Vol.:(0123456789) Asia Europe Journal (2024) 22:85–102 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-024-00691-3 1 3 ORIGINAL PAPER The ’Tilt’ and the ’Pacific Uplift’ in ’Global Britain’s’ ties with the Pacific Islands Liam Saddington1 Received: 3 July 2023 / Revised: 8 December 2023 / Accepted: 29 January 2024 / Published online: 19 February 2024 © The Author(s) 2024 Abstract Following the 2016 vote to leave the European Union, the British government sought to construct the UK as “Global Britain” to reinvigorate its foreign policy. Subsequently, in 2019, the UK government announced a “Pacific Uplift” to facilitate greater engagement with the Pacific Island States. Alongside Australia’s “Pacific Step Up” and New Zealand’s “Pacific Reset”, this engagement is part of a wider shift in foreign relations as Western powers seek to counter perceived Chinese influ- ence in the region. Within this article, I consider the changing relationship between the UK and the Pacific Island States. I argue that the UK’s “Pacific Uplift” was shaped by colonial legacies despite the absence of discussion of them. I contend that the UK’s re-engagement with Pacific Islanders is influenced by the announcement of the Australian-UK-US (AUKUS) security alliance and the UK’s wider military pres- ence continues to be framed by colonial legacies. Finally, I argue that climate-ocean governance has been utilised by the UK to leverage influence as a partner rather than a former colonial power. I advocate for greater scrutiny of the UK’s changing rela- tionship with Pacific Island States. Abbreviations AUKUS Australia-UK-US CCOA Commonwealth Clean Oceans Alliance COP Conference of the Parties CPTTT Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership FOIP Free and Open Indo-Pacific EU European Union HMS His Majesty’s Ship IRIS Infrastructure for Resilient Island States NZ New Zealand PIF Pacific Island Forum * Liam Saddington lrs46@cam.ac.uk 1 Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9679-5519 http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1007/s10308-024-00691-3&domain=pdf 86 L. Saddington 1 3 PIS Pacific Island States PNG Papua New Guinea UK United Kingdom USA United States of America Introduction On June 23, 2016, the UK voted in a referendum on its membership of the European Union (EU), with 51.9% of votes cast in favour of leaving. The UK had been a mem- ber of the EU, and its predecessor the European Communities, since 1973. Thus, its exit led to considerable debate and contestation among politicians, diplomats, and commentators about what role the UK could, and should, play internationally in the twenty-first century. “Global Britain” was first used in October 2016 by then Prime Minister Theresa May. Subsequently, it has been promoted by the British govern- ment as a framework for the UK’s post-Brexit foreign policy—although the term has been used fluidly (Turner, 2019) and has declined in use (Wilkins 2023). This reim- agining of Britain’s role across the globe has materialised in particular spaces with the UK announcing in 2019 a “Pacific Uplift” to strengthen relations with Pacific Island States (PIS). This consisted of establishing three new diplomatic posts, in Samoa, Tonga, and Vanuatu—which alongside existing posts would mean that the UK had the greatest diplomatic coverage across the PIS of any European country (Dayant 2020). Indeed, there has been a degree of “islandness” within “Global Brit- ain” more broadly with seven of the nine new diplomatic posts announced in 2018 in island states (Foreign and Commonwealth Office 2018). Within the “Pacific Uplift” component of “Global Britain”, there has been a focus on trade, security issues, and environmental issues—with the Commonwealth playing a key role in facilitating this interaction (Dayant 2020). More broadly in the 2021 Integrated Review, the UK announced a wider tilt towards the Indo-Pacific which was intended to alter the dynamics of international politics and counter a perceived threat from the People’s Republic of China (here- after China) (Nilsson-Wright 2023). Part of this was the UK seeking membership of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) (Wilkins 2023) which it joined in March 2023 (Nilsson-Wright 2023). There have also been several prominent visits to PIS by British politicians with COP26 President Alok Sharma visiting Fiji in July 2022, Minister of Asia and the Middle East Amanda Milling visiting Vanuatu in August 2022, and Foreign Secre- tary James Cleverly visiting Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, and Samoa in April 2023 (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office 2022; 2023). Fol- lowing the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, the 2023 Integrated Review Refresh refined the UK’s approach towards the Indo-Pacific—by “setting out the nature of the Chinese challenge to UK interests” (p.85) and emphasising NATO’s significance and the need to restore Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity (Nilsson- Wright 2023). The Indo-Pacific “tilt” is now seen as completed by the British gov- ernment with Prime Minister Rishi Sunak writing in the foreword “I am proud that 87 1 3 The ’Tilt’ and the ’Pacific Uplift’ in ’Global Britain’s’ ties… the UK has delivered the ambition we set for the Indo-Pacific tilt” (HM Government 2023). The “Pacific Uplift” was targeted at the PIS, but this grouping is nebulous to define, with various assemblages of states and territories included and excluded from different organisations and imaginaries (Wallis et al. 2022a). Within the 2021 Integrated Review, the UK government set out how the “UK will deepen our engage- ment in the Indo-Pacific… establishing a greater and more persistent presence than any other European country” (HM Government, p.62) focusing on the importance of the region for the UK’s economy, global security, and international law. Like the “PIS”, the “Indo-Pacific” is another construct with unclear boundaries (Sargeant 2020). Coined by the Australian government in 2013, the Indo-Pacific is a fluid term which connects the Indian and Pacific Oceans via Southeast Asia and is used by the USA, India, Japan, France, and Indonesia (Wallis and Batley 2020). However, the Indo-Pacific terminology has not been welcomed by China as it signals a reimagin- ing of regional security apparatuses (Sargeant 2020). Despite growing academic interest in Pacific diplomacy (e.g. Fry and Tarte 2015), UK foreign policy post-Brexit (e.g. Turner, 2019), and the UK’s Indo-Pacific tilt (e.g. Breslin and Burnham 2023), there has been little consideration of the “Pacific Uplift” and the current and future British relationship with PIS. Indeed, within much analysis, the PIS are scantly considered—for instance Breslin and Burnham (2023) discuss the ten Commonwealth members “going east from India” (p.416) only cit- ing Fiji and Papua New Guinea neglecting the other Commonwealth PIS—Kiri- bati, Nauru, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu, and Vanuatu. This suggests a need to evaluate the UK’s relationships with the PIS. In this article, I firstly con- sider the changing geopolitics of the Pacific Islands and range of powers (re)engag- ing with the region. Secondly, reflecting on how the limited engagement with the “Pacific Uplift” has largely been ahistorical, I argue the need to consider the UK’s colonial history and postcolonial relations with PIS. Thirdly, I explore the broader geopolitics of this (re)engagement with the PIS, considering how the Australia-UK- US (AUKUS) military alliance is affecting UK-PIS relations and the Royal Navy’s wider role in this relationship. Fourthly, I consider how the UK has tried to use cli- mate-ocean governance within its (re)engagement with the “Blue Pacific” to reposi- tion itself as a partner to PIS rather than merely a formal colonial power. Wider (re)engagement with the Pacific: China, “Old” friends and “new” powers Post-Brexit foreign policy considerations are one reason behind the UK’s (re) engagement with the PIS. However, the UK’s renewed diplomatic and military presence in the Pacific is also responding to wider Western concerns about China’s increasing regional influence. China provides large amounts of aid in the region, competes for recognition with the Republic of China (Taiwan), and is increasing its trade links (O’Keefe 2015). In 2017, Australia announced a “Pacific Step-Up” which sought to demarcate a new chapter in Australian-Pacific relations—partly to counter the perceived Chinese threat. Until 2018, Australia’s official discourse 88 L. Saddington 1 3 towards China was one of cautious optimism; this then gave way to a much more explicit focus on competition (Wallis et al. 2022b). Despite Australia’s efforts, com- mentators have suggested that its Step-Up has had limited success with some PIS, like the Solomon Islands, increasing engagement with China (Layton 2022). Aus- tralia’s approach to PIS is often counterproductive, with its domestic policies dis- connected from state foreign policy goals and Australian politicians mismanaging the balance between their strategic concerns and the sovereignty of PIS. Australian foreign policy towards the PIS has long been critiqued as “instrumental in its focus – the islands have been seen as objects that can be shaped and used in various ways to enhance Australia’s strategic