes in an "Egalitarian" Society: TamanglBlacksmith 124 Relations from Tamang Perspective David Holmberg 46 107 7. History and Significance of National Development 174 Service (NOS): Creating 'Civil Space' and Commitment to Service in Nepal During the 1970s Don Messerschmidt, Gautam Yadama and Bhuvan Silwal 4. Border Towns in the Tarai: Sites of Migration Sondra L. Hausner 3. The Decade ofYiolent Destabilisation in Nepal: An Analysis of its Historical Background and Trajectory Tone Bleie 2. Sociology in Nepal: Underdevelopment amidst Growth Chaitanya Mishra Year of Publication 2007 Volume 10 The responsibility forthe facts presented, opinions expressed, and ll1terpretatlon made 111 the articles rests exclusively with the respective authors. The opinions do not necessarily reflect the views and/or policy of the department. rE! Publisher All rights reserved. No part of this publication except an occasional paragraph or sentence for use in quotation may be reproduced 111 any form without the prior written permission of the publisher. Occasional Papers in Sociology and Anthropology Published by Central Department of Sociology and Anthropology Tnbhuvan University, Kathmandu Correspondence Chairperson Central Department of Sociology and Anthropology Tnbhuvan Umversity, Kirtipur Kathmandu Ph. 977-1-4331852 E-mail: cdtusoan@enet.com.np Printing Modern Printing Press Kantipath, Kathmandu Tel: 4253195 \ ( , EDITORIAL: OBSERVAnONS ON THE CHANGING SOCIETAL MOSAIC OF NEPAL We have decided to continue on with the idea of giving a thematic title to the Occasional Papers in Sociology and Anthropology by calling the Tenth Volume "Observations on the Changing Societal Alosaic of Nepar'. As editors, we deem it essential to declare our reasons for selecting this particular title to represent the papers included in this volume. Any perceptive observer of Nepali society will agree with us that the societal mosaic of Nepal (defined by plurality of religions, caste/ethnic groups, mother tongues spoken, etc.) has never been simple and rigid but has rather been quite complex and fluid or transient all the time. Just as time does not stand still the nature of the social relationships and the resulting structures too have been dynamic-subject to constructions and reconstruction by the agencies inherent in the peoples. A careful reading of the six papers in this collection will reveal that 'change', "development', and 'transfonnation' stand out as high priority agenda for contemporary scholars and researchers engaged in the Sociology and Anthropology of Nepal, The preferred vocabulary or the language used by the authors of the six papers in this volume in order to convey the ideas resulting from their-respective observations of Nepali social and cultural life may be different Nonetheless, they all seem to be talking about similar trends and processes in Nepal~that is, transformations, the changing social formations, defining and re-defining of social spaces, etc. Chaitanya Mishra's article reviews the state of sociological works in Nepal, His diagnosis (primarily based on a review of selected publications in some journals) is that sociology in Nepal remains underdeveloped amidst growth. He cogently argues that the social transfonnative cauldron in Western Europe in the 19th century created the space for sociological thinking. He then proceeds to critically examine the conditions for the emergence as well as florescence of the specific nature of sociology in general and that of Nepal in particular, As a keen observer of Nepali society, Professor Mishra suggests that a better sociology of Nepali society and their dynamics is possible by \vay of embedding the m icro-level research agenda \vithin the macro perspectives. The Norwegian anthropologist. Professor Tone Bleic appears to concur with the suggestion of Professor Mishra \vith regard to the need for a choice of \vider canvas even \vhen discussing apparently localised phenomena. She argues that the unravelling of the intricate interplay between internal and external structural conditions and major national political events over nearly five decades challenges any facile characterisation of the Maoist rebellion as an internal conflict only. The main analytical focus of this article is on the structural conditions and agency actions that resulted in 1996 in a Maoist-led rebellion in Nepal. Using the rights-based perspective, Bleie has discussed how the negotiations over the defining attributes of state authority and of state- society relations at important conjunctures in Nepal's recent political history are related to political and economic conditions with national, regional and global outreach over many years. Sondra L. Hauser, in her paper relates the dynamics of three border tovms, focusing on Nepal's southern Tarai-a preferred destination of hill migrants in the country. This paper focuses on the contemporary geopolitical reality of the Tarai as a place in which both hill migrants congregate and through \vhich migrants leave Nepal and travel to the Indian plains, in search of work, safety, and opportunity. Hausner critiques the rhetoric of trafficking as the sole measure through which the development industry - both international and national - views the movement of women across the Nepal-India border and opts rather to focus on the labour conditions of voluntary sex workers in Tarai towns. She contends that prostitution in border towns may appear as a localised problem while in reality it not the case. David Holmberg examines the case of inequality within a supposedly egalitarian Tamang society. He does this by discussing how Tamangs treat the Kamis (Blacksmiths) living together in a hill village. He argues that the framework for ethnographic comparison in South Asia must move beyond the confines of the insular discourse of a Western/Hindu to include systems like that of the Tamang which treats Kamis as untouchables while freely interacting with them in a number of day to day social spheres. David N. Gellner and Sarah LeVine, examine how caste, class, and gender determine the benefits which monastics in the Thera\:a.da community of contemporary Nepal commonly provide for their fm11llies f .. They note that monks, who in recent decades have beeno ongm. . f· ndrecruited mainly from poor families belonglt1g. to .annll1~ a. occupational castes, are more likely to focus on helpmg their relatlv~s Il1 practical ways, whereas the focus of the nuns, wh.o tend to come. frol~ more prosperous higher-caste families, is to provide m~mbers ~t their extended kinship network with opportunities to ca.rn. soc~al ~re~tlge and spiritual merit through high-profile donations to religIOUS ll1stltutlons. F· 11 Don Messerschmidt, Gautam Yadama and Bhuvan Silwal,lOa y, f h h rthave elaborately discussed the manifestations and impacts 0 t e s 0 -. lived National Development Service (NDS) movement that waS part of the graduate studies program at Tribhuvan University durlOg the 1970s. The paper also focuses on the rise of CIVIC service and volunteensm m Nepal. The authors argue that the NDS which required all the graduate students to dedicate one year during their Masters degree studIes to service in a rural community was considered by many to. have been a catalytic social development experiment. They have alsopomted out that the NDS had profound effects upon both its participants and host communities. Their analysis reveals that NDS in Nepal m the 1970s became the magnet for democratic participation in the absence of other legitimate avenues of democracy during the partyless Panchayat era. We believe that these articles provide a good sample of contemporary sociological and anthropologic~1 rescar.ch undert~ken by scholars in Nepal. As such, the questions and Issues raised and dIscussed in these papers should be of interest to the faculty and students at TU as well as other social scientists in general with an Jl1~erest on. Nepall societal mosaic and the dynamics and or the transfonnatJOns therem. Editors Ram Bahadur Chhetri Laya Prasad Uprety Kathmandu, April 2007 SOCIOLOGY IN NEPAL: UNDERDEVELOPMENT ADMIST GROWTH l Chaitanya Mishra Rise of Sociology The rise of the social sciences in post_16th century Western Europe has widely been attributed to the enormous political, economic and cultural contradictions-and struggles generated by the twin crises of feudalism and religious faith, the working out of reformation and renaissance, the rise of capitalism and, later, of the structure of democracl· This large- scale and drawn-out dislocation and crises could find resolution only with a radical reorganization of life and society. This reorganization involved the creation, among others, of an expanded European and global market for wage labor, commodity production and reinvestment of profit; the class and state systems; a relatively centralized production regime which gradually reduced the role of the household as a site of production; spatially and socially distanced and "tree", often migrant and urbanized, labor; a culture of "faithless" reason, doubt, empiricism, "scientific temperament"; human and historically generated, rather than supernaturally delivered and preordained, progress; and norms of citizenship. It also involved the democratic and liberating influences of the American and French revolutions, the industrial revolution, the Soviet and other socialist revolutions as well as the much more drawn- out processes of decolonization, state formation, democratization, nationalism, modernity and developmentalism within the newly independent regions and countries. The comprehension and explanation, control and reshaping, and prediction of this large-scale political, economic and cultural struggles and transformation, which generated a wide ranging and intense departure from the established order at multiple levels-ranging from 2 Occasional Papers, VollD individual and group identity to the nature and relationships among individuals, households, states, classes and the multifarious constituents of the global system, were the planks on which the social sciences were founded. Intellectual frameworks aligned with feudalism and faith were rendered incommensurate for the comprehension, explanation, prediction of, and intervention into, the processes of struggle and transformation as also of the transformed social world. Further, the transformation, by its very nature, signified an end to the stability of the old world and generated successively new rounds of systemic as well as anti-systemic struggles and transitions at the local, intermediate and global levels and in the structure of relationship among them. The altered and ever- changing social world, in turn, necessarily demanded a mode of social enquiry that was based upon the assumptions that the social world was historically (rather than divinely) constructed, that it was eminently knowable (rather than mysterious and humanly unfathomable) and that it could, within the limits and facilities set by historical processes as well as conscious and organized human social action, be consciously reshaped and reorganized. The altered and ever-changing social world would also demand an empirical, as opposed to authoritatively received, mode of social inquiry. Not only was the larger structural and state level political authority consistently challenged, but the social world, which was diverse, unstable, complex and changing and, by most accounts becoming ever more so, demanded that even social scientific authority, including those which emanate from specific metatheories, established research practices and organizational structures, for example, the university system undergo a "reality check" on a continuing basis and revalidate itself in the process. The new social world both obliged and encouraged newer social visions, theories, sets of infonnation, interpretations, critiques, modes of social control and platforms for action. The social sciences in Europe and later the USA were founded within the context of this large-scale transformation. Specialized fields within the social sciences largely evolved during the 19th century in response to the expansion and intensification of the process of transformation itself, popular struggles that this transformation entailed, multifarious impacts on religious affairs, polity, administration (including colonial administration), law, economy, culture, etc., it generated, and the emergent structures the transformation created, for CHAITANYA MISHRA :Sociology in Nepal: Underdevelopment Amidst Growth 3 example, state, market, urbanity, impoverishment, crime. The demands of the state structure for information, analysis and policy- making~and implementation thereof~ in order to selectively contain, expedite and streamline the process of transformation and its effects, as well as the struggles of urban workers and their unions, activities of social refonners and charities as well as the social science academia played significant proximate roles in the evolution of the specialization in the social sciences. The social science academia was slowly gaining legitimacy as an interpreter of specific aspects of the new and evolving social world and as a potential "fixer" of the multifarious "social problems" generated by the transformation. The success gained by the already relatively specialized natural sciences contributed both to the legitimacy of the social sciences in general as also to the "promise" held out by specialization within the "science of society". The part played by the social sciences, in particular, political science, public administration, economics, law and anthropology, during the colonial era further justified their utility. It was within this space that sociology was gradually erected in Europe over the 19'h century. The nature of the new, un-feudal, "faithless", familially and spatially "unhinged' migrant-, urban-, industrial-, capitalist-, class-based and conflict-ridden society, with pockets of extreme poverty, exploitation and seeming hopelessness was not only relatively unfettered from a host of traditional anchors of order and control, but it also raised the specter of rootlessness and formlessness. Uncertainties loomed large. Further, the rapidity of the transfonnation, and the successive waves of transition in social lives, and the relative of unpredictability of the future course of transformation were being widely and intensely discussed and acted upon. It was this a transformative cauldron which created the space for sociological thinking. Sketching and elaborating the features of the new society, as contrasted with the older forms, expectedly, was the first item in the agenda of such thinking. Comte's "law of three stages" and Durkheim's explorations of the bases of religion, education, anomie, individualism (egotism) and social integration in the new society were symptomatic of the thinking. Durkheim's explorations also constituted a significant quest for the bases of order and stability in the new society. 4 Occasional Papers, Vol10 Similarly, Weber's vast corpus sought to map this transfonnation in economic, political, administrative, social and psychological terms within a deeply historical and cross-societal comparative matrix. Marx's even vaster corpus, in turn, laid bare the history and functioning of the emerging mega structure of capitalism- the mother of all transfonna- tions, the contradictions that it produced and sharpened, and the impact it had on everyday social and personal lives. The Marxist corpus, in addition, also made the case for political action to challenge the capitalist transformation. All four sociologists, in addition, elaborated new epistemologies necessary in order to investigate the new society: empiricism; non-reductionism and "socioiogization"; historical analysis, interpretation and disenchanted objectivity; and historical-dialectical materialism. For Comte, Durkheim and, to a certain extent, Weber, the new investigative perspectives would also legitimize sociology as an independent discipline in its own right. The institutional and financial bases of sociology, within the university system and with a certain level of public support, were rather painstakingly built upon during this period. It must be said, however, that the activities of many grassroots social reform associations lent legitimacy to sociology and to the strengthening of its institutional and financial base. Following the relatively sterile interwar years, during which rural and urban sociology, symbolic interactionism, the "theory of action" and a couple of other broadly ahistorical perspectives (with the exception of critical theory, which emerged in Germany during the 1920s ) made their beginnings, the functionalist perspective gained a near-hegemonic metatheoretical status in sociology and anthropology, particularly in the US. The rise and high dominance of this conservative perspective, which lasted till the mid-60s has legitimately been attributed to the historically nnprecedented economic growth and prosperity in the US during the aftennath of World War 11, the masking of latent conflicts that such rise in prosperity afforded, the absence of major and overt conflicts, and to the elevation of the US to the preeminent position in the global hierarchy. Two of the key features of the post-World War 11 scene, particularly with respect to the colonized and other third-world countries, were decolonization and modernization-led development. Decolonization and modernization were at once liberating and imperializing (excepting, to a CHAITANYA MISHRA : Sociology in Nepal: Underdeveiopment Amidst Growth 5 certain extent in the socialist countries): The "natives" were liberated from particular colonial countries while at the same time that capitalist imperialism was strongly revitalizing itself to incorporate the globe following a live-decade long hiatus characterized by two world wars, the rise of the soviet system and one great depression. The image that the modernization framework cast was one of unilinear growth and development within which the more modern and developed economies, cultures and peoples, including those within the modernized and developed states, in effect, constituted the future of the less modern and less developed. The states and peoples which were "traditional", non- modern and less developed had only to traverse a path that had already been charted, including in relation to the generation and utilization of knowledge (including sociology) at the "local" level. It was merely a matter of filling in. This perspective was mirrored at the national level as well. Global, state and market-as well as most non-govemmental- structures and institutions had just begun to engage in the search for "system-compatible and usable" information and interpretation. The search for such information and interpretation, which was large in scale, fonned the bulk of social science work. The job market for sociologists was decidedly influenced by the search for such "usable" infonnation and interpretation put at the service of modernization and development. These processes, which, among others, transformed the non-western settings and people into the "other" and coalesced within "oriental ism", were, in turn, laid bare and severely criticized, during the 70s, among others, by Edward Said, Talal Asad and others. Within the Western countries themselves, the rise of the civil rights movement, anti-Vietnam war protests, and women's and student movements during the late 60s and the early 70s, however, led to a serious questioning of the functionalist position, as also of the empiricist and ahistorical stance. These movements and protests have also had the effect of substantially expanding the sub-fields of sociology as well as the job market for sociologists within the governments, semi- governmental institutions, the private sector, international institutions and the universities. The post-70 sociological thinking, in turn, has remained "pluralist": Even as the functionalist, empiricist and historical stances remain •6 Occasional Papers, Vol10 widespread and legitimate, the last two decades have encouraged introspection (for example, Gouldner 1971, Clifford and Marcus 1986, among others); textual analyses, powerful interpretations of the inter- connecttion between power and knowledge and the interconnectedness of macro and the micro structures and processes. The world-systems perspective has been a singular contribution of the post-70 sociology, as is the feminist perspective. In addition, the post-70 period has seen the elaboration of a host of other frameworks, which seek to include the experience and struggle of a variety of excluded groups, for example, the races, ethnic groups, caste groups, migrants, senior citizens, disabled. History, holism, conflict and contradiction are in. Expansion of sub- fields and the job market, in the meanwhile, has continued, albeit at a slower pace, not the least due to the rightist neo-liberal and state minimalist position advocated and practiced since the 80s. Within the "developing" countries, the embracing of developmental ism and its corollaries-international financial assistance and "policy guidelines", international non-governmental organizations, etc.-have further opened the job market for sociologists and social anthropologists. Ethnic, regional and other voices and struggles for inclusion and wider demands for democratization and public services have also opened up the professional space for sociologists and social anthropologists. The obverse has been the case as well: Some sociologists and social anthropologists, at times, have disagreed to honor the agenda and themes put forth by modernization, developmental ism and globalization, critiqued them and found and worked with other trames and themes. Finally, during the 80s and the 90s, serious questions have been raised on the legitimacy of the existing disciplinary contours and boundaries in the social sciences as well as on the legitimacy of the accepted theory and practice of the social sciences including sociology and social anthropology. Calls have been made for tearing down the old but strong walls between the social sciences on account of the fact that they inhibit insightful inquiry of the new social conditions. Calls have also been made for modes of social inquiry, which are historically and politically self-conscious and are at the same time plural, local as well as universal (Said 1978, Clifford and Marcus 1986, Wallerstein et al. 1997, Wallerstein 1999, also see Amin 1997: 135-52, Sardar 2002). The widespread call for indigenization of sociology and anthropology raised CHAITANYA MISHRA :Sociology in Nepal: Underdevelopment Amidst Growth 7 primarily although not exclusively by non-western academics, including those in Nepal (see below), are also at least in part based on the lack of fit between political, economic and cultural conditions within the global metropolis, on the on hand, and the peripheral regions, on the other. The academic work of the metropolis is seen to misrepresent the social work of the outlying regions, societies and peoples. Embedding This rather long-winded introduction has been intended as a platfonn to enter into a discussion of the state of sociology in Nepal .It has argued among others that. The emergence as well as the specific nature of evolution of sociology (as well as other social sciences) is predicated on the scale and intensity of social struggle and social transfonnation. Large- scale and intense social struggle and transfonnation in Europe, particularly during the 18'h and 19'h centuries led to a zeitgeist, which insisted on a historical and worldly rather than mythical and ecclesiastical nature of the social domain. This revolutionary zeitgeist systemically and gradually transformed all social practices, for example, forms of government, fonns of economic transaction, structure of the household, identity of an individual, as well as all branches of social expression, for example, art and literature, physical and biological sciences and to the emergence and transformation of "sciences of society", including sociology and anthropology, Even as the Nepali society is a making a salient transition away from faith directed and feudal traditions and towards a more democratic political culture at various levels and sectors, and even as the sciences of society are seeking to learn from the Western academic tradition, the peripheral, dependent and unsustained nature of the capitalist transition; the restricted nature of the urban and public domains; the miniscule, underdeveloped and non-polyvocal bourgeoisie; together with largely state dependent organization of higher education, relatively non-demanding and relatively unprofe- ssionalized academic systems as well as functionalist and developmental emphases that the carriers of sciences of society have taken on has inhibited the development of social sciences in general 8 Occasional Papers, Vol1 0 CHAITANYA MISHRA . Sociology in Nepal: Underdevelopment Amidst Growth 9 • and sociology in particular. The hegemonic impact of the Western academia, on the other hand, has also led to an inordinate emphasis on receiving rather than generating knowledge. The specific nature of evolution of sociology is also pt:,edicated on the nature of the transition, that is, what and which political and economic structures and regions, ideologies, institutions, classes, groups are driving the transition; hO\v the dominant structures are negotiating the transition \vith other less dominant struttures; and the relative strength of the other less powerful, but nonetheless competing, structures. The more powerful generally usurp the right to characterize and speak for the less powerful. This essentially is the crux of the practice of "orientalism" (see Sardar 2002 for summary as well as critique). Speaking for others, however. is not a monopoly of the orientalist tradition, a point \vhich is powerfully brought out in Clifford and Marcus (1987). Such "filtering frameworks" also operate at the national level in the developing countries and bear significant implication for the development of the social sciences (Guru 2002). lnterconnectedness between power and knowledge implies that the pO\verful, unless system~tically resisted and exposed, cannot but seek to usurp the authority of representing, often misrepresenting. the "other". This strain is strong in Nepal and comes in the disguises of "salvage anth.ropology (and sociology)", romanticism and a strong reformist, developmentalist and modernist sociology and social anthropology. There has b~en, since the last decade, some improvement on this front, however. Encompassing political