Vol.:(0123456789)1 3 Acta Neurochirurgica (2023) 165:4045–4054 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05839-5 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Brain blood flow pulse analysis may help to recognize individuals who suffer from hydrocephalus Arkadiusz Ziółkowski1  · Magdalena Kasprowicz1  · Marek Czosnyka2,3  · Zofia Czosnyka2 Received: 20 June 2023 / Accepted: 6 October 2023 / Published online: 27 October 2023 © The Author(s) 2023 Abstract Background Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is often associated with altered cerebral blood flow. Recent research with the use of the ultrasonic method suggests specific changes in the shape of cardiac-related cerebral arterial blood volume (CaBV) pulses in NPH patients. Our study aims to provide a quantitative analysis of the shape of CaBV pulses, estimated based on transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) in NPH patients and healthy individuals. Methods The CaBV pulses were estimated using TCD cerebral blood flow velocity signals recorded from probable NPH adults and age-matched healthy individuals at rest. The shape of the CaBV pulses was compared to a triangular shape with 27 similarity parameters calculated for every reliable CaBV pulse and compared between patients and volunteers. The diag- nostic accuracy of the most prominent parameter for NPH classification was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results The similarity parameters were calculated for 31 probable NPH patients (age: 59 years (IQR: 47, 67 years), 14 females) and 23 healthy volunteers (age: 54 years (IQR: 43, 61 years), 18 females). Eighteen of 27 parameters were differ- ent between healthy individuals and NPH patients (p < 0.05). The most prominent differences were found for the ascending slope of the CaBV pulse with the AUC equal to 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.77, 0.97, p < 0.001). Conclusions The findings suggest that in NPH, the ascending slope of the CaBV pulse had a slower rise, was more like a straight line, and generally was less convex than in volunteers. Prospective research is required to verify the clinical utility of these findings. Keywords Transcranial Doppler · Cerebral blood flow velocity · Morphological analysis · Pulse shape analysis · Infusion test · Brain blood circulation Introduction Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is a neurological dis- order primarily affecting older adults, characterized (among other features) by the accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the brain’s ventricles and associated with progres- sive cognitive and motor dysfunction. Diagnosis of NPH typically involves a combination of clinical evaluation, brain imaging, and invasive tests such as the lumbar tap test and infusion testing to evaluate CSF dynamics [18, 31, 60]. According to the last guidelines for the management of idiopathic NPH in Japan [52], more than one symptom in Hakim’s triad [28] should be observed to suspect NPH. The incidence of the triad syndromes varies across studies: a gait disturbance exhibits 94–100% of NPH patients, cognitive impairment is present in 78–98% of NPH patients, and a urinary dysfunction affects 60–92% of NPH patients [24, 29, 41, 50, 67]. It was reported that a full triad was observed in approximately 60% of NPH-diagnosed patients [24, 35, 67], whereas a large-scale questionnaire study in Japan revealed that a complete triad was exhibited in only 12.1% of NPH patients [41]. The identification of the triad symptoms is an * Arkadiusz Ziółkowski arkadiusz.ziolkowski@pwr.edu.pl 1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Fundamental Problems of Technology, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland 2 Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK 3 Institute of Electronic Systems, Faculty of Electronics and Information Technology, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1007/s00701-023-05839-5&domain=pdf http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2630-514X http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2271-7737 http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2446-8006 4046 Acta Neurochirurgica (2023) 165:4045–4054 1 3 initial step in the further NPH diagnosis procedure. The next step is usually the assessment of ventriculomegaly based on CT/MRI images which are also not unified. Several param- eters related to the ventricle’s size or shape are used in NPH diagnosis. The most frequently reported parameters are Evans’ index and callosal angle. A recently published meta- analysis revealed that the diagnostic performance expressed as the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84–0.90) for Evans’ index and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95–0.98) for callosal angle [55]. The threshold for both parameters is not unified and has been reported to be 0.3 [30, 71] or 0.32 [49] for Evans’ index and 90° [30, 46, 57, 61, 71], 100° [49], and 123° [10] for callosal angle. Another two parameters useful in MRI image evaluation are the brain-to-ventricle ratio and the convexity cistern to ventricle ratio. Their accu- racy in differentiation between NPH patients and healthy individuals reported as AUC was equal to 0.97 and 0.96 for the brain-to-ventricle ratio and convexity cistern to ventricle ratio, respectively [72]. If Hakim’s triad and CT/MRI scan evaluation suggest the diagnosis of NPH, the CSF tap test or infusion study is often performed in order to assess the dynamics of CSF circulation and the probability of benefit from shunting [18, 31, 52, 60]. The tap test is an invasive procedure in which typically 40–50 ml of CSF is drained from the lumbar space [66]. According to a systematic review [48], the CSF tap test has a sensitivity of 58% (range 26–87%) and a speci- ficity of 75% (range 33–100%). The positive response to the CSF tap test is an improvement in clinical symptoms after the test. However, the test is evaluated using different scores around the world [52]. Alternatively to (or together with) the CSF tap test, the infusion test is performed [18, 31, 52, 60]. The infusion test is more invasive than the tap test because it requires the injection of physiological saline or artificial CSF into the CSF space. During the injection, the intracranial pressure (ICP) is monitored, and the resistance to CSF outflow (RCSF) is calculated based on the pressure response to a controlled volume increase. The threshold for RCSF is reported to be 13–18 mm Hg/ml/min with a posi- tive predictive value between 80 and 92% [52]. It was also reported that analysis of slow waves of ICP, recorded during overnight monitoring [16, 59, 63, 64], and measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter [23] may be helpful additional measures in NPH diagnosis. However, the pathophysiology of hydrocephalus includes not only impaired CSF circulation and poor pressure–volume compensation but also the inter- ference of abnormal CSF with cerebral blood flow (CBF) [19, 54]. A reduction in CBF associated with increased cer- ebrovascular resistance and decreased cerebrovascular com- pliance is frequently noted in NPH patients [4, 7, 8, 14, 27, 38, 39, 42, 45, 53, 65, 68]. The decrease in CBF observed in NPH is thought to result from increased CSF pressure and increased ventricular volume [26, 44, 51, 70], leading to cortical compression and stretching of blood vessels and white matter fibers [20, 22]. Another study also points out the role of parallel changes in cardiac function and systemic blood flow in the decrease of CBF in chronic hydrocepha- lus [21]. Moreover, underlying cerebrovascular disease is an important predictor of poor outcomes after the implantation of a hydrocephalus shunt [7]. Patients with cerebrovascular disease that prevails over disturbance in CSF circulation and poor pressure–volume compensation may not exhibit clinical improvement after shunting [15, 19]. Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to assess alterations in cerebral blood circulation and cerebral blood volume; however, the downsides of these advanced imaging tech- niques are their high cost and low availability. In contrast, acoustic-based methods provide non-invasive, low-cost, real- time measures of cerebrovascular function. By transmitting short ultrasonic pulses from one side of the skull to another and dynamically measuring the time-of-flight of the pulses [56, 58], altered shapes of the cerebral arterial blood vol- ume (CaBV) pulses have been observed in NPH-diagnosed patients. Following the successful treatment, the shape of the CaBV pulses became similar to those observed in healthy volunteers, suggesting it is a possible indicator of effective NPH treatment [12]. However, this method of measurement is still under development and is not yet available on the global market. We recently proposed an ultrasound-based method for assessing CaBV changes based on the cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) signal measured with a com- monly available transcranial Doppler (TCD) device and modeling global cerebrovascular dynamics [37]. In the cur- rent study, we aim to analyze the shape of the pulse changes of CaBV in healthy volunteers and probable NPH patients using this methodology. We hypothesize that the shapes of CaBV pulses calculated from TCD measurements differ between healthy individuals and NPH patients and that a quantitative measure may help to non-invasively identify patients suffering from hydrocephalus. Methods Patient cohort NPH Thirty-one non-shunted elderly (age > 35  years) prob- able NPH patients were selected from a larger database of 42 patients who underwent constant rate infusion tests at Addenbrooke’s Hospital (Cambridge, UK) combined with TCD monitoring between 1992 and 2006. All patients had an Ommaya reservoir implanted to facilitate cerebrospinal fluid sampling without the need for repeated lumbar punctures 4047Acta Neurochirurgica (2023) 165:4045–4054 1 3 during the diagnostic process. Additionally, if there was a clinical indication, the reservoir enabled overnight moni- toring of ICP. The NPH was diagnosed by a neurosurgeon specializing in hydrocephalus management based on clini- cal symptoms (gait disturbance, cognitive impairment, and impaired bladder control) and CT/MRI imaging. All the sub- jects had clinical symptoms (at least two symptoms from Hakim’s triad [52]) and an increased Evan’s ratio (> 0.3 [30, 71]). Patient characteristics (age and sex) and values of CSF compensatory parameters calculated from the infusion test (mean ICP, RCSF, and brain elsticity (E)) are provided in the “Results” section. The authors of this study did not have access to additional clinical data such as raw CT/MRI images, the exact values of Evan’s index, and post-shunt outcomes. The primary selection criterium was a reliable, continuous recording of the CBFV signal at rest prior to the test (see the “Data processing” section for details about the signal inspection and signal reliability). Information on the patient’s age was missing in 8 cases; 3 patients were excluded due to the low quality of the CBFV signal, which was insufficient to analyze the CBFV pulse waveform in the time domain. Healthy volunteers From a database of 26 healthy volunteers for whom CBFV recordings were performed during spontaneous breath- ing at rest, 23 people were included in the final analysis. These data were collected at Wrocław University of Sci- ence and Technology (Wrocław, Poland) between 2014 and 2015. Inclusion criteria were age over 35 years, no smoking, absence of diseases of the nervous and cardiac systems, and medications known to affect cardiovascular parameters or CBF. The inclusion criteria were validated based on an inter- view before the recording. Three volunteers were excluded due to missing information on age. Data acquisition NPH In all patients, the infusion test was performed based on the methodology introduced by Katzman and Hussey [33]. The infusion study is a standard clinical investigation for NPH patients; thus, approval from the local ethical commit- tee was waived. Additional non-invasive TCD monitoring during the test was approved by the local Ethics Committee in Cambridge (08/H0306/103). ICP was measured using a hypodermic needle (25 gauge) inserted in a pre-implanted Ommaya reservoir and connected to a pressure transducer via a saline-filled tube. The second needle was used for infu- sion. CBFV in the middle cerebral artery (segment M1) was monitored through the left or right transtemporal window using the TCD system (Neuroguard; Medasonics, Fremont, CA, USA) with a 2-MHz probe. The signals were recorded using custom software for waveform collection (WREC; W. Zabołotny, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland) and later by ICM+ (Cambridge Enterprise Ltd., UK). Each recording begins with a 5-min baseline preced- ing the infusion. Healthy volunteers The middle cerebral artery (M1) was insonated with TCD (Doppler BoxX, DWL, Compumedics Germany GmbH, Singen, Germany) through the left or right transtemporal window to capture CBFV. A 2 MHz ultrasound probe was attached to a plastic helmet and immobilized the volunteer’s head throughout the measurement. The CBFV signal was recorded with ICM+ software (Cambridge Enterprise Ltd., Cambridge, UK) for at least 5 min. The study was approved by the bioethical committee of Wrocław Medical University (permission no. KB-170/2014). The recordings for both groups NPH patients and healthy volunteers were curated by the person who did the measurement. The data curation con- sisted of reviewing the recording in the ICM+ software and marking artifacts (e.g., movement artifacts or signal inter- ruptions), which reduced the final recording time for a part of the recordings to less than 5 min. Data processing Prior to further analysis, all signals were visually inspected in the ICM+ to select good-quality recordings of the CBFV signal. The good-quality signal (sufficient to analyze in the time domain) has visible cardiac-related pulses and dis- tinguishable at least two characteristic peaks: systolic and diastolic for at least half of the recording duration (distorted pulses, if any, were subsequently removed from the record- ing according to procedure described in supplementary materials). Moreover, the peaks and valleys of the pulses cannot be flattened (signal saturation), and