position” (Sargeant 2020, p.28). Parallel to Aus- tralia, New Zealand announced the “Pacific Reset” in 2018—a combination of soft power and public diplomacy focusing on engagement, partnerships, and collabora- tion (Mark 2022). Powles and Powles (2018) contest that this is the most significant shift in New Zealand’s policy towards the Pacific in decades, with the region being where New Zealand has the most influence and impact within its diplomacy, with a unique and substantial overlap between its domestic and foreign policy given its Pacific identity. The Pacific Reset addresses New Zealand’s concerns about Chinese influence in the Pacific and China’s role in the region (Iati 2021). Beyond Australia and New Zealand, other Western states have also “reengaged” with PIS. In February 2022, the Biden administration announced its Indo-Pacific strategy with a focus on trade, investment, and deepening bilateral and multilateral partnerships (Hornung 2023). Within this, the PIS were specifically mentioned with the USA announcing $810 million in expanded support and developing the first ever American strategy for the PIS (Hornung 2023). This has included the US Pacific Islands Partnerships which consists of recognising the Cook Islands and Niue as sovereign states, appointing the first ever US envoy to the PIF, and establishing embassies in the Solomon Islands and Tonga with planned embassies for Vanuatu and Kiribati (Hornung 2023; White House 2023). Vice President Kamala Harris appeared virtually at the Pacific Islands Forum in July 2022—although Biden’s can- celled visit to the PIF in Papua New Guinea in 2023 was widely criticised and seen as a missed opportunity for US diplomacy (US Department of State 2022; Hornung 2023). France has a complicated regional role as “it sees itself both as a leading Euro- pean power in the Pacific, and as an internal Pacific Islands regional power, based on its sovereignty there” (Fisher 2020, p.37). Its colonial presence is evident through institutions like the PIF, with France both a dialogue member and represented through French Polynesia and New Caledonia’s membership (Fisher 2020). Other states have also “engaged” or “re-engaged” with the PIS, with O’Keefe (2015, pp. 126) noting that “the most notable of the ‘new friends’ – Indonesia, India, Israel, the United Arab Emirates, and Turkey – are simply trying to increase their relative power and influence in the existing system (and in the Pacific)”. For instance, Indo- nesia announced a “Pacific Elevation” in July 2019—although this is more focused on Jakarta’s efforts to quieten discussions on West Papua among Pacific Islanders (Griffith Asia Institute 2020). However, these shifts are often incremental and may not be as transformative as geopolitical discourses suggest. Envall (2020, p.65) notes that although Japan has shifted from primarily a development focus to a “more 89 1 3 The ’Tilt’ and the ’Pacific Uplift’ in ’Global Britain’s’ ties… strategic set of policies towards the Pacific Islands” within its Free and Open Indo- Pacific (FOIP) strategy that “the importance of the Pacific Islands in Japan’s FOIP strategy should not be exaggerated”. Furthermore, Pacific Islanders are increas- ingly asserting their own cultural and geopolitical identity through motifs like the “Blue Pacific” and “large oceanic states” which prioritise their concerns like climate change and shape their regional identities (Wyth 2018). China’s growing influence in PIS has been long discussed (e.g. McElroy and Bai 2008)—although some commentators and academics have criticised such work for overstating China’s role or merely reproducing Western narratives (Crocombe 2009). Moreover, Pacific Islanders are not “passive recipients but active agents exer- cising choice” (Rodd, 2016, p.95) as Rodd argues in relation to Fiji’s engagement with the Maritime Silk Road under the Belt and Road Initiative. Nevertheless, Chi- na’s increased regional presence has alarmed Western powers. The UK signed a new trilateral security pact with Australia and the USA in 2021—AUKUS (Australia- UK-US)—facilitating Australia acquiring nuclear-powered submarines. Perceived as an effort to counter China, the pact focuses on military capability as opposed to intelligence-sharing which is facilitated by the broader Five Eyes alliance (BBC 2021a). AUKUS’ announcement led to France recalling its ambassadors to Wash- ington and Canberra and the cancelling of UK-France defence talks—despite assur- ances from then British Prime Minister Boris Johnson that France should not be concerned about the deal (BBC 2021b). Moreover, the UK was portrayed by inter- national media and foreign politicians, as the lesser party in the agreement with France’s Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian calling the UK the “third wheel” (Caulcutt and Gallardo 2021). Whilst China is clearly the driving factor of AUKUS, this dismissal by Le Drian undermines the UK’s efforts to use AUKUS to project itself as a key player regionally and globally. Given the history of Pacific Islander anti-nuclear activism and nuclear testing’s legacies, the announcement of Aus- tralia procuring nuclear submarines was met with widespread condemnation among Pacific Islanders thus risking Britain’s diplomatic relations with PIS (Blades 2021). These new military alliances are seen as reproducing colonial understandings of the Pacific as a space to be controlled by powerful actors. British colonial and postcolonial relations in the Pacific Firstly, before considering the UK’s contemporary relationship with PIS, it is imperative to consider its colonial and postcolonial history in the region. This his- tory shapes the UK’s contemporary diplomacy, Pacific Islanders’ attitudes towards the UK, and wider international relations in the Pacific and beyond. The British are frequently described as an unenthusiastic Pacific power with McIntyre (2012, p.136) stating the “British Government was only reluctantly involved in the [Gil- bert and Ellice] Islands” with activities of Australian and New Zealand colonists leading to British control of Fiji in 1874. Similarly, Rodd (2016, p.506) argues that “even at the height of imperialism, the British had fairly little interest in the Pacific Islands” and that “in the Pacific, colonial rule was shorter, and comparatively less intrusive” (p.516). Pacific colonies are often described as neglected imperial 90 L. Saddington 1 3 outposts—typified by minimal British intervention, under-staffed administrations, and small budgets (Rodd 2016). Despite this often-apathetic description of empire, Britain’s regional imperial legacy in is shaped by negative impacts on people, socie- ties, and environments. British colonialism in the Pacific did not occur in a vacuum but was connected to global forms of oppression with wider justifications under- pinning British colonial exploits. For instance, in 1787, there was a British mission to recover breadfruit from Tahiti which was intended to provide a food source for African slaves on British sugar plantations in the Caribbean (Matsuda, 2012). Origi- nating with James Cook, one can trace how British colonial systems in the Pacific lead to the control and exploitation of its people and environments, whether that is the forced movement of labour and people, nuclear testing, or resource exploi- tation (Matsuda, 2012). Indeed, this contested, and troubled, history is epitomised by ongoing controversy over Cook’s legacy as his  voyages are seen as epitimis- ing colonialism and imperialism (McLaren and Clark 2020). This legacy has mate- rial and discursive impacts on Pacific Islanders today. Under the British Phosphate Commission, co-owned by Australia, New Zealand, and the UK, Banaba and Nauru were devastated by phosphate mining for Australian agriculture with ongoing detri- mental impacts (Teaiwa 2015). British colonial legacies, like the forced movement of indentured Indian labours to Fiji, continue to be felt in politics across PIS (e.g. Sharma and Irvine 2016). Across the Pacific, the British Empire controlled a range of territories, with each territory having a different relationship with London thus ensuring there was no uniform colonial experience (McIntyre 2014). Colonialism in the region was justi- fied for several reasons including resource extraction, a fear of European expansion, and to deter blackbirding (McQuarrie 1994; 2000; Teaiwa 2015). Moreover, British imperial expansion into Pacific Islands was intertwined with the colonial ambitions of other territories like Australia. Morgan (2020, p.50) contends that “concerned about German and French designs in the region, Australian politicians implored British authorities to assume control of islands which subsequently became Brit- ish New Guinea, the British Solomon Islands Protectorate and the New Hebrides (jointly administered with France)” thereby ensuring Britain was the dominant regional colonial power by the beginning of the twentieth century. Whilst lacking a formal independence date, Australia and New Zealand were de facto sovereign by the early twentieth century. Independence for the PIS came much later. Following World War Two, Britain reclaimed Japanese-occupied islands and expanded its presences—for instance through the Colonial Develop- ment Welfare Grants and Land Commission in contemporary Tuvalu and Kiribati (Hughes 1992). However, this was short-lived with McIntyre (2014) noting the British adopted a position of accelerated decolonisation from 1975 with “hast- ily erected island governments” (p.259) left behind in newly independent states. Many PIS were among the last British colonies to receive independence with Vanuatu only achieving independence from the UK (and France) in 1980 (Lind- strom 2022). There has been a failure of British-derived institutions to be fully accepted in states like Fiji and the Solomon Islands as they remain shaped by the institutional and political legacies of colonisation (Rodd 2016). The contempo- rary maps of PIS can only be understood through British colonialism, like the 91 1 3 The ’Tilt’ and the ’Pacific Uplift’ in ’Global Britain’s’ ties… drawing and redrawing of colonial boundaries in the Gilbert and Ellice Islands (McIntyre 2014; McQuarrie 2000). Postcolonial UK-PIS trade has been minimal. Pacific exports make up 0.03% of import volume in the UK, although the relationship is unequal in significance, with any change in demand having a greater impact for PIS (Dayant 2020). 