debates and transitions (after the 1990 political transition and during the ongoing "Maoist struggle") as well as ethnic, regions and to a certain extent, "gender", perspectives and voices have been in ascendance during the last decade. While not all of these have yet been translated into the sociological and social anthropological proper, these cannot but leave marks within the discipline within the next decade--even as the urban, the upper class and upper caste, statist, modernist and developmentalist interests may 'very well continue to dominate the sociological enterprise. The ethnic and regional voices are already being translated into sociological and social anthropological agenda. Further democratization of the polity • in Nepal, which is inevitable in many ways, is likely to push these academic initiatives further. The specific nature of evolution of sociology and social anthropology in the West and the rest of the world are of an embedded nature. This embeddedness was principally founded upon the structure and processes of the colonial and capitalist transition that the non-Western polities, economies and cultures underwent heginning the 17'h century (see Frank 1998 for the interface between Asia and the rest of the world). In addition, between the 1880s and the 1950s, many of these countries also underwent further capitalist and imperialist as well as anti-colonial, nationalist and democratic transitions and struggles. The social sciences-together with other fonns of knowledge and expression-in these structures and countries developed both as constitutive components and critiques of these specific struggles and transitions. The social sciences there also developed both as constitutive components and critiques of the post World War 11 global and local structures and ideologies and practices related to developmental ism and modernization, capitalism and imperialism, formation of new state structures, nationalism and statism, as well as democratization, the enlargement of the public domain, expansion of public administration and the empowennent of the newly created citizens. The affinnation and remapping of the identities, political roles and life chances of the diverse class, caste, ethnic, religious, regional, linguistic, gender and other groups mandated by encompassing political, economic and cultural transitions also shaped and reshaped the social sciences and sociology and anthropology. The stamps of these structures and processes can be found in sociology and social anthropology in Nepal as welL Academic organizations at the higher level are largely financed by the state, although there is a growing private presence there. (Most private higher education structures, however, gain ITom indirect state support as well as more direct subsidy ITom state- financed academic organizations, principally in the [onn of teachers who agree to work on low part-time wages in private colleges because they continue to receive full-time wages and pensions ITom state financed colleges.) Developmentalism is a strong theme within the syllabi and it largely drives the research agenda. The state is 10 Occasional Papers, Vol10 CHAITANYA MISHRA :Sociology in Nepal: Underdevelopment Amidst Growth 11 • almost universally seen as playing the most significant role In relation to development and modernization. Nationalism remains a key and Qverarching reference point in syllabi, research outputs and discourses on development, modernization and even class, caste, ethnicity, gender and regionalism. The syllabi do emphasize critiques of these dominant preoccupations, but only a small number of academics view these transitions critically enough. Embedding has become much more intense during the post-World War 11 phase of globalization. The expansion and intensification of the global political, economic and cultural interface has had a pronounced implication for the shaping and reshaping of sociology and social anthropology in non-Western countries and, lately, within Western countries as well. The evolution of sociology and social anthropology in the non-Western world, in this specific sense, is an heir to sociology and social anthropology in the West and thus to a substantial extent inherits both the promise and the pitfalls held out by the discipline. In a rather curious but highly significant twist, this embedddeness, among others, is also beginning to reshape the discipline in the west (for example, Clifford and Marcus 1986). This embedding encompasses multiple dimensions, among which the economic interface and its political and military (for example, the "war on terrorism") implications have been widely discussed. This embedding, however, also shapes what is defined as knowledge, the identification of valid modes of generating knowledge as well as the production and distribution of knowledge The West remains highly privileged on all these accounts. As such, it is privileged in developing the frameworks of social science inquiry and defining the agenda of the social sciences (cf. Wallerstein et aL) 1997: 33-69, Wallerstein 1999: 169-184 in particular as well as in the production and distribution of texts and references, including specialized disciplinary journals. This privilege allows the Western academic establishments a much higher level of access to global information and literature, organizational competitiveness, resources and professionalization. The search for the nomothetic, the general, the grand theories and the metatheories, and universal laws, privilege the west. These, in turn, generously contribute to the powerful edge that Western sociology and social anthropology has over the practice of • • the discipline in other areas of the world. The larger economic and political privilege necessarily rubs off on Western academia in as much as the West not only has "been there" already, but also gauged and weighed alternatives and possibilities and the rest is at the stage of "catching up". Within the context of the embeddedness of the larger political and economic system and the hierarchy therein, the production of homologous and unequal intellectual and academic hierarchies are rendered inevitable. Nonetheless, and despite the gn1\ving salience of global structures and processes in the evolution of specific structures and processes that shape the polity, economy and culture in Nepal, sociologists and social anthropologists often continue to visualize societies in Nepal as uniquely local products. The significance of the macro and the long run in shaping the character of the micro and the present and the short run remain highly underemphasized both in the syllabi and the research agenda. The sociology of the interconnectedness of the global, the national and the local, the dynam ics 0 f this interconnect- tion and the implications this interconnection have on the present and future lives of different social categories such as region, class, gender, ethnic group, caste group, the poor, etc., remains under- emphasized. In addition, the significance of world-systemic processes on macroeconomic and sectoral public policies and their implications for processes such as centralization, democratization, etc., have largely been neglected in sociology and social anthro- pology in NepaL Similarly, the developmentalist and functionalist perspective which remains dominant in Nepal, has inhibited teaching and research on frameworks and themes such as politics conflict, struggle, resistance, etc., despite, among others, the ongoing "Maoist" rebellion. The de-linking of the global, on the one hand, and the national and the local, on the other, becomes clear from a perusal of the "state of sociology" writings in NepaL Most such writings fail to see the multiple levels of embeddedness involved in the evolution of sociology and social anthropology in NepaL embeddedness of the polity and economy and the evolution of the discipline in the West itself, global and national embeddedness at the level of 12 OccaSional Papers, ValID encompassing political-economic frameworks-which contribute to disciplinary embeddedness and embeddedness of political economy and the evolution of sociology and social anthropology within Nepa!. This is an area that needs to be urgently redressed. Sociology in Nepal: Institution and Growth We can now discuss the overarching as well as much more proximate institutional bases for the emergence and growth of social accounts, the social sciences and "pre-sociology" in Nepal. It must be emphasized right away, however, that the roots of such sociological endeavors have to be sought not only in other disciplines such as literature and in economic, political and social history, but also in more lay accounts of emerging social reform associations, agrarian conditions, labor migration, structures of resistance, popular struggles, etc. Both "proper literature" and lay social accounts, however, remain extremely sparse right till the 20'h century. It has to be recalled that the literacy rate in 1950 was approximately 5 percent, the first college was established in 1917 and the 1846-1951 Rana regime was politically highly controlled and autocratic. The tradition of oral and/or reconstructive history and sociology has been weak as well (See Burghart 1984, Oppitz 1971, Blaikie, Cameron and Seddon, 1980, Mikesell 1988, Ortner 1989, Shrestha 1971, among others, however.) This is an area where significant contributions can be made. Nepali sociologists and anthropologists who have remained almost exclusively preoccupied within the agenda of future, that is, modernization and development, have been particularly unproductive in reconstructing the past as also in analyzing a historically informed present. Such reconstructions would have to take on the task of describing and explaining emerging transitions in Nepal during the 1850- 1950 period. We should also be reminded that in the past those who dared to word the contradictions and transitions during the period were often discouraged, incarcerated, exiled or killed altogether Nonetheless, there is significant scope for sociological reconstruct- tion based on historical accounts. Mahesh Chandra Regmi's document- tation-based historical accounts, particularly those related to the agrarian features of the 19" century Tarai, the conditions of life of the peasants and tenants there and their relationship with the state and its intennediaries as well as the social implications of the agrarian regime CHAITANYA MISHRA. Sociology in Nepal Underdevelopment Amidst Growth 13 (Regmi 1978, t984), has proved an extremely fertile site for a variety of social science disciplines. There is no doubt either that Regmi's corpus will continue to fuel much sociological reconstruction in the future. The pain and suffering of the early 191h century Hill peasants under conditions of the impending Nepal-East India Company war has been well sketched by Ludwig Stiller (1973, 1976) as well. Similarly, accounts provided by historians and others such as Prayag Raj Sharma, Kamal Prakash Malla, Harka Gurung, the Itihas Samsodhan Manda!., etc., have created a productive platfonn for sociological reconstruction. More recently Bhattarai's (2003) Marxist account of Nepal's political economy has provided a rich source for further reconstruction of socio-spatial relationships in Nepal. The old ··colonial" account by William Kirkpatrick, (1811) francis Hamilton (1819) and Brian Hodgson (1880) also constitute good source materials for a historical analysis. If struggles and transitions make and reshape social experiences and, therefore, social accounts (including pre-sociological accounts), modem social accounts of Nepal would have to begin from the period of the risc of the world colonial capitalist bastion of the East India Company and the implications it had on the reorganization of states, markets and peoples in the north Indian region, including Nepal. The shaping and reshaping of Nepal and the peoples who inhabited it would have to be interpreted and explained within this specific global and regional context. The accounts of Mahesh Regmi and Ludwig Stiller (including The Rise afHause afGarkhas) constitute a "local", "insider" and Nepali perspective on these events and processes, but it is obvious that the shaping and reshaping of Nepal and its peoples was far more than a domestic event. Regardless, this shaping and reshaping resulted, among others, in the "silent cry" among the peasants of the Hills (Stiller 1976), as also in the creation of semi-capitalist agrarian conditions in the Tarai (Mishra 1987). It is likely that the encompassing Civil Code of 1854 (Hofer 1979) prepared and implemented during the early phase of the centralized Rana regime constituted an attempt to come to tenns with, and regulate and reshape, the political, economic, ideological and normative transitions during the first half of the 19" century within a broadly autocratic, statist, Hindu, modemizing, rationalizing (in the Weberian sense), East India Company (and British Empire)- friendly, and dependent-capitalism promoting set up. 14 Occasional Papers, Vol10 Some of the economic, agrarian, social and international implica- tions of the set lip have been described in considerable detail by Regmi (among others, in Regmi 1978, 1984; also see Mishra 1987). There were other implications as well, particularly in the overtly political and apparently, in the class, caste, ethnic and gender arenas. Several cases of resistance against the state have been recorded, for example, the revolt led by Sripati Gurung in Lamjung and Gorkha and the apparently larger revolt led by Lakhan Thapa, both of which took place in the 1870s, the longer running movement of Yogmaya, which ended d in a mass suicide in 1942 and the furor caused by a book on social and economic refonns by Subba Krishna Lal Adhikari (see Karki and Seddon 2003: 3-5). In addition, relatively oblique satires, more forthright criticisms as well as agendas for political retonn and change were making their way into the public domain. More importantly perhaps, there were transitions of a morc directly "political" nature. The short lived Prachanda Gorkha rebellion and the more genuinely political Praja Parishad movement constituted a social account and a political agenda, which underlined the contradictions bet\\'een the "old and defunct" autocratic regime which was losing its popular legitimacy and a new, yet to become democratic state of Nepal. Then, of course, there were the Nepali Congress Party and the Nepal Communist Party, together with a number of others, whose accounts and agendas had touched the lives and imaginations of a sizable number of independent peasants, skilled workers, urban dwellers, merchants and a section of the disgruntled but politically potent aristocraty. In addition, the global and, in particular, the Indian anti- colonial struggle, the struggle of various emerging political parties and their political actions as well as the emerging discourses on the new, post-World War 11 world order and modernization and development gradually delegitimized the authority of existing states, economic structures and values and norms, and generated new and alternative imaginations, visions and practices. The implications of some of the social, cultural, political and ethnic and value-related transitions and the local implications of global processes between 1921 and 1951- including the material and normative changes brought about by the demobilized Gurkhas forces-both at the "grassroots" and national levels are sketched in an engaging manner by Pande (1982). CHAITANYA MISHRA: Sociology in Nepal: Underdevelopment Amidst Growth 15 The details of the emergence and practice of applied sociology as such immediately following the 1951 transition has been sketched (see Thapa 1973 in particular). The interconnection between the emergence and practice of sociology and the larger emerging, developmentalist, modernist, international financial and policy assistance driven, statist and liberal democratic national and international agenda, however, appears to have been given a short-shrift in the search for details. What is clear enough is that in keeping with these agendas, and in keeping with the emerging concepts and categories in sociology, particularly those in the US, this early period of the practice of sociology in Nepal, like in many other parts of the developing world, found itself implicated and applied in a newly instituted "Village Development Program". The program aimed at training development extension agents in the areas of rural family and society and in community development. The training package changed and expanded considerably with the advent of the monarchy-led and undemocratic Panchayat political system and the expansion of the state apparatus. The Panchayat Training Center was charged with training the Panchayat political cadres as well as the senior staff of the bureaucracy and conducted courses on rural society, group dynam ics, communication, local leadership and social survey and planning, and sought to justifY the notion that the Panchayat political system was inherently development friendly (cf Thapa 1973). In addition, a number of trained sociologists and anthropologists \vere hired by the state in elaborating the ideological framework of the political system and elaborating a national scale educational program. Anthropologists (apparently including at least one reputed international anthropologist) were also enrolled to conceptualize and administer a remote area development program within which the clergy (Buddhist in this case) would play a significant role. It was no mere coincidence that the program was fTamed and instituted along the northern reaches of the country (which lay contiguous to the Tibetan Chinese border), at a time when the Cultural Revolution was on the ascendant in the People's Republic of China. Similarly, the resettlement program, under which landless and marginal landowners in the hills, as well as ex-military personnel, were resettled in selected locations along the southern Tarai plains, also availed the services of several anthropologists. These "strategic alliances" during this period between the state, on the one 16 Occasional Papers, Vol1Q hand, and sociologists and anthropologists, on the other, however, must not be overemphasized. The state was the largest employer of trained specialists and there were only a few trained Nepali sociologists and anthropologists so employed. Nonetheless, it does appear that the early interface between the state, on the one hand, and sociologists, on the other, was aligned with statist interest. The nature of this early interface, the state's "imperative" to introduce "Nepal" to the \vIder, principally \Vestern and aid giving world, the rapidly increasing demand for sociologists made by international funding agencies in Nepal-- some of \\'hose senior statf had been trained in the discipline itself, globally expanding developmental- ism and the demand for sociologists therein-primarily for ascertaining the "specificities" of the local, "rural" and "project site" structures and processes. crystallized together into an agenda for instituting a formal academic and degree granting program in the discipline. Emest Gellner's 1970 report on the desirability and feasibility of a Department of Sociology in Tribhmvan University, which emphasized that "social research should be closely tied both to social development and to the exploration of the national culture", and Alexander Macdonald's enrolment as the first professor of sociology (For both events see Macdonald 1973) as well as Dor Bahadur Bista's appointment as the first professor of anthropology \vere responses to these agenda. While this venture had its share of problems (Dahal 1984: 39-40), it did serve to augment the legitimacy of the discipline in the eyes of the state. several international development agencies and Tribhuvan University. These processes and initiatives culminated in the formation of a Department of Sociology and Anthropology at Tribhuvan University in 1981. The department initiated a Master's level program and, in collaboration with the Sociology Subject Committee at the University, took steps to initiate bachelor's level programs in several campuses and colleges affiliated with the university. The initial course offerings, thematic emphases and the mode of expansion of the discipline have been described and critiqued by a number of participants (among others, Dahal 1984, Bhattachan 1987, 1996, Bhandari 1990, GUflIng 1990 GUflIng 1996, Bista 1987, 1996, 1997, Bhattachan and Fisher 1994; also CHAITANYA MISHRA : Sociology in Nepal: Underdevelopment Amidst Growth 17 refer to Table I). The next section elaborates these descriptions and critiques. Organizationally, the academic program on sociology and anthropology has expanded rapidly within Tribhuvan University and is making a slow headway in other universities. Currently, a Master's program is being conducted in seven campuses, in Kirtipur, Patan, Trichandra, Biratanagar, Pokhara and Baglung. In addition, the Purbanchal University also conducts one Master's level program in the discipline. It should be emphasized that in part because most students enter the Master's level only after 10 years of high school and four years of college, the academic level of the majority of the students is internationally comparable to the Bachelor's level. Some of the students, on the other hand, compare well with graduate students of Western universities. The duration of schooling at the school level, however, is gradually shifting and the 12-year nonn may be universalized in the next 5- I0 years. The Bachelors' level in the discipline is conducted in 17 campuses within Trihuvan University. In addition, Purbanchal University conducts two bachelor's level program. Further, courses on sociology and anthropology is also offered within various other disciplines, for example, development studies, rural development, forestry, agriculture and animal sciences, medicine, environment, and computer sciences. It is also offered in some higher secondary schools as an elective subject. The discipline attracts a larger number of students: In terms of popularity among the Master's level students, it is likely that only economics rates higher. Part of the reason for this popularity is the fact that, unlike several other disciplines, entry to sociology and anthropology remains partially open to students from other disciplines, including physical sciences and technology. The root of this attraction, however, lies in the rather widely shared notion that graduates in the discipline enjoy an easier access to jobs in the development and "project" industry, for example, those implemented by international development and donor agencies, INGOs and some development agencies within the government. 