the mean value cannot exceed the range of 30–120 cm/s (the range observed in healthy individuals and NPH patients [2, 3, 32, 40, 43]). In the group of NPH patients, the longest possible baseline periods prior to infusion were manually selected. In healthy volunteers, the whole reliable CBFV recordings were used for analysis. Values of E and RCSF were calculated from infu- sion studies in probable NPH patients with the use of the ICM+ software [62]. Further, the following operations were performed: Before pulse shape analysis, CBFV signals were up- sampled to the frequency of 200 Hz with simple cubic 4048 Acta Neurochirurgica (2023) 165:4045–4054 1 3 interpolation to increase their temporal resolution and enable precise detection of the beginnings of the pulses. The CBFV signals were then processed with an 8th-order Chebyshev type I digital low-pass filter with a cutoff fre- quency of 12 Hz to remove high-frequency noise. Indi- vidual pulse detection was performed using a modified Scholkmann algorithm [6]. CaBV pulses were then cal- culated from the CBFV signal based on the methodology described [1, 34, 36] and briefly presented in supplemen- tary materials. The pulses were then detrended and nor- malized to values between 0 and 1 on the X and Y axes. To exclude the influence of heart rate on pulse-shape-related parameters, the X-axis was also normalized by linear interpolation to a uniform length of 200 samples. Finally, distorted pulses of CaBV were removed from the analysis (the exclusion criteria for pulse removal are described in supplementary materials), triangle similarity parameters were calculated for each legitimate CaBV pulse, and mean values of the parameters were calculated for each record- ing. Python 3.11 was used for all calculations. Pulse CaBV triangle similarity parameters To quantify how the pulsation resembled a triangle, a vir- tual triangle was inscribed on the pulse. The triangle was defined by three points in the CaBV pulse: the beginning of the CaBV pulse (minimum value before the ascending slope of a pulse), the maximum value of the CaBV pulse, and the end of a pulse (minimum value after the descending slope of a pulse). By connecting these 3 points, a triangle was formed—see Fig. 1a. Three basic types of parameters were proposed: (a) distances between the triangle and the CaBV pulse curve, (b) areas between the triangle and the pulse curve, and (c) durations of ascending and descending slopes. In total, 27 parameters were proposed. A detailed description of these parameters is presented in the Supplementary material. In general, the distance was calculated as the absolute differ- ence between the values of the CaBV pulse and the triangular contour at a time point t. The area was calculated by sum- ming all the distances contained in a given area. The dura- tion of a slope was expressed as the time difference between as ce nd in g pa rt descending part C a BV triangle Ascending Upper Area (AUA) Ascending Lower Area (ALA) Descending Upper Area (DUA) Descending Lower Area (DLA) Distances Beginning of C a BV pulse Max of C a BV pulse End of C a BV pulse ascending slope duration descending slope duration a) b) Fig. 1 Visualization of a a triangle inscribed in a cerebral arterial blood volume (CaBV) pulse and b primary triangle similarity parameters 4049Acta Neurochirurgica (2023) 165:4045–4054 1 3 the end of the slope and its beginning. The proposed param- eters were calculated (a) separately for each area, (b) as the sums of the areas where the pulse contour is above or below the triangle, and (c) as the mean and max of the areas or dis- tances. A visualization of selected triangle similarity param- eters is shown in Fig. 1b. The list of all proposed parameters is presented in Table 1 in the Supplementary material. Statistical analysis Mean values of ICP (for probable NPH patients) and CBFV (for all subjects) were calculated for each recording from the raw signals. Non-parametric tests were used for statis- tical analyses (the normality assumption was rejected by the Shapiro–Wilk test for the majority of variables). To eliminate the unequal influence of pulse-related parameter values in the statistics (due to the unequal number of pulses recorded for each patient or volunteer), the values of the parameters from each patient and volunteer were provided as a single mean value (calculated from all pulses belong- ing to a given patient or volunteer). The distributions of the mean values of physiological signals and other parameters, calculated as presented in the “Methods” section, were pro- vided as the median and the upper and lower quartiles in the “Results” section. Differences in mean triangle-simi- larity parameters, age, and mean CBFV between probable NPH patients and healthy volunteers were tested with Wil- coxon’s signed rank test. The ROC curve and AUC were computed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the most informative parameter for NPH classification. To select such a parameter, a machine learning predictive model— the decision tree classifier (described in [13]) of depth 1 with entropy as the optimization goal—was used. Spear- man’s correlation coefficients were calculated to examine the relationship between the calculated parameters and age, mean ICP, and CSF compensatory parameters. The signifi- cance level was set at 0.05 for all analyses. Results Group characterization The group of probable NPH patients included 14 females and 17 males with a median age of 59 years (IQR: 47–67 years). An age-matched group of healthy volunteers (age: 54 years (IQR: 43–61 years)) included 18 females and 5 males. There were no differences in age between these two groups (p = 0.100). CBFV was higher in healthy volunteers: 59.5 cm/s (IQR: 50.1–68.3 cm/s) than in probable NPH patients: 52.9 cm/s (42.4–62.0 cm/s) (p = 0.036). The ICP at the baseline prior infusion was 7.2 mm Hg (IQR: 4.4–9.5 mm Hg), RCSF was 13.9 mm Hg/ml/min (IQR: 11.7–19.7 mm Hg/ml/min), and E was 0.18 1/ml (IQR: 0.12–0.30 1/ ml). Lengths of the recordings in NPH and controls The median length of CBFV recordings was 356 s (IQR: 291–410 s) in healthy volunteers and 331 s (IQR: 232–455 s) in probable NPH patients. The total number of pulses detected in recordings from 23 healthy volunteers and 31 NPH patients was 9666 and 14,923, respectively. Trian- gle similarity parameters were calculated for 8824 pulses recorded from healthy volunteers and 13,173 pulses from probable NPH patients. Differences in  CaBV shape between healthy volunteers and probable NPH patients The analysis of the proposed descriptive parameters (see the “Methods” and “Data processing” sections) for each indi- vidual CaBV pulse waveform, revealed clear differences in values of 18 out of the 27 descriptors. The values of all these parameters are presented in Table 2 in the Supplementary material. Feature selection based on the decision tree clas- sifier demonstrated that the most important parameter for discrimination in our dataset is mean ascending upper dis- tance (mAUD), see Fig. 1—equivalent to mean ascending upper area. The AUC of the mAUD was 0.87 (lower and upper 95% confidence intervals: 0.77, 0.97, p < 0.001). This indicates thatthe