6.4% of Fijian exports go to the UK, and on average, 6.14% of the Solomon Islands’ exports are to the UK (Dayant 2020). After decolonisation, there was a period of British regional decline. This accelerated post-2000 with Britain retreat- ing “from the southwest Pacific, handing bilateral political and economic deal- ings over to the European Union, Australia and New Zealand” (Lindstrom 2022, p.100). This has been acknowledged by British diplomats. Laura Clarke, the Brit- ish High Commissioner to New Zealand, in a 2018 speech, argued “the UK has long been in and of the Pacific. But in the 2000s, we scaled down our presence. We remained present and engaged in Fiji, PNG and the Solomon Islands, and covered other Pacific countries from non-resident accreditations – as I currently cover Samoa. But we closed our High Commissions in Vanuatu and Tonga. And quite frankly we stepped back too much from our Pacific friends and partners”. Clarke’s statement that the UK “stepped back too much” from the PIS is indica- tive of wider discourses of UK withdrawal from the region and laments the UK’s declining influence among its “friends and partners”. Following Brexit, the vari- ous UK prime ministers have been forced to reconsider its wider diplomatic rela- tions and seeking to create, and reinforce, relations worldwide to assert itself as a “global” player. Global Britain, as a geopolitical narrative, has close parallels to and is shaped by the legacies and narratives of empire (Turner, 2019). To appreciate the ambition of Global Britain, one must have some pre-existing knowledge of past imperial success and acceptance of empire as a force for good. Similarly, British imperialism under- pins, but is not explored, much of the “Pacific Uplift” rhetoric. Clarke described how the UK and PIS “have strong historical connections” and that this “was one of the far-flung corners of the British Empire and – whatever we may think of the Empire and its legacy, and that is surely a topic for another speech – the ties that are left are strong” (Clarke, 2019). Here, Clarke avoids the difficult topic of Britain’s colonial past and instead focuses on contemporary relations. The Commonwealth has played a key role in the British government’s reimagining of the UK’s foreign relations. Of the 54 Commonwealth members, 11 are former British colonies in the Pacific. Although usually dismissed as a relatively minor geopolitical player (Craggs 2014), the Commonwealth has played an important role in framing Britain’s efforts to reim- agine its relationship with PIS in a way that alters and reinforces historic colonial relations. The UK is portrayed as a partner to PIS—although these ties are colonial legacies. All of three new diplomatic posts in the region, Samoa, Tonga, and Vanu- atu, are in Commonwealth countries, and the UK has doubled its diplomatic staff in Fiji (Clarke, 2019). British cooperation with the Pacific Islands on environmental issues (discussed below) is often channelled through the Commonwealth. Beyond the Commonwealth, the UK has long been engaged with regional institutions, being a founding dialogue partner of the PIF in 1989 (Wallis et al. 2022a). This relation- ship is likely to become more significant with the forum identified as a key partner 92 L. Saddington 1 3 organisation for the UK government and the UK increasing cooperation with Aus- tralia and New Zealand (HM Government 2021; RNZ 2019). Whilst clearly significant, Brexit is not the only factor regarding the UK’s “re- engagement” with the region. The UK’s reengagement, such as reopening its High Commission in Vanuatu in 2019, is occurring partly due to concern about China’s increasing regional influence (Lindstrom 2022). Consequently, the UK is also reconsidering its defence implications within the wider Indo-Pacific. However, “the Russian offensive in Ukraine has also revealed significant fault lines in the UK’s tilt strategy” (Breslin and Burnham 2023) with a credibility gap in the UK’s security commitments and ability to act unilaterally (Nilsson-Wright 2023) thus necessitat- ing alliances. Military engagements: AUKUS and HMS Spey Militarily, the UK’s renewed Indo-Pacific presence is most clearly manifest in AUKUS. Alongside the USA, the UK has announced a deal to facilitate Australia acquiring nuclear-powered submarines between 2023 and the mid-2050s (Doherty and Hurst 2023). Since its 2021 announcement, the UK, Australia, and the USA have expanded on AUKUS’ details—with broader implications for the UK’s regional role and perception. In March 2023, UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak alongside US Presi- dent Joe Biden and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced the UK and Australia will build nuclear-powered submarines, and that the UK and the USA will increase their submarine visits to Australia (Brooke-Holland 2023). Drawing the UK into Pacific security, AUKUS is described by Wallis et  al. (2022a) as an extra-regional security agenda. Most commentary has focused on Australia and the USA, with the UK viewed as the third, and minor, party. However, the UK may con- stitute the main beneficiary of AUKUS. Camroux (2021) highlights how most com- mentators have seen AUKUS as providing symbolic value for the UK post-Brexit, whether this is a revival of an imperial Anglosphere or a renaissance of Britain as a global player. The UK will have a permanent base for its nuclear-powered subma- rines in the region, facilitating its strategic goals as well as providing a major boost for Britain’s arms industry. Although AUKUS is seen by the British government as strengthening its rele- vance in the Indo-Pacific security apparatus, the alliance risks damaging British relations with PIS. After AUKUS’ announcement, there was significant concern expressed by Pacific Island diplomats and politicians, given longstanding efforts for a nuclear-free Pacific (Wallis et  al. 2022a). The spectre of nuclear testing by the Americans, French, and British in the region remains a sensitive geopolitical topic. Britain tested hydrogen and atomic bombs at Malden Island and Kiritimati as part of Operation Grapple as well as facilitating American testing on Kiritimati with the legacies of these tests still apparent (Maclellan 2017; Alexis-Martin 2019). Responding to AUKUS, i-Kiribati President Taneti Maamau, expressed frustration that he had not been consulted on the trilateral deal—emphasising “our people were victims of nuclear testing…we still have trauma” (Maamau, 2021 cited in Grant 2021). This is a viewpoint that the UK would rather remain unspoken. As argued 93 1 3 The ’Tilt’ and the ’Pacific Uplift’ in ’Global Britain’s’ ties… by Alexis-Martin et al. (2021, p.117) “the global and national policy response to the humanitarian and environmental legacies of UK and US nuclear weapons tests in Kiribati have been patchwork and inadequate at best” with AUKUS reinvigorating debates around Britain’s nuclear legacy. Similarly, Solomon Islands’ Prime Minis- ter Manasseh Sogavare criticised the Australian government for its lack of consulta- tion, and a communique from four former PIS leaders critiqued the high cost in light of the lack of climate action (Brennan 2023). Coloniality underpins these critiques, whether that is a perceived exclusion from decision-making processes, echoing colonial governance, or the nuclear aspect raising spectres of colonial nuclear test- ing and environmental degradation. However, other key regional actors, like Fijian Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka, have been more positive towards AUKUS (Brennan 2023). Beyond AUKUS, the UK has also strengthened its regional bilateral security ties with PIS. In 2022, the UK and Fiji signed a Memorandum of Understanding focusing on Fiji’s maritime borders (British High Commission Suva 2022a). There is a long history of Fijians serving in the British military, with Royal Navy crew attending medals ceremonies for Fijians who attended the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst and the Britannia Royal Naval College (British High Commission Suva 2022b). Notably, HMS Spey has been at the forefront of efforts to reassert a Brit- ish naval presence with PIS. Alongside HMS Tamar, HMS Spey was deployed in 2021 to the “Indo-Pacific Region” and