18 Occasional Papers, Vol10 In recent years, on average, the number of annual entrants to the master's level at all the participating campus has exceeded 1,200. However, one-half of the entrants drop during the second year. The proportion that graduates within a period of two years-the official duration of the course-is very small and possibly does not exceed 10 to 20 percent of those who attend the final examination. All in all, a rough estimate indicates that only about 1,500 students may have completed their Master's degree during the last 20 years. There is a high level of variation in the quality of teaching at the Master's and, presumably, Bachelor's level in different campuses. In particular, the majority of the senior faculty teaches at the Kirtipur campus. The Dean's Office, the University's academic committee on sociology and anthropology and the Central Department of Sociology- the three principal agencies charged with promoting the discipline at Tribhuvan University-have accomplished precious little to bridge the wide gap in the quality of teaching across campuses in the University. Illustratively, during the last five years, the Dean's Office has organized only one experience-sharing event among teachers from various graduates and undergraduate departments. The Academic Committee has not met even once during the last four years. In addition, the Committee, though charged with the responsibility of overseeing the overall academic perfonnance within the discipline, has historically interpreted its mandate extremely narrowly and focused only on the preparation of the courses of study. The Central Department, qualified as such because of the academically supervisol)' role it is expected to carry out in relation to other sister departments of sociology and anthropology within the University, has not pursued this mandate in a sustained manner. The design of the syllabi at the Master's level remains uneven. Some of the courses are internationally competitive while a few others leave much to be desired. While the syllabi must remain sensitive to the job prospects of graduates, there are indications that job prospects are weighing much more heavily on the syllabi and the basics of the discipline are beginning to receive a short shrift. Bureaucratic bottle- necks, the centralized examination system, in particular, as well as the lack of initiative and unprofessional resistance among teachers often discourages attempts to revise the syllabi regularly. CHAITANYA MISHRA : Sociology in Nepal: Underdevelopment Amidsl Growth 19 Access to literature for both students and teachers remains extremely restricted. This, in part, is attributable to the facts that very few good texts have been prepared locally and international publications are generally highly expensive. Most of the departments do not have a library of their own. Even the Central Library of Tribhuvan University, which is located in Kathmandu, is perennially starved of funds and a large proportion of the meager collection of journals is availed through often irregular and short-tenn donations. Principally because of financial reasons, it cannot procure ne\.... high quality books, either. However, a couple of departments have initiated a system of generating funds from the students body and utilizing the funds to procure texts and reference materials. The low level of competence of the majority of the students as well as many teachers in the English language also inhibits their access to high quality international publications in English. The incentives given to university teachers, though broadly compatible with the incentives given to public officials, generally fails to attract new high quality teachers, particularly those with Ph.Ds and those who have graduated from reputed universities outside Nepal. Thus, many such graduates prefer to work for national and international non- governmental agencies and international development agencies which are much more paying. The criteria for the promotion of teachers through the academic hierarchy, while much more systemized within the last decade, nonetheless continue to prize seniority rather than research output and the quality of teaching. The centralized hiring and promotion mecha- nisms at Tribunal University often have foregrounded non-academic criteria and opted for semi-closed rather than open evaluations and contests. Such mechanisms, in addition, have encouraged the inclusion of non-professionals in organs charged with hiring and promotion. The most significant and long-term problem that plagues teaching and learning at Tribhuvan University and the one that it shares with many other universities in the underdeveloped as well as some developed countries is the pervading climate of uncritical and unreflexive "intellectual" work. The severe lack of critical and reflexive outlooks bears serious negative consequences in the long run, among others, on the development of the social sciences and sociology and anthropology. The texts, generally, are both taught and learned not as platforms for 20 Occasional Papers, Vol1 0 CHAITANYA MISHRA : Sociology in Nepal: Underdevelopment Amidst Growth 21 Table 1: Key Arguments in Reviews of the State of Sociology and Social Anthropology the government and so forth. While many of the reviewers are Nepali nationals, some are international academics. Further, while at least half of the reviewers were at relatively an early stage of their academic career at the time they prepared the review, the rest were in their mid-career or had had a long and rather distinguished career behind them. Finally, some of the reviewers have assessed the discipline more than once and at different stages of their career. This paper, however, collapses such reviews and does not attempt to investigate possible changes in such assessment. playful and creative thinking, as windows that facilitate a view of the wider world and as instruments that allow intimate dialogue with the self and society, but as something which constitutes the last word on the subject and as one which must be passively received. Many students and some teachers read but not engage with books. To a certain extent, this is understandable as well. The fact that many of texts and references they are required to read often do not address key attributes or problems of the society they live in does feed disengagement. In addition, many of the teachers fail to link, whether by way of illustration, comparison or critique, the text with the world the students inhabit. Such texts, in such a context, often acquire a fictive character. The apparently universal text, because it does not encompass the local or gives it a short shrift, fails to acquire local authenticity and, as a result, does not excite the imagination of the students. An unperceptive and uncritical mentor who fails to read the implicit meaning of the apparently universal text for local life and society, in turn, does not make the task of engagement any easier. Review of State of Sociology For a discipline that has a relatively short history, the number of state-01'- sociology-and~social-anthropology-in_Nepal reviews has been rather astounding. These writings, expectedly, vary widely in quality with respect to quality of insight offered on these questions. While some of these writings are responses to periodic review events organized by Tribhuvan University, many such writings do represent deep personal concerns with what sociology is and is not doing, where it is headed and what it can and should do. These reviews also touch upon some of the key debates surrounding social sciences in general and sociology and anthropology in particular (in Nepal). I shall utilize this section both to summarize the reviews and to explore some of the key epistemological and substantive debates on the sociology and anthropology of Nepal A couple of caveats are in order to put this review of reviews In context. First, because these reviews have been prepared at different periods of fhe evolution of sociology in Nepal, the arguments raised have to be read with reference to the period of publication of the assessment. Some of the assessments prioritize teaching, some focus on research and many others cover both the domains. Some even implicate the university, Author, Year Gellner 1970' McDonald t973 Mishral980, t984" Thapa 1973 Key Arguments Romanticism (exploration) and midwifery (social development) complementary, particularly in Nepal where past is very much present At this early stage, should focus on training of researchers, studies of change; utility of research an important consideration; high significance of national academic contexts for all, including international researchers; romantic midwifery possible; should shun building an intellectual enclave and should connect with the state as well as international organizations; multi~ disciplinary studies required Should centcr on the linkage between concrete everyday experiences and structural, dialectical and critical approach; recognizing and transcending the politics of sponsored research; going beyond the empirical and linking it with theoretical categories; dismantling barriers among the social sciences; locating the micro within the macro context; connecting the syllabi to local experiences Discipline should serve the needs of society and the social problems; should assess the impact or major national political initiatives on social organization 22 Occasional Papers, Vol10 CHAITANYA MISHRA : Sociology in Nepal: Underdevelopment Amidst Growth 23 Dahal 1993 Inquiry into theoretically informed ethnography. national building. migration. poverty important; micro- level studies vital; infrastructurat problems hinder pedagogy; reservations on a single department of sociology and anthropology; the anthropology of the IIimalayan region characterized by undue emphasis on the micro: neglect of interaction with outside; undue emphasis on search for "natives" and romantic locale Gurung. G. 1997 \Vhile relative lack or theory consciousness should concern us, wc arc in an carly stage of disciplinary evolution. and some progress has heen made in this direction; JinanciaJ rrobkms hurting quality of teaching Bhattachan 1987. 1997 Disciplinary progress much too slmv; no original theoretical contribution even allcr five decades; preoccupied \\'ith "filling in" of details: should focus on local experiences. synthesizing Western and the indigenous: equality and social justice should become key themes; students should have ample opportunity for field research: many more c1ectives required: departmental autonomy and higher financial incentives 10 teachers required; regular review of department and teachers necessary: split the department into two. i.e. sociology and anthropology Rai 1971. 1984 International researchers should not be required to respond to national imperatives, although they should be sensitive to them; "salvage anthropology" required; language barrier should and can be reduced; essence of anthropology must be honored by guarding against intrusion of other social sciences as well as ';pseudo anthropology" Devkota 1984,200 I Romanticism and ;;otherness", not action-orientedness, remain predominant and promote intellectual colonial~ ism; coordination required between teaching depart- ments and research centers; popular resistance to state and modernization and poverty and environmental deterioration should become key areas of investigation Bista 1).1987, 1996***, 1997 Bista .K. 1973 13erreman 1994 Fisher 1987 Bhattachan and Fisher 1994 Mikesell 1993 Should attend to literature published in the Nepali lang- uage: should emphasize needs of thc count!)', national identity. integrative processes and modernization rather than on nostalgia: bland ethnography not useful; dealing \\'ith real political. economic and social issues; short- staying international researchers cannot comprehend historical context purposeful institutions key to disciplinary development; not all sponsored research sides with the "overdog": important to link social! ideological leatures and development High significance of applied anthropology; "salvage anthropology" important but "costly"; accounts by transient international anthropologists sometimes divisive; efliJrts required to reduce harrier posed by the English language Should contribute to public education principally through comparative. holistic and contextual studies and by giving voice to the oppressed; approves lvan 111ich's call for "counter-research on alternatives to prepackaged solutions" as well as C Wright Mills's call for social science to practice the politics of truth "Romanticism" and development ;'often vacuous"; extent of "reverse romanticism" high and problematic; priority to large-scale and long~range perspective and critical ,... ision of the big picture much more important than myopic and small-scale field studies; priority to universal problems and timeless issues Theorizing remains weak; phy'sical, financial and organ- izational hurdles hindering disciplinary growth; sponsored research inhibiting the emergence of focal themes within the discipline Elaborating concrete conditions that shape life in Nepal and that are very different from those in the West; critiquing ;'developmenC that embodies imperialism and giving voice to the minorities important 24 Occasional Papers, Vol10 CHAITANYA MISHRA . Sociology in Nepal: Underdevelopment Amidst Growth 25 A number of running Ihemes emerge in these reviews of the state of sociology in Nepal. The theme of romanticism (which is often defined as *In Macdonald. 1973; ** Reviews social sciences in general; *** In James Fisher 1996; **** Reviews the theor)' and practice of development in Nepal, not on sociology f1achhethu 2002** Gurung, 1990 Bhandari 1990 Cameron 1994**** Lack of serious academic work by sociologists and anthropologists because of the lure of consultancy; tinancial incentives much higher in international agencies. INGOs, NGOs. private research centers and colleges; both students and teachers in the social sciences as a \\'ho1c at Tribhuvan University (TU) regard their work in the institution as less than a full time job; erosion of personal honesty and integrity among both teachers and students; 'I'll mismanaged and underfunded Inadequate physical infrastructure and educational materials constrain both teaching and research; discipline can serve the policy maker and the people as a social and cultural interpreter; this. in turn, requires political-economic and historical familiarity; need to de.'elop local theory and methods Unattractive academic and financial incentives for teachers; texts not available in the Nepali language; Nepali language should become the medium of instruction in classrooms: expansion of career opportunities for students needs emphasis; emphasis required on policy component in teaching and research Shifting international fashions in development theory have rendered the image of Nepal fuzzy and shifting; this journey has been one of sound and fury a<> well as one in which the outsiders have been predominant; interdisciplinary efforts should be emphasized; priority to the inquiry of the global dimension that shows how interests of external agencies condition options available for internal choice; priority should be given to issues of power and accountability a preoccupation with and glamorization of the past as well as the currently existing) versus midwifery (often defined as a preoccupation with the future) is clearly implicated in these reviews. It has been alleged, mostly although not exclusively, by Nepali academics, that romanticism is strongly implicated in the very choice of Nepal-and some specific regions and locations within it, selection of themes as well as modes of thinking and writing of mostly, although not exclusively, by international academics. It has been argued by many that this romanticism detracts from the contribution the discipline could make to the "dispassionate" understanding, as also to public policy formulation and implementation and development. The scent of applied science and immediately socially useful work is strong here, as is the sense of actively and directly intervening, doing and participating. Contemplation. analysis and remaining at a distance from the center of activity, that is. activities which are elaborated through the power of the state, international agencies, international non-governmental organizations and, generically, by development, is not prized enough here, (It must be said that voluntal)' engagement by Nepali academics also remains high within the domain of the rather politically unglamorolls and financially 110n- paying civil society initiatives.) This contrast between the Nepali and international academics, however, must not be overdrawn. Many academics-both Nepali and international-have drawn attention to the significance of the large-scale and long run perspective that are theoretically and historically informed, Fisher (1987) reminds us that "reverse romanticism" arising out of the faith bestowed on the state, the international financial institutions and on the agenda of modernization can become counterproductive as well. As Fisher notes, it is difficulI to define romanticism (within the context of sociological inquiry); the allegation of romanticism as applied to particular inquiry is often vacuous. Romanticism is certainly not a matter of the physical or cultural location of the "field" or of subject matter or theme of inquiry. Nor is it a matter of a particular technique of generating dala and infonnation, It may perhaps be defined as a feature of an entire mode of inquiry that contributes to mystification rather than to clarification. Romanticism and mystification is inherent in the modes of inquiry that are non-problematizing, ahistorical, and non-comparative, Such attributes are also inherent in the modes of inquiry that do not 26 Occasional Papers, Volt 0 explore the encompassing context within which the concrete is located and that do not seek to resolve the interface between the whole and the part as well as the reconfiguration of the interface. Within the academia, the invocation of "disciplinary boundaries"' often serves to hide the connectedness and wholeness of social life, particularly in relation to the larger political and economic conditions and processes. Romanticism and mystification is inherent in modes of inquiry that do not allow full and authentic expression of the "local". Romanticism and mystification is also implicated in attempts that unproblematically seek to slot the local into a predetermined substantive and theoretical conceptual framework. The nationalist agenda is very strong in the writings of many Nepali academics. \\/hile this is evident from the preceding paragraph, the wide and frequent invocation of the nationalist-and sometimes ethnic, regional, etc., as also of the notion of "Nepal School of Anthropology"- is a telling expression of the sentiment. The call for indigeneity within the discipline and the emphasis on the investigation of the processes of national identity and integration also bear this out. On the other hand, John Cameron's (1994) warnings against the ill-consequences of changing international academic fads on the image of Nepal and the practice of development there does underpin the problematic nature of the external and universalistic gaze. (This criticism would, of course, apply to other countries as welL) The 1950-1980 period was one of nationalist renaissance in Nepal (also see Onta 1996). In particular, this was the period when Nepal was partially unshackled in a number of domains-not least within the domain of education and school curricula, trom India. Illustratively, school texts on the history and geography of Nepal were prepared and used in the school curricula, for the first time, during the late 1950s. Beginning the early 70s, a new uniform and nationalistic school curriculum was introduced in the much-expanded school system. This was also a period when the non-South Asian and non-Chinese world started to intrude, and impact directly on, the lives of the majority of Nepalis. (This does not, however, imply that Nepal was "closed" prior to this period, unlike what many historians and politicians have asserted and as conventional wisdom incessantly repeats (cf Mishra 1987.) The current generation of sociologists was nurtured during this period. The CHAITANYA MISHRA: Sociology in Nepal: Underdevelopment Amidst Growth 27 nationalist agenda within sociology and anthropology, however, should not be equated with the search for indigeniety within the discipline. This search, in part, goes beyond the notion of national ism and constitutes a resistance against the universalistic claims of (primarily Western) social science and sociology and anthropology. It also constitutes a call for providing full and authentic respect to the local, for not the privileging current Western experiences and frames of thought and for an authentic interfacing between the particular and the general. It is a voice of protest against the political and economic hierarchization within the world system. Similar voices have been heard for nearly five decades from academics in the underdeveloped countries. More recent voices along this line have been summarized in Moore (1996; in particular see the introductory essay by Moore and by Norman Long on globalization and localization). In consonance with the emphasis on nationalism, modernism and developmentalism and the resistance against romanticism, ethnography as the dominant mode of doing sociology and social anthropology has been strongly questioned both by Nepali and international sociologists. This mode of practice has been strongly questioned on the grounds of authenticity (cf Furer-Haimendorf vs. Ortner in Ortner (1973), Manzardo's (1992) mea culpa on "impression management" among the Thaklis, Kawakita liro's (1974) retraction of his initial characterization of Marphali women). It has also been questioned on the grounds of adequacy of explanation, for example, Ortner's (1989) criticism of spatially and temporally shackled ethnography and Dahal's (1983) criticism of Lionel CapJan in relation to Hindu dominance over ethnic groups (Caplan 1970). It need not be overemphasized that the dominant mode of doing ethnography was, and to a certain extent remains, "shackled". One reason for such shackling is/was methodological: Participant observation, in practice, generally did not allow for historical and/or an explicitly cross-cultural vision. If historical vision remained consistently deemphasized in ethnography, cross-cultural perspective was generally defined as falling within the domain of the Ph. D. supervisors and other high ranking "theorists", rather than "field level" and Ph. D.-seeking anthropologists. Such perspectives were often regarded as negating the definition of a culturally and/or physically defined field, regardless of the fact that the negation mortally violated 28 Occasional Papers, Vol1 0 holism, the time hanored principle of anthropological investigation. The dominant mode of doing ethnography not only encouraged discrete studies, but also legitimized the invalid notion that societies and cultures investigated were unconnected with wider expanses of time, space, cultures and polities and economies. For this artificial "\vhole" to stand on its own, it had to be set apart, often invidiously, from macro level and wider as well as immediately neighboring societies largely by means of "professional" fiat, rather than by means of historical criteria. It is for these reasons that ethnographers have been charged not only by the state, the nationalists and the culturally dominant, but also by trained sociologists and anthropologists with encouraging divisiveness. Thus also the emphasis in the preceding revie\vs that "integrative" structures, conditions and processes should legitimately be regarded as key themes of anthropological inquiry. On the other hand, the nationalist and culturally dom inant strain, as noted, remains strong among Nepali sociologists and anthropologists. One implication of this character is obvious from the preceding review. Few Nepali academics have acknowledged that resistance, conflict, struggle and emancipation-all somewhat divisive themes-ought to become a key site of sociological inquiry. Indeed, the emphasis on the developmentalist, nationalist. statist, and modernist agenda has been quite strong. The preceding review, in consequence, generally fails to acknowledge that social criticism has a legitimate place within the discipline. While many international academics have, somewhat understandably, shied away from these themes, except as applied to the local context, some others have insightfully explored them (for example, Caplan 1972, Gaige 1975, Blaikie, Camcron and Seddon 1980, Mikesell 1999). Though some Nepali academics have also highlighted such themes (for example, Mishra 1987, Bista 1992), most analyses by Nepali academics have either sought to downplay conflict and resistance or to find ways to "manage" it. Rather plentiful but discrete inquiries on ''"resource management", for example those related to particular forest tracts, drinking water systems, are examples. No surprise then that a few sociologists and anthropologists have provided substantive accounts of either the 1990 transition or the Maoist insurgency (see Bhattachan 1993, Karki and Seddon 2003, however). This must be regarded as a serious failure. The use of anns in the "Maoist struggle" has certainly inhibited CHAITANYA MISHRA : Sociology in Nepal: Underdevelopment Amidst Growth 29 field-based studies-the staple of many within the discipline. So has the government's security perception, particularly during periodic bouts of "national emergency", which views access to, storing and utilization of Maoist literature as an act of offense against the state. (Access to Maoist Party literature remains difficult in any case.) And, during this period of anned struggle bet\veen the Maoists and the state, academics as well as others, to a large extent justifiably, have remained worried and fearful on account of the "Marxist" and "Maoist" books on their shelves. Further, there is a pervading sense of insecurity among academics, journalists and many others that specific conclusions they reach and publish may invite reprisal from the government security forces or the Maoists. The ensuing sense of insecurity is a powerful inhibitor of academic engagement with the ongoing "Maoist" struggle. Nonetheless, these inhibitors cannot justifY the paucity of inquiry into the struggle. Part of this failure, which is both personal and professional----at least as far as Nepali academics are concerned, must be attributed to old disciplinary emphases on ethno- graphy, isolated ritual performances, "integrative" features, modernity and the newer disciplinaI)! as well as local emphases on development, resource management, and the routine of project-level feasibility and evaluation studies. Allied to this is paucity of inquiries on large-scale and long-range issues (cf Fisher 1987) and the micro-macro interface. Despite the legitimate criticism of discrete micro studies by several academics cited in Table I, fe\v of the articles in Contrihutions to Nepalese Studies (henceforth Contributions), the premier sociological/anthropological journal published in Nepal and onc that has been in operation for three decades, explore such themes. The political-economic perspective, which arguably lends itself much more readily to such themes, has remained relatively neglected. This neglect, among others, is tied to the academics and politics of the "field", empiricism, anthropological holism, the agenda of spatially and sectorally delimited development, the nature of sponsored research and the nature of the "development project" within the ambit of which many micro-studies are carried out. I will come to the wider implications of sponsored research later. One area, in which resistance, conflict and struggle have been rather widely studied, particularly in recent years, is the area of ethnicity. While 30 Occasional Papers, Vol1 0 ethnicity was often implicated--ta varying extents-in most ethno- graphic studies, the politics of ethnicity, ethnic conflict and the interface between ethnicity and nationalism has recently become a substantively salient area of inquiry. The 1990 restoration of democracy has furnished a potent site for organized political action on an ethnic basis and for inquiries into ethnic identity, discrimination and exclusion. The implications of emerging notions of ethnicity and ethnic political action on the nature of the Nepali state, Nepali nationalism and social justice and democracy arc being widely discussed as well. This ethnic debate has taken two principal forms. The tirst visualizes ethnicity as historically and socially constructed and contin- gent. Ethnicity, in this view, is constructed and sharpened and blunted within the context of specific political, economic and cultural structures and processes. The second [onn, which is essentialist in nature, in turn, posits that ethnicity is a primordial attribute of a group of people-an attribute (or set of attributes) that always was and, by extension, will always be, in existence. The non-essentialist position has led to a rich debate on ethnicity, ethnic connict and nationalism. While Ortner (1989), Holmberg (1989) and a few others laid the ground, the 1997 volume edited by Gellner, Pfaff-Czarnecka and Whelpton elaborates this position in great detail and with respect to the state and its evolution, various caste and ethnic groups and the emerging cultures and their career. The voices represented in the volume are diverse and amply demonstrate that ethnicity is historically constructed through specific political, economic and cultural structures and processes (see, in particular, the contribution by Pfaff-Czarnecka). The contributors to the volume also argue that because ethnicity is not an ahistorical construct, it is necessary to problematize and interrogate it. As Gellner emphasizes in his introduction, the "true" essentialist position, which smacks of the days of "headhunters" and barbarians and races and tribes, has a few adherents now (For an overview and critique of the notion of tribe, see Dahal 1981, Caplan 1990). The legitimacy of the essentialist position has also been eroded by expanding intercultural interaction, movements of population and labor, the modernist, develop- menttalist and liberal democratic nature