ascending slope of the CaBV pulse was less convex, had a slower rise, and was more like a straight line in NPH than in volunteers. These differences are visualized in Fig. 2. Relationships between triangle similarity parameters and CSF compensatory parameters CaBV shape-related parameters did not correlate with either  RCSF, E, and mean ICP in NPH patients, or age in any of the group. Discussion The results of this study support the hypothesis that the shape of the TCD-based pulse of CaBV differs between patients with NPH and healthy individuals. Our analysis revealed that the rising slope of the CaBV pulse in NPH patients was less convex and more like a straight line, resem- bling a triangle arm, while the pulse in healthy individuals had a more pronounced convexity. The results are consistent with previous studies that have reported alterations in cerebral hemodynamics in NPH patients, including decreased cerebral blood flow, increased 4050 Acta Neurochirurgica (2023) 165:4045–4054 1 3 cerebral vascular resistance [8, 14, 27, 38, 39, 42, 45, 53, 65, 68], and decreased vascular compliance [4]. The mechanism underlying these changes is not fully understood, but it has been suggested that impaired drainage of CSF from the brain may result in the compression of small cerebral vessels [5, 25], leading to decreased CBF, which may also influence the shape of the CaBV pulse. Therefore, the possible mechanism for the observed changes in CaBV pulse shape can be explained that in healthy individuals, the cerebral vessels are able to rapidly accommodate changes in blood flow demand, resulting in a more pronounced convexity of the CaBV pulse. In contrast, in NPH patients, impaired cerebral venous drainage may lead to reduced vascular compliance and increased vascular resist- ance, which may limit the ability of cerebral vessels to rapidly accommodate changes in blood flow demand, resulting in a less convex ascending slope of the CaBV pulse. Although the alterations in the shape of the CaBV pulse in NPH patients were previously reported by Chambers et al. [12], we cannot provide a direct comparison between their results and ours. Chambers et al. used a method based on the transmission of short ultrasonic pulses from one side of the skull to another and dynamic measurement of the time- of-flight of the pulses [56, 58]. This technique is not widely available. Whereas we used a global model of cerebral blood circulation and estimated CaBV pulses based on TCD meas- urement [36]. The shapes of the CaBV pulses differ between these two methods—the pulses assessed by Chambers et al. have three clearly distinguishable peaks (see Fig. 1 in [12]), whereas the CaBV pulses obtained with our method have barely visible peaks (see, for example, Fig. 2 or [11, 17, 34, 36, 69]). Therefore, Chambers et al. analyzed the heights of the detected peaks, and we proposed the quantitative similar- ity parameters. Nevertheless, our results are consistent with the results obtained by Chambers et al. [12] in the context of alterations in the CaBV pulse shape in NPH patients. The proposed CaBV pulse analysis has several advan- tages. First, it uses a commonly available TCD device. The method is fully non-invasive and does not require the use of contrast agents or ionizing radiation, making it safe for repeated use. It has the potential to provide an objective and quantitative measure, which can improve the accuracy and reliability of diagnostic tests and may be especially Fig. 2 An example of averaged CBFV (cerebral blood flow velocity) and CaBV (cerebral arterial blood volume) pulses from recordings performed in a healthy volunteer (upper plots) and a probable NPH patient (normal pressure hydrocephalus, lower plots). Dotted lines visualize the ascending upper distances (AUD) as the most prominent differences in CaBV pulse shape between the healthy volunteers and NPH patients were observed for mean AUD 4051Acta Neurochirurgica (2023) 165:4045–4054 1 3 useful in lower-income countries where the availability of MRI or computer tomography scanners is reduced. Several limitations should be considered when interpret- ing the results of the present study. First, the groups of sub- jects were relatively small. In particular, signals from only 31 probable NPH patients and from 23 healthy individuals were analyzed. Thus, the findings should be interpreted with caution and confirmed in larger database. Second, the brain blood circulation model used in the study for the calcula- tion of cerebral arterial blood volume was not directly com- pared with imaging modalities. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct further research to validate this model. Third, the custom-written algorithm for distorted pulse removal could exclude parts of reliable pulses from the analysis, but only a small percentage of pulses (10.5%) were rejected from the analysis as distorted. Fourth, the CBFV signals were up-sam- pled from 50 to 200 Hz to increase their temporal resolution, and a low-pass filtering with a cut-off frequency of 12 Hz was performed prior to analysis. It may have had a minor impact on the pulse shape—pulses became more smoothed (reduction of high-frequency noise), and both the pulse onset and the pulse maximum can be detected with width- augmented precision. It is possible that due to filtering, we lose important information from the high signal component, but both ICP and CBFV pulses are similar to some extent, and it was reported that the power of the ICP signal is mostly contained in the range below 8 Hz [9]. However, if this influ- ence exists, it is systematic and fully reproducible. We have successfully applied the same up-sampling procedure and filter to CBFV recordings in our previous studies related to the shape of CBFV pulses [73, 74]. Fifth, we analyzed the diagnostic accuracy of NPH classification for only one, the most prominent CaBV shape-related parameter in our dataset. Studies conducted on larger cohorts are required to evalu- ate the diagnostic accuracy of this parameter and combina- tions of the proposed parameters. Sixth, we did not define the minimum length of the CBFV signal sufficient to evalu- ate the CaBV pulse shape-related parameters, which should be done in prospective studies. Finally, we did not find any significant correlation between the proposed parameters and CSF compensatory parameters. However, NPH is a hetero- geneous disease often associated with changes in CBF, and CSF compensatory parameters themselves do not reflect the full picture of this complex disorder [47]. Conclusion The findings suggest that the shape of the CaBV pulse wave- form differs between healthy individuals and patients with NPH. Further research is needed to validate these findings and to determine the optimal parameters for CaBV pulse analysis in NPH diagnosis and treatment evaluation. However, the potential benefits of this methodology in terms of cost, accessibility, and safety makes it a promising avenue for clinical practice. Abbreviations CaBV: Cerebral arterial blood volume standardized by cross-sectional area of insonated artery [cm]; CBF: Cerebral blood flow [cm3/s]; CBFV: Cerebral blood flow velocity [cm/s]; CSF: Cer- ebrospinal fluid; E: Elasticity [1/ml]; ICP: Intracranial pressure [mm Hg]; IQR: Interquartile range; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging; NPH: Normal pressure hydrocephalus; PET: Positron emission tomog- raphy; RCSF: Resistance to cerebrospinal fluid outflow [mm Hg/ml/ min]; TCD: Transcranial Doppler Supplementary Information The online version contains supplemen- tary material available at https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00701- 023- 05839-5. Author contribution AZ: methodology (lead), formal analysis (equal), software (lead), visualization (lead), and writing—original draft (lead). MK: conceptualization (equal), methodology (supporting), supervision, formal analysis (equal), and writing—original draft (supporting). MC: conceptualization (equal), data collection (equal) and writing—review and editing (equal). ZC: data collection (equal) and writing—review and editing (equal). Funding This study was supported by the National Science Centre, Poland (grant no. UMO-2019/35/B/ST7/00500). MC and ZC were sup- ported by the ERDF (European Regional Development Fund) via the Interreg France (Channel) England Programme. MC is supported by NIHR, Cambridge Centre, and Med-Tec MIC cooperative. Data availability The data analyzed in this study are at present not pub- licly available. The dataset from the group of probable NPH patients is owned by Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK. Requests to access these datasets should be directed to mc141@medschl.cam.ac.uk. The data from the group of healthy volunteers are owed by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Poland, and are available upon request to magdalena.kasprowicz@pwr.edu.pl. Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate The study with healthy vol- unteers was approved by the bioethical committee of Wroclaw Medi- cal University (permission no. KB-170/2014). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the research. The investigation with NPH-probable patients was approved by the local Ethics Committee in Cambridge (08/H0306/103). Competing interests MC has a financial interest in part of the licensing fee of ICM+ software used for signal recording and analysis. All other authors declare no competing interests. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attri- bution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adapta- tion, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05839-5 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4052 Acta Neurochirurgica (2023) 165:4045–4054 1 3 References 1. Avezaat CJJ, van Eijndhoven JHM (1986) The role of the pulsatile pressure variations in intracranial pressure monitoring. Neurosurg Rev 9(1–2):113–133. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ BF017 43061 2. Author C, Shafiee K, Sedighi B, Seifaldini R, ad Abdi (2014) Changing cerebral blood flow in normal pressure hydrocephalus after the tap test can predict clinical improvement. Iran J Neurol 13(4):245. Accessed: Jan. 16, 2023. [Online]. Available: /pmc/ articles/PMC4300802/ 3. Bakker SLM, Boon AJW, Wijnhoud AD, Dippel DWJ, Delwel EJ, Koudstaal PJ (2002) Cerebral hemodynamics before and after shunting in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurol Scand 106(3):123–127. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1034/J. 1600- 0404. 2002. 01329.X 4. Bateman GA (2000) Vascular compliance in normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21(9):1574, Accessed: Mar. 16, 2023. [Online]. Available: /pmc/articles/PMC8174849/ 5. Bradley WG, Whittemore AR, Watanabe A, Davis SJ, Teresi LM, Homyak M (n.d) Association of deep white matter infarction with chronic communicating hydrocephalus: 31 implications regarding the possible origin of normal-pressure hydrocephalus. 6. Bishop SM, Ercole A (2018) “Multi-scale peak and trough detec- tion optimised for periodic and quasi-periodic neuroscience data”, in Acta Neurochirurgica. Supplementum. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ 978-3- 319- 65798-1_ 39 7. Boon AJW et al (1999) Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study: the role of cerebrovascular disease. J Neurosurg 90(2):221– 226. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3171/ JNS. 1999. 90.2. 0221 8. Brooks DJ et al (1986) Studies on cerebral oxygen metabolism, blood flow, and blood volume, in patients with hydrocephalus before and after surgical decompression, using positron emission tomography. Brain 109( Pt 4)4:613–628. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ BRAIN/ 109.4. 613 9. Calisto A et al (2010) Analysis of intracranial pressure recordings: comparison of PCA and signal averaging based filtering methods and signal period estimation. 2010 Annual Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, EMBC’10, 3638–3641, https:// doi. org/ 10. 1109/ IEMBS. 2010. 56274 20 10. Cagnin A et al (2015) A simplified callosal angle measure best differentiates idiopathic-normal pressure hydrocephalus from neurodegenerative dementia. J Alzheimers Dis 46(4):1033–1038. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3233/ JAD- 150107 11. Carrera E et al (2010) What shapes pulse amplitude of intracranial pressure? J Neurotrauma 27(2):317–324. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1089/ neu. 2009. 0951 12. Chambers IR et al (2005) The clinical application of non-invasive intracranial blood volume pulse wave monitoring. Physiol Meas 26(6):1019–1032. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1088/ 0967- 3334/ 26/6/ 011 13. Chen T, Guestrin C (2016) XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. Proc ACM SIGKDD Int Conf Knowl Discov Data Min 13–17-August-2016:785–794. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1145/ 29396 72. 29397 85 14. Chang C-C, Kuwana N, Noji M, Tanabe Y, Koike Y, Ikegami T (1999) Cerebral blood flow in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Nucl Med Commun 20(2):167–170. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ 00006 231- 19990 2000- 00009 15. Czosnyka ZH et al (2002) Cerebral autoregulation among patients with symptoms of hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 50(3):526–533. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ 00006 123- 20020 3000- 00018 16. Czosnyka Z, Czosnyka M (2017) Long-term monitoring of intrac- ranial pressure in normal pressure hydrocephalus and other CSF disorders. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 159(10):1979–1980. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S00701- 017- 3282-1/ METRI CS 17. Czosnyka M, Czosnyka Z (2020) Origin of intracranial pres- sure pulse waveform. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 162(8):1815–1817. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00701- 020- 04424-4 18. Czosnyka M, Whitehouse H, Smielewski P, Simac S, Pickard JD (1996) Testing of cerebrospinal compensatory reserve in shunted and non-shunted patients: a guide to interpretation based on an observational study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 60(5):549– 558. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1136/ JNNP. 60.5. 