will remain there for 5 years (Royal Navy 2021). This has been described as a short-term improvement to the British presence in the region, with Type 31 Frigates planned to be permanently deployed in the late 2020s or early 2030s (Vitor Tossini 2021). HMS Spey has no home base, instead tra- versing the Pacific with its Commanding Officer Lieutenant Commander Ben Evans stating, “we are going to places that the Royal Navy has not visited in a long time – that’s really exciting” with visits to Hawaii, French Polynesia, Pitcairn, Samoa, Tonga, Cook Islands, Niue, and Fiji (Evans, 2021 cited in Royal Navy 2021; Brit- ish High Commission 2022b). In March 2022, HMS Spey was the first Royal Navy ship to visit Fiji since 1997 and in April 2022, the first to visit Vanuatu since 1978 (Madigibuli 2022; Ball 2022). Despite this interlude, the visit was framed by a nar- rative of return and continuity with British sailors visiting the Nakelo district in Fiji which was described by Lieutenant Commander Bridget Macnae as having “a strong link and historical ties with the Royal Navy who the villagers had supported about 100 years ago” (Macnae cited in Madigibuli 2022). Colonial and imperial nostalgia underpins much of the rhetoric around HMS Spey, even its appearance is described as having a “retro World War era ‘dazzle paint’” (Royal Navy 2021). With PIS, the UK has reinforced discourses of partnership—promoting HMS Spey as serving a humanitarian role. Following the 2022 Tongan volcanic eruption and tsunami, HMS Spey delivered aid including bottled water, medical supplies, personal protective equipment, and sanitation products (British High Commission Suva 2022a; Ministry of Defence 2022). UK Armed Forces Minister James Heappey stated: “The UK is a long-standing partner of the Pacific Islands and having the ship deployed in the Indo-Pacific meant that we could be there for Tonga” (Heappey, 2022, cited in Ministry of Defence 2022). Here, Heappey stresses the longevity and reciprocity of the UK-PIS relations, neglecting the colonial history. This engagement 94 L. Saddington 1 3 has also reinforced domestic narratives about British scientific and technical exper- tise post-Brexit and the reimagining of Britain’s “global” role. For instance, the UK- controlled and developed uncrewed surface vessel Maxlimer mapped the caldera of Hunga-Tonga Hunga-Ha’apai (Ormiston 2022). HMS Spey is also portrayed as cru- cial to Britain’s contribution to regional climate-ocean governance. Climate‑ocean governance: Britain’s changing role in the Pacific Within the 2021 Integrated Review, the UK government argues the Indo-Pacific tilt is significant as “in the decades to come it [the Indo-Pacific] will be the crucible for many of the most pressing global challenges – from climate and biodiversity to mar- itime security and geopolitical competition linked to rules and norms” (HM Govern- ment 2021, pp.66). Within the Refresh, “climate” remains prominent being men- tioned 35 times (HM Government 2023). Britain’s re-engagement with PIS has been framed by numerous aquatic and vertical metaphors, namely through the “Uplift”, with such a move figuratively “lifting” relations with large oceanic states as these partners are threatened with environmental degradation through a shared focus on issues such as security. Morgan (2020, p.62) argues that “the UK has made clear that pursuing global climate action is a ‘central plank’ of its renewed engagement in the Pacific. British ambassadors in the region have joined island states to call for coun- tries worldwide to ‘follow through on their commitments under the Paris Agree- ment, particularly on cutting emissions’”. The UK government has stated one is its Indo-Pacific priorities is “tackling climate change, using both adaptation and mitiga- tion activity to support a transition to clean, resilient and sustainable growth in the Indo-Pacific through influence with major and growing emitters and the most vul- nerable countries, linked directly to our wider COP26 strategy” (HM Government 2021, p.67). Not only does this approach to climate diplomacy align with PIS’ pri- orities, but it also reinforces British efforts to engage in nation branding to construct a new post-Brexit identity. The UK has presented itself as a world leader on climate with COP26 providing the UK government with “a stage upon which to play out the role of an independent ‘Global Britain’, countering the loss of influence that most analysts predicted would follow British exit from the EU” (Vogler 2020, p.31). Dur- ing COP26, “the media agenda for the first nine days was taken up almost entirely by a series of sectoral ‘side agreements’ carefully choreographed by the British pres- idency” (Jacobs 2022, pp.274). Alongside these “global” efforts, the UK has also increased support on environmental issues targeted at SIDS and specifically PIS. At COP26, then British Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, alongside the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, announced the Infrastructure for Resilient Island States (IRIS) with the UK contributing £10 million for the fund alongside a £40 million overseas aid package for the “Small Island Developing States Capacity and Resil- ience” Programme (Island Innovation 2021). Contributing to the SIDS Accelerated Modalities of Action (SAMOA) Pathway, IRIS is focused on improving infrastructure resilience, strengthening knowledge and partnerships, and promoting gender equal- ity and disability inclusion (CDRI 2023). The UK has used its COP Presidency to emphasise its green credentials to PIS. On the 7th of July, Alok Sharma, the COP26 95 1 3 The ’Tilt’ and the ’Pacific Uplift’ in ’Global Britain’s’ ties… President, chaired an event entitled “UK/Pacific High Level Climate Dialogue” with a focus on building on Pacific-UK cooperation on climate to ensure “ambitious out- comes” at COP26 (Wilton Park 2021). Moreover, the UK has promoted its domestic legislation, like its net zero target, within its regional diplomacy to assert its posi- tion as a climate change “leader”. Climate’s centrality to the UK’s engagement with PIS is evidenced through its co-hosting of a Wilton Park Forum on Climate Change and Resilience in the Pacific with New Zealand (Clarke, 2019). Moreover, alongside these engagements, the UK has also provided climate finance, spending NZ $88 mil- lion between 2016 and 2018 on Climate Finance in the Pacific and contributing £1.4 million to the Pacific Nationally Determined Contributions Hub (Clarke, 2019). Environmental concerns have become intertwined with security issues through the UK’s bilateral diplomacy. For instance, the UK’s conflict, stability, and security fund is financing a £360,000 project to support Fiji, Solomon Islands, Tonga, and Vanuatu in undertaking training to submit extended continental shelf submissions under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (HM Government 2022). Indeed, the UK’s increased military presence in the region is carefully framed through an environmen- tal lens. HMS Spey is described as the Royal Navy’s greenest ship, with emissions reduction technology reducing nitrogen oxide emissions from its diesel generators by about 90% giving the ship the ability to operate in emission-controlled areas (Madi- gibuli 2022; British High Commission 2022b; HMS Spey 2022b). Documented through public and digital diplomacy, HMS Spey’s crew have engaged in activities like “eco-hikes” and tree planting at Colo-I-Suva Forest Park and Village (Republic of Fiji Navy 2022). This integration of environmental and security issues is made explicit by the British High Commission arguing that HMS Spey “working alongside partners and allies the ship is helping tackle security challenges and support nations against the impacts of climate change” (British High Commission 2022b). Britain’s imperial seafaring history has been selectively and partially invoked in the reimagining of the UK’s Pacific role, specifically regarding ocean govern- ance. In 2023, Minister of the Indo-Pacific Anne Marie-Trevelyan sets out “as an island nation and global trading power, the UK is constantly focused on the seas and oceans” (Trevelyan, 2023). Clarke (2019) in her keynote speech on UK-Pacific relations argues “We are all seafaring nations, by and of the sea” emphasising how the UK jointly leading the Commonwealth Clean Oceans Alliance (CCOA) with Vanuatu as part of the Commonwealth Blue Charter focusing on plastic waste. The Royal Navy has also been utilised to project the UK as an environmental actor in the region. HMS Spey has been involved in data collection and water sampling to protect marine life; supporting the UK Government Blue Belt Programme; counter- ing illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing in Vanuatu; and patrolling Tonga’s Exclusive Economic Zone to deter illegal fishing (HMS Spey 2022a; 2022c; Blue Belt Programme 2022; Government of the Kingdom of Tonga 2022). As the UK portrays itself as a “global” player in climate-ocean governance, the PIS have been championing their environmental concerns thus making the Pacific an important space for “Global Britain” to materialise. Pacific Islanders have been actively reimagining their region as the “Blue Pacific” of “large oceanic states” asserting agency over the region’s islands and oceans. Such geopolitical imaginaries draw on a