of many states, and the galloping commodity and labor exchange regime under capitalism and imperialism, CHAITANYA MISHRA :Sociology in Nepal: Underdevelopment Amidst Growth 31 which is sometimes subsumed under the notion of globalization. Further, the essentialist position often defeats itself as many of those who take such a position in relation to the past and the present, nonetheless, argue that future ethnic political consciousness and practice (that is, ethnicity) will undergo a transition to the extent that certain specific contradictions find a resolution. Regardless, "less pure" and softer versions of the essentialist position remain in vogue among ethnic political activists and politically committed academics (for example, National Ad hoc Committee for International Decade for the World's Indigenous Peoples, Nepal, 1994, Bhattachan 1995). These visions freeze history, create unidimensional "ethnics", eschew diversity and invidious political interests within and between ethnic groups, force a disconnect with encompassing political and economic issues and, in addition, seek to del ink such issues from the question of ethnic identity. These visions, nonetheless, point out accumulating contradictions in a politically powerful manner and underscore the continuing significance of participatory and equity-based cultural and political negotiations. Even as ethnography and ethnic studies have been in full bloom for several decades, the extreme lack of attention on the Dalits by sociolo- gists remains both curious and sad (see Caplan 1972, however). This inattention must be regarded as a serious flaw within the sociology of Nepal. Indeed, the omnipresent and powerful caste system as a whole has received far less attention than ethnicity and several other themes. The Gellner, Pfaff- Czarnecka and Whelpton volume is no exception, except for a relatively peripheral treatment of the caste system among the Newars by Gellner. The politically and culturally excluded have also been left out of the intellectual discourse by Nepali academics. As far as international academics are concerned, could it be that those interested in the caste system and the Dalits fmd neighboring India more interesting instead? The "reverse romanticism" with developmental ism and modernity- and with state and international development and donor agencies as well as INGOs and NGOs who remain at the foretTont of these agendas- within sociology and anthropology in Nepal as noted by Fisher, remains pronounced. The preoccupation with feasibility and impact studies 32 Occasional Papers, Vol1 0 resource (for example. forest, irrigation, drinking water) management, etc., remains notably intense. The participation of sociologists and anthropologists. both national and international, takes place within the frame of a project and by its vcry nature is generally limited to "field" level information generation, analysis of data and preparation of report. The reports generally do not contextualize the project and the field within a larger historical, spatial and theoretical-conceptual ti'ame. Most such reports are not publicly and intellectua[l~y scrutinized and they thus do not contribute to public. intellectual and disciplinary debate. Project literature, not least because they are zealously guarded from public scrutiny, very often does not even contribute to the practice of national and international development debate and the larger agenda that cut across different sectors, different development agencies and different levels of government. One key, although not the only, reason for the relatively high level of participation of sociologists in such "sponsored" research is the high level of distortion in the structure of wage incentives. The incentives to engage in sponsored research are several times more than the incentives to teach at the university ( It is also the case. on the other hand, there is a sharp and just about impenetrable barrier in incentives for the national and international researchers). In addition, many international development agencies contract work out to individuals rather than institutions. Most academic institutions, on the other hand, are organizationally, although not academically. unequipped to organize research programs and to collaborate \vith the government and international development agencies to that cnd. The engagement \vith sponsored research, however, has not all been negative for the evolution of the discipline. It has contributed to the interfacing of the disciplinary texts-\vhich, to a substantial extent are repositories of specific Western experiences-with local structures and lives. This interfacing has helped national academics to engage in a comparative reading of the texts as against national and local structures and lives. It has made available a platform for the generation of comparative infonnation and insight. This platform can serve as a creativity-promoting site, particularly within a setting within which the authority of the text has tended to remain unquestioned and sacrosanct. CHAITANYA MISHRA : Sociology in Nepal: Underdevelopment Amidst Growth 33 In addition, to the extent that the line between applied and basic research is permeable, sponsored applied research can provide valuable input to more basic disciplinary research. Emphases in Sociology in Nepal The evolution of the discipline in Nepal can also be characterized and assessed through a review of the outlets for sociological and anthro- pological writings. Such writings, however, remain scattered in several academic and semi-academic journals, magazines and newspapers. The significance of semi-academic writings by sociologists and anthropolo- gists, while lying along the borders of the discipline, should not be underrated. It serves not only as an aid to public education but also to the training of aspiring and "junior" sociologists. These outlets, which are not the exclusive privilege of the trained academics, provide valuable space to those who wish to write in the Nepali or other vernacular languages and have helped several non-sociologists and non- anthropologists make valuable contributions to the discipline (See Rai 1984, however). At present, several journals cater to the writings of sociologists and anthropologists Contributions (1973-), which is published by the Center for Nepal and Asian Studies, of course, has remained the principal outlet for the last three decades. The Occasional Papers in Sociology and Anthropology published by the Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur Campus since 1987, is an additional outlet. By 2001, seven volumes of the journal have come out. Studies in Nepali History and Society, published by Center for Social Research and Development since 1996, Kailash, the publication of which has recently become irregular, and the journal of Nepal Research Center are other significant outlets. In addition, there are several other academic and semi-academic journals and magazines, published in the English and Nepali language, such as Pragya, Mulyankan, Himal, Himal South Asia, Asmita, Rolamba. In addition, during the last decade, several semi- academic and news magazine publications have focused on issues related to gender ethnicity and ethnic groups, Dalithood and Dalits as well as specific regions of the country, Such publications have started the polyvocal genre within social thinking and writing and are beginning to 34 Occasional Papers, Vol10 make to make their presence fclt within public policy institution. Further, several weeklies and dailies occasionally publish articles by sociologists and anthropologists, This review will focus on the Contributions and provide quantitative information on some aspects of the nature and "productivity" of Nepali and international sociologists and anthropologists describe the theme of the articles and assess decadal trends with respect to productivity and themes. In addition, the articles will also be categorized in tenns of their level of "theory consciousness". Further, the themes covered in Occasio- nal Papers will also be described. It must be emphasized that this description and assessment is of a preliminary and quantitative nature. Table 2. Themes Covered by Articles in Contributions Theme/PeriodlNumber of Articles 1973- 1981- 1991- Total 1980 1990 2001 Ethnography, ethnicity, nationalism, identity 17 13 7 37 Resource management. population, ecosystem 5 4 2 11 State, economy, market. livelihood 4 t I 2 17 Politics, resistance, conflict struggle, inequality 2 0 3 5 Gender, caste, kinship 3 7 2 12 Ideology, knowledge, sociology, anthropology 2 I 1 4 Health, education, environment development I 8 4 13 Social and cultural change 3 2 I 6 Religion, rituals, shamanism 11 0 6 17 Ethnography, livelihood, rituals and shamanism and faith healing are the most favored genre within Contributions. Many of the ethnographic articles are also based on very short-tenn and one-shot visits to particular "field" sites and, partly as a consequence, provide a simple descriptive account of a specific aspect of an ethnic group's cultural life, for example, discrete ritual performance, shamanism, trans- humance, dimensions of livelihood, demographic attributes, Often the articles implicitly evoke a sense of material poverty, physical and social isolation and rather stark boundedness among the ethnic group described, The descriptive focus, generally, is on relatively unusual "ethnic CHAITANYA MISHRA : Sociology in Nepal, Underdevelopment Amidst Growth 35 attributes" and the descriptive mood is often somber. In turn, there is little history, little "wholeness", little explicit cross-cultural comparison and little emphasis on locating the subjects within larger, that is, regional, national, international or more encompassing political, economic and cultural patterns and processes. These features indicate that there is more than a whiff of anthropological romanticism here, even as such ethnographic efforts have opened our eyes to the diverse nature of social structure and culture. provided a base for deeper and wider investigations and furnished perspectives and infomlation, which are potentially useful for preliminary ethnographic mappings. On the other hand, sociological and anthropological writings, as reflected in Contrihutions have seriously deemphasized themes related to politics, ideology, resistance, inequality, contradiction and change-- themes which have been starkly highlighted and acquired a particular urgency during the current era of "Maoist conflict". Romanticism, "salvage anthropology" functionalism, developmental ism, sciemificity, political neutrality, boundedness and the failure to look at the larger picture, despite their value, have performed a potent disservice to the sociological and anthropological enterprise, Studies of these genres, on the other hand, do serve to highlight the significance of sociological and anthropological studies which focus on the larger picture and which seek to interconnect different sections of the larger picture. They also highlight the significance of the historically infonned studies that do not fetishize "culture", but locate it alongside and within a specific and changing political economic structure and which give sufficient space to political processes and to the genesis and consequences of social contradiction. Approximately 30 percent of the articles published in Contributions substantively locate themselves within, or seek to interrogate, relatively established conceptual-theoretical frameworks and contribute to the interpretation, buttressing or refutation, of the relatively established schools of thought or to the development of a more or less novel frame, The scope and significance of such articles is also broader than their immediate empirical engagement One-half of the articles, even as they do locate themselves within a relatively established conceptual- theoretical framework, do so in a peripheral manner. Such articles do not 36 Occasional Papers, Volt 0 bring themselves to bear on such frameworks. About one-fifth of the articles remain at the level of "lay description". The academic significance of the later two categories of articles, the last category in particular, necessarily remains low. Table 3: Level of Theoretical Consciousness" in Articles in Contributions Articles b.y Articles that Articles that Articles that sociologists and substantively marginally remain at thePeriod anthropologists implicate a implicate a level of lay theoretical theoretical description framework framework t973-1980 48 15 2t 12 1981-1990 47 14 24 9 1991-200t 33 9 20 4 Total 128 38 65 25 . Trends indicate that the proportion of articles, which substantively Imphcat,~ SP~CI~,C conceptual-theoretical frameworks while setting up and/or solvmg a research problem, has remained nearly constant through three decades of publication of Contributions. On the other hand there has been a discernible rise in the proportion of articles tha; peripherally invoke a conceptual- theoretical framework. Whether this r~pr~sents a step toward a more intense and explicit recognition of the SignIficance of conceptual-theoretical and comparative analysis in the future remains to be seen. Table 4. Productivity of Sociologists and Anthropologists in Contributions Period Issues Articles Articles by Articles by published published Articles bysociologists/ Nepali international anthropologists authors authors 1973-1980 14 96 48 7 41 1981-1990 22 133 47 15 32 199t -2001 23 180 32 1I 21 Total 59 409 127 33 94 CHAITANYA MISHRA : Sociology in Nepal: Underdevelopment Amidst Growth 37 This decadal comparison of Contrihutions shows several notable features. First, sociologists and anthropologists contributed one-half of all the articles published during the 70s (columns 3 and 4). During the 80s, the number of articles authored by sociologists and anthropologists declined substantially in terms of proportion. Ditto in the 90s, both in terms of number and proportion. Sociologists and anthropologists contributed only about one-fifth of all articles published during tlie 90s. This quantitative reduction, however, also has to be viewed against the "expanding inclusivensss" of editorial policy as well as the overall growth of social science academic writing in Nepal. The initial domain of Contributions lay along the disciplines of history, linguistics and anthropology and sociology. The growth of academia and research outputs in other field of social sciences for example, economics, development, political science, human geography, etc., obliged the editors of Contributions to cater to articles in these fields as well. While the consequent "expanding inclusiveness" of Contrihutions does in part explain the proportional reduction in the number of articles authored by sociologists and anthropologist, it fails to explain the reduction in terms of absolute number evidenced during the 90s. This reduction is much more troubling than it appears to be in as much as the number of sociologists and anthropologists, including those employed at Tribhuvan-and to a much smaller extent other-universities grew rapidly during this very period. In addition, Tribhuvan University, which remains the principal institutional locus of academic sociology and anthropology, had increased the premium on the publication of articles as a basis for promotion within the academic hierarchy. While it is not possible here to exhaustively scan the reasons underlying the reduction in the number of articles published by sociologists and anthropologists in the journal, it can be safely said that the opening of other avenues of publication as mentioned earlier and engagement in the fast growing sponsored "project" research might have accounted for the reduction. Second, during all the three periods, Nepali sociologists and anthropologists published fewer articles in the Contributions compared to international sociologists and anthropologists. Some progress, however, has been discernible on this front: While Nepali authors contributed only one-seventh of all articles-seven in all--published in the journal during the 70s, the proportion rose to one-third during the 38 Occasional Papers, Volt 0 latter two decades. Once again, however, the "expansion" of the disciplines of sociology in Nepal during the 80s and, particularly, the 90s is hardly substantiated by the record of publication in Contrihutions. The record, on the other hand, does show that the presence of intemational authors continued to remain strong within sociology and anthropology in Nepal. Table 5. Themes Covered by Articles in Occasional Papers (1987-2001) CHAITANYA MISHRA : Sociology in Nepal: Underdevelopment Amidst Growth 39 on politics, ideology, resistance, struggle, inequality. Unlike Contribu- tions, on the other hand, it has fewer writings on ethnography, rituals caste, kinship, gender, shamanism, etc" the traditional core of sociology and anthropology. During the early years, somewhat expectedly, and as evidenced by the information provided in Table I, the journal was also preoccupied with "appropriate sociology and anthropology" and the preparation of a programmatic agenda for pushing the discipline towards greater "appropriateness". As noted, one of the possible reasons for the low presence of Nepali authors in Contributions is the opening of alternative avenues of publication in sociology and anthropology. Occasional Papers, which was first published by the Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur campus, in 1987, is one such avenue. Till 200 I, seven issues of Occasional Papers have been published. Most of the articles have been in the Occasional Papers have been authored by members of the faculty in the Kirtipur campus. The focus of Occasional Papers is much more explicitly "developmental" compared to Contributions. A large proportion of the articles on education, environment, resource management, population, ecosystem, livelihood, etc., in the journal falls within the "development" genre. On the other hand, and like Contributions, there are few writings Theme Ethnography. ethnicity, nationalism, identity Resource management. popu lation. cwsystem State. economy. market. livelihood Politics. resistance, conflict. struggle. inequality Gender. ca"te. kinship Ideology, knowledge. sociology. anthropology Health, education, environment, development Social and cultural change Religion, rituals. shamanism Other Total Number of Articles 5 9 6 1 5 7 14 1 2 4 54 Acknowledgements I would like to express appreCiation to the Institute for Social and Economic Transition, Kathmandu, for supporting me in the preparation of the article. ENDNOTES 1. This paper "as originally publisbed in CONTRIl3LJTIONS TO NEPALESE STUDIES Volume.32.No.l. January. 2005 and it has been reprinted here in this volume \\-'ith the kind permission of Centre Cor Nepal and Asian Studies. Tribhuvan University. Kathmandu. Nepal. 2. Whether sociology is distinct relatively recent and modern European product or whether the discipline-----()r a recognizable precursor of it--can be traced to other specific spatial and historical setting(s) has, surprisingly, remained a nearly unexplored issue \vithin sociology. To the extent that historical and social thinking and writing is rooted in social struggle and transformation. one could certainly have expected the sociological genre to have marked its presence during the formation and dismemberment of the Greco-Roman empires and civilizations. the opening of the Euro-American and Eurasian trade routes, the decimation of the American-Indian peoples and cultures and the rapid ascendance of the European civilization in the Americas during the 16th to 20th centuries. the stave trade in and across Africa, the formation of North Africa and Arabic urban regions. the ups and downs of the Sinic and Japanese civilizations. the initial institutionalization of the extremely oppressive and deeply divisive caste in India as well as the ferments created during the rise of all great religions and various larger scale and long-winded religious, sectarian, ethnic and national wars and their aftermath. The overall economic, political and cultural significance of these struggles and transition may very well have been relatively narrower, shallower and slower and, therefore, more contained than those produced by 40 Occasional Papers, Volt 0 capitalism and imperialism. Nonetheless, sociology has n:mained poorer because of the virtual absence of explorations, which seek to link these and other Iargc-sculc struggles and transitions on the onc hand and modes and substances of social imagination and investigation on the other. I am grateful to Sur~sh Dhakal for helping me with information provided in the tables in this section. REFERENCES Amin. Samir. 1997. Capitalism in th~ Agc of Glohalization: The Management of Contemporary Society, Delhi: Madhyam Books. Berreman. Gcrald. 1994. "Anthropology, developm~nt and public policy". Occasional Papers in Sociology and Anthropology. Vol. 4. Department of Sociology and Anthropology. Tribhuvan ljniversity. Bhandari. Bishnu. 1990. "The past and futurc of" sociology in Ncpal"·. Occasional Pap~rs in Sociology' and Anthropology. vol. 2. Department of Sociology and Anthropology. Tribhuvan University. Bhattachan. Krishna B. 1987. "Sociology and anthropology curriculum and the needs of Nepal". Occasional Papers in Sociology and Anthropology, vol. I. Department of Sociology and Anthropology. Trihhuvan University. Bhanachan. Krishna B. 1993. "Public debate on development: sociological perspectives on the public philosophy of development in Nepal", Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California Berkeley. Bhattachan. Krishna B. 1995. "Ethnopolitics and ethnodevelopment: An emerging paradigm in Nepal". In Dhruba Kumar (cd.). State. Leadership and Politics in Nepal. Kathmandu: Center for Nepal and Asian Studies. Tribhuvan University. Bhattachan. Krishan B. 1997. "Sociological and anthropological research and teaching in Nepal: Western adaptation versus indigenization'·.In Prcm K. Khatry (cd.), Social Sciences in Nepal: Some Thoughts and Search for Direction. Kathmandu: Center for Nepal and Asian Studies, Tribhuvan University. Bhattachan, Krishna B. and James Fisher. 1994. "Contemporary sociology in Nepal". Pp. 731-42 in Raj P. Mohan and Arthus S Wilke (cdss), International Handbook of Sociology. Westport, Connecticut Greenwood. Rhattarai, Baburam. 2003. The Nature of Underdevelopment and Regional Structure of Nepal: A Marxist Analysis. Delhi: Adroit. CHAITANYA MISHRA . Sociology 10 Nepal: Underdevelopment Amidst Growth 41 Bista. Dor 13ahadur.1992. "Nepal school of sociology/anthropo logy·'. Occasional Papers in Sociology and Anthropology. vol. I, Depatrment of Sociology and Anthropology, Trihhuvan University. Sista, Dor Bahadur. 1992. Fatalism and Development in Nepal: Nepal's Struggle for Modernization. Calcutta: Orient Longman. Ilista. Dor Bhahduf. t 996. (Sec I'isher, James, 1996) Hista. Oar 13ahadur. 1997. "Comments on 'Sociological and anthropological research and teaching lJ1 Nepal: Western adaptation versus indigenization'" [by Krishna b. Bhattachan]. In Prcm K. KhatI)' (eds.), Social Sciences in Nepal: Some Thoughts and Search for Direction. Kathmandu Cenkr li.Jr Nepal and Asian Studies. Tribhuvan University. Bista. Khcm Bahadur. 1973. "The state of anthropology in Nepal". In Prayag Raj Sharma (cd.). Social Science in Nepal. Kathmandu: Institute of Nepal and Asian Studies, Tribhubvan University. Blaikie. Piers. John Cameron and David Seddon. 1980. Nepal in Crisis: Growth and Stagnation at the Periphery. Delhi: Oxford. Burghart. Richard. 1984. "The formation of the concept of nation-state in Nepal'·. Journal of Asian Studies 44 (1): 101-25. Cameron, John. 1994. "Nepal's development thinking: T\'icnty years on in theory and practice". The Economic Journal of Nepal 17 (2): 71 -84. Caplan. Lionel. 1970. Land and Social Change in East Nepal: A Study of Hindu- Tribal Interface. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Caplan. Lionel. 1990. "Tribes in the ethnography of Nepal: Some comments on a debate". Contributions to Nepalese Studies 17(2): 129-45. Caplan. Patricia. 1972. Priests and Cobbki's. San Francisco: Chandler. Cli/Tord. James and George Marcus (eds.). 1986. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California. Dahal. Dilli Ram. 1981. "Tribalism as an incongruous concept in modem Nepal". Asie du Sud: Tradition et Changements. Paris: CNRS. Dahal, Dilli Ram. 1984. "Anthropology in Nepal: Infrastructure and development". In Mohan P. Lohani (ed.), Social Sciences in Nepal: Infrastructure and Program Development. Kathmandu: Institute of llumanitics and Social Sciences, Tribhuvan University. Dahal, Dilli Ram. 1983. "Poverty or plenty: Innovative responses to population pressure in an eastern Nepalese village community". Unpublished Ph.D dissertation. University of Hawaii. 42 Occasional Papers, Vol10 DOOal, Dilli Ram. 1993. ';Anthropology of the Nepal Himalaya: A critical appraisal", In Charles Ramble and Martin Braucn (cd.), Anthropology of Tibet and the Nepal lIimalaya. Zurich: Ethnological Museum, university of Zurich. Devkota, Padam La!' 1984. "Critique on development of infrastructure and program in anthropology in Nepal", In Mohan P. Lohani (cd.), Social Sciences in Nepal: Infrastructure and Program Development. Kathmandu: Institute of Humanities and Social Science, Tribhuvan University. Devkota Padam La!' 2001. "Anthropology, society and development in Nepal: A native perspective", Occasional Papers in Sociology and Anthropology, vol. 7, Department of Sociology and Social Sciences, Tribhuvan University. Fisher, James. 1987. "Romanticism and development in Nepalese anthropology". Occasional Papers in Sociology and Anthropology, vol. 1. Department of Sociology and Anthropolob'Y. Tribhuvan University. Fisher, lames. 1996. "An Interview \vith Dor Bahadur Bista". Current Anthropology 37(2): 349-56. Frank, Andre Gunder. 1998. Reorient: Global Economy in the Asian Age. New Delhi: Vistaar. Gaige, Frederick. 1975. Regionalism and National Unity in Nepal. Berkeley: University of California. Gellner. D.N.. Jomma Pfaff-Czarnecka and John Whelpton (eds.). 1997. Nationalism and Ethnicity in a Hindu Kingdom: The Politics of Culture in Contemporary Nepal. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publisher. Gouldner. Alvin. 1971. Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. London: Heinemann. Guru, Gopal. 