549 19. Czosnyka Z, Van Den Boogaard F, Czosnyka M, Momjian S, Gel- ling L, Pickard JD (2005) The relationship between CSF circula- tion and cerebrovascular pressure-reactivity in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir Suppl 95(95):207–211. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/3- 211- 32318-X_ 43 20. Del Bigio MR (1993) Neuropathological changes caused by hydrocephalus. Acta Neuropathol 85(6):573–585. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ BF003 34666 21. Dombrowski SM, Schenk S, Leichliter A, Leibson Z, Fukamachi K, Luciano MG (2006) Chronic hydrocephalus-induced changes in cerebral blood flow: mediation through cardiac effects. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 26(10):1298–1310. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ SJ. JCBFM. 96002 82/ ASSET/ IMAGES/ LARGE/ 10. 1038_ SJ. JCBFM. 96002 82- FIG7. JPEG 22. Edwards RJ, Dombrowski SM, Luciano MG, Pople IK (2004) Chronic hydrocephalus in adults. Brain Pathol 14(3):325–336. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/J. 1750- 3639. 2004. TB000 72.X 23. Ertl M et al (2017) Measuring changes in the optic nerve sheath diameter in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocepha- lus: a useful diagnostic supplement to spinal tap tests. Eur J Neu- rol 24(3):461–467. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ ENE. 13225 24. Factora R, Luciano M (2006) Normal pressure hydrocephalus: diagnosis and new approaches to treatment. Clin Geriatr Med 22(3):645–657. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. CGER. 2006. 05. 001 25. Franceschi AM, Bangiyev L (2022) Normal pressure hydrocepha- lus. PET/MR Imaging: A Case-Based Approach 335–336. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ 978-3- 319- 65106-4_ 136 26. Goh D, Minns RA (1995) Intracranial pressure and cerebral arte- rial flow velocity indices in childhood hydrocephalus: current review. Childs Nerv Syst 11(7):392–396. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ BF007 17403 27. Graff-Radford NR, Rezai K, Godersky JC, Eslinger P, Damasio H, Kirchner PT (1987) Regional cerebral blood flow in normal pres- sure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 50(12):1589– 1596. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1136/ JNNP. 50. 12. 1589 28. Hakim S, Adams RD (1965) The special clinical problem of symptomatic hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Observations on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics. J Neurol Sci 2(4):307–327. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ 0022- 510X(65) 90016-X 29. Hashimoto M, Ishikawa M, Mori E, Kuwana N (2010) Diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus is supported by MRI- based scheme: a prospective cohort study. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 7. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ 1743- 8454-7- 18 30. Ishii K et al (2008) Clinical impact of the callosal angle in the diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Eur Radiol 18(11):2678–2683. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S00330- 008- 1044-4 31. Ishikawa M, Hashimoto M, Mori E, Kuwana N, Kazui H (2012) The value of the cerebrospinal fluid tap test for predicting shunt effectiveness in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Fluids Barriers CNS 9(1). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ 2045- 8118-9-1 32. Jarus-Dziedzic K et al (2005) Transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultra- sonography in patients with ventriculomegaly: investigation of additional parameters for qualifying shunt implantation. Pol J Radiol 70(1):27–34 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01743061 https://doi.org/10.1034/J.1600-0404.2002.01329.X https://doi.org/10.1034/J.1600-0404.2002.01329.X https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65798-1_39 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65798-1_39 https://doi.org/10.3171/JNS.1999.90.2.0221 https://doi.org/10.1093/BRAIN/109.4.613 https://doi.org/10.1093/BRAIN/109.4.613 https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627420 https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627420 https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-150107 https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2009.0951 https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2009.0951 https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/26/6/011 https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785 https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006231-199902000-00009 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006231-199902000-00009 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200203000-00018 https://doi.org/10.1007/S00701-017-3282-1/METRICS https://doi.org/10.1007/S00701-017-3282-1/METRICS https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04424-4 https://doi.org/10.1136/JNNP.60.5.549 https://doi.org/10.1007/3-211-32318-X_43 https://doi.org/10.1007/3-211-32318-X_43 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00334666 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00334666 https://doi.org/10.1038/SJ.JCBFM.9600282/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1038_SJ.JCBFM.9600282-FIG7.JPEG https://doi.org/10.1038/SJ.JCBFM.9600282/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1038_SJ.JCBFM.9600282-FIG7.JPEG https://doi.org/10.1038/SJ.JCBFM.9600282/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1038_SJ.JCBFM.9600282-FIG7.JPEG https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1750-3639.2004.TB00072.X https://doi.org/10.1111/ENE.13225 https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CGER.2006.05.001 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65106-4_136 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65106-4_136 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00717403 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00717403 https://doi.org/10.1136/JNNP.50.12.1589 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-510X(65)90016-X https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-510X(65)90016-X https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8454-7-18 https://doi.org/10.1007/S00330-008-1044-4 https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-8118-9-1 4053Acta Neurochirurgica (2023) 165:4045–4054 1 3 33. Katzman R, Hussey F (1970) A simple constant-infusion mano- metric test for measurement of CSF absorption. I. Rationale and method. Neurology 20(6):534–544 34. Kazimierska A et al (2021) Compliance of the cerebrospinal space: comparison of three methods. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 163(7):1979–1989. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00701- 021- 04834-y 35. Kazui H et al (2015) Lumboperitoneal shunt surgery for idio- pathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (SINPHONI-2): an open- label randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 14(6):585–594. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ S1474- 4422(15) 00046-0 36. Kim DJ et al (2009) The monitoring of relative changes in com- partmental compliances of brain. Physiol Meas 30(7):647–659. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1088/ 0967- 3334/ 30/7/ 009 37. Kim DJ et al (2010) Cerebrospinal compensation of pulsating cerebral blood volume in hydrocephalus. Neurol Res 32(6):587– 592. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1179/ 17431 3209X 455673 38. Klinge P et al (2002) The role of cerebral blood flow and cer- ebrovascular reserve capacity in the diagnosis of chronic hydro- cephalus–a PET-study on 60 patients. Acta Neurochir Suppl 81:39–41. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ 978-3- 7091- 6738-0_ 10 39. Klinge-Xhemajli P, Heissler HE, Fischer J, König K, Zumkeller M, Rickels E (1998) Cerebral blood flow in chronic hydroceph- alus–a parameter indicating shunt failure–new aspects. Acta Neurochir Suppl 71(SUPPL. 71):347–349. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ 978-3- 7091- 6475-4_ 100 40. Krejza J et al (2005) Age and sex variability and normal refer- ence values for the VMCA/VICA index. AJNR Am J Neurora- diol 26(4):730, Accessed: Jan. 16, 2023. [Online]. Available: / pmc/articles/PMC7977124/ 41. Kuriyama N et al (2017) Nationwide hospital‐based survey of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in Japan: epidemio- logical and clinical characteristics. Brain Behav 7(3). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ BRB3. 635 42. Larsson A et al (1994) Regional cerebral blood flow in normal pressure hydrocephalus: diagnostic and prognostic aspects. Eur J Nucl Med 21(2):118–123. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ BF001 75758/ METRI CS 43. Lee EJ, Hung YC, Chang CH, Pai MC, Chen HH (1998) Cer- ebral blood flow velocity and vasomotor reactivity before and after shunting surgery in patients with normal pressure hydro- cephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 140(6):599–605. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S0070 10050 147 44. Mabe H, Suzuki K, Nagai H (1990) Cerebral blood flow after ventriculoperitoneal shunt in children with hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 6(7):388–391. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ BF003 02224 45. Mamo HL, Meric PC, Ponsin JC, Rey AC, Luft AG, Seylaz JA (1987) Cerebral blood flow in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Stroke 18(6):1074–1080. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1161/ 01. STR. 18.6. 1074 46. Mantovani P et al (2020) Anterior callosal angle: a new marker of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus? World Neurosurg 139:e548–e552. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. WNEU. 2020. 04. 085 47. Meese W, Kluge W, Grumme T, Hopfenmüller W (1980) CT evaluation of the CSF spaces of healthy persons. Neuroradiology 19(3):131–136. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ BF003 42387 48. Mihalj M, Dolić K, Kolić K, Ledenko V (2016) CSF tap test - obsolete or appropriate test for predicting shunt responsiveness? A systemic review. J Neurol Sci 362:78–84. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. JNS. 2016. 01. 028 49. Miskin N et al (2017) Diagnosis of normal-pressure hydroceph- alus: use of traditional measures in the era of volumetric MR imaging. Radiology 285(1):197–205. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1148/ RADIOL. 20171 61216 50. Mori K (2001) Management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a multiinstitutional study conducted in Japan. J Neurosurg 95(6):970–973. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3171/ JNS. 2001. 95.6. 0970 51. Nakada J, Oka N, Nagahori T, Endo S, Takaku A (1992) Changes in the cerebral vascular bed in experimental hydrocephalus: an angio-architectural and histological study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 114(1–2):43–50. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ BF014 01113 52. Nakajima M et al (2021) Guidelines for management of idi- opathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (third edition): endorsed by the Japanese society of normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neu- rol Med Chir (Tokyo) 61(2):63. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2176/ NMC. ST. 2020- 0292 53. Owler BK et al (2004) Normal pressure hydrocephalus and cer- ebral blood flow: a PET study of baseline values. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 24(1):17–23. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ 01. WCB. 00000 93326. 88757. 49 54. Owler BK, Pickard JD (2001) Normal pressure hydrocephalus and cerebral blood flow: a review. Acta Neurol Scand 104(6):325–342. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1034/J. 1600- 0404. 2001. 00092.X 55. Park HY, Kim M, Suh CH, Lee DH, Shim WH, Kim SJ (2021) Diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement of the cal- losal angle and Evans’ index in idiopathic normal pressure hydro- cephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 31(7):5300–5311. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S00330- 020- 07555-5/ FIGUR ES/6 56. Petkus V, Ragauskas A, Jurkonis R (2002) Investigation of intrac- ranial media ultrasonic monitoring model. Ultrasonics 40(1– 8):829–833. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ S0041- 624X(02) 00216-0 57. Quattrone A et al (2020) Magnetic resonance imaging biomark- ers distinguish normal pressure hydrocephalus from progressive supranuclear palsy. Mov Disord 35(8):1406–1415. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ MDS. 28087 58. Ragauskas A, Daubaris G, Ragaisis V, Petkus V (2003) Implemen- tation of non-invasive brain physiological monitoring concepts. Med Eng Phys 25(8):667–678. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ S1350- 4533(03) 00082-1 59. Raftopoulos C, Chaskis C, Delecluse F, Cantraine F, Bidaut L, Brotchi J (2016) Morphological quantitative analysis of intracra- nial pressure waves in normal pressure hydrocephalus. 14(5):389– 396. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 01616 412. 1992. 11740 091 60. Ryding E, Kahlon B, Reinstrup P (2018) Improved lumbar infu- sion test analysis for normal pressure hydrocephalus diagnosis. Brain Behav 8(11). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ BRB3. 1125 61. Ryska P, Slezak O, Eklund A, Malm J, Salzer J, Zizka J (2020) Radiological markers of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocepha- lus: relative comparison of their diagnostic performance. J Neurol Sci 408. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/J. JNS. 2019. 116581 62. Smielewski P, Czosnyka Z, Kasprowicz M, Pickard JD, Czosnyka M (2012) “ICM+: a versatile software for assessment of CSF dynamics”, in Acta Neurochirurgica. Supplementum. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ 978-3- 7091- 0956-4_ 13 63. Spiegelberg A, Krause M, Meixensberger J, Seifert B, Kurtcuoglu V (2018) Significant association of slow vasogenic ICP waves with normal pressure hydrocephalus diagnosis. Acta Neurochir Suppl 126:243–246. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ 978-3- 319- 65798-1_ 49 64. Stephensen H, Andersson N, Eklund A, Malm J, Tisell M, Wik- kelsö C (2005) Objective B wave analysis in 55 patients with non-communicating and communicating hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76(7):965. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1136/ JNNP. 2004. 