postcolonial tradition of emphasising the connectivity of the ocean and 96 L. Saddington 1 3 resisting colonial imaginaries (e.g. Hau’Ofa 1993). The “Blue Pacific” has focused on the role of islanders as stewards of the Pacific (Wallis and Batley 2020). This "Blue Pacific" offers an alternative representation to more common depictions of the PIS as remote and naturally at risk (Griswold 2021). Such representations were utilised to justify colonial rule, with tropical islands seen as exotic, primitive spaces in need of civilisation through colonial rule (Griswold 2021). Through focusing on climate-ocean governance, and with initiatives like the Commonwealth’s Blue Char- ter, the UK has an opportunity to engage with Pacific Islanders on their own terms and support geopolitical imaginaries, like the "Blue Pacific", which place the envi- ronment at the centre of the Pacific-British relations. These seek to shift perceptions of the UK from postcolonial power to valued partner. However, historical environmental degradation under British colonialism is absent from these discourses. This legacy is most evident in Banaba and Nauru’s devastated landscapes (Teaiwa 2015) but more broadly environmental degradation and governance were part of British imperial rule in the Pacific. Environmental pres- sures were used to justify population, like the Phoenix Island Settlement Scheme, when these relocations supported broader British geopolitical and economic goals (Weber 2016; Hughes 1992). Moreover, it remains to be seen how deep the UK’s contemporary environmental commitments are. Economic imperatives post-Brexit have taken precedence over environmental concerns; for instance, it was widely reported that UK ministers dropped climate change commitments to secure its Aus- tralian trade deal (BBC 2021c). Superficial engagement with climate action leads the UK vulnerable to being accused of greenwashing. Shifting relations: the UK and PIS The UK has a long, complex, and difficult history in the Pacific which continues to shape its contemporary relations. As argued by Breslin and Burnham (2023), the broader “tilt” towards the Indo-Pacific, and the greater engagement with PIS specifi- cally, has been largely a product of Brexit. Recent efforts to “reengage” with the PIS pay little attention to Britain’s colonial legacy, despite assumptions of empire in the promotion of particular narratives (Turner, 2019). This paper has outlined the impor- tance of these colonial legacies in shaping how “Global Britain” is materialised in the Pacific. Grydehøj (2017, p.9) argues that “island studies frequently focuses on former colonies and/or islands that remain in colonial or neocolonial relationships with met- ropolitan powers. Matters are complicated by the fact that it is often scholars from the metropole in question who are most active in undertaking research on these islands. The desire to ‘study islands on their own terms’ risks allowing scholars to overlook the effects of colonialism”. To critique and understand the UK’s changing relationships with PIS, it is imperative to be attentive to these colonial legacies. The utilisation of the Commonwealth for climate-ocean initiatives illustrates how colonialism continues to shape British engagement. Indeed, the UK still retains one British Overseas Terri- tory, Pitcairn, in the region, and the British Overseas Territories have featured heav- ily within imaginaries of “Global Britain”—particularly in relation to its role in cli- mate-ocean governance. Britain’s colonial past shapes perceptions of its contemporary 97 1 3 The ’Tilt’ and the ’Pacific Uplift’ in ’Global Britain’s’ ties… environmental and military endeavours with PIS. Through environmental action, the UK is seeking to utilise soft power to construct a new role for itself. I advocate for a more nuanced engagement to better understand the shifting regional geopolitics. Davis et  al. (2020) challenge the notion of the PIS as being “caught” between China and the USA and its allies, arguing this fails to recognise how PIS simultaneously engage with multiple powers as they navigate foreign influ- ences. Wallis et al. (2022a, pp.15) argue “security cooperation in the Pacific Islands is best characterized as a patchwork of bilateral, minilateral, and multilateral, for- mal and informal, agencies, arrangements, and agreements across local, national, regional, and international levels constituting a patchwork of cooperation”. In this context, climate change is increasingly an integral part of this regional patchwork— exemplified by the Boe Declaration. Through engaging with the PIS on climate-ocean governance, the UK has an opportunity to meaningfully cooperate with PIS, on their own terms. Chinese initiatives, (e.g. the Belt and Road) have been criticised for pay- ing insufficient focus on climate change or the needs of small island states (Li et al. 2020), creating space for PIS cooperation with other actors like the UK. Environmen- tal governance also provides the UK with an opportunity to distance itself from its colonial past. However, without sufficient domestic action to support the UK govern- ment’s discursive reimagining as an environmental leader, the UK risks replicating the mistakes of Morrison’s administration. Climate change could hamper relations rather than improving them. Emerging discussions on loss and damage, following the agreement at COP27, provide the UK with an opportunity to match its climate rheto- ric with leadership on environmental issues to address the concerns of PIS. Since the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, there have been calls for the UK to refocus on its European presence (Dormen et al. 2022). The 2023 Refresh notes that although the UK will still prioritise the Indo-Pacific, the UK government has achieved its original goals and has a lesser presence in the region than other allies such as Japan and France (Brooke-Holland et  al. 2023). The USA has been sug- gested as better placed to focus on the Indo-Pacific given initiatives like the US Pacific Islands Partnership (Nilsson-Wright 2023; Tossini 2021). Moreover, UK for- eign policy post-Brexit has been unstable. Since the referendum, the UK has had four prime ministers and six foreign secretaries—with divergent views on Brexit and UK foreign policy. Given the UK’s domestic turbulence and other international pri- orities, it can only play a supporting role in the PIS region. Beyond the PIS, the UK’s Pacific engagement through CPTTT will only have marginal economic gains but is still actively promoted by the UK government (Webb 2023). This illustrates the efforts that the UK government is undertaking to reinforce the globality of British trade and diplomacy. The UK is only one actor in an increasingly geopolitically complex region, with the UK having significantly less economic, diplomatic, and military influence than others. “Global Britain” is a largely ahistorical narrative—particularly in relation to the “Pacific Uplift”. Given domestic and international challenges, it remains to be seen whether the UK will sustain this renewed interest with PIS or whether it will just be a post-Brexit blip. It is imperative as academics we remain attentive to how colonial legacies shape Brit- ish engagements in the region—especially as state actors seek to use environmental concerns as a less contentious space for collaboration and influence. 98 L. Saddington 1 3 Acknowledgements I would like to thank Phil Steinberg and Klaus Dodds for useful conversations which helped shaped the ideas of this paper. I would like to thank Rory Walshe for his feedback on a draft of this paper. Thank you to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive reviews. Author contribution Sole author. Funding ESRC Award Number: ES/W005646/1; Jesus College, University of Oxford. Data availability Not applicable. Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The author declares no competing interests. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permis- sion directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/. References Alexis-Martin B (2019) The atomic history of Kiritimati – a tiny island where humanity realised its most lethal potential. The Conversation. https:// theco nvers ation. com/ the- atomic- histo ry- of- kirit imati-a- tinyi sland- where- human ity- reali sed- its- most- lethal- poten tial- 114870. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Alexis-Martin B et  al (2021) Addressing the humanitarian and environmental consequences of atmos- pheric nuclear weapon tests: a case study of UK and US test programs at Kiritimati (Christmas) and Malden Islands, Republic of Kiribati. Global Pol 12(1):106–121 Ball E (2022) Royal navy: HMS Spey becomes first British ship to visit Vanuatu since HMS Plymouth in 1976. Plymouth Herald. https:// www. plymo uthhe rald. co. uk/ news/ plymo uth- news/ royal- navy- hms- speyb ecomes- 69103 58. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 BBC (2021a) Aukus: UK, US and Australia launch pact to counter China. BBC. https:// www. bbc. co. uk/ news/ world- 58564 837. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 BBC (2021b) Aukus: France pulls out of UK defence talks mid row. BBC. https:// www. bbc. co. uk/ news/ uk- 58620 220. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 BBC (2021c) UK ‘cut climate pledges’ to clinch Australia trade deal. BBC. https:// www. bbc. co. uk/ news/ busin ess- 58493 481. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Blades J (2021) Aukus pact strikes at heart of Pacific regionalism. BBC. https:// www. rnz. co. nz/ inter natio nal/ pacifi c- news/ 451715/ aukus- pact- strik es- at- heart- of- pacifi c- regio nalis mi. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Blue Belt Programme (2022) Twitter. https:// twitt er. com/ ukgov blueb elt/ status/ 15008 36647 34006 4769. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Brennan D (2023) Pacific responses to AUKUS a mix of unease and understandings. The Diplomat. https:// thedi plomat. com/ 2023/ 04/ pacifi c- respo nses- to- aukus-a- mix- of- unease- and- under stand ing/. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Breslin S, Burnham P (2023) International order transition and the UK’s tilt to the ‘Indo-Pacific’. Pac Rev 36(2):406–432 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://theconversation.com/the-atomic-history-of-kiritimati-a-tinyisland-where-humanity-realised-its-most-lethal-potential-114870 https://theconversation.com/the-atomic-history-of-kiritimati-a-tinyisland-where-humanity-realised-its-most-lethal-potential-114870 https://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/news/plymouth-news/royal-navy-hms-speybecomes-6910358 https://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/news/plymouth-news/royal-navy-hms-speybecomes-6910358 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-58564837 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-58564837 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-58620220 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-58620220 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-58493481 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-58493481 https://www.rnz.co.nz/international/pacific-news/451715/aukus-pact-strikes-at-heart-of-pacific-regionalismi https://www.rnz.co.nz/international/pacific-news/451715/aukus-pact-strikes-at-heart-of-pacific-regionalismi https://twitter.com/ukgovbluebelt/status/1500836647340064769 https://thediplomat.com/2023/04/pacific-responses-to-aukus-a-mix-of-unease-and-understanding/ 99 1 3 The ’Tilt’ and the ’Pacific Uplift’ in ’Global Britain’s’ ties… British High Commission Suva (2022a) UK and Fiji seal new deal on maritime security. UK Government https:// www. gov. uk/ gover nment/ news/ uk- and- fiji- seal- new- deal- on- marit ime- secur ity. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 British High Commission Suva (2022b) HMS Spey arrives in Fiji. Fiji Sun. https:// fijis un. com. fj/ 2022/ 03/ 17/ hms- spey- arriv es- in- fiji/. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Brooke-Holland L Mills C Loft P Walker N Curtis J (2023) The integrated review refresh 2023: what has changed since 2021? Research Briefings. https:// resea rchbr iefin gs. files. parli ament. uk/ docum ents/ CBP- 9750/ CBP- 9750. pdf. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Camroux D (2021) AUKUS: why Britain was the big winner? The Diplomat. https:// thedi plomat. com/ 2021/ 12/ aukus- why- brita in- was- the- big- winne r/? fbclid= IwAR1 YPAn_ ILoCd f8QsM jurUR ETqRC LW633 6nwUG TIbRQ bzgp_ veFfG f4T-I. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Caulcutt C, Gallardo C (2021) AUKUS snub signals ‘clear cooling’ of relations between France and the UK. Politico. https:// www. polit ico. eu/ artic le/ aukus- relat ions- france- uk/. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 CDRI (2023) Launch of ‘Infrastructure for Resilience Island States’ (IRIS) at COP26. CDRI. https:// www. cdri. world/ press- relea ses/ launch- infra struc ture- resil ient- island- states- iris- cop26. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Clarke (2019) UK-Pacific partnerships and share values. UK Government. https:// www. gov. uk/ gover nment/ speec hes/ oceans- apart- the- uk- the- pacifi c- partn ershi ps- shared- values. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Craggs R (2014) Postcolonial geographies, decolonization, and the performance of geopolitics at Com- monwealth conferences. Singap J Trop Geogr 35(1):39–55 Crocombe R (2009) China and USA in the Pacific and the Caribbean: whose incursion, whose territory? A brief rejoinder to McElroy and Bai. Island Studies Journal 4(1):99–100 Davis S Munger L A Legacy H J (2020) Someone else’s chain, someone else’s road: U.S military strat- egy, China’s Belt and Road Initiative, and island agency in the Pacific. Island Stud J 15(2):13–36 Dayant A (2020) Brexit and the Pacific: sink or swim? Lowy Institute. https:// www. lowyi nstit ute. org/ the- inter preter/ brexit- pacifi c- sink- or- swim. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Dohert B, Hurst D (2023) What is the Aukus submarine deal and what does it mean? – the key facts. The Guardian. https:// www. thegu ardian. com/ world/ 2023/ mar/ 14/ what- is- the- aukus- subma rine- deal- and- whatd oes- it- mean- the- key- facts. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Dorman A, German T, Uttley M (2022) Impact of Russia’s invasion on UK Integrated Review. Chatham House. https:// www. chath amhou se. org/ 2022/ 03/ impact- russi as- invas ion- uk- integ rated- review. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Envall HDP (2020) The Pacific islands in Japan’s ‘Free and Open Indo-Pacific’: from ‘slow and steady’ to strategic engagement? Secur Chall 16(1):65–77 Fisher D (2020) The crowded and complex Pacific: lessons from France’s Pacific experience. Secur Chall 16(1):37–43 Foreign and Commonwealth Office (2018) Foreign secretary expands UK Commonwealth diplomatic network. Foreign and Commonwealth Office. https:// www. gov. uk/ gover nment/ news/ forei gn- secre tary- expan ds- uk- commo nweal th- diplo matic- netwo rk#: ~: text= Forei gn% 20Sec retary% 20Bor is% 20Joh nson% 20ann ounced. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office (2022) UK boosts diplomatic ties in Australia and the Pacific as Minister Amanda Milling begins visit to region. Foreign Commonwealth and Develop- ment Office. https:// www. gov. uk/ gover nment/ news/ uk- boosts- diplo matic- ties- in- austr alia- and- the- pacifi c- as- minis ter- amanda- milli ng- begins- visit- to- the- region. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office (2023) “Partnering for the long haul”: British foreign secretary visits Pacific nations. Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office. https:// www. gov. uk/ gover nment/ news/ partn ering- for- the- long- haul- briti sh- forei gn- secre tary- visits- pacifi c- natio ns. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Fry G, Tarte S (2015) The new pacific diplomacy. ANU Press, Acton Government of the Kingdom of Tonga (2022) HMS Spey to transit through Tonga’s EEZ. Government of the Kingdom of Tonga. https:// www. gov. to/ press- relea se/ hms- spey- to- trans it- throu gh- tongas- eez/. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Grant S (2021) Kiribati president says AUKUS nuclear submarine deal puts Pacific at risk. ABC. https:// www. abc. net. au/ news/ 2021- 09- 28/ kirib ati- presi dent- criti cises- austr alia- defen ce- subma rine- deal/ 10049 5894? fbclid= IwAR2 Ps4PF sv3_ W0nI8 ep2h_ T0g- vuOSG NyO4k_ XkNhh 9bmea 8MblV Z821Y_Y. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-and-fiji-seal-new-deal-on-maritime-security https://fijisun.com.fj/2022/03/17/hms-spey-arrives-in-fiji/ https://fijisun.com.fj/2022/03/17/hms-spey-arrives-in-fiji/ https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-9750/CBP-9750.pdf https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-9750/CBP-9750.pdf https://thediplomat.com/2021/12/aukus-why-britain-was-the-big-winner/?fbclid=IwAR1YPAn_ILoCdf8QsMjurURETqRCLW6336nwUGTIbRQbzgp_veFfGf4T-I https://thediplomat.com/2021/12/aukus-why-britain-was-the-big-winner/?fbclid=IwAR1YPAn_ILoCdf8QsMjurURETqRCLW6336nwUGTIbRQbzgp_veFfGf4T-I https://thediplomat.com/2021/12/aukus-why-britain-was-the-big-winner/?fbclid=IwAR1YPAn_ILoCdf8QsMjurURETqRCLW6336nwUGTIbRQbzgp_veFfGf4T-I https://www.politico.eu/article/aukus-relations-france-uk/ https://www.cdri.world/press-releases/launch-infrastructure-resilient-island-states-iris-cop26 https://www.cdri.world/press-releases/launch-infrastructure-resilient-island-states-iris-cop26 https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/oceans-apart-the-uk-the-pacific-partnerships-shared-values https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/oceans-apart-the-uk-the-pacific-partnerships-shared-values https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/brexit-pacific-sink-or-swim https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/brexit-pacific-sink-or-swim https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/14/what-is-the-aukus-submarine-deal-and-whatdoes-it-mean-the-key-facts https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/14/what-is-the-aukus-submarine-deal-and-whatdoes-it-mean-the-key-facts https://www.chathamhouse.org/2022/03/impact-russias-invasion-uk-integrated-review https://www.gov.uk/government/news/foreign-secretary-expands-uk-commonwealth-diplomatic-network#:~:text=Foreign%20Secretary%20Boris%20Johnson%20announced https://www.gov.uk/government/news/foreign-secretary-expands-uk-commonwealth-diplomatic-network#:~:text=Foreign%20Secretary%20Boris%20Johnson%20announced https://www.gov.uk/government/news/foreign-secretary-expands-uk-commonwealth-diplomatic-network#:~:text=Foreign%20Secretary%20Boris%20Johnson%20announced https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-boosts-diplomatic-ties-in-australia-and-the-pacific-as-minister-amanda-milling-begins-visit-to-the-region https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-boosts-diplomatic-ties-in-australia-and-the-pacific-as-minister-amanda-milling-begins-visit-to-the-region https://www.gov.uk/government/news/partnering-for-the-long-haul-british-foreign-secretary-visits-pacific-nations https://www.gov.uk/government/news/partnering-for-the-long-haul-british-foreign-secretary-visits-pacific-nations https://www.gov.to/press-release/hms-spey-to-transit-through-tongas-eez/ https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09-28/kiribati-president-criticises-australia-defence-submarine-deal/100495894?fbclid=IwAR2Ps4PFsv3_W0nI8ep2h_T0g-vuOSGNyO4k_XkNhh9bmea8MblVZ821Y_Y https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09-28/kiribati-president-criticises-australia-defence-submarine-deal/100495894?fbclid=IwAR2Ps4PFsv3_W0nI8ep2h_T0g-vuOSGNyO4k_XkNhh9bmea8MblVZ821Y_Y https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09-28/kiribati-president-criticises-australia-defence-submarine-deal/100495894?fbclid=IwAR2Ps4PFsv3_W0nI8ep2h_T0g-vuOSGNyO4k_XkNhh9bmea8MblVZ821Y_Y https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09-28/kiribati-president-criticises-australia-defence-submarine-deal/100495894?fbclid=IwAR2Ps4PFsv3_W0nI8ep2h_T0g-vuOSGNyO4k_XkNhh9bmea8MblVZ821Y_Y 100 L. Saddington 1 3 Griffith Asia Institute (2020) Indonesia’s Pacific elevation: elevating what and who?. Griffith Asia Insti- tute. https:// blogs. griffi th. edu. au/ asiai nsigh ts/ indon esias- pacifi c- eleva tion- eleva ting- what- and- who/. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Griswold D (2021) Growing hope: island agriculture and refusing catastrophe in climate change adapta- tion in Fiji. Island Stud J 16(2):136–155 Grydehøj A (2017) A future of island studies. Island Stud J 12(1):3–16 Hau’Ofa E (1993) Our Sea of Islands. In: Naidu V, Waddell E, Hau’Ofa E (eds) A New Oceania: rediscovering our sea of island, 1st edn. The University of the South Pacific, Suva, pp 2–16 HM Government (2021) Global Britain in a competitive age. UK Government. https:// assets. publi shing. servi ce. gov. uk/ gover nment/ uploa ds/ system/ uploa ds/ attac hment_ data/ file/ 975077/ Global_ Brita in_ in_a_ Compe titive_ Age-_ the_ Integ rated_ Review_ of_ Secur ity__ Defen ce__ Devel opment_ and_ Forei gn_ Policy. pdf. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 HM Government (2022) Maritime zone training strengthens Fiji’s ocean governance. UK Govern- ment. https:// www. gov. uk/ gover nment/ news/ marit ime- zone- train ing- stren gthens- fijis- ocean- gover nance. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 HM Government (2023) Integrated review refresh 2023. Responding to a more contested and volatile world, UK Government. https:// www. gov. uk/ gover nment/ publi catio ns/ integ rated- review- refre sh- 2023- respo nding- to-a- more- conte sted- and- volat ile- world. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Hornung JW (2023) The United States: a comprehensive strategy with challenges ahead. Asia Policy 18(3):7–16 Hughes HGA (1992) Colonial officials in the Gilbert and Ellice Islands, 1892–1979. Gwasg Gwenf- frwd, Afonwen Iati I (2021) China’s impact on New Zealand foreign policy in the Pacific: the Pacific reset. In: Smith G, Wesley-Smith T (eds) The China alternative: Changing Regional Order in the Pacific Islands, 1st edn. ANU Press, Acton, pp 143–166. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2307/j. ctv1h 45mkn.8 Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Innovation I (2021) PM Johnson announces support for small island States at COP26. Island Innova- tion. https:// islan dinno vation. co/ artic les/ pm- johns on- annou nces- suppo rt- for- small- island- states- at- cop26/? utm_ source= rss& utm_ medium= rss& utm_ campa ign= pm- johns on- annou nces- suppo rt- for- small- island- states- at- cop26. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Jacobs M (2022) Reflections on COP26: international diplomacy, global justice and the greening of capitalism. Polit Q 93(2):270–277 Layton P (2022) Fixing Australia’s failing Pacific step-up strategy. Lowy Institute https:// www. lowyi nstit ute. org/ the- inter preter/ fixing- austr alia-s- faili ng- pacifi c- step- strat egy. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Li C, Chen J, Grydehøj A (2020) Island climate change adaptation and global public goods within the belt and road initiative. Island Stud J 15(2):173–192 Lindstrom L (2022) Notes on sovereignty in Vanuatu. Oceania 92(1):93–106 Maclellan N (2017) Grappling with the bomb: Britain’s Pacific H-bomb tests. ANU Press, Acton Madigibuli A (2022) A visit after 25 years. Fiji Times https:// www. fijit imes. com/a- visit- after- 25- years/. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Mark S (2022) New Zealand’s public diplomacy in the Pacific: a reset, or more of the same? Place Brand Public Dipl 18:105–112. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1057/ s41254- 020- 00196-x Matsuda M (2012) Pacific Worlds: a history of seas, peoples, and cultures, 1st edn. Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge McElroy J, Bai W (2008) The political economy of China’s incursion into the Caribbean and Pacific. Island Stud J 3(2):225–246 McIntyre WD (2012) The partition of the Gilbert and Ellice Islands. Island Stud J 7(1):135–146 McIntyre WD (2014) Winding up the British Empire in the Pacific Islands, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford McLaren A, Clark A (2020) Captain cook upon changing seas; indigenous voices and reimagining at the British museum. J Pac Hist 55(3):418–431 McQuarrie P (1994) Strategic atolls: Tuvalu and the second world war. Macmillan Brown Centre for Pacific Studies, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, N.Z. McQuarrie P (2000) Conflict in Kiribati: a history of the Second World War. Macmillan Brown Cen- tre for Pacific Studies, Canterbury, Christchurch, N.Z. Ministry of Defence (2022) Royal Navy ship delivering emergency aid into Tonga. UK Government. https:// www. gov. uk/ gover nment/ news/ royal- navy- ship- deliv ering- emerg ency- aid- into- tonga. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 https://blogs.griffith.edu.au/asiainsights/indonesias-pacific-elevation-elevating-what-and-who/ https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/975077/Global_Britain_in_a_Competitive_Age-_the_Integrated_Review_of_Security__Defence__Development_and_Foreign_Policy.pdf https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/975077/Global_Britain_in_a_Competitive_Age-_the_Integrated_Review_of_Security__Defence__Development_and_Foreign_Policy.pdf https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/975077/Global_Britain_in_a_Competitive_Age-_the_Integrated_Review_of_Security__Defence__Development_and_Foreign_Policy.pdf https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/975077/Global_Britain_in_a_Competitive_Age-_the_Integrated_Review_of_Security__Defence__Development_and_Foreign_Policy.pdf https://www.gov.uk/government/news/maritime-zone-training-strengthens-fijis-ocean-governance https://www.gov.uk/government/news/maritime-zone-training-strengthens-fijis-ocean-governance https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/integrated-review-refresh-2023-responding-to-a-more-contested-and-volatile-world https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/integrated-review-refresh-2023-responding-to-a-more-contested-and-volatile-world https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1h45mkn.8 https://islandinnovation.co/articles/pm-johnson-announces-support-for-small-island-states-at-cop26/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=pm-johnson-announces-support-for-small-island-states-at-cop26 https://islandinnovation.co/articles/pm-johnson-announces-support-for-small-island-states-at-cop26/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=pm-johnson-announces-support-for-small-island-states-at-cop26 https://islandinnovation.co/articles/pm-johnson-announces-support-for-small-island-states-at-cop26/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=pm-johnson-announces-support-for-small-island-states-at-cop26 https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/fixing-australia-s-failing-pacific-step-strategy https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/fixing-australia-s-failing-pacific-step-strategy https://www.fijitimes.com/a-visit-after-25-years/ https://www.fijitimes.com/a-visit-after-25-years/ https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-020-00196-x https://www.gov.uk/government/news/royal-navy-ship-delivering-emergency-aid-into-tonga 101 1 3 The ’Tilt’ and the ’Pacific Uplift’ in ’Global Britain’s’ ties… Morgan W (2020) Oceans apart? Considering the Indo-Pacific and the Blue Pacific. Security Chal- lenges 16(10):44–64 Nilsson-Wright J (2023) UK policy on the Indo-Pacific: balancing global ambition in an era of resource scarcity and rising insecurity. Asia Policy 18(3):82–95 O’Keefe (2015) The strategic context of the new Pacific diplomacy. In: Fry GAND, Tarte S (eds) The new pacific diplomacy, 1st edn. ANU Press, Acton, pp 125–136 Ormiston S (2022) Robot boat maps Pacific underwater volcano. BBC. https:// www. bbc. co. uk/ news/ scien ce- envir onment- 62606 589? fbclid= IwAR2 I7GAC gYT3X utFF9B- ax16h s3j95 xsbpC gHFOt dLui1 G5OzK j66vg aa4. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Powles A, Powles M (2018) New Zealand’s Pacific sea change. The Interpreter. https:// www. lowyi nstit ute. org/ the- inter preter/ new- zeala nd-s- pacifi c- sea- change. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Republic of Fiji Navy (2022) Twitter. https:// twitt er. com/ FijiN avy/ status/ 15056 83881 80189 1843. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 RNZ (2019) UK ‘stepped back too much’ from Pacific – high commissioner. RNZ. https:// www. rnz. co. nz/ inter natio nal/ progr ammes/ datel inepa cific/ audio/ 20187 02665/ uk- stepp ed- back- too- much- from- pacifi c- highc ommis sioner. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Rodd A (2016) Adapting postcolonial island societies: Fiji and the Solomon Islands in the Pacific. Island Stud J 11(2):505–520 Royal Navy (2021) Patrol ships bid farewell to Portsmouth as they begin Indo-Pacific deployment. Royal Navy. https:// www. royal navy. mod. uk/ news- and- latest- activ ity/ news/ 2021/ septe mber/ 07/ 210907- spey- andta mar- deploy. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Sargeant B (2020) The Pacific Islands in the Indo-Pacific. Secur Chall 16(1):26–31 Sharma U, Irvine H (2016) The social consequences of control: accounting for indentured labour in Fiji 1879–1920. Qual Res Account Manag 13(2):130–158 HMS Spey (2022a) Twitter. https:// twitt er. com/ HMS_ Spey/ status/ 15024 39292 66845 6966 HMS Spey (2022b) Twitter. https:// twitt er. com/ HMS_ Spey/ status/ 15937 29105 90776 5248? cxt= HHwWg MCqnb GLiJ4 sAAAA HMS Spey (2022c) Twitter. https:// twitt er. com/ HMS_ Spey/ status/ 15568 10585 20718 1313? cxt= HHwWg sC8ndO- 85orA AAA Teaiwa K (2015) Ruining Pacific Islands: Australia’s phosphate imperialism. Aust Hist Stud 46(3):374–391 Trevelyan A-M (2023) First sea Lord’s sea power conference 2023: Minister Trevelyan’s keynote speech. UK Government https:// www. gov. uk/ gover nment/ speec hes/ minis ter- for- indo- pacifi c- anne- marie treve lyan- deliv ers- keyno te- speech- at- first- sea- lords- sea- power- confe rence- 2023 Turner O (2019) Global Britain and the narrative of empire. Polit Q 90(4):727–734 US Department of State (2022) US-Pacific island country summit. US Department of State https:// www. state. gov/u- s- pacifi c- islan ds- count ry- summit/. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Vitor Tossini (2021) The UK tilt to the Indo-Pacific – is it achievable? UK Defence Journal. https:// ukdef encej ournal. org. uk/ the- uk- tilt- to- the- indo- pacifi c- is- it- achie vable/. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Vogler J (2020) The international politics of COP26. Scott Geogr J 136(1–4):31–35 Wallis J, Batley J (2020) How does the ‘Pacific’ fit into the ‘Indo-Pacific’? The changing geopolitics of the Pacific islands. Secur Chall 16(1):2–10 Wallis J, McNeill H, Batley J, Powles A (2022a) Security cooperation in the Pacific Islands: architec- ture, complex, community, or something else? Int Relat Asia-Pac 23(2):263–296. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ irap/ lcac0 05 Wallis J, Ireland A, Robinson I, Turner A (2022b) Framing China in the Pacific islands. Aust J Int Aff 76(5):522–545 Webb D (2023) The comprehensive and progressive agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. Retrieved from https:// commo nslib rary. parli ament. uk/ resea rch- briefi ngs/ cbp- 9121/ Weber E (2016) Only a pawn in their games? Environmental (?) migration in Kiribati – past, present and future. DIE ERDE: J Geogr Soc Berlin 147(2):153–164 Whitehouse (2023) FACT SHEET: enhancing the U.S.-Pacific Islands Partnership, Whitehouse. https:// www. white house. gov/ briefi ng- room/ state ments- relea ses/ 2023/ 09/ 25/ fact- sheet- enhan cing- the-u- s- pacifi cisl ands- partn ershi p/#: ~: text= The% 20Uni ted% 20Sta tes% 20is% 20com mit- ted% 20to% 20par tneri ng% 20with% 20the% 20Pac ific,stabi lity% 3B% 20and% 20con tinued% 20sup port% 20for. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Wilkins T (2023) Tilting’ the balance? An evaluation of Britain’s strategic approach to the Indo- Pacific. Int Political Sci Rev. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 01925 12123 11956 05 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-62606589?fbclid=IwAR2I7GACgYT3XutFF9B-ax16hs3j95xsbpCgHFOtdLui1G5OzKj66vgaa4 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-62606589?fbclid=IwAR2I7GACgYT3XutFF9B-ax16hs3j95xsbpCgHFOtdLui1G5OzKj66vgaa4 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-62606589?fbclid=IwAR2I7GACgYT3XutFF9B-ax16hs3j95xsbpCgHFOtdLui1G5OzKj66vgaa4 https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/new-zealand-s-pacific-sea-change https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/new-zealand-s-pacific-sea-change https://twitter.com/FijiNavy/status/1505683881801891843 https://www.rnz.co.nz/international/programmes/datelinepacific/audio/2018702665/uk-stepped-back-too-much-from-pacific-highcommissioner https://www.rnz.co.nz/international/programmes/datelinepacific/audio/2018702665/uk-stepped-back-too-much-from-pacific-highcommissioner https://www.rnz.co.nz/international/programmes/datelinepacific/audio/2018702665/uk-stepped-back-too-much-from-pacific-highcommissioner https://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/news-and-latest-activity/news/2021/september/07/210907-spey-andtamar-deploy https://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/news-and-latest-activity/news/2021/september/07/210907-spey-andtamar-deploy https://twitter.com/HMS_Spey/status/1502439292668456966 https://twitter.com/HMS_Spey/status/1593729105907765248?cxt=HHwWgMCqnbGLiJ4sAAAA https://twitter.com/HMS_Spey/status/1593729105907765248?cxt=HHwWgMCqnbGLiJ4sAAAA https://twitter.com/HMS_Spey/status/1556810585207181313?cxt=HHwWgsC8ndO-85orAAAA https://twitter.com/HMS_Spey/status/1556810585207181313?cxt=HHwWgsC8ndO-85orAAAA https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/minister-for-indo-pacific-anne-marietrevelyan-delivers-keynote-speech-at-first-sea-lords-sea-power-conference-2023 https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/minister-for-indo-pacific-anne-marietrevelyan-delivers-keynote-speech-at-first-sea-lords-sea-power-conference-2023 https://www.state.gov/u-s-pacific-islands-country-summit/ https://www.state.gov/u-s-pacific-islands-country-summit/ https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/the-uk-tilt-to-the-indo-pacific-is-it-achievable/ https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/the-uk-tilt-to-the-indo-pacific-is-it-achievable/ https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcac005 https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcac005 https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-9121/ https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/09/25/fact-sheet-enhancing-the-u-s-pacificislands-partnership/#:~:text=The%20United%20States%20is%20committed%20to%20partnering%20with%20the%20Pacific,stability%3B%20and%20continued%20support%20for https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/09/25/fact-sheet-enhancing-the-u-s-pacificislands-partnership/#:~:text=The%20United%20States%20is%20committed%20to%20partnering%20with%20the%20Pacific,stability%3B%20and%20continued%20support%20for https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/09/25/fact-sheet-enhancing-the-u-s-pacificislands-partnership/#:~:text=The%20United%20States%20is%20committed%20to%20partnering%20with%20the%20Pacific,stability%3B%20and%20continued%20support%20for https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/09/25/fact-sheet-enhancing-the-u-s-pacificislands-partnership/#:~:text=The%20United%20States%20is%20committed%20to%20partnering%20with%20the%20Pacific,stability%3B%20and%20continued%20support%20for https://doi.org/10.1177/01925121231195605 102 L. Saddington 1 3 Wilton Park (2021) UK/Pacific High Level Climate Dialogue. Wilton Park https:// www. wilto npark. org. uk/ event/ uk- pacifi c- high- level- clima te- dialo gue/. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Wyth K (2018) Paying attention to the Blue Pacific. The Diplomat. https:// thedi plomat. com/ 2018/ 10/ paying- atten tion- to- the- blue- pacifi c/. Accessed 5 Feb 2024 Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. https://www.wiltonpark.org.uk/event/uk-pacific-high-level-climate-dialogue/ https://www.wiltonpark.org.uk/event/uk-pacific-high-level-climate-dialogue/ https://thediplomat.com/2018/10/paying-attention-to-the-blue-pacific/ https://thediplomat.com/2018/10/paying-attention-to-the-blue-pacific/ The ’Tilt’ and the ’Pacific Uplift’ in ’Global Britain’s’ ties with the Pacific Islands Abstract Introduction Wider (re)engagement with the Pacific: China, “Old” friends and “new” powers British colonial and postcolonial relations in the Pacific Military engagements: AUKUS and HMS Spey Climate-ocean governance: Britain’s changing role in the Pacific Shifting relations: the UK and PIS Acknowledgements References