2002. "How egalitarian are the social sciences in India?" Economic and Political Weekly, December 14-20. Gurung, Ganesh Man. 1997. "Comments on 'Sociological and anthropological research and teaching in Nepal: Western adaptation versus indigenization' [by Krishna B. Bhattaehan]. In Prem K. Khatry (ed.) Social Sciences in Nepal: Some Thoughts and Search for Direction. Kathmandu: Center for Nepal and Asian Studies, Tribhuvan University. Gurung, Om. 1990. "Sociology and anthropology: An emerging field of study in Nepal". Occasional Papers in Sociology and Anthropology, vo!' 2, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Tribhuvan University. , I I,: 1\ I, f :1I~ 11 \, I I !' I CHAITANYA MISHRA : Sociology in Nepal: Underdevelopment Amidst Growth 43 Hachhethu, Krishna. 2002. "Social sciences research in Nepal'·. Economic and Political Weekly, August 3 I-september 6. Hamilton, Francis B. 1819. An Account of the Kingdom of Nepal and of the Territories Annexed to this Dominion by the House of Gurkhas. Edinburgh: Archibald Constable and Company. Hodgson, I3rian. 1880. Miscellaneous Essays Relating to Indian subjects, vol. I. London: Trubner. Hoter, Andras. 1979. The Caste Hierarchy and the State in Nepal: A Study of the Muluki Ain of 1854. Innsbruck: Unnivesitatsverlag Wagner. llolmberg, David. 1989. Order in Paradox, Myth, Ritual and Exchange among Nepal's Tamangs. lthaca: Comell. Karki. A~jun and David Seddon (eds). 2003. The People's War in Nepal: Left Perspectives. Delhi: Adroit. Jiro, Kawakita. 1974. The Hill Magars and Their Neighbors. Tokyo: Tokai University. Kirkpatrick, Willam. 1811. An Account of the Kingdom of Nepaul. London: W. Miller. Mc Donald. A.W. 1973. "Sociology and anthropology in Nepal". In Prayag Raj Sharma (ed.), Social Science in Nepal: Kathmandu: Institute of Nepal and Asian Studies, Tribhuvan University. Manzardo, Andrew. 1992. "Anthropological origins". lIimal 5 (6) MikeselL Stephen. 1988. "Cotton on the Silk Road (or the dialectic ora merchant community in Nepal)'". Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin- Madison. Mikesell, Stephen. 1993. "Afro-American sociologist and Nepali ethnography". Occasional Papers in Sociology and Anthropology, VD!. 3, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Tribhuvan University. Mikesell. Stcphen. t 999. Class. State and Struggle in Nepal. New Delhi: Manohar. Mishra, Chaitanya. t980. "Social research in Nepal: Challenges for the 1980s". Paper presented at a seminar organized by Nepal Social Science Research Council, Kathmandu. Mishra, Chaitanya. 1984. "Social research in Nepal: A critique and a proposal". Contributions to Nepalese Studies 11 (2): 1·10. 44 Occasional Papers, Vol10 CHAITANYA MISHRA : Sociology in Nepal: Underdevelopment Amidst Growth 45 Mishra. Chaitanya. 1987. "Development and underdevelopment: A preliminary sociological perspective". Occasional Papers JIl Sociology and Anthropology. vol.l. Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Tribhuvan University. Moore, Henrictta (cd). 1996. The FlHurc of Anthropological Kmwiledge. London: Rout/edge. National Ad hoc Committee for International Decade for the World's Indigenous Peoples, Nepal. 1994. Proceedings of National Consultation on Indigenous Peoples of Nepal. Katmandu. OOla, Pratyoush. 1996. "Ambivalence denied: The making of rastriya itihaas in Panchayat era textbooks", Contributions to Nepalese Studies 23 (I): 21 J- 54, Oppitz, Michael. 1974. "Myths and f~lctS: Reconsidering some data concerning the clan history of the Sherpa,>". In Christoph von Furcr~ Jlairncndorf (ed.). Contributions to the Anthropology of Nepal. Warminster. England: Aris and Philips, pp, 232-43, Ortner, Sherry. 1973. "Sherpa purity". American Anthropologist 75 (I). Onner, Sherry. 1989. High Religion: A Cultural and Political I Iistory of Sherpa Buddism. New Jersey: Prineeton University. Pandc, Sardar Bhim Bahadur. 1982. Tyas Bhakhatko Nepal. 2 vols. Kathmandu: Center tor Nepal and Asian Studies, Tribhuvan University. (in Nepali) Raj, Navin K. 1973. ·'Critique to sociology and anthropology in Nepal". In Prayag Raj Sharma (ed.), Social Science in Nepal. Kathmandu: Institute of Nepal and Asian Studies. Tribhuvan University. Rai. Navin K. 1984. ··Critique on development and infrastructure and program in anthropology in Nepal". In Mohan P. Lohani (cd.), Social Sciences in Nepal: In1Tastructure and Program Development. Kathmandu: Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Tribhuvan University. Regmi, Mahesh Chandra. 1978. Land Tenure and Taxation in Nepal. Kathmandu: Ratna Pustak Bhandar. Regmi. Mahesh Chandra. 1984. The State and Economic Surplus. Varanasi: Nath Publishing House. Said, Edward. 1978. Orientalism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Sardar, Ziauddin. 2002. Oriental ism. New Delhi: Viva Books. First South Asian Edition. h d TheShrcstha. Bihari Krishna. 1971. Diyargaunka Thakuriharu. Kat man u: Royal Nepal Academy. (in Nepali). Stillt:r, Lud\vig. 1973. The Risc of the House of Gorkhas, Kathmandu: Ratna Pustak Hhandar. Th' ' 'I' S 1971 "The development of sociology in Nepal". In Prayag Rajapa. ." -' Sharma (cd.). Social Science in Nepal. Kathmandu: Institute of Nepal and Asian Studies, Tribhuvan University. Wallerstein, ImmanueJ. 1991. Unthinking Social Science: The Limits of Nineteenth Century Paradigms. Cambridge: Polity. Wallerstdn, hnmanuel. 1999. The End of the World As Wc Know It: Social Science for the Twentieth Century. MinneapJlis/London: University of Minnesota. \Vallerstein, Immanud. Ca1cslOus Juma. E ' ielyn Fox Keller, Jurgen Kocka. Dominique LecourL V. Y. Mudimbe, Kinhide Mushakoki, Ilya Prigoginc, Petcr 1avlor and Michcl-Rolph Trouillct. 1997. Open the Social Sciences: Report ;1' the Gulbcnkian Commission on the Restructuring of the Social Sciences. New Delhi: Vistaar. THE DECADE OF VILOENT DESTABILIZATION IN NEPAL: AN ANALYSIS OF ITS HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND TRAJECTORY Tone B1eie This article l w~lI discuss how the negotiations over the defining attributes ?f state ~uthonty and of state-society relations at important conjunctures In N~~al 5 recent political history are related to political and economic condltlO~s ":,,ith n~tionaL regional and global outreach. The unravelling of the mtncate 1I1terplay between internal and external st t Id" rueuro con 1tlO115 and ma~or national political events over nearly five decades (1950 -] 996) questions any facile characterisation of the Maoist rebellion (which started in 1996) as an internal conflict only. The exposition ~oreo~er questIOns any characterisation of the Nepalese state as increasingly "developmentalist" and hence accountable from a rights- based perspective (see Bleie et. ai, 2000). !.he main analytical focus of this article is on the structural conditIOns and agency actions that resulted in 1996 in a Maoist-led rebellion m this richly endowed Himalayan kingdom 2 Th' C . . . IS lOCUS mevltably raises the need for an analytical framework to explain the causes of the inception of the Maoist uprising in Nepal. To outline the :vhole net:vork of interacting ultimate and proximate causes and effects IS exceedmgly demanding, analytically speaking, as well as space consummg, and thus too tall an order for an article. Instead, this article seeks to establish a more tentative explanatory framework of the dialectic betw~en structural conditions and agency actions, which to some degree explams both some enduring features of the autocratic state and its ability to adapt - at least for an mtennedlate period over the last 50 years _ under dramatically changing circumstances. Well-known historical I Il TONE BLEIE : The Decades af Vailen! Destabilizatian in Nepal: 47 events, including the palace revolt in 1951, the democratic refonns of 1959, the 1980 referendum, the People's Movement in ]990, the declaration of People's War in 1996 and the April Movement in 2006, are analysed by combining insights from political science, public administration and anthropology. A straightforward instrumentalist view of government that conceptualises policy as technical, rational, action- oriented instruments for effecting change is supplemented by an anthropological view of governance (see Shore and Wright, 200 I). This view conceptualises governance as governed by more complex and diffuse symbolic processes which establish indigenous institutional rules and codes of conduct that are internalised. Through these processes, certain fundamental tenets of the prevailing order of governance are naturalised and therefore scarcely subjected to reflection. Such a perspective is applied in order to explain the strikingly widespread and deeply-felt belief in the sacrosanct Hindu monarchy among supporters both of the autocratic regime and of liberal democracy. This view of governance, derived from political anthropology, also gains analytical strength from drawing on a more comprehensive theory of the nature of this Hindu state and its underlining cultural models of divine kingship, sovereignty, body politic and the nature of cultural diversity] This analytical approach to governance is found to be useful in explaining how and why the monarch has been unaccountable until the historical decision in 2006 of the reinstated House of Representatives, and how the bureaucracy in Nepal has been imbued with an institutional logic based on patronage and loyalty, a logic unlike the Western notion of accountability as answerability to human rights concerns' While Nepal's rulers, for purely pragmatic reasons, in the period between ]950 and ]990 tapped legitimacy through a development discourse, the internal workings of the government, bureaucracy and public domain created few incentives for establishing basic accountability mechanisms. 5 In ]990, the People's Movement (Jana Andolan) fought through a new democratic constitution. This led to the creation of a democratically elected government, which subsequently ratified a number of human rights conventions. These unprecedented events promised a new era of intensified efforts to institutionalise basic accountability mechanisms. The reasons why such high expectations were dashed will be explored. 48 Occasional Papers, Voll0 TONE BLEIE : The Decades of Voilenf Destabilization in Nepal: . 49 The discussions in this article are confined to analysing most, if not all, the structural conditions for the violent conflict between the state and the military and political movement led by the Communist Party of Nepal (MaOist). Thus, the exposition is not meant to cover all the necessary and sufficient causes for the rapid escalation of the conflict which has over the last decade engulfed large parts of the country in civi; w~r and led to a reduced presence (and in certain areas full withdrawal) of the "old state's" functions. This does not detract from the fact that a number of the structural causes outlined here are of considerable relevance in understanding the escalation of the conflict, including the otherwise inexplicable positions of the main stakeholders (the r~ling monarch, the Royal Nepalese Anny, the mainstream political parties and the Commumst Party of Nepal (Maoist) in a situation that seem nearly unsolvable, but eventually ended in a Comprehensive Peace Accord in late 2006. In order tobe able to cast some light on the degree of continuity and change m the Hmdu state, the article starts out with a brief analysis of the state smce the unification of Nepal in the late eighteenth century Th' . . . ISffi mtended to claritY and explicate the salient structural features of the state m 1951., including its underpinning cultural models, when strictly autocratIc rule ended and a period of early contestation of the Hindu state began. The article argues for caution against sweeping assertions about the political history of the last half century as a period of shifts between aut?~ratic and democratic government. It argues instead that the old pol~t~cal regime underwent certain restructurings as it reasserted its pohtlcal dominance through a dramatic expansion of a bureaucracy with a modem appearance, but governed by institutional rules and practices grounded m an upper-caste, patronage-oriented court culture. This massIve ~xpansion of the state apparatus only created the appearance of a progressIve Nepalese accommodation to international norms of demo- cracy and a redistributive and accountable state ensuring human rights. In real tenns, the expansion led to a certain upward mobility predominantly of men from the hIgher castes, whose co-option into the state apparatus allowed a revitalisation of the old regime. This restructured and consolidated regime could now, though bureaucratic expansion and legItImate development rhetoric, directly penetrate rural society and pursue a policy of centralisation in spite of its rhetoric to the contrary. Thus, it is only apparently a paradox that the integration of the mountain kingdom into the world community (accompanied by a large influx of development assistance) enabled the regime to tap both Western and indigenous sources of legitimacy. Donor assistance was used by the regime to expand a bureaucracy that emulated the old patronage culture, now flourishing on generous monetary and technical assistance. While helping to ensure the hegemonic grip of the old autocratic regime in the shorter run, the development assistance also had other contradictory effects, reinforcing economic differentiation, restructuring social disparities and transforming political consciousness of ethnic, caste and gender-based injustices at both collective and individual levels. While both international political developments and development assistance in the four principal development decades (1960s to 1990s) engendered first the seeds and later the ferment of political dissent - centred on a Western liberal discourse on the nature of the state and state-society relations - there was another set of national actors who represented an alternative chorus of dissenting voices, based on Marxist- Leninis! and Maoist political ideology. This stream of political thought, which claimed to be scientific and of universal applicability, contained a comprehensive set of propositions about the nature of world history, of global/regional and national interdependencies, and thus also of Nepal's history. Based on this political ideology, the communists had, from their establishment of the first communist party, challenged the autocratic monarchy and called for a constituent assembly in order to create what they coin "the objective conditions" for a radical rupture in the old political order and the genesis of "a new state". This state would effectively combat gender, caste, ethnic and regional oppression. In recognition of the importance of this growing political movement and its regional basis, the article briefly describes the major shifts in the institutionalisation of communism in Nepal, through bewilderingly numerous fissions and fusions. These were at times the results of personality-based politics and other more pragmatic postures. But the fissions and fusions were at times the results of deep ideological dissent, resulting in the purging of minority views. The article eventually focuses on the sudden rise in 1990 of a popular movement, which led to a new constitution that enshrined 50 Occasional Papers, Voll0 TONE BLEIE :The Decades of Voilent Destabil'lzation ',n Nepal: 51 constitutional monarchy and multi-party democracy. Three main lines of argument are developed about the 1990/91 events and the following period up to the proclamation of the insurgency. Firstly, the article pinpoints that the cultural hegemony of the notion of Hindu monarchy and certain international and national political constellations resulted in a qU~lIed mass movement and an incongruous constitution. Secondly, the article stresses the importance of 1990/91 and the following years as a radical juncture for the communist movement in Nepal. Some of these leftist parties became parliamentary actors. One newly merged communist party (Communist Party of Nepal Unified Marxist-Leninist) turned to social democratic ideology and went into government. Three other Maoist and outrightly republican parties, though opposed to the constitution and the multiparty system, created first a political front (the UnIty Centre) so as to expose tactically the inadequacies of the parliamentary system, then later withdrew from parliamentary politics while utilising the expanded liberties of civil society to make a~ unprecedented comeback. Thirdly, the reasons for the failure of both leftist and rightist democratic parties to build effective coalitions around national interests and to start institutionalising a democratic transition are outlined. This blatant failure to embark on a road of democratisation may be understood as much as an effect of the old regime's political and mental grip over policy making and administration. But, this effect led, in turn, to an intolerable disjuncture between on th~ one hand a fennenting and spreading consciousness of political gnevances (in a civil society invariably moulded by foreign development aid and the communist movement) and on the other, the state's failure to start responding to basic democratic demands, through the establishment of accountability mechanisms. In fact, the state instead took on a conflict-inducing and escalating role, resorting to repressive means through the intact, authoritarian state apparatus. The constellation of these internal conditions and in addition the ideological victory (within the Unrty Centre) of the hardliners in favour of armed struggle left the ground fertIle for the declaration in February 1996 by the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) of the political and military programme of a so- called "People's War". This programme aimed at creating a mass-based movement through first establishing so-called 'base areas' in the remote rural areas, and then later surrounding urban areas and seizing state t. f power. The Comprehensive Peace Accord of November 2006 can be characterised as a victory for the Communist Party of Nepal (MaOIst), though they have for pragmatic reasons conceded to a deal that is based on liberal democratic values. THE RISE OF THE HINDU STATE IN NEPAL Unification and Early Consolidation during Ihe Shahs (1768-1846) Both in the South-Indian region and Indo-Gangetic region, a number of expansionist kingdoms rose during the medieval period. They were organised on religions based on sophisticated textual sources, on the culture of caste and Hinduism, and on sacred kings considered gods and great conquerors (lnden, 1990). The rise of Hindu kingdoms in the foot and mid-hill Himalayan region should be seen as part of these regJOn- wide trends in state-formation. The unification of Nepal in the middle and late eighteenth century by Prithivi Narayan Shah was based on a combination of military force, marriage alliances between immigrants and ethnic clites, state patronage of earlier local or regional deities, exterminating some contending chiefly lines while offering others high- ranking office, and promoting the migration of Hindus to tribal domains.' As a result of the alliance between Hindu settlers and central ehtes, tnbal lands were turned into state lands or cleared for cultivation. This resulted in increased taxation which accrued to the state treasury. State religion in Nepal was based on the royal lineage's religious practices, and only this lineage was accorded the power to offer patronage and confer state status to the state rituals. This basic notio.n ~as also proved extremely resilient and can be discerned in the contradictIOn (to be debated in a later subsection) between the 1990 Constitution's stress on the one side of a sovereign Hindu monarch and descendants from the Shah lineage's exclusive right to the kingship, and on the other side, a multi-ethnic and religiously diverse state. This contradiction waS sought solved at the supra-structural level by the recently (in April 2006) reinstated House of Representatives, which claimed itself sovereIgn and abolished Hinduism as state religion and cut deeply most of the privileges of the kingship. With the adoption of the Hindu notion of the king as epitomising society and hence the embodiment of his subjects, it was natural that 52 Occasional Papers, Volt 0 TONE BLEIE : The Decades of Voilent Destabilization in Nepal: . 53 sarkar referred both to the government and the king as the embodiment of his subjects. While the more subtle interpretation of the founder warnOr kmg's treatise Divine Teaching (Dibya Upadesh) remains contested, the fact that the founding statement of Nepal as a Hindu kmgdom, a garden of four classes (varnas) and of 36 castes (jats) was even ~ncorporated into the democratic 1990 Constitution is worth reflect111g t¥Jon (see Shanna, 1997)7 As we will see below, the cultural model of the monarchy as Hindu has delivered a main state-defining feature that has proved extremely compelling in Nepalese society. This model, expressed and legitimised in state rituals, remained virtually uncontested until the 1920s when as we wI'11 later s II . . ' ec, some 5ma SOcieties started to question the legitimate basis for the kingship's divi rule and the hierarchical caste order. ne Closely linked to the Shahs' assimilationist and conciliatory strategies 111 relatIOn to tribal religion, they also opted for a policy of selective 111tegration of local lords and nobles and chiefly lines from the heartland mto the state apparatus. The same heartland (the Western and mId-western hills) was to become the core area of Maoist resistance in the late twentieth century. The Consolidated Hindu State: The Rana Era (1846-1951) lung Bahadur of Kunwar asserted himself as a seminal figure in Nepalese political history through the Kot massacre in 1846. Bv means of the famous royal sanad(charter), he managed in 1856 to curt;il the de }aclo authonty of the Shah patrilineage of Succession and established his own patnlmeage (adopting the title of Rana) as the heirs' to the Premlershl~, which were accorded extremely wide powers (see Uprety, 1992.3-4). Rana rule thnved during the next nearly 100 years within the already well-established institution of divine kingship. The king as the sovereign was the supreme dispenser of land and offices amongst others. He was the patron of an extensive pyramid-like ritual exchange network 10 as well as the head of command structures and of direct! IndlreC~ polItIcal.control of remote areas, also exercising dominion over a centralIsed taxatIOn system (based on a particular land tenure re' ).dd' . glme m a ItlOn to monopoly trade. The centre of judicial, legislative and executive powers was the Maharaja and his Council, who appointed and If t commanded the district officers (badahakims). The Ranas centralIsed the bureaucracy even more than during the rule of the Shahs. Even minor appointments needed the Premier's approval. A rule of annual renewal of offices from lower-ranking offices up to Commander-in-Chief ensured a strict upward "accountability system" based on loyalty in exchange for patronage. This principle was matched by a principle of hereditary succession to all major civil and military positions. The state apparatus was thus grounded in a bureaucratic culture defined by a patronage system that mobilised both kinship and caste principles. The official state realm was devoid of the Western distinction between the public and the private. At the very top was the Premier, who after 1856 substituted in persona the erstwhile king as the head of government (sarkar) and thus as the embodiment of all matters of collective interest. In other words, the Ranas ruled and the Shahs reigned. The idea of a harmonious, hierarchical order between ruler and subjects co-existed uneasily with the ruling family's violent intra-family feuds over the right of succession to the position of Premier. Of the ten Rana Premiers, only four died natural deaths while in office. The others were either assassinated or forced to abdicate (see Uprety 1992:5). The hierarchical order was also formalised through the promulgation in 1854 of the first civil code, Muluki Ain. The promulgation of a civil code was inspired by the rulers' exposure to the British Empire's use of codifications. The content of the code represented an ambitious, yet pragmatic effort to superimpose an orthodox Hindu caste structure based on the idea of castes as qualitative species, some slaveable and other unslaveable. Any notion of the individual was subsumed under the concept of the collective as an ascribed category of caste. One outstanding feature of the Code's pragmatic attitude is the middle position conferred to tribal groups, which the Code ranked as pure castes, both subdivided into slaveable and unslaveable. 11 This very substantial reform is an early precursor to political refonns by successive generations of authoritarian rulers in Nepal. Certain formal features are borrowed from Western institutions and political language and wedded with political notions and practices of the Hindu state, regardless of whether these were truly rooted in Nepali society or simply imposed through combining force with more subtle fonns of coercion. 