039834 65. Tanaka A, Kimura M, Nakayama Y, Yoshinaga S, Tomonaga M (1997) Cerebral blood flow and autoregulation in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 40(6):1161–1167. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ 00006 123- 19970 6000- 00009 66. Thakur SK, Serulle Y, Miskin NP, Rusinek H, Golomb J, George AE (2017) Lumbar puncture test in normal pressure https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04834-y https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00046-0 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00046-0 https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/30/7/009 https://doi.org/10.1179/174313209X455673 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6738-0_10 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6475-4_100 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6475-4_100 https://doi.org/10.1002/BRB3.635 https://doi.org/10.1002/BRB3.635 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175758/METRICS https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175758/METRICS https://doi.org/10.1007/S007010050147 https://doi.org/10.1007/S007010050147 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302224 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302224 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.18.6.1074 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.18.6.1074 https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WNEU.2020.04.085 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00342387 https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNS.2016.01.028 https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNS.2016.01.028 https://doi.org/10.1148/RADIOL.2017161216 https://doi.org/10.1148/RADIOL.2017161216 https://doi.org/10.3171/JNS.2001.95.6.0970 https://doi.org/10.3171/JNS.2001.95.6.0970 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01401113 https://doi.org/10.2176/NMC.ST.2020-0292 https://doi.org/10.2176/NMC.ST.2020-0292 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.WCB.0000093326.88757.49 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.WCB.0000093326.88757.49 https://doi.org/10.1034/J.1600-0404.2001.00092.X https://doi.org/10.1007/S00330-020-07555-5/FIGURES/6 https://doi.org/10.1007/S00330-020-07555-5/FIGURES/6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00216-0 https://doi.org/10.1002/MDS.28087 https://doi.org/10.1002/MDS.28087 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4533(03)00082-1 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4533(03)00082-1 https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.1992.11740091 https://doi.org/10.1002/BRB3.1125 https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNS.2019.116581 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0956-4_13 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0956-4_13 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65798-1_49 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65798-1_49 https://doi.org/10.1136/JNNP.2004.039834 https://doi.org/10.1136/JNNP.2004.039834 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199706000-00009 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199706000-00009 4054 Acta Neurochirurgica (2023) 165:4045–4054 1 3 hydrocephalus: does the volume of CSF removed affect the response to tap? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38(7):1456. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3174/ AJNR. A5187 67. Thomas G et al (2005) Baseline neuropsychological profile and cognitive response to cerebrospinal fluid shunting for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 20(2–3):163–168. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1159/ 00008 7092 68. Tuniz F et al (2017) The role of perfusion and diffusion MRI in the assessment of patients affected by probable idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. A cohort-prospective preliminary study. Fluids Barriers CNS 14(1):1–11. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ S12987- 017- 0072-3/ FIGUR ES/3 69. Uryga A, Kasprowicz M, Calviello L, Diehl RR, Kaczmarska K, Czosnyka M (2019) Assessment of cerebral hemodynamic parameters using pulsatile versus non-pulsatile cerebral blood outflow models. J Clin Monit Comput. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10877- 018- 0136-1 70. Wozniak M, McLone DG, Raimondi AJ (1975) Micro- and mac- rovascular changes as the direct cause of parenchymal destruction in congenital murine hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 43(5):535–545. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3171/ JNS. 1975. 43.5. 0535 71. Yamada S, Ishikawa M, Yamamot K (2015) Optimal diagnostic indices for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus based on the 3D quantitative volumetric analysis for the cerebral ventricle and subarachnoid space. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36(12):2262–2269. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3174/ AJNR. A4440 72. Yamada S, Ishikawa M, Yamamoto K (2016) Comparison of CSF distribution between idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and Alzheimer disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37(7):1249– 1255. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3174/ AJNR. A4695 73. Ziółkowski A et al (2023) Peak appearance time in pulse wave- forms of intracranial pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity. Front Physiol 13:2670. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3389/ FPHYS. 2022. 10779 66/ BIBTEX 74. Ziółkowski A, Pudełko A, Kazimierska A, Czosnyka M, Czosnyka Z, Kasprowicz M (2021) Analysis of relative changes in pulse shapes of intracranial pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity during infusion test. Physiol Meas. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1088/ 1361- 6579/ AC38BF Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. https://doi.org/10.3174/AJNR.A5187 https://doi.org/10.3174/AJNR.A5187 https://doi.org/10.1159/000087092 https://doi.org/10.1186/S12987-017-0072-3/FIGURES/3 https://doi.org/10.1186/S12987-017-0072-3/FIGURES/3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-018-0136-1 https://doi.org/10.3171/JNS.1975.43.5.0535 https://doi.org/10.3174/AJNR.A4440 https://doi.org/10.3174/AJNR.A4695 https://doi.org/10.3389/FPHYS.2022.1077966/BIBTEX https://doi.org/10.3389/FPHYS.2022.1077966/BIBTEX https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/AC38BF https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/AC38BF Brain blood flow pulse analysis may help to recognize individuals who suffer from hydrocephalus Abstract Background Methods Results Conclusions Introduction Methods Patient cohort NPH Healthy volunteers Data acquisition NPH Healthy volunteers The recordings for both groups Data processing Pulse CaBV triangle similarity parameters Statistical analysis Results Group characterization Lengths of the recordings in NPH and controls Differences in CaBV shape between healthy volunteers and probable NPH patients Relationships between triangle similarity parameters and CSF compensatory parameters Discussion Conclusion Anchor 26 References