54 Occasional Papers, Volt 0 . The pragmatic alliance with the white, impure masters on India soil allowed the Rana t ' , 0... S 0 pursue a foreign policy of strict isolation. This pol~cy sUited well the central nation-building objective of reinforcing a notIOn of Nepal as a uniq t' I' ,, ue na IOn 0 the ritually pure, In addition th p:hcy --:- whether intentionally or not - practically isolated the elite' an~ t e subjugated multl-ethmc population and lower castes from direct exposure to 200 years of dramatic political upheavals that led eventually~o political a~d ~ndus~nal revolutions in the Western world. l :! The full Impact of thiS IsolatIOnist policy is impossible to 11 'satisfactory h b ... spc out In anyf manner ere, ut the Implications for political imaginations o governance and economic development seem noticeable even until very recently, d IThe end of the Rana period has been characterised by contemporary an atcr commentators as the end of conspiratorial violent politics in Nepal~ B~t the exceptionally unclear circumstances surroundin the~:assmatlOn of the royal couple and their nearest kin in June 20g1 do make It unr~a.sonable to question whether this conclusion is premature, The political culture (institutionalised for more than 150 of Shah a d RI) , , yearsr ~ ,ana ru e with ItS underlying models of the public order of~entra Ise Hmdu state religion, and of loyalty based on patronage ~nd laVOUrltlsm would also pro 'I' th I , fr ve very res] lent against later efforts to refonn e po Ity om above. ~~~:~~~RUCTUREDHINDU STATE IN THE TWENTIETH The Early Post-Rana Period The formal ending of Rana rule in Nepal was due to a a'~~cumstantial constellation of global, regional and domestic c:nd~;~ou~:r , e recruitment of Gurkhas ' ] into the British Indian Army led to ~ simmering political consciousness about the political e' 'NTh G kh ' , , r glme m epal , e ur a s participation in the two World Wars and their st t' , 'm IndIa d' h ' a IOnmgunng t e most decisive years of the Indian N t' "Movement f' a Iona 1St C . .' :vas 0 particular importance for their earliest political onSClentlsatlOn. After the . . .of G kh Y were penSIOned, a not mSlgnificant number dd ' ur as refused, partly on political grounds, to resettle in Nepal In a ItlOn to the ex-Gurkh II ' as, a SOla number of elite intellectuals who ,I I , TONE BLEIE : The Decades 01 Voilent Destabilization in Nepal: .. , 55 stayed in India due to family connections and higher studies were also groomed politically in the Nationalist Movement. They came to form the core of the small anti-Rana groups, The victory of the Liberation Movement in 1947, the subsequent withdrawal of the British and the instalment of the first post-independence government created a new political situation in Nepal. The Ranas were deprived of their old colonial ally and found themselves with a neighbouring government which had every reason to dislike the Ranas, who through the supply of Gurkha soldiers had directly helped the British to maintain their empire, Internal dissent over succession in the rapidly expanding Rana family helped to weaken the Ranas' ability to close the ranks in this new international situation (see Uprety 1992:5), While some anti-Rana activities had already taken place in India in the 1920s and 1930s, J4 the 1940s brought a rapid growth in political activity, which included one assassination attempt. This was discovered. Some of those implicated were punished by execution and thereby became the first martyrs for the democratic cause, In the late 1940s the Nepali National Congress and the Communist Party of Nepal were fanned. When Nepal experienced its first incipient civil disobedience movement, the erstwhile Rana Prime Minister found it necessary to undertake some limited reforms15 so as to cope in the new international situation. These steps generated an internal backlash, leading to the resignation of the Prime Minister (Padma Shamsher) and a ban on the recently formed Nepali Congress Party, To appease the new Indian government, the Ranas let the Indians use Nepalese troops during the Hyderabad and Kashmir crisis and accepted, in 1950, a Treaty on Trade and Commerce and another on Peace and Friendship (see Shaha, 1990b:195), The latter treaty made Nepal an integrated part of India's security policy, The Trade Treaty opened Nepal up for Indian economic interests on very unequal tenns and laid the basis for a growing Indian domination of the Nepalese economy in the 1960s and 1970s, with profound long-tenn consequences for Nepal's subsistence economy and the poverty situation, With the influx of industrial goods like manufac- tured cloth (augmented later in the 1960s by farm implements and household utensils), the artisan and service occupations of Nepal'S numerically large service castes were undermined, Also, the import of Indian food items, such as a large variety of spices and salt (the salt trade 56 Occasional Papers, Vol10 TONE BLEIE : The Decades of Voilent Destabilization in Nepal: 57 with Tibet was made impossible by the Chinese occupation in 1959), altered the viability of particular occupations and economic institutions amongst some of the ethnic groups. Already in 1951, the Communist Party for the first time demanded the drafting of a new constitution by a constituent assembly. This demand was voiced during the following 50 years by a number of communist actors, including the current Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist), which waged a war against the "semi-feudal" state until 2006,16 The actual significance of the Shah royal family in anti-Rana activities in the 1930s, 1940s and in the Ranas' ultimate downfall in 1950 is disputed (see Shrestha, 1984:121; Brown, 1996:14-22), In November 1950, the king and other royal family members sought asylum at the Indian embassy in Kathmandu, The royals were later flown to India, The circumstances surrounding the royal family's flight reveal both India's direct and indirect roles in the ousting of the Ranas' rule. As we will repeatedly observe over the next five decades, India was ambivalent in its strategic postures towards its northern neighbour. The Congress's armed resistance movement, Mukti Sena,17 received only limited support from the Indians, who feared the immediate effects of an unstable northern frontier however much they wanted a more palatable rule in Nepal (Rose 1971), IS Delhi doubted the Congress's capability as a prospective ruling party, and feared the Congress's collaboration with the Nepali Communist Party at the time of the communist takeover in China, Consequently, they went for a carefully guided transition based on a so- called power-sharing arrangement through a coalition government of the Ranas, the kingship and the Congress (see Rose 1971:194), The Delhi Settlement of 1951 was largely fonned by Delhi's pragmatic strategic interest. The Settlement, or Delhi Compromise as it was also called, can only be said to have been a compromise of a cosmetic kind, since the Congress was mostly excluded from the real political negotiations, There was certainly a reshuming of the power- sharing arrangements between the Shah family and the Rana family, Somewhat more political power was yielded to the kingship and the king in persona, whilst the Ranas' dominance within the palace administration and the anny was mostly left intact The consequence of the Delhi Compromise could be seen as highly influential for the political development in Nepal until the present. The autocratic state centred on the institution of kingship was largely left intact The tenn "intact" is purposely used here to underline the fact that the institution of kingship as a form of reign could survive a century of Rana political "foot- binding", The Ranas very cleverly did not interfere with the traditional and effective modes of publicising and exercising kingly authority through patronage of a number of national religious festivals and temple institutions situated both in the capital valley and throughout the rugged countryside (see Bleie and Bhattarai, 2002), After the Delhi Settlement, the Congress's room for manoeuvre to bargain for any real democratisation was severely limited. The regime was, in other v\lords, intact. Only the partly co-opted and inexperienced Congress Party gave the new government an aura of democratic legitimacy, The Delhi Settlement was largely made by Indian actors in New Delhi, some of whom had multiple economic, kinship-based and ideological links to the Shah and Rana contenders, The "compromise" provided new political capital to the king, who could return to Kathmandu in triumph, declaring his commitment to building democracy in Nepal, This Royal Declaration, like later political statements from Congress politicians, was of a rhetorical nature. The composition of the old elite was intact The practice of marriage alliances between the Shahs and the Ranas continued, as did the customary patronage practices of giving positions within the bureaucracy to clients, kinsmen and other allies, Though some of the traditional privileges and power bases of the Ranas and Shahs were undennined or abolished outright, they successfully expanded into new sectors of the Indian and Nepalese economies. 19 The India-groomed Congress, superficially victorious, actually lacked a popular countrywide support base and proved itself incapable of bringing the Kathmandu-based anti-Rana intellectuals into the party echelons (see loshi & Rose, 1966:123-124), The Koirala brothers were in the top leadership, B, P, Koirala wanted a real dismantling of the Rana state, while M, P, Koirala had strong royalist leanings, M, P, Koirala is representative of the great majority of the 1950s generation of leadership which was accultured in India and had internalised the Sanscritic world view of divine kingship and a 58 Occasional Papers, Volt 0 TONE BLEIE : The Decades of Voilent Destabilization in Nepal: 59 hierarchcial social order of rulers and ruled. Neither the palace administration nor the incipient bureaucracy, or any other central social or political institutions, nurtured cultural ideas and practices which could act as catalysts toward a democratic political culture. To be sure, political statements could be heard that carried a new aura of liberal political aspirations. But neglecting to initiate anything akin to modern party- building from grass-roots constituencies, the newly groomed Congress leaders and aspiring leaders resorted to traditional modes of patronage and political decision-making which suited the invigorated kingship very well. The outcome was an empowered king who the Congress hoped would be a balancing agent against disgruntled Rana elements. The king and his courtiers had more ambitious intentions than the Congress hoped, and they succeeded in acquiring considerable power over the indecisive and disunited party. This set of developments led to a series of short-lived governments bent on internal rivalries, unchecked by any popular party-based or electoral accountability. The king appointed M. P. Koirala to the position as Prime Minister twice in 1952/53. Both this and other offices were handed out as gestures of royal benevolence and patronage, not as appointments based on any popular mandate. Benefiting individuals in their turn became empowered and capacitated to dispense their own extended patronage. During this period, the traditional elite fonned their own pressure groups. The Communist Party was banned in 1955. The party continued underground to influence some permitted civil rights organisations and, more importantly, it started to build a cadre base in some parts of the western and eastern hills. In these western hills (Pyuthan, Rolpa and Rukum), the Maoist insurgency would start about five decades later. Already in those early years of party-building, the communists were ideologically divided over the role of the monarchy in Nepal (Brown, 1996:27). As the king expanded his power base and the array of short-lived governments provoked disillusionment with so-called democracy, the king abandoned his promise of a constituent assembly and in 1954 proclaimed that supreme power was to be vested with the kingship (see Shaha, 1990:303-305). These moves between 1951 and 1953 have certain parallels with the 1991-1999 period (see discussion below). The 1955 successor to the throne, King Mahendra, was bent on consolidating monarchical absolutism. The elections promoted earlier were postponed and the administration reorganised to facilitate the ambitious monarch's direct control and patronage.20 During the post-Rana period, novel avenues for political careers opened up. The new build-up of bureaucratic institutions, also aided by the influx of development funds, resulted in an increase in both political and bureaucratic offices. 21 This led to new opportunistic competition for offices and influence. Also during this period, Indian influence and to some degree outright interference in domestic affairs continued and inevitably provoked growing anti-Indian sentiment. To provide a thin fal'ade of democratisation, the ban on the Communist Party was lifted in 1956. This lifting paved the way for a joint campaign with the Congress for elections. After years of internal scrambles, the Congress managed in 1956 to consolidate a socialist platfonn. Despite the parties' successful pressure for an election, they were not able to stop the king from promulgating a new constitution directly and dishonouring the demand for a constituent assembly. The new 1959 Constitution vested all juridical and executive power in the king. Nevertheless, the appointment of the experienced B. P. Koirala on the basis of the 1959 elections led to a brief period of incipient democratisation under Koirala's unifying leadership. The Aborted Democratisation under B. P. Koirala B. P. Koirala's appointment was a pragmatic compromise, but the palace's cool reception shifted to staunch resistance when the king felt threatened by the emerging prospect of new, Western (democratic) accountability structures based on an elected parliament. During this phase, the communists (who took a strong pro-Chinese stand) led a fairly effective opposition in the parliament (see Brown, 1996:34). The B. P. Koirala government, with its recently adopted socialist programme, started promoting the concept of an interventionist state which should deliver basic services, run economic enterprises and uphold an independent judiciary. This new programme led to certain land refonns and to an early effort to institute an independent judiciary. The Koirala 60 Occasional Papers, Vol10 TONE BLEIE . The Decades 01 VOIten! Deslabilizallon 'In Nepal 61 government mostly succeeded in the precarious balancing act of maintaining fairly good Indo-Nepali and Sino-Nepali relations." The not insignificant gains of the B. P. Koirala government during its early period gave Koirala a growing popularity and authority. The government' 5 early effort to institutionalise a more independent bureaucracy threatened to marginalise the palace-based administration and the traditional patronage-based politics (See loshi and Rose, 1966:386; Rose and Scholz, 1989:48). In December 1960, the Prime Minister and his cabinet were arrested. The constitution was suspended and direct palace-based rule instituted. The conspicuous lack of public resistance from the smaller parties, the traditional elite and the upper echelons of the bureaucracy against the royal ousting of an elected government shows just how profoundly the patronage-based political culture permeated these public institutions. Also importantly, the international community did not strongly condemn King Mahendra's move. The ousting of the government and the ban on the party led Congress members to start a resistance movement in India. This movement could not muster enough support for conducting raids on Nepal's soil that would represent any real military challenge to the regime. The Indian endorsement of the insurgent activities on their side of the border was soon withdrawn, on account of the Sino-Indian border conflict in particular, which altered Himalayan geopolitics. During the 1950s and the first years of the 1960s, the monarchy quite effectively managed to manipulate and contain the incipient seeds of democratic transition. With some level of credibility, the king could denounce parliamentary democracy as a foreign import. Instead, the monarch announced the establishment of the four-tiered Panchayat system (underpinned by a new constitution), which he claimed would be based on Nepalese political culture. 23 In addition, the regime - inspired both by Maoist ideology and by the Nepalese notion of unity in the public order - instituted class organisations (bargiya sangatban) for fanners, women, youth and fonner servicemen. These organisations were seen as representing private interest groups which were entitled to nominate some representatives to the National Assembly.24 Other private interest organisations needed government approval to enter public space or were banned altogether (i.e., the communists) from the same space. As Burghart (1994: 1-14) has pinpointed, the 1962 Constitution contains a striking contradiction. On the one hand, it was to constitute political relations between the king and his people in harmony with the traditional order. On the other hand, the constitution was a modem legal means by which a remoulded political culture was to be created. The Panchayat system represented certain novel organisational forms (such as the class-based organisations"), but tapped into and expanded local and supra-local traditional forms of political authority favouring men from the highest castes. Local and central public arenas revolved around chains of chiefly and royal authority. The Rana-instituted governance practice of mobile official tours (daudaha) was revived. The monarch held annual audiences (darshan) in the zonal and district centres and accepted salami, the ritual offering (similar to the offering of gifts to deities in temples) of a coin to the royal authority in appreciation for being appointed to a public offlce.26 The practice of pajani, the annual renewal of offices, was also given new emphasis by the royal authority. These public practices were also expressive of the royals' full control over any legitimate expression of public service.:'.7 All these engagements were guided by a notion of public order defined through unity, ultimately vested in the institution of kingship. This notion was different from the Western notion of public order as a negotiating space for diverse, partly conflicting, partly converging personal interests. Thus, in Nepal dissent and conflict were by and large not pennitted. Nation-building efforts (desa banaune) during the Panchayat years showed how contested and incomplete the project was. A language policy issue such as the role of regional languages in education and mass communication was highly contested already in the 1950s. This and other language issues reappeared soon in political debate. In 1962, Nepali was made the sole medium of instruction in all state schools, and broadcasts in Hindi and Newari were t-55. B1eie, Tone et a1. 2002. A Rights-based Approach to (Nonvcgian) Development Assistance. Commissioned Report to the Royal Norwegian Ministry for Foreign Affairs (Bergen: Chr. Michclsen Institute). l3Ieie, Tone, Bhattaehan, Krishna and Bhattarai, Lok. From Himmclbjerget til Himalaya: MS in Nepal, available at: http//:ww\v.danida.dk.evaluations- disc. 104 Occasional Pape~, Vol10 Borrc. 0., Panday, S. R. and Ti .....ari. R. 1991. "The Nepalese Election of 1991". Electoral Sludies. Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 356-362. Brown. T. Louise. 1996. The Challenge to Democracy in Nepal (London:RoutIOOgc). Burghart, Richard 1994. -The Political Culture of Pancha)at Democracy". in Michael HUll (00.), Nepal in the Nineties: Versions of the Past, Visions oflilc Future (Delhi: Oxford Uni\'ersit)· Press). pp. 1-14. Dahal, De\' Raj. 2001. Civil Society in Nepal: Opening lhe Ground for Questions(Kathmandu: Centre for De\'elopment and Go\·emance). de Sales. Anne 2000. "The Kam Magar Country, Nepal: Between Ethnic Claims and Maoism", European Bulktin ofllimalayan Research, No. 19, pp. 41-71. Hayes. Louis D. 1975. "The Monarchy and Modernisation in Nepal". AsianSurvey, Vol. 15, No. 9, pp. 616-628. HMG(N) (His Majesty's Government of Nepal), 1991. House of Representati\'eMembers' EIC(:tion - 2048: Final Results (Kathrnandu: ElectionCommission). HMG(N) (Ilis Majesl)'s Go\ernrnent of Nepal), 1990. 1bc Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal 2047 (1990) (Kathmandu: Minisuy of Law and Justice and ParlianlC11!ary 1\ ffaiTS). flofer, Andras. 1979. The Caste Hierarchy and the State in Nepal: A Study ofthcMuluki Ain of 1954 (Innsbruck: Universitfits\'eflag Wagencr). http://www.kantipur.online.comlphplkolnc:ws.phs&nid.22 Janu3r)' 2004. hltp.1fwww.nepalnews.com/archivel2006lno\.fnov08IFull_text_summ it_meeting.php Huu, Michael 1994. "The Drafting of lIle 1990 Constitution", in Michael Hun(00.), Nepal in the Nineties (Delhi: Oxford University Press), pp. 28-48. Inden, Ronald. 1990. Imagining India (Oxford: Basil Blac\..."Vo'ell). INSEC (Infonnal Sector Scrvice Centre) aI: httpJfW\\w.insec.org.n(l'killings-'data, 14 February 2004. INSEC (Informal Sector Service Centre).Human Rights Yearbook 2002 and 2003(Kathmandu: Informal Sector SCT\ice Centre). Joshi, B. L. and Rose, Leo E. 1966. Democratic Innovations in Nepal: A CaseStudy of Political Acculturalion (Berkelcy: Uni\ersity ofCalifomia Press). Kumar, Dhruba. 2001. Social StruClurc and Voting Beha\iOlU in Nepal(unpublished report), (Kathmandu: Nepal Centre for Contemporary Studies. Maddex, Robert L. 1996. The l1Iustrated Dictionary of Constitutional Concepts(London: Routledge). TONE BLElE : The Decades of Voilenl Destabilizatioo in Nepal:... 105 Pandey. D. R. 1989. "Administrative De\'elopment in a Semi-Dependency: The Experience of Nepal", Public Administration and Development. Vol. 9. No. 3, pp. 315-329. Parmanand, 1982. Nepali Congress Since its Inception: A Critical Assessment(New Delhi: B. R. Publishing). Pfaff-Czamecka, Joanna. 1993. "The Nepalese Durga Puja Festival or Displa}'i~g Military Supremacy on Ritual Occasions", in Charles Ramble and M~m Brauen (eds.), Anthropology of Tibet and the Himalayas (lunch: Ethnological Museum), pp. 270-286. Racper. William nod Hoftun, Martin. 1992. ~pri~g. A"akening: An Account of the 1990 Revolution in Nepal (New DelhI: Vlklng). Riedinger, JefTrcy. 1989. "Prospects of Land Reform in Nepal'·. South Asia Bulletin. No. I J. Rose, Leo E. and Scholz, 1. T. 1989. Nepal: Profile of a Himalayan Kingdom(Boulder, Colorado: Westview). Rose, Leo E. 1971. Nepal: Strategy for Survival (Berkeley: University of California). SAHRDEC's (Soulll Asia Human Rights Documentation ~entre). 1996.Midnight Knocks and Extra-Judicial Killings in Nepal (avallablc at: httplJ www. hri.caJ partncrs!sahrdecJenapVfulltlcxt). Shaha, Rishikesh. 199Oa. Modem Nepal: A Political History 1769-1955, Vol. 2(New Delhi: Manohar). Shaha, Rishikesh, 199Gb. Politics in epa1198.o-1990: Referendum, Stalemate and Triumph ofPcople's Power (New DelhI: Manohar). Sharma. Prayag Raj 1997. "Nation-Building, Multi-Ethnicity, and the lIinduState", in David Gellner,l00nna PfalT-Czarnecka and John Whelpton (eds.), Nationalism and Ethnicity in a Hindu Kingdom (Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers), pp. 471--494. Shore Chris and Wrighl, SUS3ll, 2001. "Policy: A New Field of Anthropology",i~ Chris Shore and Susan Wrighl (eds.) Critical Perspceti\'es on Governance and Power (London and New York: Roudedge) pp. 3-39, Shrestha. K. 1984. Monarchy in Nepal. Tribhuvan Era: Imprisonment to Glory(Bombay: Popular Prakashan). Shrestha, N. R. and Conway. D. 1985. "Issues of Population Pressure: ~dResettlement and Development: 1be Case of Nepal-, StudIes III Comparative International Development, Vol. 20, No. I, pp. 55-82. Thapa, Deepak and Sijapati, Bandita 2003. A Kingdom. Under Siege: Nepal's Maoist Insurgency, 1996-2003 (Kathmandu: The Prmthouse). The Independent, 13~19 December 1995. 106 Occasional Papers, Vol10 Uprety, Prem. R. 1992. Political Awakening in Nepal (New Delhi: Commonwealth Puhlishers). Word Bank, 1991. Nepal: Poverty and Incomes (Washington DC: The World Bank), pp. 3-4. World Bank, Nepal: Policies for Improving Growth and Alleviating Poverty Report No. 7418-NEP (Washington DC: The World Bank, 1988). ' World Bank, 1990. ~ep~l: Relieving Poverty in a Resource-Scarce Economy, Report No. 8630-NEP, Vol. I (Washington DC: The World Bank). Zaman..M. ~. 1992. Evaluation of the Land Reform in Nepal (Madras: Oxford Ul1lverslty Press) BORDER TOWN IN THE TARAI: SITES OF MIGRATION I Sondra L. Hausner This paper relates the dynamics of three border towns, focusing on Nepal's southern Tarai as a belt of migration. This paper focuses on the contemporary geopolitical reality of the Tarai as a place in which both hill migrants congregate and through which migrants leave Nepal and travel to the Indian plains, in search of work, safety, and opportunity. The theoretical aspects of the paper touch on the questions of voluntary versus forced migration, and also, analogously or not, voluntary versus forced prostitution (De La Costa and Alexander 1993, Doezma 1998). It is grounded in a critique of the rhetoric of trafficking as the sole measure through which the development industry - both international and national _ views the movement of women across the Nepal-India border (Fujikura 200 I, O'Neill 200 I), and opts rather to focus on the labor conditions of voluntary sex workers in Tarai migrant towns. Prostitution in border towns is a global reality - border crossings in the Tarai are no exception _ and our reflections on this region of Nepal must include ways to ensure the proper treatment of sex workers. Each Tarai border crossing poses a particular set of geographic, cultural, and political realities, with various histories ~ certain routes are more plied than others at different moments in time, which reflect variable labor and market economies in India (Rankin 2004) and, in more recent history, the Gulf, where an estimated half a million Nepali migrant wage laborers live and work (Seddon et. al 1998, Seddon 2005), almost all men.' Women who migrate are by no means ail victims of trafficking rings (Frederick 1998, Hausner 2005), but those who are trafficked are nonetheless among those who migrate. As far as we know, trafficking destinations are not usually large towns on the border. But active sending 108 Occasional Papers, Voll0 routes change over time (Lieehty 2001), and will determine \vhether a particular border area is a place where high numbers of traffickers cross into India. Junctures with direct lines to railway stations to Mumbai, for example, are long-standing routes of established trafficking networks; others pose fairly' llC\V markets. In the years at the height of conflict in Nepal, at the beginning orthe millennium, violence bct\vecn Maoist cadres and the Royal Nepal Army was worst in the Mid- and Far-Western Development Regions of Nepal, and this too affected the changing rates of migrant outflow at different border points. Many more young men were choosing to become Jahor migrants to India as an explicit alternative to joining the Maoists in \vestern Nepal than in eastern Nepal..! When my team conducted our field\vork, in 2004, the number of migrants leaving Nepal through each border town that \VC looked at increased as \ve moved farther west, where the roots of conflict were coming to fruition (de Sales 2000, Friedman 2005) and where, at that time, the intensity of conflict between Maoist insurgents and Royal Nepal Army security forces was strongest (Lama- Tamang et. al 2003). Nepal's Tarai: 3 Sites of Migration The paper is not about the Tarai as a singular location but as a border area and place of active migration to India, as \\'ell as a destination itself, for III igrants from other parts of Nepal. Understanding the Tarai in contemporary geopolitical terms means acknowledging its role, among others, as a series of points of exit and entrance, and therefore as a region of transience (Adhikari 2006). What I want to do is bring to light thc realities of people's migratory choices at a pivotal moment in their lives, through the lens of the locations in which they occur I am particularly interested in the question of women's experiences of migration; my research team elicited this information through ethnographic research in three Tarai bordertowns: Kakarvitta, Jhapa district, on Nepal's eastern border; Bhairawa, Rupandehi district, on Nepal's southern border, and Nepalganj, Banke district, also on Nepal's southern border, about 300 kiJometcrs further west." SONDRA L. HAUSNER Border Town in The Taral: Sites of Migration 109 memhcrs, \\'ho likely observed many comings and goings of women and their companions, and \vere \vell aware of the realities of migration and prostitution. Our methods \\'ere open-ended, informant-guided, ethnographic conversations. The research \vas not based on pre- formulated questionnaires or conducted in focus groups, but rather took the form of informal exchanges with migrants as they passed through the national border. The border bet\\'een Nepal and India is a porous one: many' more crossing points exist than are formally policed or patrolled, and these movcments are legal. The Tarai region is a place of old migration: most border town settlers are themselves people \vho migrated from the hills three to four decades ago, in the 1960, and 1970, (Thapa 1989. von dcr 'Icide and Hoffinan 200 I). Vole must not thinK of III igration through the rarai as a recent phenomenon (although it has cel1ainly increased in recent years), nor of migrants as a new Kind of population. These are questions that must rather be fitted into a longer histo!)' of regional labor migration, and a larger view of state relations bet\veen Nepal and [ndia, and also of COl11l11unal identity (Hutt 1997). In what fo]]cw,..s, I discuss the three sites of border research, in turn, giving snapshots of each, focusing on the dynamics of migration, and particularly on the realities of border town prostitution. I end with a number of policy recommendations, emphasizing (i) the importance of educating women on processes of ·'safe migration" so that they may more productively and securely' move to and through border towns: (ii) the need to establish refiJges or rest homes for \vomen who have been abused, tratlicked, or thrown out of their communities, and the potential usefulness of existing border patrol facilities for this purpose; and (iii) the need to ensure that border town sex workers arc protected, not demeaned, b)/ armed forces. The easy equation that prostitutes need not be treated well - they sell sex, after all -- means that the greatest difficulties for sex workers may come from members of those institutions that are paid to protect women and communities more broadly: the police force, the anny, the insurgents. i. Kakarbhitta-Siliguri The research was predominantly conducted with women crossing the border, but \ve also interviewed border guards and local community The Kakarbhitta-Siliguri harder Darjeeling, Sikkim, Shillong, and falls on an old trade Calcutta. Migration route to bet\veen 110 Occasional Papers, Vol10 Kathmandu and these parts of eastem India - and the kind of town such movements give rise to - is a well-known story here. One hotcl owner told us, "You see, Kakarbhitta is a place of migrants. Fifteen years ago, people from Meghalaya and Assam started coming and settling down here. Here you find all castes and kinds of people.'" This is a common talc in Tarai border lawns, and we see how it has become part of residents' identity as \vell. Most of the women traveling from Kakarbhitta through the border to India were not migrating but shopping, because goods are cheaper in India, Although border tratTic is steady, migration did not appear heavy across this border at the time we did research there, in November 2004. Most women who were travcling through the border and not returning with goods were returning to their cross-border marital homes after the Dashain and Tihar festivals, usually with children, sisters, sisters-in-law, husbands, or brothers in tow. Very few Kakarbhitta informants were leaving Nepal for India for good, or for the first time. Migration through this border did not seem to have been particularly affected by conflict; at the time the research was conducted, Nepal's eastern areas were less affected by violence and forced recruitment than western regions, and this likely accounts for less out-migration through Kakarbhitta. Migrant flow was much heavier through the southern border 'points that lead to the vast plains of India. Many commercial workers cross the Kakarbhitta - Siliguri border daily in pursuit of work that comes when a large, mobile population needs to be catered to: people shopping for cosmetics and trinkets to sell in small shops and market places; merchants shopping for vegetables and foodstuffs that could be cooked and sold in transitory chai-shops; and women crossing the border - in both directions - to do household chores in hotels and restaurants, and to sell sex to migrant workers, truck and bus drivers, local residents, and travelers temporarily freed from small- town scrutiny. Bengali women come to Nepal, and Nepali women go to Siliguri. Local hotel owners told us that women would cross the border for the day, servicing clients, and return home in the evenings. What came out very clearly over the course of this research is the vast difference between trafficking across a border - the assessment of which was the original inspiration for the study we conducted - and SONDRA L. HAUSNER . Border Town in The Tara; Sites of Migration 111 street-based or brothel-based prostitution in a border town. Kakarbhitta is a Maiti Nepal border post because of it falls on the route to Calcutta, where the brothel industry relies on powerful networks that traffic Nepali women (Frederick and Tamang 2005). The prostitution that takes place in Kakarbhitta town itself, however, appears not to rely on trat1lcking networks at all, but rather on women choosing to participate in a voluntary market for sex. This is a critical difference - that of consent - and succinctly demonstrates how viewing women's migration exclusively through the lens of trat1lcking both inhibits women's freedom of movement across an open border, and fails to ensure that public health provisions and social protections arc provided to border town sex workers in their proper context. Because it is an old, well-plied border crossing between two poor regions (eastern Nepal and the plains of West Bengal), Kakarbhitta has something of a reputation as a brothel town. The hotel owner where we stayed told us, "There is a lot of prostitution in this town although people are slightly cautious these days. It is not as open as it used to be. But what I have heard is that a recent trend is developing: village children - school children 14 or 15 years of age - also engage in sex work. See, the hotels have to pay rent. Look at my hotel - it has been mentioned in the Lonely Planet; it is more expensive than the other hotels and most foreigners come and stay here but still I find it difficult to pay the rent sometimes. How do the other hotels manage? They have to have some side business". Another informant told us, "According to police station data, there are 300 hotels in Kakarbhitta. Let's say 50 are clean: all the rest are involved in prostitution. There are hotels that do not cook any food; the hotel is just a fal'ade for canrying on sex work." When asked about migrants who come to work in the hotels, she replied, "What help do they need in the kitchen when no food is being cooked" What to do, sister; it has reached a point where we sometimes feel ashamed to say we are from Kakarbhitta." Following a series of raids, the local Hotel Association had recently circulated a petition condemning prostitution as a practice in their establish-ments. A cabin restaurant visited by our research team was completely empty, possibly as a result of the recent raids. Prostitution is 112 Occasional Papers, VollO a cOTl\/cnicnt issue all \\'hich both police and Maobadi want to "crack dO\vl1," citing sex \vork as a social ill: while five women caught \vith men in hotels were being held as prostitutes at the border police station at the time \ve were there, the Maoists had recently' cut the hair off a prominent local madam. h. Bhmra!lult'u-,)'unauh At the Bhairah,l\va border, as in Kakarbhitta, many local residents travel back and forth to India daily for purchasing goods. The number of people especially men-migrating to India for \"'ork through the Bhairahaw'-l borckr is extremely high, however: border patrols estimated that as Illany as 1000 people cross the border to India Jailv morc than hal f of \vhum are labar III igrants. Moving \\i'estward thrOL;g'h our three border points, the difference in labor migration between Kakarbhitta and Bhairahawa was remarkable. Our I3hairahmva rescarchcr estimated that most migrants were mcn bct\vcctl the ages of 18 to 30, migrating in a group of 5 to 15. Many had come to visit relatives over the holiday' and \v'ere returning to India to work. About half of the men (but many' fewer \vomen) identified conflict - particularly' the demands or the Maoists - as the primary reason thev had moved or were mov'ing to India, The other half identifIed economi~ reasons as their primary motivation: they told us that "no matter hO\v hard they \vorked in the fIelds, it was not enough for their families to eat t\\/O meals a day." \\/h3t is clear is that the political and economic sides of the coin are not far removed from one another: political instability causes economic devolution, and economic devolution causes politic~l instability. People experience the combination of events; how they report them depends on how palpably they feel the effect of each, and on how much they trust us, the questioners. The girls and women migrating through the Bhairahawa border, mostly from the surrounding districts Gulmi, Palpa, and Arghakanchi, were vel)' uneducated. Few had been to school or could read or write' those who had gone to school had dropped out at class five, A Jew girl; knew how to use the telephone. Our researcher found that they did not knO\v anything about their destinations. Five girls did not know the names of their o\\'n villages. or the name of the places they were headed in India. None had the contact addresses of their destinations, nor did SONDRA L. HAUSNER Border Town in The Taral: Sites of Migration 113 they have any money on them. Women who \vere going to visit their husbands did not knO\v \vhat kind of jobs their husbands were doing in India. These women \vere entirely reliant on male family and village members, with no resources, address contacts, or information. They had no idea how to go about making contact with prospective employers, relatives at home, or institutions that could help or protect them if things go wrong, like the police, the Nepali Embassy, or a transit home, Many said that \vhether they worked or not how long they stayed in India, whether they would be able to study, and whether and when they would return to their home villages were decisions their husbands alone would make. Almost all the girls and women we spoke to said they trusted their hlmilies, and although a fev\' first-time travelcrs said they' were scared, most told us that they felt no fear as long as they \"'ere with their companions, "When I'm traveling with my O\vn brother-in-law, why should I be nervous?" one young woman who did not know the name of her home district asked. A woman from Gulmi said she did not feel scared to migrate as her "husband had not left her for a second." Others confessed their fears~ one \voman moving to Lucknow to be with a new husband said she was scared to move to a big city, but as her husband lived in Lucknow, she had to live with him whether she liked it or not. Many women we spoke to stated their confidence in husbands they had not met in years. This reflects a deep cultural value in Nepal - not limited to the Tarai - that women should look up to and place faith in men, ard shows how encouraging women's independence may be a critical part of preventing trafficking and assuring safe migration. The essence of successful anti-trafficking programming lies in teaching girls to believe they have some role to play in their travels, in learning their geographies, and in questioning the circumstances of their movements, even if this means taking on responsibilities that men nonnally bear. A number of women said they were enjoying their trips, and were excited to cross the border, viewing their migration as an opportunity to be in a new setting. "Safe migration" means that women should be encouraged to watch what their companions are doing, and how they handle the exigencies of travel, rather than stand passively by. In this way, women might gain experience and independence, rather than 114 Occasional Papers, Vol10 remain reliant. This is a matter of gaining confidence, in part, as well as experience, so that travel, short- or long-tenn migration, and labor can all fall more easily under women's O\vn purview. iii. l'v'cpalganj - Rupedzva The most heavily-plied border town of our research period was undeniably Nepalganj. Upon arriving in Nepalganj, one member of my research team reported, "It looks like all of Nepal is emptying out of Nepalganj I" Bus station officials told us that they had added extra buses to accommodate the extra flow: 60 30-person buses - around 1800 people - were leaving from the government bus station daily. (Recall that our research period was just after the Tihar holidays, when numbers of migrants were particularly high.) Even with post-holiday traffic, however, this figure indicates an extremely high level of migration to India through Nepalganj. As in Bhairahawa, a relatively small percentage of migrants (our researcher estimated 5~lO%) were \vomen and girls, almost all of whom were traveling with male family members to meet their husbands or brothers. Conflict had clearly impacted many infonnants" lives, but in most cases they did not identify violence as the main reason for migration, although many said the situation \vas complicated and uncertain 6 As in Kakarbhitta and Bhairahawa, labor migration through this Tarai border point is a long-standing phenomenon; too few employment opportunities and too little land are problems that preceded the conflict, and indeed gave rise to it. Almost everybody hoped they would be able to return to Nepal at some point in the future, and even appeared mournful at the thought of not being able to. The population of Nepalganj itself has certainly increased in recent years, because of conflict. If migrants to India more often cited economic reasons as their primary motivation for moving, migrants newly resettled in Nepalganj more often cited the conflict itself (although these two motivations should not be viewed as entirely separable entities). Women migrants to Nepalganj told us quite explicitly that they had had to leave home because Maoists had demanded too much food and money. Families migrating to the city ofNepalganj are likely more wealthy, and from higher castes, than those crossing the border from Nepalganj into India for work, who largely come from very poor families (Hausner SONORA L. HAUSNER: Border Town in The Tarai: Sites 01 Migration 115 2006); most told us they did not have enough cultivable land to feed the family for the year. More wealth means that a family is first, more heavily targeted by Maoists, but also more able to reestablish itself in a new city, with the upfront economic investment that requires. Nepalganj has also been concentrated somewhat, as people from outlying areas have moved in~ surrounding districts were no longer considered safe. A woman who had moved from Bardiya, a half-hour away, said that Maoists had not allowed her and her husband (who had since migrated to Saudi Arabia, \vhich had increased Maoist demands for money) to run their small Mallt, or liquor shop.' In Nepalganj, she said, opportunities were higher. She herself had become a sex worker: "After all," she told us, "a bazaar is a bazaar. We can eam money here somehow." Quite a number of recent women migrants to Nepalganj were family members of men who had migrated to the Arab States; some had found work as prostitutes. As in other border cities, prostitution in Nepalganj is quite high - it is a border town, an army base, and an increasingly populated urban center of refuge from the conflict-ridden western and far western regions of the country. About half of the roughly ISO sex workers in the local prostitutes' support organization were recent migrants. One sex worker complained to us, actually, that the increasing number of sex workers meant that local rates of services were going down - what used to cost Rs. 500-1000 now cost a tenth of that sum, or Rs. 50-lOO. Nepalganj sex workers work out of small tea and liquor shops, as well as little paan stalls, where they meet and solicit customers: many of whom are Indian men crossing the border expressly to find Nepali women. Indeed, Indian men seem to be willing to pay more for a Nepali woman, and were therefore the preferred clients of the Nepalganj prostitutes we spoke to. A number of sex workers we spoke with had been abandoned by husbands or had been widowed; others were married to men who didn't earn enough (rickshaw drivers, for example, who earned Rs. 80- J00 per day), and who might turn a blind eye to their wives' source of supplemental income. Many came from abusive family backgrounds. A small number of more educated women said they were sex workers because it was fun, a kind of entertainment. Most said they would never encourage women to work in the profession; one woman said that when 116 Occasional Papers, Vol10 she met new sex \vorkers, she suggested they leave as quickly as possible. All the sex \\'orkcrs ""'jth \vhom w'e spoke were looking tor alternative sources of income generation: most wanted to open a shop or start a small business. Although there is a long history of prostitution in the area (including Badi women), police and other public offices have clamped down on prostitution in the last few years. Police had raided the major hotels and restaurants a few months hcforc our research, and most hotels in the area had since refused to hire nc\v \vomen employees. Sex workers told us that the RNA and police \vcrc their main clients, however. as well as their main adversaries.8 Even though hotels \\"ould not publicly hire women employees in November 2004, a client could still bring a prostitute to his room, Not hiring \vomen is a policy that clearly discriminates against \vomcn laborcrs because of t~1lse assumptions that all women migrants are prostitutes: such a policy means, of course. that more \vomen \vill become prostitutes, because there are fev..'er labor options. Ultimately, the refusal to hire women so as to avoid public scrutiny most severely affects women migrants, the very people such public scrutiny intends to protect. Policy and Programming: A Fe"" Recommendations In the rhetoric of the development industry, \vomen's experiences are largely cast in terms of the need for protection from sexual predators:9 protect girls from trafficking (even if it means prohibiting migration); save \vomen from prostitution (even if it is engaged in voluntarily as a viable means of income), In this article, I too call for ways to ensure the safety of· or to protect - migrating women and girls, but without, I hope, the patriarchal or patronizing mechanisms that assume that women are not in control of their own movement, or their own sexuality, Rather, I wish to insert these realities ofwomen's lives -- moving with or without family members to find work; opting to migrate to a town where new economic opportunities might open up; choosing to become a sex worker in order to make enough money to live - into our view of Tarai border towns. Acknowledging these arenas of women's agency ~ and these aspects of life in the Tarai - is onc \vay programmers and policy makers can help ensure women are socially protected, not in the sense of being SONDRA L. HAUSNER Border Town ,n The Tarai Sites of Migration 117 til!htlv restricted in their movements or behav'iors, but rather i~ thc,sens,c l11- b~ing free from harassment and judgment on the baSIS ot theIr SC:\ll~llity. I, Establish education ccnters at borders: retrain border auards as safe migration educators, not interceptors. M Women we spoke in regions all over Nepal -- migrants and prostitutes, educated and uneducated -- hoped m.ost fervently for L'ducation for their daughters, arguing that the 1I1dependellce and KlH1\\'lcdge brought about with higher levels of education is the best social protection possible. The poor le\'t~ls of education among women and !2irls crossing the border mean that they arc entirely' dependent on thcir~malc cOlllra~lions,and often unable to muster resources of any' kind should trouble arise. Improving national levels of education for girls - and cducati!l!! women and girls on the means and modes of migration specifically ~ \vould mean that they' \vould be morc prepared for their journeys. and their destinations. A llumber of organizations. most prominently Maiti Nepal, have trained \VOll1cn border guards to be on the lookout for cases of potential trafficking. This training and placement can be very' useful to preventing tr3ffickin~, but not quite in thL \,,'ay' it is now operating. Fig~ting trafficking \.... ill not happen effectively at borders, because there is no \vay to know whether, in anv onc case, a patroller is effectively stopping a IrafTicker or inhibiting aWmigrant womi.lIl's mobility. Stories of policemen and "..'omen taking bribes so as not to raid certain border town hotels (or not to stop cel1ain people going through the border) are rampant. in Bhairahawa. onc policewoman \vas accused of sending girls to India for money herself. And in large part because Maiti Nepal's advocacy efforts have been so successful, traffickers knov,' they must go through "chor halO" _ thief roads - \vhen they are actually smuggling girls to India, As a Kakarbhitta custOlllS officer told us. "Frankly speaking, there is a great deal of smuggling going on - both goods and people - but not through this route. They go through "chor-batos" - through the jungle or border villages. NO\v that the river is dry', they cross the border by walking through the riverbed." Rather than act as investigators and police, border guards from women's organizations likL Maiti Nepal. Saathi, and ABC Nepal should 118 Occasional Papers, ValID act as educators and information brokers. Girls need to know how to check offers of potential employment or marriage, and become accustomed to the idea of acting independently. Education about how to migrate satCly, such as how to keep records of contact addresses which can be shown to someone for help; the importance of having onc's own money; and learning about borders, travel routes, and names of places, could be very helpful. A Bardiya woman \\lorking in a Nepalganj hotel did not know how much her salary was, as her brother collected it for her. The importance of teaching girls how to control their own money _ and indeed that this might be a value at all- cannot be overstated. Education materials forming the basis of a safe migration curriculum should be incorporated into girls' and \vomen's empowerment efforts in both home villages and urban centers (SCN and S.A. 1996), as well as in border areas. As one long-tenn advocate of the issue told us, the best results come from programs that encourage girls to "check it out. An offer of marriage? Check it out. An offer of employment" Check it out. Who are these people? Where do they want to take you?" l1y encouraging scrutiny, critical thinking, and independence, girls will feel more resourceful and empowered, and be better able to protect themselves. 2. Establish safe havens for migrating women and girls: support transit homes in border towns and resource centers in destination cities. A. Support transit homes Currently, transit homes havc been established to accommodate those girls intercepted at the border, who must wait for parents or guardians to pick them up and escort them home or to a legitimate destination. But large, well-run, and well-funded transit homes can accommodate many morc girls than are stopped at the border. In some cases - certainly the Kakarbhitta transit homes - local communities have taken over the homes for a much better purpose: places of refuge for runaway girls, usually from domestic violence from either husbands or parents-in-law. None of the three girls at the Kakarbhitta transit home, for example, had been fonnally intercepted, and none had been engaged in prostitution. SONDRA L. HAUSNER Border Town in The Tarai Sites at Migration 119 These transit homes are clearly useful. but they would he more useful still if they publicly acknowledged that their primary purpose was to serve as a refuge for women who need or want to leave their domestlc situations. A\\'areness about the broad uses of a transit .h?me would also help the girls who live there, who said no one came to VISit them: perhaps out of a stigma that all the girls and women affiliated with Maltl Nepal were prostitutes or had H[V or AIDS. The communal support available in transit homes, especially with a well-trained and dedicated statf, IS an important way to ensure productive counseling, rehabilitation, a~d remte- gration efforts of all kinds; these are successes that should be built upon. E. Estahlish migrant resource centers A number of informants told us that we[l-established and well- blicized "contact points" in Indian cities could be very useful for~ .,~ migrating women, and a transit home H'rit large 1I1 al~ urban center mlg \vell serve this purpose. One programming suggestion that has not yet been acted upon but which holds great promise is the establishment of Migrant Resource Centers, which could provide legal, educational, and refuge facilities for migrants from all areas in major urban Cities. These nters with phones and message boards, could serve as the "contact::int"~ for both families wanting assurance of a dau~hter's s~fe migration and possible employers - desired by so many migrants wIth 10 whom we spoke. From a donor perspective, a migrant resource center is very efficient, as migrants from all countries and in all circumstan~cs can be catered to under a single administrative structure. Women from many different areas of the subcontinent working in neighboring brothel areas would also be able to convey infol111ation to one another about how to get assistance that is not limited to women fro~.a part!~ular country. An ideal model might be transit homes in subSidiary cities and resource centers in large cities, although they would in the end perhaps serve very similar roles. 3. Ensure protective mechanisms for p.rostitut~s,.. ~nd encourage viable alternative income generation pOSSibilities. Mechanisms to protect prostitutes rather than penalize them would be quickly felt. Those NGOs that provide vocational training and 120 Occasional Papers, Vol 10 rehabilitation arc greatly ENDNOTES I. For a more extensive version of this paper. describing and analyzing civic service and youth volunteer movements in South Asia, with the Nepal NOS case study, see Yadama & Messcrschmidt 2004. 2. Don Messerschmidt is an applied anthropologist, consultant, researcher, writer (and former American Peace Corps Volunteer). He has authored several dozen articles, many reports and several books on Nepal, mostly dealing with development topics. 3. Gautam Yadama is an associate professor in the George Warren Brown School of Social Work at Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. 198 OccaSional Papers, Vol10 MESSERSCHMIDT, YADAMA & SILWAL,; History and Significance of, 199 4. 13huvan Silwal is currently \\'ith the U.N. in Eastern Europe on assignment to a local governance and development project in Albania. In 2001 he served as Nepal l\'ational Coordinator tiJf the International Year of Volunteers (lYV) program under the olliec of the lI.N. VolunteersiNcpal. lie has considerable cxrerience as an advisor on volunteer affairs in Nepal. including the new J'.:ational Development Volunteer Service (NDYS). 5. At the root of voluntccrism in Nepal arc the strong cultural-historical concepts of 'service' (Ncpali: sc\t'o) and 'duty' (dharma) constituted to promote a dharma-hascd 'good society' where the weak and the powerless are served by those occupying a better position in lite (Dahal et a1 2002:34- 35, Menan, Maore & Sherraden 2002). There is a very thin line between the meaning or 'servicc' that is freely given and 'duty" that is expected to be given. Engaging in some voluntary 'servicc' to society is easily interpreted as simply the socially expected performance of one's moral 'duty', 6. Maskay (who questions any association of t\'epal's contemporary civil society movemcnts with past service traditions) saw it slightly differently \vhen he wrote: "Evidence exists here and there that NGOs existed in Nepal in the remote past. long before the written history oft\'epal .. ,' (1998:68). 7. The list is slightly modified. from hy Biggs. CJurung & Messerschmidt 2004. It is based on their O\vn research as \vcll as an extensive literature: Bhattachan 1996, 2000 & 2002; ehhetri & Kattcl 2004: Dhakal 1994 & 1996: fisher 19R9 & 1991: (;urung (1,) 2000: Gurung (S,M,) 2000: lashi. Sharma & Thapa 2000: Limbu 2001: Messerschmidt 1979, 1981, 1985, 1986. 1987 & 1995: Pradhan 1983 & 1989: Pun 200 I: Regmi 2002; and Shrcstha 1999, 8. Rhattachan (1996) designates the same as "indigenous' and 'induced', We have adapted "indigenous'. 'traditional' and 'sponsored' from Fisher 1991. Indigenous refers to a system (or group) developed within a local community (by insiders), identified as locally-originated. local1y-'O\vned' and 'customary', Traditional implies well established and accepted, usually with some degree of antiquity, something 'old' in the eyes of the beholder, but not necessarily indigenous, Sponsored groups are those initiated or 'induced' from outside the host community by projects, programs, government agencies. NGOs or other outside organizations. 9. See Uiggs, Gurung & Messerschmidt 2004 for an in-depth discussion. 10. The remaining 4% were undecided due to personal or family concerns, not in opposition to the program, 11. 'Local authorities' art; identified as persons related to NDS program. as distinct from local leaders, many of whom \vere threatened by it. Of the 111 local leaders and 385 villagers surveyed. 100% and 99%, respectively. expressed their Javor of the program (Pradhan 1978:275), 12. A recent assessment of the root causes of the Maoist insurgency. from districts where Maoism first arose in Nepal in the mid-1990s, points to local discontent with the status quo and, especially. with the neglect by the palace and royal retainers of local needs and aspirations (Gersony 2(03), That study, however. makes no reJerence 10 the presence of NDS volunteers during the 1970s. Ciersony's reference to outside influences begins, unfortunately. only wilh the implementation of a large donor-funded development project in 1980. Thus, the likely influence of NOS volunteers in the same districts over the previous decade was ignored. 13. For more detail on the political setting, see Baral 1993. Holtun et al 1999: 26-45, and Shah 199() & 1993, 14, In a close vote. the National Referendum resulted JI1 a win for the king's preference to continue the Panchayat system \"ith appropriate reforms although. in the end, it only marked time, one decade, until the popular revolutional)' movement to restore Democracy won out in 1990. 15. By 2002 this number had risen 10 almost 14.000 t\'GOS affiliated \.vith the Social \Velfare Council (Pyakural 2002), Not all. however, are fully functional and professionally sound. This number does not count the scores ofintemational NGOs Ihat also operate in NepaL many of which, along with international aid agencies. fund much of the national and local NGO community through which they channel specific development activities, REfERENCES Acharya, M. 1997. 'Non-government organization (NGOs)-led development in Nepal'. Pp, 69·99, in K. Bhattachan & C. Mishra. eds .. Development Practices in Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal: Central Department of Sociology and Anthropology. Tribhuvan University. Aditya. A. & Karmaeharya. Y., eds. 1988. The Role of NOS and the Present National Context (Seminar Report). Kmhmandu: National Development Service Directorate. Tribhuvan University. BaraL LR. 1977. 'An experiment in education: The NDS system in Nepal', in T,M. Shakya & P. Kasaju, eds., Education and Development. Kathmandu: Center for Educational Research, Innovation and Development, National Education Committee, 200 Occasional Papers, Vol1 0 MESSERSCHMIDT, YADAMA & SILWAL.: History and Significance of. 201 Saral. L.R. 1993. Nepal: Problems of Governance. Ne\.... Delhi: Kanark Publishers Pvt. Ltd .. under auspices o1'thl;: Centre ti,r Policy Research. Bendix. R. 1962. Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait. Garden City: Doubleday. 13endix. R. 1978. Kings and People: Pmver and the Mandate to Rule. Bcrkcley: University of California Press. Bhattachan. K.B. 1996. 'Induced and indigenous sclf·hdp organizations in the context of rural development: A ca<;c study of the CiTZ supported self..help promotion programs in Nepal'. Pp. 109-137 in M.K. Dahal & H. Mund. cds.. Social Economy and National Development: Lessons from Nepalese Experience. Kathmandu: Nepal Foundation lor Advanced Studies (NEFAS) with Fricdrick.. Lbert -Sti ftung!N epal. Bhattachan. K.B. 2000. 'People/Community-based development strategy in Nepal'. Pp. 100-148 in K.R Bhattachan & C. Mishra. cds.. Developmental Practices in Nepal (2nd edition). Kathmandu: Central Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Tribhuvan University, in cooperation \vith Friedrick-Ebert-Stiftung (rES). Germany and Nepal. Bhattachan, K.B. 2002. 'Traditional voluntary organisations in Nepal'. in V.K. Shrestha. et al. eds.. Nepal Volunteer Book. Kathmandu: International Year of Volunteers Steering Committee for Nepal. Bhattachan, K.S. & C. Mishra. eds. 1997. Development Practices in Nepal. Kirtipur. Kathmandu. Nepal: Central Department of Sociology and Anthropology. Tribhuvan University. Riggs. S.D.. S.M. Gurung & Messerschmidt, D. 1004. An Exploratol)' Study of Gender- Social Inclusion and Empowerment through Development Groups and Group-Based Organizations in Nepal: Building on the Positive. Report to the Gender and Social Exclusion Assessment Study.Kathmandu: U.K. Department for International Development and The World Bank. Bista., D.B. 1991. Fatalism and Development: Nepal's Struggle for Modernization. Calcutta: Orient Longman. Brown, E. 1999. 'The scope of volunteer activity and public service'. Law and Contemporary Problems 62(4):17-42;www.law.duke.edw' journals/62Brown Brown, T.L. 1996. The Challenge to Democracy in Nepal: A Political History. New Yark: Routledge. Chand, D. 1991. Development through Non-Governmental Organizations in Nepal. Kathmandu: Institute for Development Research and Social Service. Chand. D. 1998. 'The role of civil society in democratization: NGO perspective'. Pp. 46-58 in A.P. Srestha., The Role of Society and Democratization in Nepal. Kathmandu: Nepal Foundation for Advanced Studies (NEFAS) and the Friedrich-Ebcrt-Stiftung (FES), Gennany and Nepal. Chand, D. 1999. Views and Visions of Non-Governmental Organization. Kathmandu: Association of Development Agencies of Nepal (ADAN). Chand, D. 2000. 'HMG policy. INGOs legal status in NepaL role of SWC on INGOs and utilization ofINGOs aid'. Pp. 19-26 in RB. Swar, S.R. Naupane & S.K. Basnet. eds .. Social Development and INGOs Activities in Nepal 2000 (2nd ed.). Kathmandu: Community Development Service Association. Chhctri, R.B. & KatteL S.P. 2004. Dispute Resolution in Nepal: A Socio-Cultural Perspective. Kathmandu: Centre for Victims of Torture. Clotfelter, c.T. 1999. 'Why "Amateurs"?, Law and Contemporary Problems 62(4):1-16. DahaL D.R, Uprety, H. & Subba. P. 2002. Good Governance and Decen- tralization in Nepal. Kathmandu: Center for Governance and Development Studies, in cooperation with Friedrich~Ebert-Stiftung. DahaL D.R. 1998. 'Is there anything as "Good Governance" in Nepal? Reflections on the functioning of the civil society'. Pp. 78-90, in G.R Thapa, ed.. Local Self~Govemment in Nepal. Kathmandu: Political Science Association of Nepal, with Friedrich-Ebert·Stiftung. Dhakal, S. 1994. Adaptive Strategies of Magars: An Ecological-Anthropological Case Study from Kali Gandaki River Basin. Unpublished Masters Thesis. Kathmandu: Tribhuvan University. Dhakal, S. 1996. 'Bheja as a strategic cultural convention: Community resource management in the Barha Magarat', Emerging Ethnicity and Aspects of Community Adaptation, a special issue of Occasional Papers in Sociology and Anthropology, 5:39-51. Drogosz, K.M. 2003. 'Citizenship without politics? A critique of pure service'. In E.1. Dionne Jr., K.M Drogosz & R.E. Litan, eds., United We Serve: National Service and Future of Citizenship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Dionne, E.J., Drogosz, K.M. & Litan, R.E. 2003. United We Serve: National Service and Future of Citizenship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. 202 Occasional Papers, Vol1 0 MESSERSCHMIDT, YADAMA & SILWAL.: History and Significance of. 203 Fisher, RJ. 1989. Indigenous Systems of Common Property Forest Management in Nepal. EAPI Working Paper No. 18. Honolulu: Environment and Policy Institute, East-\\/est Center. University of Hawaii. Fisher. R.J. 1991. Studying Indigenous Forest Management Systems in Nepal: TO\vard a More Systematic Approach. EAPI Working Paper No. 30. Honolulu: Environment and Policy Institute. East·West Center, University of Hawaii. I:riedman. T.L. 2002. 'Where Frcedom Reigns'. The New York Times. (Op-Fd, August 14), p. A29. Fukuyama. F. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press. Fussell. D. & Quarmby, A. 1974. 'Study service: A survey'. lJnpublished report to International Development Research Center (fORe), Canada. FusselL D. & Quarmby. A. 1977. 'Study service: An idea \vhose time has come'. The Times (London, March 4). Gersony, R. 2003. Sowing the Wind ... History and Dynamics of the Maoist Revolt in Nepal's Rapti Hills. Portland. OR: Mercy Corps International. Ghimire. 1 2000. "NGO Development in Nepal'. Pp. 12-18, in RB. SV.iar. S.R. Naupane & S.K. Basnet. eds .. Social Development and INGOs Activities in Nepal 2000 (2nd cd.). Kathmandu: Community Development Service Association. Gurung, HB. 1988. 'Development Role of NDS Programme'. Pp. 40-61, in A. Aditya and Y. Karmacharya, eds., The Role of NOS and the Present National Context (Seminar Report). Kathmandu: National Development Service Directorate, Tribhuvan University. Gurung, 1. 2000. 'Some social organization and customs of the Gurung community'. Pp. 11-13 in R. 10shi. K. Sharma & R Thapa, eds., Twice Blessed: The Art of Giving. Kathmandu: Tewa. Gurung, S.M. 2000. Assessment of Traditional Institutions for Watershed Management. Paper prepared for ADB Project Preparation on Watershed Rehabilitation and Management. Kathmandu: Asian Development Bank. HMG/MOE. 1971. The National Education System Plan 1971-76. Kathmandu: Ministry of Education, HMGN. Hoftun, M., Raeper, W. & Whelpton, 1. 1999. People, Politics and Ideology: Democracy and Social Change in Nepal. Kathrnandu: Mandala Book Point. liDS. 1992. Rural Services Delivery Review. Phase 11. Report 1: A Strategy lor Rural Services Delivery (Main Report. 2 VO[5.+ annexes). Kathmandu: Institute t. Maskay. B.K. 1998. Non-Governmental Organizations in Development: Search for a New' Vision. Kathmandu: Centre for Development and Governance. Maskay, B.K. 2000. Development Governanec: Agenda For Action. Kathmandu: Centre for Development and Governance. Menon. N., Moore, A. & Shcrraden, M. 2002. 'Understanding service: Words in the context of history and culture'. Working Paper No. 02-1. S1. Louis, MO: Center for Social Development. Global Service Institute, Washington University. Messerschmidt. D.A. 1979. 'Dhikur: Rotating credit associations in Nepal'. Pp. 141-166 in IF. Fisher. cd.. Himalayan Anthropology: The Indo..Tibetan Interface. The Hague: Mouton. Messerschmidt. D.A. 1981. 'Nogar and other traditional forms of cooperation in Nepal: Significance for development'. Human Organization 40:40-47. Messerschmidt, D.A. 1985. 'Local participation in park resource planning and management'. Pp. 133·140 in lA. McNeely, et ai, eds., People and Protected Areas of the Hindu Kush-Himalaya. Kathmandu: International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (fCIMOD). Messerschmidt, D.A. 1986. 'People and resources in Nepal: Customary resource management systems in the upper Kali Gandaki'. Pp. 455-480 in NAS, Common Property Resource Management. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, U.S. National Academy of Sciences. Messerschmidt, D.A. 1987. 'Conservation and society in Nepal: Traditional forest management and innovative development'. Pp. 373-379 in P. Little & 204 Occasional Papers, Voll0 MESSERSCHMIDT, YADAMA & SILWAL.: History and Significance of. 205 M. llorowitz, eds., Lands at Risk in the Third World: Local Level Perspectives. Boulder: Westview. Messerschmidt, D.A. 1995. 'Local traditions and community forestry manage- ment: A view from Nepal'. Pp. 231-244 in D.M. Warren, L.J. Slikkerveer& D. Brokensha, eds., The Cultural Dimension of Development: Indigenous Knowledge Systems. London: Intcnncdiate Technolob'Y Publications. Mishra, C. 1988. 'Comment'. Pp. 102-105, in A. Aditya & Y. Kannacharya. eds., The Role of NOS and the Present National Context (Seminar Report). Kathmandu: National Development Service Directorate, Tribhuvan University. NOS stan~ 1988. 'National Development Service: A Review', Paper presented at a seminar on The Role of NOS and the Present National Context, April 1988. Kathmandu: Tribhuvan University. Directorate ofNDS. Poudyat, M.P. 1979. National Development Service Programme: A Study in Its Supervision and Evaluation System. Political Science Masters Thesis, Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Tribhuvan University. Kathmandu, Nepal. PoudyaL M.P. & Ti\vari. C.K. 1978. 'Youth mobilization for development.' Country paper presented to the Asian Regional Youth Meeting held under auspices of UNESCO, Kathmandu, September. Pradhan, P. 1978. Impact of NDS in Nepal: A Study of Changing Attitude and Behavior of Student Participants and Village People. Kathmandu: Centre for Economic Development and Administration, Tribhuvan University. Pradhan, P. 1983. ;Community managed irrigation systems case study: Chhatis Mauja irrigation system'. Appendix-II, pp. 218~242 in MOAJAPROSCI ADC, Water Management in Nepal. Kathmandu: Agricultural Projects Services Centre and Agricultural Development Council. Pradhan, P. 1988. 'The National Development Service: Its Attitudinal and Development Aspects'. Pp. 61-78, in A. Aditya & Y. Karmacharya, eds., The Role of NDS and the Present National Context (Seminar Report). Kathmandu: National Development Service Directorate, Tribhuvan University. Pradhan. P. 1989. Patterns of Irrigation Organization in Nepal: A Comparative Study of 21 Farmer-Managed Irrigation Systems. Colombo. Sri Lanka: International Irrigation Management Institute. Pun, L.B. 2001. ;Indigenous knowledge and practice in irrigation management system: A case study of the Khalle Dandakhet Kula FMIS in Bagluttg District. Pp. 74-99 in U. Gautam & S. Rana, eds .. Challenges to Farmer Managed Irrigation Systems (Proceedings of the International Seminar on Challenges to Farmer Managed Irrigation Systems. 28-29 March 2000, Kathmandu, Nepal). Kathmandu: Farmer Managed Irrigation Systems Promotion Trust. Pyakural. 1. 2002. Annual Report of Social Welfare Council. Kathmandu: Social Welfare Council. Ranaque, A.. Masud, A.R.M. & Wadud Mian, M.A., eds. 1978. Study Service: A Way to National Development. Mymensingh. Bangladesh: Bangladesh Agriculture University. Regmi. M.C. 2002. 'The Guthi System' & 'Kathmandu City and the Guthi System Today'. Pp. 268~290 & 291-295, in M.C. Regmi. Nepal: An Historical Miscellany. Delhi: Adroit Publishers. Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. Nev.' Delhi: Oxford University Press. Shah, R. (1972) ;Hami kata?' ('Where do \\'e go from Here?'). Rastra Pukar (a Kathmandu. Nepal weekly), 27 April. Shah, R. 1978. Nepali Politics-Retrospect and Prospect. Delhi: Oxford University Press. Shah, R. 1982. The Nepalese Elite. Varanasi: Centre for the Study of Nepal, Renaras Hindu University. Shah, R. 1990a. Modern Nepal: A Political History 1769-1955. Va!. I: 1769- 1885, Vo!. 2: 1886-1995. New Delhi: Manohar. Shah, R. I990b. Three Decades and Two Kings (1960-1990): Eclipse of Nepal's Party less Monarchic Rule. Kathmandu: Ratna Pustak Bhandar. Shah, R. 1993. Politics in Nepal 1980-1990: Referendum, Stalemate and Triumph of People Power. 3rd rev. ed. Delhi: Manohar. Sharma. K. 2000. 'Crisis of compassion'. Pp. 14-18 in R. Joshi, et aL eds., T\viee Blessed: The Art of Giving. Kathmandu: Tewa. Sherraden. M. 2001a. ;Civic service: Issues, outlook. institution building'. Paper presented at the Biennial Conference of the Inter~University Seminar on Armed Forces and Society. October 19~21, 2001. at Baltimore, MD. St. Louis, MO: Center for Social Development. Global Service Institute, Wa'ihington University. Sherraden, M. 2001b. 'Youth service as strong policy'. Youth Service Country Study, prepared for The Ford Foundation. St. Louis, MO: Center for Social Development, Global Service Institute, Washington University. 206 Occasional Papers, Vol10 MESSERSCHMIDT, YAOAMA &SILWAL.. History and Significance of . 207 Shcrraden. M., Moore. A. & Cho. S. 2002. 'TO\'iard a global research agenda on civic service'. Draft prospectus for special issue of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. St. Louis. MO: Global Service Institute, Center for Social Development. \\"ashington University. Shrcstha. B.K. 1999. 'The origin and evolution ofuscr groups as the institutional anchor for development at the grassroots', Sahabhagita: Journal of Development and Local Government (Kathmandu, Nepal) 2(2):23~30. Shrcstha. G.M. 1988. 'Village Profile: Educational. Academic and Developmental Dimensions', Pp. 95-108, in A. Aditya & Y. Karmacharya, cds .. The Role ofNDS and the Present National Context (Seminar Report). Kathmandu: National Development Service Directorate, Tribhuvan University. Shrestha. V.K. & Upadhyay. P.P. 2002. 'National Development Volunteer St:rvice: Public Sector Initiation in Volunteerism in Nepal.' Pp. 45-54 in V.K. Shrestha. et aI, cds .. Volunteerism in Nepal. Kathmandu: NPCINDVS, IYV 2001 Nepal. and UN Volunteers. Shrestha. V.K.. Upadhyay. P.P.. SihvaL 13.B. & Higgins, D.. cds. 2002. Volunteerism in Nepal. Kathmandu: NPCINDVS, IYV 2001 Nepal. and U.N. Volunteers SihvaL RH. 2001. International Year of Volunteers: Status of IYV 2001 in Nepal. Kathmandu: International Year of Volunteers Steering Committee and U.N. Volunteers Nepal Program; Silwal, RH. 2001. What Future for the Renaissance of Volunteerism: Prospects l;)r Nepalese Society. Draft. Kathmandu: IYV 2001 Steering Committee and UNV Nepal Program; Smith. J. D. 1999. On Volunteering and Social Development. Proceedings of the Expert Working Group Meeting, 29-30 Nov_ember 1999. New York: United Nations Volunteers. Srestha, AP., ed. 1998. The Role of Civil Society' and Democratization in Nepal. Kathmandu: Nepal Foundation for Advanced Studies (NEFAS) and Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES). Swar. B.B., Naupane, S.R. & Basnet, S.K., eds. 2000 [1999]. Social Development and INGOs Activities in NepaJ 2000 (2nd ed.). Kathmandu: Community Development Service Association. SWc. 1999·2000. List of Non-Governmental Organizations AHiliated with Social Welfare Council (2 vols.). Kathmandu: Social Welfare Council. Thapa, GB., ed. 1998. Local Self·Government in Nepal. Kathmandu: Political Science Association of Nepal. with Friedrich-Ebel1+Stiftung. Timilsina. P.P. 2000. 'Civil society organizations: Their dilemmas and perspectives'. Pp. 1-11. in RB. Swar. S.R. Naupane & S.K. Basnel. eds .. Social Development and INGOs Activities in Nepal 2000 (2nd cd.) Kathmandu: Community Development Scrvice Association. U.N. 2001. 'Support for volunteering'. Report to the Secretary-General (A-56- 288); & 'Recommendations on support for volunteering' (A-56-L.27). Ne\v York: U.N. General Assembly. 56th Session. Upadhyay. H.P.. Larnichane. S.R.. Singh, R. & Silwal. RB. 1989. National Development Service Program: Past Experiences and Future Strategies. A Study Report. Kathmandu: Tribhuvan University. Centcr for Educational Research and Innovativc Development. Uphotl N. 1986. Local Institutional Development: An Analytical Source book with Cases. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press. Vaidya, T.R. 1978. National Development Service: A Ca"e Study. Paris: UNESCO. Vaidya, T.R. 1992a. 'National Development Service: Its Philosophy and O~jectives'. Pp. 123-127 in T.R. Vaidya. Nepal: A Study of Socio- Economic and Political Changes. New Delhi: Anmol Publishers. Vaidya, T.R. 1992b. 'A case study on "National Development Service" Nepal'. Pp. 128-148, in T.R. Vaidya, Nepal: A Study of Socio-Economic and Political Changes. New Delhi: Anmol Publishers. Vaidya, ToR. 2002. 'A good example of volunteerism in Nepal: National Development Service.' Pp. 35-44 in V.K. Shrestha. et ai, eds., Volunteerism in Nepal. Kathmandu: NPCINDVS, IYV 2001 Nepal, and UN Volunteers. Weber, M. 1947. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Oxford University Press. Wilson, J. & Musick, M. 1999. 'The effects of volunteering on the volunteer'. Law and Contemporary Problems 62(4):141-168: www.law.duke.edu/ joumals/62LCPWilson. Yadama, G. & D. Messerschmidt, 2004. 'Civic service in South Asia: A case study of Nepal'. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(4. Supplement): 98s-126s, NOTES TO CONTRIBUTORS Occasional papers on Sociology and anthropology' publishes articles, origina research reports, review articles. book n:vic\vs, dissertation abstracts, professiona announcements, and other information of interest in the arcas of the sociology am anthropology of Nepal and other Himalayan regions. Both the Nepalese and forcigr scholars may submit their articles. Materials submitted should be in English or in Nepali. Authors must take ful responsibility for the originality of the contents and opinions expressed in Ihest articles. The copyrighted material, which is to be reproduced in the article must be suitably ackno\vledgcd. Contributors are requested to send, if possible, their materials on compute] floppy disks using IBM compatible word processing programs. They may. however send copy of the manuscript separately. The texts. notes, and references should bt typed double-spaced. All pages should he numbered. The title of the paper- autbor'~ name, affiliations. and complete address should appear on the first page. The anthropological style of referencing is preferred. Texts should refer to note~ numbered consecutively. All notes and footnotes should appear at the cnd of th' paper. Book reviews should not, hov>'ever, contain footnotes: all references should be incorporated in the text itself. Citation in the text should include the author's surname, year of publication, anc page number. e.g. : (Sorokin. 1978:49). If the publication to be cited is authored h) morc than t\'.'O persons, then use the surname of the first author. to be follO\ved by, e al. If the same reference is cited more than once continuously, use ibid. After citin~ the full reference once. just give the relevant page number if it is different Entries for the bibliographical list should follow the following order: author'~ name (surname, followed by full first name or initials), year of publication, the tit It of publication along with its edition number, place of publication. and publisher'~ name. If the reference is from an article ofan edited book. just give the name "fth' author as suggested above. year of publication, the title of the article, the title of th' book. editor's name, place of publication. and publisher's name; e,g. Greenwolc Stephen 1978. "The Role of the Priest in Ne\var Society". Himalayan Anthropolog) cd. James Fisher The Hague: Mouton. If the reference is from a periodical, give the name of the author as suggested above, year of pUblication, the title of the periodical with its volume number. and page number: e.g. : Gray John N. 1980, "Hypergamy. Caste and Kinship among th' Chhetris of Nepal". Contributions to Indian Sociology. 14: 1-34. If the year and the place of publication arc missing, use n.d, and n.p respectively. The bibliographical list should preferably include only the works cited Use double quote marks (" ") while quoting sentences and single quotes (' ') for <: single work/phrase, Use spellings as followed in the New Webster Dictionary OJ Oxford Dictionary. Contributes are requested to maintain consistency throughou their articles. All correspondences related to editorial and subscription should be addressed to: The Chairperson Central Department of Sociology/Anthropology Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu