<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC " -//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">

<!--

File produced by pipelineRunner package (for JATS 2 SCJATS with pipeline SCJATS)
At: 2026-07-01T01:51:41.822Z

Version        : 1.18
Last update    : 2026-02-10
Modified by    : bachev

-->
<article  xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">petroj</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Petrology</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">0022-3530</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1460-2415</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/petrology/egag046</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">egag046</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="category-toc-heading">
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="category-taxonomy-collection">
          <subject>AcademicSubjects/SCI00350</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Biotite/Melt Trace-Element, Lithium, and F-OH Partitioning in Silicate Magmas</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name>
            <surname>Beard</surname>
            <given-names>Charles D</given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>
            <institution>Department of Earth &amp; Planetary Sciences, McGill University</institution>, 3450 University St., Montreal, H3A 0E8, Québec, Canada</aff>
          <aff>
            <institution>Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge</institution>, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EQ, UK</aff>
          <aff>
            <institution>Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University</institution>, Princetonlaan 8A, 3584 CB, Utrecht, The Netherlands</aff>
          <xref rid="cor1" ref-type="corresp" />
          <email>c.d.beard@uu.nl</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>van Hinsberg</surname>
            <given-names>Vincent J</given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>
            <institution>Department of Earth &amp; Planetary Sciences, McGill University</institution>, 3450 University St., Montreal, H3A 0E8, Québec, Canada</aff>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Stix</surname>
            <given-names>John</given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>
            <institution>Department of Earth &amp; Planetary Sciences, McGill University</institution>, 3450 University St., Montreal, H3A 0E8, Québec, Canada</aff>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Humphreys</surname>
            <given-names>Madeleine C S</given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>
            <institution>Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University</institution>, Science Labs, Stockton Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK</aff>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Weller</surname>
            <given-names>Owen M</given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>
            <institution>Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge</institution>, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EQ, UK</aff>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Soderman</surname>
            <given-names>Caroline R</given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>
            <institution>Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge</institution>, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EQ, UK</aff>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Bédard</surname>
            <given-names>Jean H</given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>
            <institution>Geological Survey of Canada, 491 de la Couronne</institution>, G1K 9A9, Québec, Canada</aff>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="editor">
          <name>
            <surname>Hammer</surname>
            <given-names>Dr. Julia</given-names>
          </name>
          <role>Handling Editor</role>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes>
        <corresp id="cor1">Corresponding author: E-mail: <email>c.d.beard@uu.nl</email></corresp>
        <!--fn id="fn1"><p>Handling Editor: Dr. Julia Hammer</p></fn-->
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="cover">
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection" iso-8601-date="2026-06-04">
        <day>04</day>
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2026-05-21">
        <day>21</day>
        <month>05</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>67</volume>
      <issue>6</issue>
      <elocation-id>egag046</elocation-id>
      <supplementary-material xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" mimetype="text" id="sup1" content-type="data-supplement" xlink:href="web_material_egag046.zip">
        <label>Web_Material_egag046</label>
      </supplementary-material>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>30</day>
          <month>7</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="rev-recd">
          <day>18</day>
          <month>2</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>2</day>
          <month>5</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" license-type="cc-by" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
          <license-p>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link>), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="egag046.pdf" />
      <abstract abstract-type="abstract">
        <title>Abstract</title>
        <p>Biotite is a key hydrous silicate mineral in evolved magmatic systems, but its control on the behaviour of minor- and trace-elements, in particular Li, Nb, F and the REE is not well understood. Here, we quantify that control in sodic (per)alkaline <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation1"><![CDATA[${\text{H}_{2}\text{O}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-saturated magmas with variable F-content through crystallisation experiments at 650–800<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation2"><![CDATA[${}^\circ $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>C and 200 MPa total pressure, at log <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation3"><![CDATA[$f$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation4"><![CDATA[$_{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>  <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation5"><![CDATA[$\approx $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> FMQ +1. Biotite-glass pairs from tephriphonolite to phonolite fall deposits from Tenerife, Canary Islands, and a broad compilation from literature, complement our experimental data set. The new biotite-melt <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation6"><![CDATA[$Kd_{\text {F/OH}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> exchange coefficients are 2.9–47.0, typically 6.5–12.5, with minima for Al-rich, Mg-poor biotite. Nernst partition coefficients (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation7"><![CDATA[$D$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) for lithium are 0.24–32.8 with minima in F-poor biotite formed at high temperatures from peraluminous silicate melt. <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation8"><![CDATA[$D$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values for the large alkali metal ions Na–Cs define Onuma parabolae consistent with their incorporation on the biotite <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation9"><![CDATA[${{}^\text{XII}\text{A}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-site. Niobium partition coefficients are 0.1–1.2, and highest in Ti-rich biotite. The REE and actinides have <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation10"><![CDATA[$D$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values less than 0.01 as their ionic radii fall between the size of the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation11"><![CDATA[${{}^\text{XII}\text{A}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-site and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation12"><![CDATA[${{}^\text{VI}\text{M}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-sites of biotite. Our data, alongside a literature compilation, constrain empirical models that: (1) describe the exchange of F and OH between the silicate melt and the biotite W-site; (2) predict the partitioning of 1+ cations Li–Cs between silicate melt and the biotite A- and M-sites; (3) predict <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation13"><![CDATA[${D_\text{Nb}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values. The models use the major-element composition of biotite and silicate melt, pressure and temperature as input. Models are calibrated for use over a wide range of pressure, temperature and bulk composition (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation14"><![CDATA[$P$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation15"><![CDATA[$T$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation16"><![CDATA[$X$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) and can be used to interrogate biotite from natural systems to determine the composition of their source melt, or to forward model the trace-element evolution of mafic to evolved peralkaline syenite or peraluminous granite systems at upper-mantle to crustal pressures.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>experimental petrology</kwd>
        <kwd>halogens</kwd>
        <kwd>mica group</kwd>
        <kwd>partition coefficient</kwd>
        <kwd>pegmatite</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <counts>
        <page-count count="25" />
      </counts>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <label>1</label>
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Biotite forms in a wide variety of natural settings and is estimated to comprise up to 8% of the exposed continental crust (<xref rid="ref99" ref-type="bibr">Nesbitt &amp; Young, 1984</xref>). The biotite series are trioctahedral micas with a structure that comprises two opposing sheets of tetrahedrally-coordinated cations, with a sheet of larger octahedrally-coordinated cations sandwiched between (<xref rid="ref27" ref-type="bibr">Brigatti &amp; Guggenheim</xref>, <xref rid="ref27" ref-type="bibr">2002</xref>, <xref rid="ref42" ref-type="bibr">Fleet</xref>, <xref rid="ref42" ref-type="bibr">2003</xref>, <xref rid="ref109" ref-type="bibr">Rayner</xref>, <xref rid="ref109" ref-type="bibr">1974</xref>; see inset to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Fig. 7</xref> below). Biotite mica has the general formula <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation17"><![CDATA[$\mathrm {A M_3 T_4 O_{10} W_2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> where A are large, dominantly monovalent, interlayer cations that are 12-fold coordinated (K, Na, Ba), M are octahedrally coordinated cations (Li, Mg, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation18"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{Fe}^{2+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, Al, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation19"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Fe^{3+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, Ti) split into two M1 sites and one slightly smaller M2 site, T are tetrahedrally coordinated cations (Si, Al, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation20"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Fe^{3+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>), and W (sometimes known as the X- or OH-site) are dominantly monovalent anions that are positioned perpendicular to the plane of the silicate sheets (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation21"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{OH^-}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation22"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{F^-}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation23"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{O^{2-}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> with minor <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation24"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Cl^-}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p>The composition of igneous biotite tracks that of their co-existing melts, with Mg-rich phlogopite stable in calc-alkaline arc systems and in small-fraction lithospheric mantle melts (e.g., <xref rid="ref1" ref-type="bibr">Abdel-Rahman</xref>, <xref rid="ref1" ref-type="bibr">1994</xref>, <xref rid="ref36" ref-type="bibr">Ezad &amp; Foley</xref>, <xref rid="ref36" ref-type="bibr">2022</xref>, <xref rid="ref77" ref-type="bibr">LaTourrette <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref77" ref-type="bibr">1995</xref>), and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation28"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Fe^{2+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-rich annite stable in (per)alkaline magmatic systems (<xref rid="ref39" ref-type="bibr">Finch <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref39" ref-type="bibr">1995</xref>, <xref rid="ref93" ref-type="bibr">Möller &amp; Williams-Jones</xref>, <xref rid="ref93" ref-type="bibr">2016</xref>). Trioctahedral micas in peraluminous granites are mostly magnesian annite, with high M-site Al contents (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation30"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^M Al}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> = 0.35–0.64 cpfu [cations per formula unit]; <xref rid="ref27" ref-type="bibr">Brigatti &amp; Guggenheim</xref>, <xref rid="ref27" ref-type="bibr">2002</xref>) whereas biotite in metaluminous, commonly I-type granites such as the Sierra Nevada batholith in California, USA, have intermediate <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation31"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{Fe^{2+}}/({Fe^{2+}} + Mg)}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> of ca. 0.48–0.41, and low Ti content up to 0.02 cpfu (0.63–0.68 <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation29"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{Fe^{2+}}/({Fe^{2+}}+Mg) =}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) (<xref rid="ref54" ref-type="bibr">Gray <italic>et al.</italic>, 2008</xref>).</p>
      <p>As a major hydrous silicate mineral in both crustal and upper mantle environments, biotite is an important host for volatile components including water, fluorine (<xref rid="ref5" ref-type="bibr">Aiuppa <italic>et al.</italic>, 2009</xref>, <xref rid="ref33" ref-type="bibr">Dolejš &amp; Baker, 2007</xref>, <xref rid="ref36" ref-type="bibr">Ezad &amp; Foley, 2022</xref>, <xref rid="ref57" ref-type="bibr">Grégoire <italic>et al.</italic>, 2002</xref>, <xref rid="ref85" ref-type="bibr">London, 1997</xref>) and lithium (<xref rid="ref34" ref-type="bibr">Ellis <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022</xref>, <xref rid="ref75" ref-type="bibr">Kunz <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022</xref>, <xref rid="ref100" ref-type="bibr">Neukampf <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023</xref>). Most igneous biotite have molar F/(F + Cl + OH) &lt; 0.4, with biotite hosting 70–90% of the F in muscovite- and fluorite-free granitoids (<xref rid="ref124" ref-type="bibr">Speer, 1984</xref>). Mg-F rich metasomatic biotite has been reported from Mt. Etna and a number of other potassic volcanoes in Italy (<xref rid="ref48" ref-type="bibr">Gianfagna <italic>et al.</italic>, 2007</xref>) and is associated with porphyry copper deposits (<xref rid="ref124" ref-type="bibr">Speer, 1984</xref>).</p>
      <p>The behaviour of the halogen fluorine is of particular interest because it reduces both the liquidus and solidus temperature of most silicate assemblages (<xref rid="ref137" ref-type="bibr">Wyllie &amp; Tuttle, 1961</xref>), the viscosity of silicate melts (<xref rid="ref31" ref-type="bibr">Dingwell <italic>et al.</italic>, 1985</xref>) and impacts the mineralogy and major-element composition of crystallising phases (<xref rid="ref15" ref-type="bibr">Beard <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020</xref>, <xref rid="ref50" ref-type="bibr">Giehl <italic>et al.</italic>, 2014</xref>). In alkaline-silicate systems, fluorine is thought to play a key role in the orthomagmatic enrichment of the REE, HFSE and U (<xref rid="ref13" ref-type="bibr">Beard <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023</xref>, <xref rid="ref82" ref-type="bibr">Linnen <italic>et al.</italic>, 2012</xref>, <xref rid="ref84" ref-type="bibr">London, 1987</xref>, <xref rid="ref88" ref-type="bibr">Marks &amp; Markl, 2017</xref>, <xref rid="ref118" ref-type="bibr">Siegel <italic>et al.</italic>, 2018</xref>). This role is, at least in part, because fluorine complexes directly with REE in silicate melt (<xref rid="ref108" ref-type="bibr">Ponader &amp; Brown, 1989</xref>) and influences the medium-range structural environment around <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation32"><![CDATA[${\text{HFSE}^{4+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> cations (<xref rid="ref38" ref-type="bibr">Farges, 1996</xref>), reducing their activity and thus availability for incorporation into silicate minerals (<xref rid="ref15" ref-type="bibr">Beard <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020</xref>). The limited effect of fluorine on the solubility of Mn-columbite and Mn-tantalite, and small positive effect on the solubility of zircon and hafnon indicates that fluorine has a smaller influence on the budget of 5+ and 4+ HFSE cations in magmas relative to REE (<xref rid="ref9" ref-type="bibr">Aseri <italic>et al.</italic>, 2015</xref>). Temperature and melt ASI (molar <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation33"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{Al_2 O_3}/({Na_2O + K_2O + CaO})}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> appear to be the dominant controls on HFSE phase saturation. Fluorine in the melt thereby promotes residual enrichment of the REE and, to a lesser extent, HFSE during crystallisation of alkaline magmatic systems. To a certain degree fluorine, along with the alkalies, explains the high concentration of REE and HFSE in some of the most evolved peralkaline rocks. Fluorine can also trigger liquid immiscibility, which can further segregate and concentrate the REE and HFSE (<xref rid="ref130" ref-type="bibr">Vasyukova &amp; Williams-Jones, 2016</xref>, <xref rid="ref140" ref-type="bibr">Yang &amp; van Hinsberg, 2019</xref>).</p>
      <p>Because biotite has the highest Li concentration of the major mineral phases in alkaline and calc-alkaline volcanic suites, the crystallisation or destabilisation of biotite represents a major control on the lithium budget of silicate melts, and of crustal igneous systems globally (<xref rid="ref34" ref-type="bibr">Ellis <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022</xref>, <xref rid="ref100" ref-type="bibr">Neukampf <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023</xref>). Major economic deposits of lithium occur in LCT (Li-Cs-Ta) pegmatites associated with evolved peraluminous igneous systems (<xref rid="ref45" ref-type="bibr">Gardiner <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024</xref>, <xref rid="ref82" ref-type="bibr">Linnen <italic>et al.</italic>, 2012</xref>, <xref rid="ref86" ref-type="bibr">London, 2018</xref>). However, forward modelling of the processes responsible for the enrichment of their contained lithium have mostly been limited to use of fixed <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation34"><![CDATA[$D^{mineral/melt}_{\text {Li}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values (e.g., <xref rid="ref74" ref-type="bibr">Koopmans <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref74" ref-type="bibr">2024</xref>), despite broad reported variation that spans incompatible to compatible behaviour (see <xref rid="ref66" ref-type="bibr">Horányi <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref66" ref-type="bibr">2025</xref>, <xref rid="ref96" ref-type="bibr">Morris <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref96" ref-type="bibr">2026</xref>). Only a few studies have presented experimental Li partition coefficients (<xref rid="ref3" ref-type="bibr">Adam &amp; Green, 2006</xref>, <xref rid="ref35" ref-type="bibr">Evensen &amp; London, 2002</xref>, <xref rid="ref66" ref-type="bibr">Horányi <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025</xref>, <xref rid="ref68" ref-type="bibr">Icenhower &amp; London, 1995</xref>, <xref rid="ref77" ref-type="bibr">LaTourrette <italic>et al.</italic>, 1995</xref>, <xref rid="ref107" ref-type="bibr">Pichavant <italic>et al.</italic>, 2016</xref>, <xref rid="ref116" ref-type="bibr">Schmidt <italic>et al.</italic>, 1999</xref>) most likely due to challenges with analyses of Li via EPMA, and contamination of ICP-MS instruments with lithium metaborate flux. None to our knowledge have presented continuous functions that describe lithium partitioning among biotite and silicate melt.</p>
      <p>Biotite has been produced experimentally over a wide range of temperatures and pressures (500–1430<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation35"><![CDATA[${}^\circ $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>C, 1 atm to 5 GPa, LEPR database; <xref rid="ref63" ref-type="bibr">Hirschmann <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref63" ref-type="bibr">2008</xref>), with Mg-rich biotite stable at high temperature and pressure relative to Fe-rich varieties. The presence of fluorine expands biotite stability to higher temperatures (by up to <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation36"><![CDATA[$\sim $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>500<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation37"><![CDATA[${}^\circ $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>C; <xref rid="ref97" ref-type="bibr">Munoz</xref>, <xref rid="ref97" ref-type="bibr">1984</xref>, <xref rid="ref106" ref-type="bibr">Peterson <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref106" ref-type="bibr">1991</xref>) and to atmospheric pressure (e.g., <xref rid="ref60" ref-type="bibr">Hammouda &amp; Cherniak</xref>, <xref rid="ref60" ref-type="bibr">2000</xref>).</p>
      <p>Experimental investigations have also studied biotite-melt partitioning of minor- and trace-elements at a range of conditions, including in mafic bulk compositions at upper mantle pressures (15–30 kbar; <xref rid="ref3" ref-type="bibr">Adam &amp; Green</xref>, <xref rid="ref3" ref-type="bibr">2006</xref>, <xref rid="ref56" ref-type="bibr">Green <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref56" ref-type="bibr">2000</xref>, <xref rid="ref59" ref-type="bibr">Guo &amp; Green</xref>, <xref rid="ref59" ref-type="bibr">1990</xref>, <xref rid="ref77" ref-type="bibr">LaTourrette <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref77" ref-type="bibr">1995</xref>, <xref rid="ref116" ref-type="bibr">Schmidt <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref116" ref-type="bibr">1999</xref>), granitic systems (<xref rid="ref68" ref-type="bibr">Icenhower &amp; London, 1995</xref>, <xref rid="ref69" ref-type="bibr">1997</xref>, <xref rid="ref87" ref-type="bibr">Lukkari &amp; Holtz, 2007</xref>) and moderately evolved alkaline silicate compositions at upper crustal pressures (0.76–2 kbar; <xref rid="ref37" ref-type="bibr">Fabbrizio &amp; Carroll</xref>, <xref rid="ref37" ref-type="bibr">2008</xref>, <xref rid="ref112" ref-type="bibr">Righter &amp; Carmichael</xref>, <xref rid="ref112" ref-type="bibr">1996</xref>, <xref rid="ref143" ref-type="bibr">Zhang <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref143" ref-type="bibr">2022</xref>). These element partitioning studies indicate that biotite readily incorporates the LILE and HFSE, but not the REE or actinides (see compilation in the Appendix). However, none of these studies targeted peralkaline systems, where F-OH exchange may be influenced by short-range order between F and excess alkalies in the silicate melt (<xref rid="ref32" ref-type="bibr">Dolejš &amp; Baker, 2006</xref>) and trace-element partitioning may be controlled by different exchange mechanisms relative to those active in less-evolved igneous systems (cf. <xref rid="ref14" ref-type="bibr">Beard <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref14" ref-type="bibr">2019</xref>).</p>
      <p>Here, we investigate the effects of biotite composition and temperature on the uptake of minor- and trace-elements in silica-undersaturated alkaline and peralkaline silicate melts at varying F contents. We combine experiments at 200 MPa with biotite phenocryst-glass pairs from phonolitic pumice fall deposits, and collate biotite-melt partitioning experiments from the literature that simulate mafic to evolved systems, including granites. We then characterise the mineral and melt compositional controls on element partitioning behaviour and present empirical models for fluoride-hydroxyl exchange (cf. <xref rid="ref113" ref-type="bibr">Riker <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref113" ref-type="bibr">2018</xref>, <xref rid="ref143" ref-type="bibr">Zhang <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref143" ref-type="bibr">2022</xref>), the partitioning of Li and Nb, and a lattice-strain model for partitioning of the large 1+ ions Na–Cs. These new element partitioning models can be used to predict the evolution of element budgets during magmatic differentiation, as well as providing a tool to reconstruct parental melt compositions from analyses of biotite in natural igneous rocks.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <label>2</label>
      <title>Methodology</title>
      <sec id="sec2a">
        <label>2.1</label>
        <title>Experimental techniques</title>
        <p>Biotite was synthesised in sodic alkaline melts of tephriphonolite to phonolite composition to obtain a range of mineral compositions consistent with those in natural alkaline-silicate magmas. Three synthetic, trace-element doped starting glass compositions were investigated (compositions M3, M5 and H5 from <xref rid="ref14" ref-type="bibr">Beard <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="TB1">Table 1</xref>), and fluorine was added to some of the charges as trace metal grade 40% hydrofluoric acid (<xref rid="ref15" ref-type="bibr">Beard <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref15" ref-type="bibr">2020</xref>; see Appendix). Powders of starting glass (0.125–0.190 g) were loaded into platinum capsules of 3.0–3.5 mm internal diameter and 16–25 mm length, with distilled water in excess of saturation <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation38"><![CDATA[$\pm $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> HF added immediately prior to closure and welding. Capsule mass was monitored throughout the loading procedure and verified after the experiments to check for leaks.</p>
        <table-wrap id="TB1">
          <label>
            <sc>Table</sc> 1</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Major-element oxide composition of starting materials for the internally heated pressure vessel experiments. The totals are calculated with all iron as FeO. The standard deviation (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation39"><![CDATA[$\sigma $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) and relative standard deviation (RSD) are given for EPMA measurements of glass from a superliquidus experiment.</p>
          </caption>
          <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
            <colgroup>
              <col align="left" />
              <col span="2" align="left" />
              <col span="3" align="left" />
              <col span="4" align="left" />
              <col span="5" align="left" />
              <col span="6" align="left" />
              <col span="7" align="left" />
              <col span="8" align="left" />
              <col span="9" align="left" />
              <col span="10" align="left" />
              <col span="11" align="left" />
            </colgroup>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th colspan="8">
                  <italic>Dry starting glass composition calculated from masses of reagents added [wt%]</italic>
                </th>
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <th>Composition</th>
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation40"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{SiO_{2}}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation41"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{TiO_{2}}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation42"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Al_2O_3}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation43"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{FeO_T}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
                <th>MgO</th>
                <th>CaO</th>
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation44"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Na_2O}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation45"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{K_2O}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
                <th>Total</th>
                <th>(Na+K)/Al</th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>M3</td>
                <td>52.67</td>
                <td>2.27</td>
                <td>18.13</td>
                <td>7.86</td>
                <td>2.75</td>
                <td>5.40</td>
                <td>7.19</td>
                <td>3.73</td>
                <td>100.00</td>
                <td>0.875</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>M5</td>
                <td>60.04</td>
                <td>0.66</td>
                <td>19.13</td>
                <td>3.69</td>
                <td>0.42</td>
                <td>0.89</td>
                <td>9.76</td>
                <td>5.41</td>
                <td>100.00</td>
                <td>1.145</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>H5</td>
                <td>58.38</td>
                <td>0.65</td>
                <td>18.60</td>
                <td>3.59</td>
                <td>0.41</td>
                <td>0.86</td>
                <td>11.31</td>
                <td>6.20</td>
                <td>100.00</td>
                <td>1.362</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td colspan="8">
                  <italic>Water saturated glass compositions from a superliquidus experiment (EPMA) [wt%]</italic>
                </td>
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>H5 (fluorine free)</td>
                <td>55.5</td>
                <td>0.61</td>
                <td>16.2</td>
                <td>2.6.</td>
                <td>0.42</td>
                <td>0.91</td>
                <td>10.8</td>
                <td>5.7</td>
                <td>92.8</td>
                <td>1.48</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation46"><![CDATA[$\sigma $]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula> (n = 13)</td>
                <td>0.3</td>
                <td>0.06</td>
                <td>0.2</td>
                <td>0.1</td>
                <td>0.04</td>
                <td>0.05</td>
                <td>0.2</td>
                <td>0.2</td>
                <td>0.4</td>
                <td>0.03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>RSD</td>
                <td>0.59%</td>
                <td>9.33%</td>
                <td>1.36%</td>
                <td>4.41%</td>
                <td>10.44%</td>
                <td>5.40%</td>
                <td>1.90%</td>
                <td>2.69%</td>
                <td>0.45%</td>
                <td>1.87%</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <fig id="f2">
          <label>
            <sc>Fig.</sc> 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Reflected light micrograph and major-element abundance maps for experiment M3 1.25F, as measured by wavelength dispersive spectrometry. The thick cream line in the left panel shows the melt fluorine content at each vertical interval averaged over the capsule width. Bt = biotite; Cpx = clinopyroxene; Ttn = titanite; Ox = Fe oxide minerals; Vesic. = vesicle of aqueous fluid.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" mimetype="image" xlink:href="egag046f1.jpeg">
            <alt-text>Figure one shows a reflected light micrograph and
WDS X-ray major-element abundance maps for a
representative experimental charge from this study.
Element maps are shown for K, Na, Mg, and Ti, as
well as a backscattered electron image. The image
shows the mineral phases clinopyroxene, oxides,
titanite and biotite in a glass matrix. Several vesicles
of aqueous fluid are also present. The left panel shows
how melt fluorine content varies vertically along the
long axis of the experimental charge, and covers the
range 0 to 1.6 weight percent. Portions of the capsule
with higher fluorine content are associated with a
greater mode of biotite at the expense of
clinopyroxene.</alt-text>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>Crystallisation experiments were conducted in Pt capsules in a Harwood-type internally heated pressure vessel in the HP-GeoMatS laboratory at the GeoForschungsZentrum, Potsdam, Germany. Run temperatures were chosen between liquidus and solidus for each of the compositions of interest, corresponding to 650 to <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation47"><![CDATA[${800}^\circ $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>C at 200 MPa total pressure. Oxygen fugacity was buffered using an Ar-<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation48"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{H_2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> gas pressure medium, with exchange of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation49"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{H_2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> through the experiment capsule walls resulting in log <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation50"><![CDATA[$f$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation51"><![CDATA[$_{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>  <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation52"><![CDATA[$\approx $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>  <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation53"><![CDATA[$\Delta $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>FMQ +1 in our <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation54"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{H_2O}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-saturated charges (see <xref rid="ref20" ref-type="bibr">Berndt <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref20" ref-type="bibr">2002</xref>, <xref rid="ref73" ref-type="bibr">Jugo <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref73" ref-type="bibr">2010</xref>). Our vessel did not feature a Shaw membrane for measurement and control of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation55"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{H_2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> fugacity (<xref rid="ref20" ref-type="bibr">Berndt <italic>et al.</italic>, 2002</xref>). Charges were placed into the apparatus, pressurised, then homogenised at 1100–1200<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation56"><![CDATA[${}^\circ $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>C for at least 16 h. Following homogenisation, the charges were cooled to run temperature at 1<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation57"><![CDATA[${}^\circ $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>C/min to facilitate slow growth of crystals and to impede development of melt heterogeneities adjacent to phase boundaries. Temperature was then cycled twice between run temperature and run temperature + <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation58"><![CDATA[${10}^\circ $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>C to encourage dissolution of small crystals at the expense of larger grains, and to promote crystal growth close to the run temperature (one cycle equals 30 min at <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation59"><![CDATA[${T_{run}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, 30 min at <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation60"><![CDATA[${T_{run}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> + <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation61"><![CDATA[${10}^\circ $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>C, then cooling to <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation62"><![CDATA[${T_{run}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> at 1<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation63"><![CDATA[${}^\circ $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>C/min). The final run temperature was held for &gt;45 h to allow for homogenisation of the melt and Ostwald ripening of the biotite crystals. Capsules were then quenched to room temperature. Wherever possible, rapid quench apparatus was used to limit the growth of groundmass crystals. Here, the vessel was mounted vertically on a trunion, with capsules hung from a fusible Pt wire allowing them to fall out of the hot zone on experiment termination. Even without rapid quench apparatus, cooling to below the glass transition (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation64"><![CDATA[$<350^\circ $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>C; <xref rid="ref51" ref-type="bibr">Giordano <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref51" ref-type="bibr">2005</xref>) was achieved in less than 150 seconds. Following quench the capsules were weighed, pierced, dried and re-weighed, which confirmed in all cases the presence of a free fluid phase. Capsules were then torn open with pliers and charges split along their vertical axis with a low-speed wafering saw. Half of each charge was mounted in epoxy and polished for microanalysis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Fig. 1</xref>). A more detailed experimental methodology is presented in <xref rid="ref14" ref-type="bibr">Beard <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref14" ref-type="bibr">2019</xref>,
<xref rid="ref15" ref-type="bibr">2020</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2b">
        <label>2.2</label>
        <title>Natural samples</title>
        <p>Biotite crystals were separated from fifteen pyroclastic deposits from the Canary Islands with basanitic to phonolitic compositions (see Appendix and <xref rid="ref14" ref-type="bibr">Beard <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref14" ref-type="bibr">2019</xref>). The pumices and scoria were rinsed under tap water, dried at 110<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation65"><![CDATA[${}^\circ $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>C overnight, then gently hand crushed with a hammer. Crystals and glass fragments were hand-picked from sieved size fractions of 125–1180 <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation66"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{\mu }$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>m, and 5–20 crystals of biotite from each sample were mounted in epoxy for microanalysis. The pyroclastic rocks also contain augite clinopyroxene, anorthoclase to sanidine feldspars, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation67"><![CDATA[$\pm $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> spinel, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation68"><![CDATA[$\pm $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> amphibole, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation69"><![CDATA[$\pm $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> olivine, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation70"><![CDATA[$\pm $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> titanite, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation71"><![CDATA[$\pm $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> sodalite [see analyses in <xref rid="ref14" ref-type="bibr">Beard <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019</xref>). The glass analysed for partition coefficients was adhered to the walls of the mounted clinopyroxene crystals.</p>
        <p>The Canaries biotite are elongate faceted crystals with vesicular glass adhered to the surface of some grains (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">Fig. 2</xref>). The mounted biotite crystals were examined using backscattered electron imagery and all from the selected samples appeared to be free of chemical zoning.</p>
        <fig id="f3">
          <label>
            <sc>Fig.</sc> 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Canary Islands biotite (a–c; yellow annotations, all same scale) are faceted and show no zonation in backscattered electron images (BSE). Some have vesicular glass adhered to their margins. Experiment biotite (d–f; pink annotations) also show no zonation in BSE, and commonly preserve melt inclusions. Occasionally, biotite also enclose clinopyroxene (d). Bt = biotite; Cpx = clinopyroxene; Ttn = titanite; Ox = Fe oxide mineral; Fl = fluorite.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" mimetype="image" xlink:href="egag046f2.jpeg">
            <alt-text>Figure two shows six backscatter electron images,
with three panels showing biotite grains from the
Canary Islands rocks in this study, and three panels
showing experiment run products. The Canary Islands
biotite are faceted grains of about 200 microns
diameter with vesicular glass adhered to some
surfaces. They do not display brightness variation across grains, suggesting limited to no compositional
zonation. The experiment biotite grains are embedded
in a glass matrix and are seen edge-on with thickness
about 20 microns. They occur alongside
clinopyroxene, titanite, oxides and fluorite.
Experiment biotite also show no variation in
brightness across grains, suggesting they are not zoned
chemically. They commonly preserve melt inclusions.</alt-text>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>Biotite crystals from all of the samples were analysed by electron probe microanalyser (EPMA) to determine their major-element composition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">Fig. 3</xref>). A subset of four samples were selected for determination of apparent biotite/melt trace-element partition coefficients by laser ablation ICP-MS (see Appendix). These samples were chosen because, in addition to biotite, they contain unzoned crystals of clinopyroxene, a mineral that readily records chemical and physical perturbations to the magmatic system during growth (e.g., <xref rid="ref90" ref-type="bibr">Masotta <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref90" ref-type="bibr">2020</xref>, <xref rid="ref128" ref-type="bibr">Ubide <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref128" ref-type="bibr">2019</xref>). The clinopyroxene-melt pairs within these fall deposits preserve near-equilibrium crystallisation (<xref rid="ref14" ref-type="bibr">Beard <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019</xref>), and their biotite most probably formed under similar conditions. The samples comprise phonolitic, plinian fall deposits from the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation72"><![CDATA[$\sim $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> 2 ka eruptions of Montaña Blanca (units LMB and UMB-II) and Pico Viejo, Tenerife (<xref rid="ref2" ref-type="bibr">Ablay <italic>et al.</italic>, 1995</xref>), as well as a basanite pyroclastic deposit from Montaña Samara, a monogenetic cinder cone, also on Tenerife (<xref rid="ref6" ref-type="bibr">Albert <italic>et al.</italic>, 2015</xref>). Pre-eruptive magma storage conditions for Montaña Blanca unit UMB-II have been constrained with phase equilibrium experiments to be 850<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation73"><![CDATA[$\pm $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>15<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation74"><![CDATA[${}^\circ $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>C, 50<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation75"><![CDATA[$\pm $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>20 MPa, with 2.5<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation76"><![CDATA[$\pm $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>0.5 wt% <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation77"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{H_{2}O}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> at log <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation78"><![CDATA[$f$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation79"><![CDATA[$_{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>  <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation80"><![CDATA[$\approx \Delta $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>NNO –0.5 (<xref rid="ref7" ref-type="bibr">Andújar &amp; Scaillet, 2012</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <label>3</label>
      <title>Analytical techniques</title>
      <sec id="sec3a">
        <label>3.1</label>
        <title>Electron probe analysis</title>
        <p>Major-element compositions of the experiment run products and natural biotite and glass were measured using a JEOL 8900 instrument at McGill University and a JEOL 8230 instrument at the University of Ottawa, with analyses calibrated using natural mineral standards. Biotite crystals were measured with a 15 nA beam of 2–5 <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation87"><![CDATA[${\mu }$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>m diameter, accelerated by a potential of 15 kV. Quenched melts were measured with a 4 nA beam of 50 <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation88"><![CDATA[${\mu }$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>m diameter. At Ottawa, all major-elements, including fluorine, were measured for 60 s. At McGill, counting times for the elements Al, K, Fe, Na, Si, Mg and Ca were 20 s, Cl 30 s, Ti 40 s and F 150 s. For fluorine, a notoriously challenging element to measure, we used TAP diffraction crystals with intensities calibrated against natural fluorite reference materials. Fluorine detection limits at Ottawa were <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation89"><![CDATA[$\sim $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> 275 ppm and at McGill were <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation90"><![CDATA[$\sim $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> 1100–3600 ppm. With these routines, we observed no sodium loss, nor amplification of signals for the rest of the major-elements over the measurement time period (e.g., Al, F; <xref rid="ref95" ref-type="bibr">Morgan vi &amp; London</xref>, <xref rid="ref95" ref-type="bibr">2005</xref>).
Melt compositions for the Canary Islands rocks were determined by analyses of glass rims adhered to clinopyroxene grains separated from the same samples (see <xref rid="ref14" ref-type="bibr">Beard <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019</xref>).</p>
        <p>Data for two mica and twelve glass secondary standards are in the Appendix. Reproducibility of major and minor element oxide abundance in mica standards is 1–7% RSD (1<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation91"><![CDATA[$\sigma $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) and for F and Cl is 8.7–13.6%. Accuracy relative to GeoRem compiled values is better than 10%, except for Na and Cl, which are within 20%. Glass secondary standard reproducibility ranges from 0.17–1.06% for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation92"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{SiO_{2}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and is better than 5% for most major elements (&gt;1 wt.%).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3b">
        <label>3.2</label>
        <title>Laser ablation ICP-MS</title>
        <p>The trace-element concentrations of biotite crystals and glass were measured with a NewWave 213 nm Nd-YAG laser system coupled to a Thermo Finnigan iCAP-Qc quadrupole ICP-MS instrument at McGill University. A pulse frequency of 10 Hz was used, and beam fluence was typically 6–10 J/cm<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation93"><![CDATA[${}^{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Ablated material was carried to the ICP-MS instrument in a He flow of 800 mL/min and mixed with Ar prior to injection into the plasma. The primary standard glass BCR-2G was used to monitor and correct for drift, and accuracy was determined by the analyses of secondary standards NIST-610, USGS-RGM-1 rhyolite, UTR-2 peralkaline rhyolite glass, and Mg-mica and Fe-mica reference materials. Sample surfaces were pre-ablated to remove residues from polishing and to improve coupling between the laser beam and sample. A list of analytes with typical precision, as determined from multiple analyses of reference materials, is given in the Appendix.</p>
        <table-wrap id="TB2">
          <label>
            <sc>Table</sc> 2</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Major-element oxide composition (in wt%) of biotite from the experiments and Canary Islands rocks. The standard deviation (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation110"><![CDATA[$\sigma $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) and relative standard deviation (RSD) are given for the EPMA data.</p>
          </caption>
          <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
            <colgroup>
              <col align="left" />
              <col span="2" align="left" />
              <col span="3" align="left" />
              <col span="4" align="left" />
              <col span="5" align="left" />
              <col span="6" align="left" />
              <col span="7" align="left" />
              <col span="8" align="left" />
              <col span="9" align="left" />
              <col span="10" align="left" />
              <col span="11" align="left" />
              <col span="12" align="left" />
              <col span="13" align="left" />
            </colgroup>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <td />
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation111"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{SiO_{2}}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation112"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{TiO_{2}}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation113"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Al_2O_3}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation114"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{FeO_T}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
                <th>MnO</th>
                <th>MgO</th>
                <th>CaO</th>
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation115"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Na_2O}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation116"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{K_2O}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
                <th>F</th>
                <th>Cl</th>
                <th>Total</th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>16-07</td>
                <td>36.6</td>
                <td>6.9</td>
                <td>12.7</td>
                <td>15.5</td>
                <td>0.43</td>
                <td>13.7</td>
                <td>0.01</td>
                <td>0.97</td>
                <td>8.51</td>
                <td>0.7</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>95.9</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation117"><![CDATA[$\sigma $]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula> (n = 31)</td>
                <td>0.4</td>
                <td>0.2</td>
                <td>0.4</td>
                <td>0.5</td>
                <td>0.03</td>
                <td>0.3</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.04</td>
                <td>0.09</td>
                <td>0.2</td>
                <td>0.01</td>
                <td>0.7</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>RSD</td>
                <td>1.06%</td>
                <td>2.72%</td>
                <td>3.37%</td>
                <td>2.88%</td>
                <td>7.95%</td>
                <td>2.31%</td>
                <td>121.11%</td>
                <td>3.62%</td>
                <td>1.02%</td>
                <td>25.70%</td>
                <td>44.16%</td>
                <td>0.68%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>21-30</td>
                <td>36.86</td>
                <td>6.718</td>
                <td>12.64</td>
                <td>15.92</td>
                <td>0.467</td>
                <td>13.70</td>
                <td>0.007</td>
                <td>0.952</td>
                <td>8.580</td>
                <td>0.666</td>
                <td>0.020</td>
                <td>96.25</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation118"><![CDATA[$\sigma $]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula> (n = 24)</td>
                <td>0.41</td>
                <td>0.39</td>
                <td>0.19</td>
                <td>1.06</td>
                <td>0.06</td>
                <td>0.81</td>
                <td>0.01</td>
                <td>0.05</td>
                <td>0.09</td>
                <td>0.19</td>
                <td>0.01</td>
                <td>0.96</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>RSD</td>
                <td>1.11%</td>
                <td>5.74%</td>
                <td>1.48%</td>
                <td>6.64%</td>
                <td>13.13%</td>
                <td>5.95%</td>
                <td>157.95%</td>
                <td>5.63%</td>
                <td>1.09%</td>
                <td>29.02%</td>
                <td>31.71%</td>
                <td>1.00%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>17-12</td>
                <td>36.91</td>
                <td>7.606</td>
                <td>13.05</td>
                <td>13.57</td>
                <td>0.278</td>
                <td>14.71</td>
                <td>0.003</td>
                <td>1.128</td>
                <td>8.274</td>
                <td>0.675</td>
                <td>0.023</td>
                <td>94.71</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation119"><![CDATA[$\sigma $]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula> (n = 12)</td>
                <td>0.27</td>
                <td>0.14</td>
                <td>0.11</td>
                <td>0.12</td>
                <td>0.04</td>
                <td>0.28</td>
                <td>0.00</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.09</td>
                <td>0.22</td>
                <td>0.01</td>
                <td>1.99</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>RSD</td>
                <td>0.74%</td>
                <td>1.90%</td>
                <td>0.81%</td>
                <td>0.89%</td>
                <td>13.64%</td>
                <td>1.91%</td>
                <td>92.44%</td>
                <td>1.91%</td>
                <td>1.07%</td>
                <td>33.18%</td>
                <td>33.58%</td>
                <td>2.11%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>17-14</td>
                <td>36.63</td>
                <td>6.690</td>
                <td>12.52</td>
                <td>16.45</td>
                <td>0.479</td>
                <td>13.26</td>
                <td>0.011</td>
                <td>0.940</td>
                <td>8.582</td>
                <td>0.660</td>
                <td>0.019</td>
                <td>95.96</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation120"><![CDATA[$\sigma $]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula> (n = 25)</td>
                <td>0.46</td>
                <td>0.12</td>
                <td>0.23</td>
                <td>0.20</td>
                <td>0.01</td>
                <td>0.16</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.03</td>
                <td>0.14</td>
                <td>0.15</td>
                <td>0.01</td>
                <td>0.83</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>RSD</td>
                <td>1.25%</td>
                <td>1.76%</td>
                <td>1.81%</td>
                <td>1.19%</td>
                <td>3.01%</td>
                <td>1.23%</td>
                <td>169.33%</td>
                <td>3.46%</td>
                <td>1.60%</td>
                <td>23.19%</td>
                <td>33.74%</td>
                <td>0.87%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>M3_2</td>
                <td>38.19</td>
                <td>4.467</td>
                <td>13.73</td>
                <td>9.546</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>19.76</td>
                <td>0.040</td>
                <td>1.162</td>
                <td>8.403</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>95.32</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation121"><![CDATA[$\sigma $]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula> (n = 10)</td>
                <td>0.97</td>
                <td>0.17</td>
                <td>0.62</td>
                <td>0.87</td>
                <td />
                <td>0.54</td>
                <td>0.03</td>
                <td>0.06</td>
                <td>0.13</td>
                <td />
                <td />
                <td>1.99</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>RSD</td>
                <td>2.55%</td>
                <td>3.72%</td>
                <td>4.49%</td>
                <td>9.14%</td>
                <td />
                <td>2.76%</td>
                <td>67.24%</td>
                <td>5.33%</td>
                <td>1.56%</td>
                <td />
                <td />
                <td>2.09%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>M3_0.6F</td>
                <td>39.42</td>
                <td>2.909</td>
                <td>12.40</td>
                <td>8.105</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>21.47</td>
                <td>0.037</td>
                <td>1.209</td>
                <td>8.659</td>
                <td>2.710</td>
                <td>0.004</td>
                <td>96.93</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation122"><![CDATA[$\sigma $]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula> (n = 9)</td>
                <td>0.97</td>
                <td>0.19</td>
                <td>0.33</td>
                <td>0.34</td>
                <td />
                <td>0.55</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.05</td>
                <td>0.09</td>
                <td>0.51</td>
                <td>0.00</td>
                <td>1.49</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>RSD</td>
                <td>2.46%</td>
                <td>6.60%</td>
                <td>2.67%</td>
                <td>4.21%</td>
                <td />
                <td>2.55%</td>
                <td>46.74%</td>
                <td>4.02%</td>
                <td>0.99%</td>
                <td>18.95%</td>
                <td />
                <td>1.53%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>M5_2.5F Top</td>
                <td>44.64</td>
                <td>2.460</td>
                <td>8.593</td>
                <td>10.10</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>17.59</td>
                <td>0.002</td>
                <td>0.663</td>
                <td>9.748</td>
                <td>5.268</td>
                <td>0.024</td>
                <td>99.12</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation123"><![CDATA[$\sigma $]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula> (n = 4)</td>
                <td>0.56</td>
                <td>0.21</td>
                <td>0.38</td>
                <td>0.62</td>
                <td />
                <td>0.22</td>
                <td>0.00</td>
                <td>0.03</td>
                <td>0.20</td>
                <td>0.30</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.29</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>RSD</td>
                <td>1.25%</td>
                <td>8.44%</td>
                <td>4.45%</td>
                <td>6.15%</td>
                <td />
                <td>1.24%</td>
                <td />
                <td>4.67%</td>
                <td>2.00%</td>
                <td>5.78%</td>
                <td />
                <td>0.29%</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <table-wrap id="TB3">
          <label>
            <sc>Table</sc> 3</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Major-element oxide composition (in wt%) of quenched melts from the experiments and Canary Islands rocks.</p>
          </caption>
          <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
            <colgroup>
              <col align="left" />
              <col span="2" align="left" />
              <col span="3" align="left" />
              <col span="4" align="left" />
              <col span="5" align="left" />
              <col span="6" align="left" />
              <col span="7" align="left" />
              <col span="8" align="left" />
              <col span="9" align="left" />
              <col span="10" align="left" />
              <col span="11" align="left" />
              <col span="12" align="left" />
              <col span="13" align="left" />
            </colgroup>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <td />
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation124"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{SiO_2}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation125"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{TiO_2}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation126"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Al_2O_3}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation127"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{FeO_T}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
                <th>MnO</th>
                <th>MgO</th>
                <th>CaO</th>
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation128"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Na_2O}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation129"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{K_2O}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
                <th>F</th>
                <th>Cl</th>
                <th>Total</th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>21-30 Pico Viejo</td>
                <td>60.40</td>
                <td>0.642</td>
                <td>19.85</td>
                <td>3.481</td>
                <td>0.198</td>
                <td>0.344</td>
                <td>0.754</td>
                <td>9.161</td>
                <td>5.570</td>
                <td>0.132</td>
                <td>0.408</td>
                <td>100.93</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>16-07 LMB</td>
                <td>60.38</td>
                <td>0.635</td>
                <td>19.96</td>
                <td>3.284</td>
                <td>0.138</td>
                <td>0.387</td>
                <td>0.758</td>
                <td>9.000</td>
                <td>5.410</td>
                <td>0.084</td>
                <td>0.376</td>
                <td>100.41</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>17-14 MBII</td>
                <td>59.08</td>
                <td>0.663</td>
                <td>19.68</td>
                <td>3.620</td>
                <td>0.222</td>
                <td>0.317</td>
                <td>0.765</td>
                <td>9.760</td>
                <td>5.450</td>
                <td>0.173</td>
                <td>0.395</td>
                <td>100.12</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>17-12 M. Samara</td>
                <td>55.10</td>
                <td>1.733</td>
                <td>18.30</td>
                <td>6.494</td>
                <td>0.229</td>
                <td>1.837</td>
                <td>4.098</td>
                <td>7.257</td>
                <td>4.087</td>
                <td>0.123</td>
                <td>0.193</td>
                <td>99.45</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>M3_2 (800<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation130"><![CDATA[${}^\circ $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>C)</td>
                <td>57.29</td>
                <td>0.265</td>
                <td>19.14</td>
                <td>1.217</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.126</td>
                <td>0.954</td>
                <td>7.319</td>
                <td>4.097</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>90.41</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>M3_0.3F Gl[2:6, 8, 10]</td>
                <td>58.95</td>
                <td>0.283</td>
                <td>19.51</td>
                <td>1.283</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.142</td>
                <td>0.984</td>
                <td>7.834</td>
                <td>4.036</td>
                <td>0.110</td>
                <td>0.005</td>
                <td>93.16</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>M3_0.6F Gl[10 6]</td>
                <td>58.63</td>
                <td>0.278</td>
                <td>19.60</td>
                <td>1.365</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.121</td>
                <td>0.824</td>
                <td>8.170</td>
                <td>4.215</td>
                <td>0.123</td>
                <td>0.009</td>
                <td>93.35</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>M3_1.25F Gl[1:3]</td>
                <td>57.47</td>
                <td>0.248</td>
                <td>19.64</td>
                <td>1.660</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.138</td>
                <td>0.720</td>
                <td>8.520</td>
                <td>4.233</td>
                <td>0.157</td>
                <td>0.010</td>
                <td>92.82</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>M3_0.6F Gl[2 4 5]</td>
                <td>58.15</td>
                <td>0.129</td>
                <td>19.76</td>
                <td>1.530</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.125</td>
                <td>1.228</td>
                <td>7.990</td>
                <td>4.123</td>
                <td>0.956</td>
                <td>0.011</td>
                <td>94.01</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>M3_1.25F Gl[9:10]</td>
                <td>56.10</td>
                <td>0.166</td>
                <td>19.36</td>
                <td>1.835</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.167</td>
                <td>1.359</td>
                <td>8.710</td>
                <td>4.195</td>
                <td>1.535</td>
                <td>0.017</td>
                <td>93.45</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>M5_2 (700<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation131"><![CDATA[${}^\circ $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>C)</td>
                <td>57.45</td>
                <td>0.226</td>
                <td>16.69</td>
                <td>0.912</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.148</td>
                <td>0.244</td>
                <td>9.078</td>
                <td>4.682</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>89.43</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>M5_0.3F Gl[1:4]</td>
                <td>55.67</td>
                <td>0.243</td>
                <td>16.23</td>
                <td>2.305</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.189</td>
                <td>0.311</td>
                <td>10.51</td>
                <td>4.353</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>0.005</td>
                <td>89.81</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>M5_0.6F Gl[6 8]</td>
                <td>57.61</td>
                <td>0.246</td>
                <td>16.89</td>
                <td>2.360</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.196</td>
                <td>0.381</td>
                <td>8.475</td>
                <td>4.835</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>90.99</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>M5_0.3F Gl[7:9]</td>
                <td>55.89</td>
                <td>0.326</td>
                <td>16.12</td>
                <td>2.623</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.172</td>
                <td>0.394</td>
                <td>10.65</td>
                <td>4.337</td>
                <td>0.043</td>
                <td>0.003</td>
                <td>90.56</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>M5_1.25F Gl[1:4]</td>
                <td>59.80</td>
                <td>0.123</td>
                <td>17.54</td>
                <td>1.427</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.084</td>
                <td>0.225</td>
                <td>8.120</td>
                <td>5.005</td>
                <td>0.346</td>
                <td>0.017</td>
                <td>92.70</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>H5_3 (650<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation132"><![CDATA[${}^\circ $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>C)</td>
                <td>54.91</td>
                <td>0.618</td>
                <td>16.06</td>
                <td>2.843</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.346</td>
                <td>0.837</td>
                <td>8.880</td>
                <td>5.301</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>89.81</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>H5_0.3F Gl[1:7]</td>
                <td>55.72</td>
                <td>0.238</td>
                <td>16.16</td>
                <td>2.426</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.187</td>
                <td>0.309</td>
                <td>10.66</td>
                <td>4.331</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>0.004</td>
                <td>90.03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>H5_0.3F Gl[9:12]</td>
                <td>55.57</td>
                <td>0.390</td>
                <td>16.03</td>
                <td>2.845</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.161</td>
                <td>0.421</td>
                <td>10.58</td>
                <td>4.365</td>
                <td>0.127</td>
                <td>0.003</td>
                <td>90.48</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <fig id="f4">
          <label>
            <sc>Fig.</sc> 3.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Major-element compositions of biotite from the Canary Islands pyroclastic rocks, compared with those produced in the experiments. (a) M-site <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation81"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Fe^{2+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, Mg, Ti ternary diagram; (b) Tetrahedral Al + <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation82"><![CDATA[${\mathrm {Fe^{3+}}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> vs <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation83"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{Fe^{2+}}/({Fe^{2+}}+ Mg)}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> ratio for biotite; (c) W-site <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation84"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{F^-}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation85"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{OH^-}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation86"><![CDATA[${\mathrm {O^{2-}}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> ternary diagram. Lattice site occupancies are calculated based on a total cation charge of 22 per formula unit following <xref rid="ref81" ref-type="bibr">Li <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref81" ref-type="bibr">2020</xref>). Literature experiment biotite are divided into: Granite, Alk and Mafic based on their glass compositions (Full references in Appendix). Canary Islands biotite compilations not used in determination of partition coefficients from <xref rid="ref121" ref-type="bibr">Sliwinski <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref121" ref-type="bibr">2017</xref>) and <xref rid="ref12" ref-type="bibr">Beard</xref> (<xref rid="ref12" ref-type="bibr">2018</xref>). Gardar Province biotite from <xref rid="ref39" ref-type="bibr">Finch <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref39" ref-type="bibr">1995</xref>).</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" mimetype="image" xlink:href="egag046f3.jpeg">
            <alt-text>Figure three contains three major-element diagrams designed to show the compositional range of biotite grains covered by our experimental run products and Canary Islands material. For comparison the diagrams show a compilation of biotite grains from elsewhere in the Canary Islands, from the alkaline intrusions of the Gardar continental rift, Greenland, and for previously published experimental biotite from granite, alkaline and mafic magma compositions. The literature experimental data are used later in the study to calibrate empirical partitioning models, along with our newly presented data.</alt-text>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>Experiment biotite crystals were measured with a beam of 12–40 <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation94"><![CDATA[${\mu }$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>m diameter, along line scans of 4–12 <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation95"><![CDATA[${\mu }$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>m/s, with 5–15 grains measured per experimental charge. To minimise downhole fractionation among analytes we used faster scans where target phases required a smaller beam size. Experiment glass was measured with a beam size of 20–60 <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation96"><![CDATA[${\mu }$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>m along line scans at 4–8 <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation97"><![CDATA[${\mu }$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>m/s, and 8–16 areas of glass were measured per charge. These settings resulted in ca. 4–60 sec of signal per analysis. Canary Islands biotite crystals were analysed along line transects at 4 <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation98"><![CDATA[${\mu }$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>m/s with a beam of 40 <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation99"><![CDATA[${\mu }$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>m diameter and fluence of 9.5 J/cm<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation100"><![CDATA[${}^{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. A total of 4–10 crystals of biotite were measured per sample. Corresponding quenched melts were measured with a static beam of 20–30 <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation101"><![CDATA[${\mu }$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>m.</p>
        <p>Drift corrections and data reduction were performed with the Iolite v2.5 software (<xref rid="ref105" ref-type="bibr">Paton <italic>et al.</italic>, 2011</xref>), running in the Igor Pro environment. For the glass and Canary Islands biotite, the Al concentration from electron probe analyses was used as an internal standard. For the majority of biotite crystals in the experimental charges, mixed analyses of biotite and glass resulted. In this case, a robust linear unmixing model was applied to determine the trace-element composition of these crystals using their Mg/Al ratio as determined by electron probe to constrain mixing ratios (see Appendix, cf. <xref rid="ref14" ref-type="bibr">Beard <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref14" ref-type="bibr">2019</xref>,
<xref rid="ref15" ref-type="bibr">2020</xref>, <xref rid="ref115" ref-type="bibr">Rubatto &amp; Hermann</xref>, <xref rid="ref115" ref-type="bibr">2007</xref>, <xref rid="ref141" ref-type="bibr">Yang <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref141" ref-type="bibr">2018</xref>). For some samples, glass analyses by LA-ICP-MS also required unmixing, and here the mixing ratio was constrained using the Na/Al ratio as determined by electron probe analysis. A series of three MATLAB scripts for reduction of laser ablation data from both unmixed and mixed analyses are available in the Appendix.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <label>4</label>
      <title>Results</title>
      <sec id="sec4a">
        <label>4.1</label>
        <title>Experiment run products</title>
        <p>Results were obtained for eight experimental charges (<xref ref-type="table" rid="TB2">Tables 2</xref>–<xref ref-type="table" rid="TB3">3</xref>). The experiments equilibrated at near-liquidus conditions (&lt; 35% crystals, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Figs 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">2</xref>), and glass in most charges is free of quench crystals. Charges run without fluorine are homogeneous with respect to melt composition and phase proportions, containing an assemblage of quenched melt, aqueous fluid, biotite, sodic clinopyroxene <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation102"><![CDATA[$\pm $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> magnetite <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation103"><![CDATA[$\pm $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> titanite <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation104"><![CDATA[$\pm $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> alkali feldspar. Charges run with fluorine contain quenched melt, aqueous fluid, biotite <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation105"><![CDATA[$\pm $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> sodic clinopyroxene <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation106"><![CDATA[$\pm $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> Fe-oxide <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation107"><![CDATA[$\pm $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> F-rich titanite <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation108"><![CDATA[$\pm $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> fluorite <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation109"><![CDATA[$\pm $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> a F-Ti-Ca-Na phase with a composition consistent with the sorosilicate minerals hiortdahlite and kochite. The fluorine-bearing charges are internally zoned, with higher quenched melt fluorine contents and greater modes of fluorine-rich biotite and titanite toward their top, grading to clinopyroxene-rich assemblages toward their bottom (maximum melt F variation in a single capsule was 0.16–1.57 wt.%; see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Fig. 1</xref>). Vertical variation in fluorine concentration results from addition of concentrated HF to the top of capsules and subsequent downward migration of fluorine through the charges. The concentration of other major-elements in quenched melt show limited variation with position in the capsule, with small offsets associated with changes to phase relations that follow melt fluorine. While capsule-wide equilibrium was not attained, our earlier Cpx/melt study that uses these same charges demonstrated close approach to local equilibrium between minerals and melt (<xref rid="ref15" ref-type="bibr">Beard <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020</xref>). Phase relations and Cpx/melt partition coefficients are similar among charges with differing fluorine concentration gradients, as well as with unzoned charges where fluorine was pre-homogenised throughout the starting glass. A detailed description of the textures, phase relations and variations in melt chemistry and a discussion of the implications of capsule stratification are presented in <xref rid="ref15" ref-type="bibr">Beard <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref15" ref-type="bibr">2020</xref>).</p>
        <p>Capsules with a melt fluorine gradient are split into up to five zones for a total of 39 zones including the fluorine-free compositions. A total of twelve zones contain biotite and are discussed below.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4b">
        <label>4.2</label>
        <title>Biotite compositions</title>
        <p>Major-element compositions of the experiment and natural biotite are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="TB2">Table 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">Fig. 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="sup1">A12</xref>. Major- and minor-element ions were assigned to lattice sites following the method of <xref rid="ref81" ref-type="bibr">Li <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref81" ref-type="bibr">2020</xref>), including the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation133"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Fe^{2+}/Fe^{3+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> ratio, Li, and the proportions of fluorine, hydroxyl, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation134"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{O^{2-}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and chlorine at the biotite W-site (calculations are for a charge of 22 per formula unit). This method is based on a principle component regression machine learning model, calibrated on a training set of 155 biotite references with measured chemistry and crystal structural refinement. Absolute errors reported for this model are <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation135"><![CDATA[$\pm $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> 0.2 apfu for octahedral <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation136"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Fe^{2+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, octahedral <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation137"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Al^{3+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation138"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{OH^{-}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> at the W site, and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation139"><![CDATA[$\pm $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> 0.3 apfu for total <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation140"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Fe^{3+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation141"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{W}O^{2-}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
        <fig id="f6">
          <label>
            <sc>Fig.</sc> 4.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Major-element compositions of quenched melt from experiments and Canary Islands pyroclastic rocks (subset for partitioning). Small symbols are individual EPMA points, and larger ones are averages per experiment zone or natural sample. Literature data for ‘Alk’, ‘Mafic’ and ‘Granite’ as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">Figure 3</xref>. (a) is a total alkalies vs silica diagram, showing that our experiment quenched melts are trachyte to phonolite in composition; (b) shows their per-/metaluminous to peralkaline compositions; (c) shows glass compositions on a granite classification diagram from <xref rid="ref44" ref-type="bibr">Frost <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref44" ref-type="bibr">2001</xref>); (d) shows their low Mg# and high Na/K compositions; (e) shows glass <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation155"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{TiO_2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and F content, and; (f) the proportion of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation156"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{F^-}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation157"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{OH^-}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> anions versus molar Si/Al ratio.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" mimetype="image" xlink:href="egag046f4.jpeg">
            <alt-text>Figure four shows in six panels major-element oxide
and major-element molar ratios for quenched melt for
our experimental run products and Canary Islands rocks. Also shown are quenched melt compositions
from previously published experiments used later with
our new data to calibrate empirical partitioning models.</alt-text>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>Biotite crystals from the experiments are phlogopite to fluorophlogopite following <xref rid="ref110" ref-type="bibr">Rieder <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref110" ref-type="bibr">1998</xref>), with molar Mg# of 57–78, tetrahedral Al of 0.43–1.14 c.f.u., octahedral Al of 0.04–0.34 c.f.u, Ti of 0.13–0.26 c.f.u. and F contents of 0–1.45 a.f.u (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">Fig. 3</xref>). With increasing fluorine content in the synthesised biotite, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation142"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{IV}Al}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> exchanges for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation143"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{IV}Si}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="sup1">A12</xref>a), and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation144"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{VI}Ti}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> exchanges for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation145"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{VI}Mg}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="sup1">A12</xref>b), the latter consistent with the Ti-oxy-hydroxide coupled substitution mechanism reported by <xref rid="ref116" ref-type="bibr">Schmidt <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref116" ref-type="bibr">1999</xref>):
</p>
        <disp-formula id="deqn01">
          <label>(1)</label>
          <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="DmEquation1"><![CDATA[$$ \begin{align} \begin{split} \mathrm{{[{}^{M}Mg^{2+} + 2^{W}(OH^{-},\; F^{-})]_{Bt} + Ti^{4+}_{melt} + 2 O^{2-}_{melt}} \rightleftharpoons } \\ \mathrm{{[{}^{M}Ti^{4+} + 2^{W}O^{2-}]_{Bt} + Mg^{2+}_{melt} + 2 (OH^{-},\; F^{-})_{melt}}} \end{split}\end{align} $$]]></tex-math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>Further, potassium at the A-site increases at the expense of sodium with increasing fluorine at the biotite W site. These trends are observed across all experiment bulk compositions.</p>
        <p>The Canary Islands crystals selected for this partitioning study (large triangles in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">Fig. 3</xref>) are phlogopite to biotite in composition and sit toward the upper end of the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation146"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{X^M_{Ti}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation147"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{Fe^{2+}/(Fe^{2+}}+ Mg)}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> range defined by a larger Canaries biotite dataset (including our measurements and those from <xref rid="ref121" ref-type="bibr">Sliwinski <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref121" ref-type="bibr">2017</xref>). They show no notable zonation in BSE intensity across grains, suggesting minimal compositional variation during growth (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">Fig. 2</xref>). When compared to our experiment biotite, the Canaries minerals extend the compositional range to slightly lower Mg# (54–72), higher <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation148"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{IV}Al}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> (1.05–1.30 c.f.u.) and Ti (0.23–0.44 c.f.u.), and have a narrower range of F contents (0.05–0.30 a.f.u). The Canary Islands biotite follow compositional trends defined by the experiment biotite and additionally display a positive correlation between Mn and F content (the experiments are Mn-free).</p>
        <p>The most abundant trace-elements in both the experiment and natural biotite are Ba and Rb (ca. 100–3700 and 200–350 <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation149"><![CDATA[${\mu }$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>g/g, respectively). Our Canary Islands biotite have Ba, Zr, Sr and Nb concentrations that fall within the typical range for biotite from Tenerife zoned phonolitic ignimbrites (<xref rid="ref121" ref-type="bibr">Sliwinski <italic>et al.</italic>, 2017</xref>). They have Li contents of 3.5–28 <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation150"><![CDATA[${\mu }$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>g/g and REE contents close to or below the detection limit of our setup (ca. 0.1 <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation151"><![CDATA[${\mu }$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>g/g).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4c">
        <label>4.3</label>
        <title>Glass compositions</title>
        <p>Quenched silicate melts from the experiments are trachyte and phonolite on the TAS classification of <xref rid="ref78" ref-type="bibr">Le Maitre <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref78" ref-type="bibr">2005</xref>), with molar (Na + K)/Al of 0.86–1.34, Mg# of 6–14, and F contents of up to 2.85 wt.% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">Fig. 4</xref>). The final experiment glasses have higher <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation152"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{SiO_{2}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and lower <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation153"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{FeO_T}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, MgO and CaO relative to their respective starting material, consistent with crystallisation of the produced mineral phases. A superliquidus experiment using the H5 composition lost 0.82% <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation154"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{FeO_T}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> relative to its starting glass via alloying with the Pt capsule (see <xref rid="ref14" ref-type="bibr">Beard <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref14" ref-type="bibr">2019</xref>). This alloying phenomenon will contribute to changes in experiment Mg#, but is not enough to explain the all of the Fe-Mg systematics of the experiment glass data set. The Canary Islands tephra glasses are tephriphonolite and phonolite and overlap with the composition of experiment glass with molar (Na + K)/Al 0.78–1.16 and F contents &lt;0.07–0.28 wt.%. Canary Islands glass extends to higher Mg# (13–39) than the experiments.</p>
        <p>All experiments produced an aqueous fluid phase in addition to silicate melt. The water content of the silicate melt was estimated as 6.19–7.62 wt.% using a solubility model calibrated on andesite and rhyolite compositions that takes into account the effects of fluorine (<xref rid="ref143" ref-type="bibr">Zhang <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022</xref>). The model assigns water dissolved in the silicate melt to molecular water (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation158"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{H_2O_m}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) and hydroxyl species (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation159"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{OH^-}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) using equilibrium constants for water dissociation from <xref rid="ref23" ref-type="bibr">Botcharnikov <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref23" ref-type="bibr">2006</xref>), which are optimised for andesitic melts. This approach is valid as there is little variation in water dissociation constants between rhyolitic and basaltic melts (<xref rid="ref19" ref-type="bibr">Behrens, 2020</xref>). Following this scheme, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation160"><![CDATA[$X_{\text {F}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation161"><![CDATA[$X_{\text {OH}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for the quenched melt in our fluorine-bearing experiments is 0.02–0.29. The melt ratio of non-bridging oxygen anions per tetrahedrally coordinated cation (NBO/T) was calculated following <xref rid="ref92" ref-type="bibr">Mills</xref> (<xref rid="ref92" ref-type="bibr">1993</xref>). This calculation method does not consider the potential role of ferric iron, nor that of water or the halogens. It was chosen to maximise applicability of our empirical models, especially considering scenarios where only routine whole-rock geochemical measurements have been made.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5">
      <label>5</label>
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <sec id="sec5a">
        <label>5.1</label>
        <title>The attainment of equilibrium between biotite and silicate melt</title>
        <p>Close approach to local equilibrium in the experiments is indicated by consistency of results among duplicate charges, and in the case of experiments with vertical zonation in fluorine content, in vertical zones within charges (see below, for both Cpx/melt and Bt/melt <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation162"><![CDATA[$D$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values; cf. <xref rid="ref15" ref-type="bibr">Beard <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref15" ref-type="bibr">2020</xref>) and the presence of mineral phases with limited to no chemical zoning. Biotite crystals from our experiments are homogeneous with respect to major-element compositions, as determined from EPMA mapping (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Fig. 1</xref>), although they are too small to assess whether zonation of trace-elements is present. Quenched melts are homogeneous with respect to both major- and trace-elements, showing no discernible gradients in composition adjacent to crystal boundaries. Zonation of lanthanides within clinopyroxene from the same experiments is minimal (<xref rid="ref14" ref-type="bibr">Beard <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019</xref>, <xref rid="ref15" ref-type="bibr">2020</xref>), suggesting that trace-element zonation within the experimental biotite would also be minor.</p>
        <p>Numerous fluorine-bearing charges in this study are vertically-zoned (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Fig. 1</xref>), an effect attributed to the incomplete homogenisation of fluorine, which was added as concentrated HF to the top of the capsules (see discussion in <xref rid="ref15" ref-type="bibr">Beard <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref15" ref-type="bibr">2020</xref>). For these charges, local equilibrium between the minerals and melt is demonstrated by the following observations: (1) minerals and glass have the same composition within horizontal bands of equal melt F content among separate experimental charges; (2) charges with pre-homogenised fluorine contents (added as NaF and KF powders) developed similar mineral and melt compositions for a given melt fluorine content, and return similar mineral/melt <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation163"><![CDATA[$D$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values (<xref rid="ref15" ref-type="bibr">Beard <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020</xref>); and (3) mineral compositions, melt compositions and partitioning behaviour are consistent among experiments and natural samples, including literature data (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">Figs 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">4</xref> and below).</p>
        <p>Homogenisation of major and trace-element concentrations within the mica structure is generally assumed to occur quickly relative to that of inosilicates and the feldspar minerals, because biotite in natural igneous systems rarely displays zonation [e.g., optical zonation related to composition, <xref rid="ref30" ref-type="bibr">Deer <italic>et al.</italic>, 1992</xref>). Biotite grains that preserve major-element or trace-element zoning have been reported for volcanic systems and pegmatites (<xref rid="ref11" ref-type="bibr">Azadbakht &amp; Lentz, 2020</xref>, <xref rid="ref121" ref-type="bibr">Sliwinski <italic>et al.</italic>, 2017</xref>). The experimental diffusion database for micas is limited, with published studies focused on the diffusion of LILE cations, Ar, O, H and the OH-F exchange [see review by <xref rid="ref29" ref-type="bibr">Cherniak &amp; Dimanov, 2010</xref>). For Sr, the activation energy for diffusion in mica is significantly lower than that for hornblende, which in turn is lower than for diopside. Diffusion in melt is faster. It can thus be assumed that our experiment biotite and glass compositions represent the equilibrium partitioning of elements at the run conditions.</p>
        <p>In the Canary Islands samples, biotite is unzoned in backscattered electron images (e.g., <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">Fig. 2</xref>), and the compositional consistency between crystals in each pyroclastic fall sample supports the hypothesis of equilibrium. This interpretation is further corroborated by the presence of unzoned clinopyroxene in the same samples that record a relatively constant physical and chemical environment in the magma chamber during crystal growth (see <xref rid="ref14" ref-type="bibr">Beard <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019</xref>). <xref rid="ref69" ref-type="bibr">Icenhower &amp; London</xref> (<xref rid="ref69" ref-type="bibr">1997</xref>) suggested that fluorine partition coefficients determined from pyroclastic rocks are biased toward higher values due to oxidation reactions and reequilibration associated with degassing and decline of the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation164"><![CDATA[$f \mathrm{H_2O}/f\mathrm{HF}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> ratio of biotite. We do not see F-rich rims on biotite from our Canary Islands rocks, suggesting this phenomenon does not affect our results.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec5b">
        <label>5.2</label>
        <title>F-OH exchange between biotite and silicate melt, and implications for Ti-in-biotite thermometry</title>
        <p>Biotite incorporates fluoride as a structural anion, replacing as much as 100% of the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation165"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{OH^-}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation166"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{O^{2-}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> anions (e.g., Fig <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">3c</xref>), and can therefore exert a major control of the fluorine budget of alkaline-silicate magmatic systems (<xref rid="ref97" ref-type="bibr">Munoz, 1984</xref>, <xref rid="ref124" ref-type="bibr">Speer, 1984</xref>). Fluoride can be incorporated into biotite via the following exchange reaction:
</p>
        <disp-formula id="deqn02">
          <label>(2)</label>
          <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="DmEquation2"><![CDATA[$$ \begin{align} \mathrm{{}^{W}OH^{-}_{Bt} + F^{-}_{melt} \rightleftharpoons OH^{-}_{melt} +{}^{W}F^{-}_{Bt}}\end{align}$$]]></tex-math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>Fluorine in the investigated system acts as a major to minor element, with its partitioning expected to be in the Raoult’s law domain. We therefore discuss the exchange of fluorine between biotite and silicate melt in terms of exchange coefficients (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation167"><![CDATA[$Kd$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) rather than a Nernst partition coefficient (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation168"><![CDATA[$D$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>);
</p>
        <disp-formula id="deqn03">
          <label>(3)</label>
          <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="DmEquation3"><![CDATA[$$ \begin{align} Kd^{Bt-melt}_{\text{F/OH}} = (X^{Bt}_\text{F}/X^{Bt}_{\text{OH}})/(X^{melt}_{\text{F}}/X^{melt}_{\text{OH}})\end{align}$$]]></tex-math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation169"><![CDATA[$X^{Bt}_\text{F}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation170"><![CDATA[$X^{Bt}_\text{OH}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are mole fractions of F and OH on the biotite W site, and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation171"><![CDATA[$X^{melt}_\text{F}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation172"><![CDATA[$X^{melt}_\text{OH}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are mole fractions of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation173"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{F^-}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation174"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{OH^-}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in the silicate melt. A spreadsheet to calculate these terms is provided in the Appendix.</p>
        <fig id="f8">
          <label>
            <sc>Fig.</sc> 5.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Biotite-melt fluorine/hydroxyl exchange coefficients vs biotite and melt compositional parameters for our experiments and Canary Islands pyroclastic rocks, compared with literature experiments, labeled ‘Granite’, ‘Alk’, ‘Mafic’ (references are in the Appendix. a.f.u. is anions per formula unit, and c.f.u. cations, both of which are calculated for a total charge of 22 per formula unit following <xref rid="ref81" ref-type="bibr">Li <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref81" ref-type="bibr">2020</xref>).</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" mimetype="image" xlink:href="egag046f5.jpeg">
            <alt-text>Figure five shows in six panels the exchange
coefficients for fluoride and hydroxyl between biotite
mica and silicate melt and their relationship with
major-element cation abundances in biotite and silicate
melt.</alt-text>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>The <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation175"><![CDATA[$Kd^{Bt-melt}_{\text {F/OH}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are 9.3–47.0 for our experiments, and 4.9–11.4 for the Canary Islands natural mineral-melt pairs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">Fig. 9</xref>), ranges that are broadly consistent with literature experiments on granitic compositions (<xref rid="ref69" ref-type="bibr">Icenhower &amp; London</xref>, <xref rid="ref69" ref-type="bibr">1997</xref>; 1.9–20.6), and on alkali-rich basalt to tephriphonolite compositions (<xref rid="ref143" ref-type="bibr">Zhang <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref143" ref-type="bibr">2022</xref>; 6.1–51.1). This shows that F is compatible to highly compatible in biotite (for alkaline compositions in particular) and that if sufficient biotite is crystallising, it will deplete the residual melt of fluorine.</p>
        <p>In experiments containing greater concentrations of fluorine, the biotite are offset to higher Mg contents and lower Ti contents, indicating that the exchange mechanism (Eqn. <xref rid="deqn01" ref-type="disp-formula">1</xref>) is driven to the left in biotite dominated by F rather than OH. This finding confirms that the Ti-in-biotite thermometer of <xref rid="ref62" ref-type="bibr">Henry <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref62" ref-type="bibr">2005</xref>) should not be applied to fluorine-bearing systems since variations in fluorine content reduce the amount of Ti in biotite at a given Mg# and temperature, resulting in an over-prediction of temperature (also see <xref rid="ref80" ref-type="bibr">Li &amp; Zhang, 2022</xref>, <xref rid="ref103" ref-type="bibr">Patiño Douce, 1993</xref>, <xref rid="ref104" ref-type="bibr">Patiño Douce <italic>et al.</italic>, 1993</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec5c">
        <label>5.3</label>
        <title>Trace-element partitioning</title>
        <p>Apparent Nernst partition coefficients (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation176"><![CDATA[$D$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values) are reported for twelve experimental and four Canary Islands biotite-glass pairs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">Fig. 5</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="TB4">Table 4</xref>). <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation177"><![CDATA[$D$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values are highly consistent among our experiments and are broadly similar to those reported from existing experiments on mafic or granitic compositions (<xref rid="ref3" ref-type="bibr">Adam &amp; Green</xref>, <xref rid="ref3" ref-type="bibr">2006</xref>, <xref rid="ref4" ref-type="bibr">Adam <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref4" ref-type="bibr">1993</xref>, <xref rid="ref56" ref-type="bibr">Green <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref56" ref-type="bibr">2000</xref>, <xref rid="ref68" ref-type="bibr">Icenhower &amp; London</xref>, <xref rid="ref68" ref-type="bibr">1995</xref>, <xref rid="ref77" ref-type="bibr">LaTourrette <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref77" ref-type="bibr">1995</xref>, <xref rid="ref116" ref-type="bibr">Schmidt <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref116" ref-type="bibr">1999</xref>).</p>
        <table-wrap id="TB4">
          <label>
            <sc>Table</sc> 4</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Biotite-melt partition coefficients from a selection of the Canary Islands pyroclastic rocks and internally heated pressure vessel experiments. EP indicates partition coefficients calculated from concentrations measured by EPMA. All others are from LA-ICP-MS. Analyses where either biotite or melt were below detection limit of our setup are denoted by ‘-’. Note that the experiments are Mn-free.</p>
          </caption>
          <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
            <colgroup>
              <col align="left" />
              <col span="2" align="left" />
              <col span="3" align="left" />
              <col span="4" align="left" />
              <col span="5" align="left" />
              <col span="6" align="left" />
              <col span="7" align="left" />
              <col span="8" align="left" />
              <col span="9" align="left" />
              <col span="10" align="left" />
              <col span="11" align="left" />
              <col span="12" align="left" />
              <col span="13" align="left" />
              <col span="14" align="left" />
              <col span="15" align="left" />
              <col span="16" align="left" />
              <col span="17" align="left" />
            </colgroup>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>Name</th>
                <th>21-30</th>
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation178"><![CDATA[$\sigma $]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
                <th>16-07</th>
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation179"><![CDATA[$\sigma $]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
                <th>17-12</th>
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation180"><![CDATA[$\sigma $]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
                <th>M3<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation181"><![CDATA[${_2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation182"><![CDATA[$\sigma $]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
                <th>M3_0.6F</th>
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation183"><![CDATA[$\sigma $]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
                <th>M5_2.5F</th>
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation184"><![CDATA[$\sigma $]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
                <th>H5_1.25F<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation185"><![CDATA[${_2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation186"><![CDATA[$\sigma $]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
                <th>H5<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation187"><![CDATA[${_3}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation188"><![CDATA[$\sigma $]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td />
                <th colspan="2">PicoViejo</th>
                <th colspan="2">LMB</th>
                <th colspan="2">M.Samara</th>
                <th colspan="2">Full capsule</th>
                <th colspan="2">Full capsule</th>
                <th colspan="2">Top</th>
                <th colspan="2">Top</th>
                <th colspan="2">Full capsule</th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Li</td>
                <td>0.90</td>
                <td>0.70</td>
                <td>0.72</td>
                <td>0.59</td>
                <td>0.23</td>
                <td>0.14</td>
                <td>0.48</td>
                <td>0.04</td>
                <td>0.82</td>
                <td>0.07</td>
                <td>19.80</td>
                <td>0.34</td>
                <td>23.82</td>
                <td>5.23</td>
                <td>3.05</td>
                <td>1.21</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Na</td>
                <td>0.112</td>
                <td>0.099</td>
                <td>0.142</td>
                <td>0.120</td>
                <td>0.160</td>
                <td>0.143</td>
                <td>0.152</td>
                <td>0.006</td>
                <td>0.134</td>
                <td>0.003</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.199</td>
                <td>0.034</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Mg</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>16</td>
                <td>10</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>6</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>15</td>
                <td>6</td>
                <td>177</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>209</td>
                <td>56</td>
                <td>8</td>
                <td>5</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Si</td>
                <td>0.67</td>
                <td>0.58</td>
                <td>0.62</td>
                <td>0.58</td>
                <td>0.67</td>
                <td>0.63</td>
                <td>0.68</td>
                <td>0.04</td>
                <td>0.66</td>
                <td>0.03</td>
                <td>0.64</td>
                <td>0.03</td>
                <td>0.72</td>
                <td>0.19</td>
                <td>0.79</td>
                <td>0.10</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>K</td>
                <td>1.49</td>
                <td>1.32</td>
                <td>1.78</td>
                <td>1.59</td>
                <td>1.87</td>
                <td>1.67</td>
                <td>1.50</td>
                <td>0.25</td>
                <td>1.78</td>
                <td>0.20</td>
                <td>1.73</td>
                <td>0.03</td>
                <td>2.30</td>
                <td>0.39</td>
                <td>1.43</td>
                <td>0.35</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Ca</td>
                <td>0.008</td>
                <td>0.007</td>
                <td>0.026</td>
                <td>0.015</td>
                <td>0.006</td>
                <td>0.004</td>
                <td>0.098</td>
                <td>0.013</td>
                <td>0.032</td>
                <td>0.012</td>
                <td>0.209</td>
                <td>0.107</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Ti</td>
                <td>9.6</td>
                <td>8.4</td>
                <td>10.5</td>
                <td>10.2</td>
                <td>10.6</td>
                <td>9.9</td>
                <td>3.8</td>
                <td>1.0</td>
                <td>4.1</td>
                <td>0.9</td>
                <td>3.6</td>
                <td>0.1</td>
                <td>4.7</td>
                <td>0.9</td>
                <td>3.3</td>
                <td>1.2</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Fe</td>
                <td>3.0</td>
                <td>2.6</td>
                <td>4.4</td>
                <td>3.7</td>
                <td>2.7</td>
                <td>2.3</td>
                <td>2.9</td>
                <td>0.8</td>
                <td>2.6</td>
                <td>0.6</td>
                <td>6.3</td>
                <td>0.1</td>
                <td>4.4</td>
                <td>0.7</td>
                <td>2.4</td>
                <td>0.7</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Ga</td>
                <td>1.0</td>
                <td>0.9</td>
                <td>1.8</td>
                <td>1.4</td>
                <td>5.9</td>
                <td>4.0</td>
                <td>1.9</td>
                <td>0.4</td>
                <td>2.6</td>
                <td>0.3</td>
                <td>3.5</td>
                <td>0.3</td>
                <td>2.4</td>
                <td>0.7</td>
                <td>1.3</td>
                <td>0.2</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Rb</td>
                <td>1.75</td>
                <td>1.56</td>
                <td>2.27</td>
                <td>1.99</td>
                <td>1.75</td>
                <td>1.53</td>
                <td>1.74</td>
                <td>0.31</td>
                <td>2.15</td>
                <td>0.28</td>
                <td>2.09</td>
                <td>0.05</td>
                <td>2.84</td>
                <td>0.51</td>
                <td>1.96</td>
                <td>0.52</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Sr</td>
                <td>0.17</td>
                <td>0.09</td>
                <td>0.16</td>
                <td>0.08</td>
                <td>0.33</td>
                <td>0.15</td>
                <td>0.20</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.19</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.00</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.10</td>
                <td>0.06</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Y</td>
                <td>0.001</td>
                <td>0.001</td>
                <td>0.004</td>
                <td>0.001</td>
                <td>0.002</td>
                <td>0.001</td>
                <td>0.058</td>
                <td>0.024</td>
                <td>0.050</td>
                <td>0.022</td>
                <td>0.080</td>
                <td>0.021</td>
                <td>0.068</td>
                <td>0.057</td>
                <td>0.009</td>
                <td>-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Zr</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.10</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.04</td>
                <td>0.01</td>
                <td>0.06</td>
                <td>0.01</td>
                <td>0.10</td>
                <td>0.04</td>
                <td>0.12</td>
                <td>0.05</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Nb</td>
                <td>0.7</td>
                <td>0.6</td>
                <td>0.8</td>
                <td>0.7</td>
                <td>0.8</td>
                <td>0.7</td>
                <td>1.0</td>
                <td>0.4</td>
                <td>0.4</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.1</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>1.2</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.2</td>
                <td>-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Cs</td>
                <td>0.47</td>
                <td>0.41</td>
                <td>0.59</td>
                <td>0.50</td>
                <td>0.39</td>
                <td>0.33</td>
                <td>0.79</td>
                <td>0.07</td>
                <td>0.67</td>
                <td>0.04</td>
                <td>0.25</td>
                <td>0.03</td>
                <td>0.46</td>
                <td>0.20</td>
                <td>0.83</td>
                <td>0.14</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Ba</td>
                <td>55.0</td>
                <td>32.8</td>
                <td>11.5</td>
                <td>6.4</td>
                <td>101.1</td>
                <td>50.8</td>
                <td>2.4</td>
                <td>0.6</td>
                <td>5.2</td>
                <td>1.1</td>
                <td>5.5</td>
                <td>0.1</td>
                <td>4.6</td>
                <td>1.1</td>
                <td>1.3</td>
                <td>0.3</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>La</td>
                <td>0.0001</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.0042</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.0004</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Ce</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.0051</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.0003</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Nd</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.0064</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.0003</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Sm</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.0046</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Eu</td>
                <td>0.0139</td>
                <td>0.0098</td>
                <td>0.0364</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.0549</td>
                <td>0.0234</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Dy</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.0000</td>
                <td>0.0030</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Tm</td>
                <td>0.0021</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.0028</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Yb</td>
                <td>0.0049</td>
                <td>0.0036</td>
                <td>0.0080</td>
                <td>0.0039</td>
                <td>0.0035</td>
                <td>0.0005</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Hf</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.01</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.16</td>
                <td>0.04</td>
                <td>0.04</td>
                <td>0.01</td>
                <td>0.03</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.10</td>
                <td>0.07</td>
                <td>0.06</td>
                <td>0.04</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Ta</td>
                <td>0.4</td>
                <td>0.4</td>
                <td>0.4</td>
                <td>0.4</td>
                <td>0.5</td>
                <td>0.4</td>
                <td>1.0</td>
                <td>0.4</td>
                <td>0.9</td>
                <td>0.3</td>
                <td>1.0</td>
                <td>0.9</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.6</td>
                <td>0.3</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Pb</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.01</td>
                <td>0.03</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.03</td>
                <td>0.03</td>
                <td>0.08</td>
                <td>0.01</td>
                <td>0.08</td>
                <td>0.01</td>
                <td>0.15</td>
                <td>0.04</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.83</td>
                <td>0.37</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Th</td>
                <td>0.0001</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.0007</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.0051</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.0074</td>
                <td>0.0051</td>
                <td>0.1149</td>
                <td>0.0320</td>
                <td>0.0892</td>
                <td>0.0706</td>
                <td>0.0618</td>
                <td>0.0292</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>U</td>
                <td>0.001</td>
                <td>0.001</td>
                <td>0.002</td>
                <td>0.001</td>
                <td>0.001</td>
                <td>0.001</td>
                <td>0.015</td>
                <td>0.007</td>
                <td>0.007</td>
                <td>0.005</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.074</td>
                <td>0.041</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Si_EP</td>
                <td>0.61</td>
                <td>0.01</td>
                <td>0.61</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.71</td>
                <td>0.04</td>
                <td>0.66</td>
                <td>0.03</td>
                <td>0.64</td>
                <td>0.03</td>
                <td>0.70</td>
                <td>0.03</td>
                <td>0.72</td>
                <td>0.07</td>
                <td>0.71</td>
                <td>0.04</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Ti_EP</td>
                <td>10.2</td>
                <td>1.0</td>
                <td>10.9</td>
                <td>0.5</td>
                <td>3.3</td>
                <td>0.2</td>
                <td>15.7</td>
                <td>2.1</td>
                <td>18.9</td>
                <td>3.1</td>
                <td>3.4</td>
                <td>2.8</td>
                <td>4.3</td>
                <td>0.4</td>
                <td>6.9</td>
                <td>1.4</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Al_EP</td>
                <td>0.64</td>
                <td>0.01</td>
                <td>0.64</td>
                <td>0.03</td>
                <td>0.75</td>
                <td>0.05</td>
                <td>0.67</td>
                <td>0.04</td>
                <td>0.57</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.45</td>
                <td>0.06</td>
                <td>0.45</td>
                <td>0.03</td>
                <td>0.63</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Fe_EP</td>
                <td>4.5</td>
                <td>0.4</td>
                <td>4.7</td>
                <td>0.2</td>
                <td>1.7</td>
                <td>0.2</td>
                <td>8.0</td>
                <td>1.3</td>
                <td>5.3</td>
                <td>0.3</td>
                <td>6.1</td>
                <td>3.7</td>
                <td>4.9</td>
                <td>0.4</td>
                <td>6.0</td>
                <td>0.9</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Mn_EP</td>
                <td>2.3</td>
                <td>0.7</td>
                <td>3.1</td>
                <td>0.3</td>
                <td>1.3</td>
                <td>0.3</td>
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Mg_EP</td>
                <td>40</td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>36</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>5.7</td>
                <td>0.3</td>
                <td>144</td>
                <td>23</td>
                <td>157</td>
                <td>15</td>
                <td>196</td>
                <td>185</td>
                <td>113</td>
                <td>38</td>
                <td>39</td>
                <td>6</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Ca_EP</td>
                <td>0.009</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.019</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.039</td>
                <td>0.027</td>
                <td>0.026</td>
                <td>0.013</td>
                <td>0.024</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.024</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>0.017</td>
                <td>0.013</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Na_EP</td>
                <td>0.11</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.11</td>
                <td>0.01</td>
                <td>0.17</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.15</td>
                <td>0.01</td>
                <td>0.13</td>
                <td>0.01</td>
                <td>0.07</td>
                <td>0.01</td>
                <td>0.06</td>
                <td>0.00</td>
                <td>0.05</td>
                <td>0.00</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>K_EP</td>
                <td>1.54</td>
                <td>0.05</td>
                <td>1.57</td>
                <td>0.05</td>
                <td>2.41</td>
                <td>0.15</td>
                <td>1.88</td>
                <td>0.08</td>
                <td>1.87</td>
                <td>0.04</td>
                <td>1.73</td>
                <td>0.41</td>
                <td>1.82</td>
                <td>0.08</td>
                <td>1.70</td>
                <td>0.05</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>F_EP</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>8</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>2.3</td>
                <td>0.7</td>
                <td>2.0</td>
                <td>0.5</td>
                <td>2.3</td>
                <td>0.5</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Cl_EP</td>
                <td>0.05</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.06</td>
                <td>0.03</td>
                <td>0.20</td>
                <td>0.12</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Biotite/melt partition coefficients for the large <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation190"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{R^+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> cations (Na, K, Rb, and Cs) cover a narrow range of values (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">Figs 5</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="sup1">A15</xref>), with K and Rb being compatible in biotite (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation191"><![CDATA[$D_{\text {K}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> 1.43–2.67, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation192"><![CDATA[$D_{\text {Rb}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> 1.74–3.08), and Na and Cs being incompatible to weakly compatible (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation193"><![CDATA[$D_{\text {Na}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> 0.05–0.51, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation194"><![CDATA[$D_{\text {Cs}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> 0.41–1.02). <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation195"><![CDATA[$D$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values for these four monovalent ions define Onuma parabolae (<xref rid="ref102" ref-type="bibr">Onuma <italic>et al.</italic>, 1968</xref>), consistent with their partitioning onto the 12-fold coordinated A-site (interlayer) of biotite (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Fig. 7</xref>). Increases to the fluorine content of the biotite subtly elevate partition coefficients for Rb while having little influence on the behaviour of Na, K and Cs (Fig. <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="sup1">A15</xref>).</p>
        <p>Lithium is weakly incompatible to strongly compatible in biotite, with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation196"><![CDATA[$D_{\text {Li}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values in our experiments and natural samples from 0.24–32.8 that are decoupled from those for larger R<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation197"><![CDATA[${}^{+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> cations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">Fig. 5</xref>). This decoupling results from the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation198"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Li^+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> cation being too small for the XII A-site, and instead sitting in the octahedral M-sites of the biotite lattice (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation199"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{{}^{VI}Li} = 0.76}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> Å; with M-site radii from X-ray diffraction on natural biotite = 0.50–0.86 Å; <xref rid="ref27" ref-type="bibr">Brigatti &amp; Guggenheim</xref>, <xref rid="ref27" ref-type="bibr">2002</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Fig. 7</xref>). Our apparent <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation200"><![CDATA[$D_{\text {Li}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values overlap partly with compiled experimental studies on mafic and granitic compositions. There is excellent correspondence of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation201"><![CDATA[$D_{\text {Li}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> between the Canaries samples and the M3 composition experimental charges (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation202"><![CDATA[$D_{\text {Li}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> 0.24–0.90, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">Fig. 6</xref>). Fluorine-rich experiments on the M5 and H5 compositions have strongly elevated <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation203"><![CDATA[$D_{\text {Li}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> relative to the Canaries rocks and M3 composition experiments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">Fig. 6</xref>c; e.g., for M5 and H5 experiments with 1.25–2.5% bulk fluorine, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation204"><![CDATA[$D_{\text {Li}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is 12.0–32.8). Lithium <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation205"><![CDATA[$D_{\text {Li}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values further show positive correlations with biotite <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation206"><![CDATA[$X_{\text {Si}}^{T}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and inverse temperature (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">Fig. 6</xref>a, b).</p>
        <fig id="f10">
          <label>
            <sc>Fig.</sc> 6.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Biotite/melt element partition coefficients for experiments and Canary Islands pyroclastic rocks. Shown for comparison are published experimental partition coefficients for mafic compositions from <xref rid="ref3" ref-type="bibr">Adam &amp; Green</xref> (<xref rid="ref3" ref-type="bibr">2006</xref>), <xref rid="ref4" ref-type="bibr">Adam <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref4" ref-type="bibr">1993</xref>), <xref rid="ref56" ref-type="bibr">Green <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref56" ref-type="bibr">2000</xref>), <xref rid="ref77" ref-type="bibr">LaTourrette <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref77" ref-type="bibr">1995</xref>), <xref rid="ref116" ref-type="bibr">Schmidt <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref116" ref-type="bibr">1999</xref>), and from granitic compositions from <xref rid="ref68" ref-type="bibr">Icenhower &amp; London</xref> (<xref rid="ref68" ref-type="bibr">1995</xref>, <xref rid="ref69" ref-type="bibr">1997</xref>). Panels (a) and (b) show the same data in a different order and colour to aid readability. Elements with a subscript E are partition coefficients determined by EPMA (this study). All other <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation189"><![CDATA[$D_{i}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values determined for this study were measured by LA-ICP-MS.
</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" mimetype="image" xlink:href="egag046f6.jpeg">
            <alt-text>Figure six is an extended trace-element partitioning
diagram showing Nernst distribution coefficients for 20 cations and 2 anions. The diagram compares our new experimental- and phenocrysts-glass data with
that from previously-published studies that explore
mafic and granitoid compositions.</alt-text>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>The large <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation210"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{R^{2+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> cations Ca, Sr, Ba and Pb (residing on the biotite A-site) show a larger range of partitioning behaviour compared with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation211"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{R^+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> cations on this site. Their <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation212"><![CDATA[$D$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values generally fall within the range of published experimental values for mafic and granitic compositions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">Fig. 5</xref>). Ca is strongly incompatible in biotite (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation213"><![CDATA[$D_{\text {Ca}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> 0.004–0.06), Sr and Pb are incompatible to weakly compatible (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation214"><![CDATA[$D_{\text {Sr}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> 0.10–0.29, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation215"><![CDATA[$D_{\text {Pb}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> 0.02–1.54) and Ba is compatible (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation216"><![CDATA[$D_{\text {Ba}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> 1.3–11.8). This trend reflects the decreasing mismatch in radius between the ions and the biotite <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation217"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{XII}A}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> site. <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation218"><![CDATA[$D_{\text {Ba}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> from our experiments and Canary Islands rocks define a negative log-linear correlation with inverse temperature (temperature based on phase equilibrium experiments of <xref rid="ref7" ref-type="bibr">Andújar &amp; Scaillet</xref>, <xref rid="ref7" ref-type="bibr">2012</xref>; Fig. <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="sup1">A14</xref>), which contrasts with the positive log-linear correlation reported by <xref rid="ref135" ref-type="bibr">Wood &amp; Blundy</xref> (<xref rid="ref135" ref-type="bibr">2014</xref>). We attribute this mismatch to a smaller decrease in biotite solubility with increasing temperature (and hence A-site <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation219"><![CDATA[$D_{0}^{2+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) in our alkali-rich compositions relative to those mafic and granitic data compiled by <xref rid="ref135" ref-type="bibr">Wood &amp; Blundy</xref> (<xref rid="ref135" ref-type="bibr">2014</xref>). Calcium partition coefficients could not be calculated for all of our samples owing to low concentrations of Ca in the biotite and high LA-ICP-MS background counts for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation220"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{44}Ca}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> due to interferences from <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation221"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{CO_{2}^{+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation222"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{N_2O^+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
        <fig id="f1">
          <label>
            <sc>Fig.</sc> 7.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Onuma diagram for partitioning of 1+ cations between the mica <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation25"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{XII}A}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> interlayer site and silicate melt (this study and literature). Note the range of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation26"><![CDATA[$D$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation27"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Li^+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, which is too small for the A-site. Mica structure from <xref rid="ref27" ref-type="bibr">Brigatti &amp; Guggenheim</xref> (<xref rid="ref27" ref-type="bibr">2002</xref>). See Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="sup1">A16</xref> for a comparison to lattice site sizes determined via X-ray diffraction (<xref rid="ref27" ref-type="bibr">Brigatti &amp; Guggenheim, 2002</xref>).</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" mimetype="image" xlink:href="egag046f7.jpeg">
            <alt-text>Figure seven shows biotite/melt Nernst partition
coefficients for 1 plus cations plotted against their XIIcoordinated
ionic radii. For the elements Na-Cs, each
experiment defines an Onuma parabola, with a strainfree
ionic radius similar to the cation Rb plus, consistent
with incorporation of these ions into the XII-coordinated
interlayer site of biotite mica. D values for
Li plus plot above the Onuma curve, indicating that
lithium is incorporated elsewhere in the biotite lattice,
most probably in the M-sites.</alt-text>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>The ions <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation228"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Ga^{3+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation229"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Ti^{4+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are compatible in biotite (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation230"><![CDATA[$D_{\text {Ga}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> 1.3–3.5, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation231"><![CDATA[$D_{\text {Ti}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> 3.3–19.0, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">Fig. 5</xref>), while the 4+ and 5+ HFSE are incompatible to weakly compatible (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation232"><![CDATA[$D_{\text {Zr}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> 0.02–0.17, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation233"><![CDATA[$D_{\text {Nb}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> 0.05–1.2), and actinides U and Th are incompatible. This behaviour is similar to that in the compiled literature data (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">Fig. 5</xref>b).</p>
        <p>The REE and Y are strongly incompatible, with the biotite usually containing concentrations of REE below the detection limit of our laser ablation setup (Fig. <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="sup1">A13</xref>). Their partition coefficients are less than <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation234"><![CDATA[$10^{-2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation235"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{REE^{3+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> cations have ionic radii intermediate between the size of the M and A-sites of biotite (cf. <xref rid="ref116" ref-type="bibr">Schmidt <italic>et al.</italic>, 1999</xref>), and their very low biotite/melt partition coefficients reflect this. Partition coefficients for La are highest as it has the smallest mismatch in radius with the A-site of biotite (our Canaries data and <xref rid="ref3" ref-type="bibr">Adam &amp; Green</xref>, <xref rid="ref3" ref-type="bibr">2006</xref>, see Fig. <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="sup1">A13</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec5d">
        <label>5.4</label>
        <title>Fits to the lattice strain model</title>
        <p>The equilibrium partitioning of trace-elements between minerals and silicate melts is controlled largely by the size and elasticity of the crystal lattice sites (<xref rid="ref21" ref-type="bibr">Blundy &amp; Wood, 1994</xref>, <xref rid="ref26" ref-type="bibr">Brice, 1975</xref>, <xref rid="ref102" ref-type="bibr">Onuma <italic>et al.</italic>, 1968</xref>, <xref rid="ref135" ref-type="bibr">Wood &amp; Blundy, 2014</xref>) and the ability of the mineral to accommodate a local excess or deficit in charge (<xref rid="ref22" ref-type="bibr">Blundy <italic>et al.</italic>, 1998</xref>, <xref rid="ref94" ref-type="bibr">Mollo <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020</xref>). This behaviour is quantitatively described by the lattice-strain equation:</p>
        <disp-formula id="deqn04">
          <label>(4)</label>
          <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="DmEquation4"><![CDATA[$$ \begin{align}D_{i}^{min./melt} = D_{0} \; exp \begin{bmatrix}{\frac{-4\pi E_{s}N_{a}}{RT}} \left({\frac{r_{0}}{2}}(r_{0}-r_{i})^{2}-{\frac{1}{3}}(r_{0}-r_{i})^{3}\right)\end{bmatrix}\end{align}$$]]></tex-math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation239"><![CDATA[$r_{0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is the ideal radius for the lattice site (Å), <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation240"><![CDATA[$E_{s}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is its Young’s modulus (i.e., stiffness in GPa), <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation241"><![CDATA[$D_{0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is the strain-free partition coefficient, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation242"><![CDATA[$N_{a}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is Avagadro’s number, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation243"><![CDATA[$R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is the gas constant, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation244"><![CDATA[$T$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is temperature (Kelvin) and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation245"><![CDATA[$r_{i}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is the ionic radius of each element (Å). The <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation246"><![CDATA[$r_{0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is controlled by mineral composition as the lattice site dimensions change systematically with, for example, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation247"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Mg^{2+} \rightleftharpoons Fe^{2+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> exchange or <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation248"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Al^{+3} \rightleftharpoons Si^{4+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> substitution. The same is true for the elastic properties of the lattice, and hence <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation249"><![CDATA[$E_{s}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and mineral solubility, which is tracked by <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation250"><![CDATA[$D_{0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Lattice strain parameters also vary with the physical conditions, for example via thermal expansion of the lattice with increasing temperature and its compression with increasing pressure. These trends can (in part) be estimated from independently obtained data, e.g., thermal expansion from high-temperature X-ray diffraction.</p>
        <p>To investigate the systematics in <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation251"><![CDATA[$D_{i}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values and the mechanisms by which alkali elements are incorporated into biotite, element partitioning behaviour was explored using the lattice strain model. Parabolae for 1+ ions were fitted for the A-site (XII coordination) using the elements Na, K, Rb and Cs, with fits weighted based on analytical uncertainties on the partition coefficients (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Fig. 7</xref>). For 1+ ions in 12-fold coordination, the data define <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation252"><![CDATA[$r_{0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values of 1.7–1.73 Å, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation253"><![CDATA[$E_{s}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> 35–75 GPa and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation254"><![CDATA[$D_{0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> 1.2–7.5. The <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation255"><![CDATA[$r_{0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> parameter is similar for our experimental biotite, our natural Canaries biotite, and for biotite grown from mafic melts (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f13">Fig. 8</xref>). Biotite in granitic experiments has a smaller <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation256"><![CDATA[$r_{0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> of 1.64–1.68 Å. A–O bond lengths determined for biotite via single-crystal X-ray diffraction are reported as inner and outer sphere values (<xref rid="ref42" ref-type="bibr">Fleet, 2003</xref>). After subtraction of the ionic radius of tetrahedral <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation257"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{O^{2-}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, their A-site cation radii are 1.586–1.579 Å (median 1.587 Å) for the inner sphere, and 1.976–1.988 Å (median 1.980 Å) for the outer sphere; bracketing the range of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation258"><![CDATA[$r_{0}^{1+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values fitted to element partitioning data (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f13">Fig. 8</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="f13">
          <label>
            <sc>Fig.</sc> 8.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Biotite-melt D<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation207"><![CDATA[$_{Li}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> vs biotite tetrahedral silica, inverse temperature and biotite fluorine content for our experiments and Canary Islands pyroclastic rocks, compared with compiled experiments from literature. ‘Granite’ compositions from <xref rid="ref35" ref-type="bibr">Evensen &amp; London</xref> (<xref rid="ref35" ref-type="bibr">2002</xref>), <xref rid="ref66" ref-type="bibr">Horányi <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref66" ref-type="bibr">2025</xref>), <xref rid="ref68" ref-type="bibr">Icenhower &amp; London</xref> (<xref rid="ref68" ref-type="bibr">1995</xref>), <xref rid="ref107" ref-type="bibr">Pichavant <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref107" ref-type="bibr">2016</xref>); ‘Alk’ compositions from <xref rid="ref116" ref-type="bibr">Schmidt <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref116" ref-type="bibr">1999</xref>); ‘Mafic’ compositions from <xref rid="ref3" ref-type="bibr">Adam &amp; Green</xref> (<xref rid="ref3" ref-type="bibr">2006</xref>), <xref rid="ref77" ref-type="bibr">LaTourrette <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref77" ref-type="bibr">1995</xref>). Uncertainty on D<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation208"><![CDATA[$_{\text {Li}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values is shown at the 1<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation209"><![CDATA[$\sigma $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> level. <italic>a.f.u.</italic> is anions per formula unit, and <italic>c.f.u.</italic> cations, both of which are calculated for a total charge of 22 per formula unit.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" mimetype="image" xlink:href="egag046f8.jpeg">
            <alt-text>Figure eight shows Nernst partition coefficients for Li plus, plotted against (1) the alkalinity index of the
silicate melt, which is the molar ratio of alkalis to
aluminium; (2) inverse temperature; and (3) the fluorine
content of the W-site of biotite. All diagrams show a
positive correlation between D Li plus and other variables.</alt-text>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>The low Young’s modulus values (35–75 GPa) for the A-site of biotite indicate its relative flexibility compared with the M2-site of clinopyroxene, or the cation site of plagioclase (cf. <xref rid="ref135" ref-type="bibr">Wood &amp; Blundy, 2014</xref>). These elastic moduli are similar to values measured for biotite using a spherical nanoindentation apparatus at room temperature (30.8–51.4 GPa, layer-normal; <xref rid="ref76" ref-type="bibr">Lanin <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021</xref>).</p>
        <p>
          <inline-formula>
            <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation269"><![CDATA[$D_{0}$]]></tex-math>
          </inline-formula> values for 1+ ions at the A-site have a narrow range of positive values 1.2–7.5. A positive correlation exists between <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation270"><![CDATA[$r_{0}^{1+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation271"><![CDATA[$D_{0}^{1+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for our experiments and for mafic compositions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f13">Fig. 8</xref>a, <xref rid="ref3" ref-type="bibr">Adam &amp; Green, 2006</xref>, <xref rid="ref116" ref-type="bibr">Schmidt <italic>et al.</italic>, 1999</xref>). No such correlation is observed for granitic experiments (<xref rid="ref68" ref-type="bibr">Icenhower &amp; London, 1995</xref>). As <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation272"><![CDATA[$D_{0}^{+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> tracks the solubility of an ideal monovalent cation in the biotite A-site (cf. <xref rid="ref135" ref-type="bibr">Wood &amp; Blundy, 2014</xref>), a similar chemical substitution may be related to expansion of the A-site (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation273"><![CDATA[$r_{0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) facilitating incorporation of 1+ ions.</p>
        <p>Lattice strain fits were attempted for the large 2+ cations onto the A-site (Ca, Sr, Ba), but generation of a satisfactory parabola was not possible in most cases owing to the low concentrations of Ca in biotite, and corresponding high analytical uncertainty. Fits with Pb were attempted, but Pb plotted consistently below lattice strain parabolae defined by the other three elements, an effect reported elsewhere and attributed to the non-ideal electronic structure of the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation274"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Pb^{2+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> ion (<xref rid="ref135" ref-type="bibr">Wood &amp; Blundy, 2014</xref>).</p>
        <p>The 4+ and 5+ HFSE ions Ti, Zr, Hf, Nb and Ti provide an insufficient spread of radii for the fitting of lattice strain parabolae for the two M-sites in biotite.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec6">
      <label>6</label>
      <title>Empirical element partitioning models</title>
      <p>The partitioning behaviour of major- and trace-elements between minerals and melts varies systematically with the physicochemical conditions of magmas (<xref rid="ref134" ref-type="bibr">Wood &amp; Blundy, 2003</xref>). In
principle, partitioning behaviour can be predicted a-priori from the dependence of the lattice-strain parameters <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation275"><![CDATA[$r_{0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation276"><![CDATA[$D_{0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation277"><![CDATA[$E_{s}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> on pressure, temperature and the composition of the mineral and the melt. A number of empirical models have been presented that describe element partitioning between melt and various minerals (e.g., <xref rid="ref14" ref-type="bibr">Beard <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref14" ref-type="bibr">2019</xref>, <xref rid="ref15" ref-type="bibr">2020</xref>, <xref rid="ref17" ref-type="bibr">Bédard</xref>, <xref rid="ref17" ref-type="bibr">2014</xref>, <xref rid="ref18" ref-type="bibr">2023</xref>, <xref rid="ref94" ref-type="bibr">Mollo <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref94" ref-type="bibr">2020</xref>, <xref rid="ref119" ref-type="bibr">Sievwright <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref119" ref-type="bibr">2017</xref>, <xref rid="ref125" ref-type="bibr">Sun <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref125" ref-type="bibr">2017</xref>, <xref rid="ref133" ref-type="bibr">Wood &amp; Blundy</xref>, <xref rid="ref133" ref-type="bibr">1997</xref>). These models permit forward modelling of the major- and trace-element budget of crystallising magmatic systems and vice versa can be used to read the mineral record of melt composition in natural volcanic and intrusive igneous systems (cf. <xref rid="ref129" ref-type="bibr">van Hinsberg <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref129" ref-type="bibr">2010</xref>). Few models so far pertain to biotite-melt element partitioning (e.g., <xref rid="ref143" ref-type="bibr">Zhang <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref143" ref-type="bibr">2022</xref>) and none, to our knowledge, are calibrated for compositions extending to peralkaline magmatic systems. We present six models: one describes the F-OH exchange between silicate melt and the biotite W-site; a second, based on lattice strain theory, describes the exchange of 1+ cations between silicate melt and the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation278"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{XII}A}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-site of biotite; a third, fourth and fifth describe lithium partitioning between the melt and the M-sites of biotite (with and without a temperature term, and without a fluorine term) and finally a sixth addresses niobium. Model performance is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f14">Figs 10</xref>–<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f15">11</xref>, coefficients are in <xref ref-type="table" rid="TB5">Table 5</xref> and an EXCEL spreadsheet of the empirical partitioning models is provided in the Appendix.</p>
      <p>Our calibration database includes 229 biotite-melt partitioning experiments and covers a wide range of melt and biotite composition, pressure, temperature, and oxygen fugacity (50–3000 MPa, 620–1200<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation329"><![CDATA[${}^\circ $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>C, log <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation330"><![CDATA[$f$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation331"><![CDATA[$_{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> = IW (iron-wüstite) to MH (magnetite-haematite) <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation332"><![CDATA[$\approx \Delta $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>FMQ -5 to +5). The database includes experiments with a range of bulk compositions including our tephrite to phonolite composition experiments, alkali basalt to trachyte (<xref rid="ref143" ref-type="bibr">Zhang <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022</xref>), peraluminous and metaluminous granite (<xref rid="ref68" ref-type="bibr">Icenhower &amp; London, 1995</xref>, <xref rid="ref69" ref-type="bibr">1997</xref>) and nepheline-normative basanite (<xref rid="ref3" ref-type="bibr">Adam &amp; Green, 2006</xref>). A full list of references is in the Appendix. Experiment biotite have 2.6–3.3 <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation333"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{^{T}Si}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, 0–1.4 <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation334"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{M}Al}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, 0–2.7 <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation335"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{M}Mg}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and 0–1.8 <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation336"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{W}F}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> ions per formula unit (total unit charge of 22). Quenched melt has 44.7–78.3 wt% <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation337"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{SiO_{2}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, 0–1.0 molar Mg/(Mg + Fe) and 0.37–1.40 molar (Na + K)/Al. The majority of trace-element partition coefficients in this data set was determined via SIMS or LA-ICP-MS analyses, minimising analytical uncertainty compared to data from electron microprobe.</p>
      <sec id="sec6a">
        <label>6.1</label>
        <title>A model for F-OH exchange between silicate melt and the biotite W-site</title>
        <p>To determine the principal physicochemical controls on the exchange of F and OH anions between silicate melt and the W-site of biotite a least-squares multiple linear regression analysis was performed using our new <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation338"><![CDATA[$Kd^{\text {Bt-melt}}_{\text {F/OH}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values, alongside a compilation of previously published experimental data. Candidate fitting parameters were initially examined in binary scatter diagrams (e.g., <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">Fig. 9</xref>) to check for covariance and to ascertain whether correlations were linear. Intensive variables for multiple linear regression models for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation339"><![CDATA[$Kd^{\text {Bt-melt}}_{\text {F/OH}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> were introduced following a hierarchical forward selection criterion with switching. Only parameters with student t-tests showing statistical significance at the 95% confidence level were retained, with the preferred model incorporating five biotite compositional terms (<xref ref-type="table" rid="TB5">Table 5</xref>). Uncertainties on the model coefficients were determined via bootstrapping. The PRESS <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation340"><![CDATA[$R^{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> value obtained by repeated random sub-sampling of the data set is similar to the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation341"><![CDATA[$R^{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> value calculated for the full data set, indicating that the model is robust and has high predictive power. Full regression reports are in the Appendix.</p>
        <p>The final set of significant parameters defines the model equation:</p>
        <disp-formula id="deqn05">
          <label>(5)</label>
          <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="DmEquation5"><![CDATA[$$ \begin{align} \begin{split} LnKd^{\text{Bt-melt}}_{\text{F/OH}} = a_{1} + a_{2}X^{T}_\text{Si} + a_{3}X^{M}_\text{Mg} + a_{4}X^{W}_\text{OH} \\ + a_{5}X^{M}_{\text{Fe}^{2+}} + a_{6}\text{Fe}^{3+}/\text{Fe}^{Bt}_{tot} \end{split}\end{align}$$]]></tex-math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>Compositional coefficients are included for the T, M and W sites of the biotite structure, and for the oxidation state of iron in the biotite (<xref ref-type="table" rid="TB5">Table 5</xref>). The positive <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation342"><![CDATA[$X^{T}_{\text {Si}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> coefficient is consistent with Pearson acid-base theory: The W and T sites are adjacent in the biotite lattice, meaning there is a direct bond between Al or Si in the T site and OH or F in the W site (<xref rid="ref27" ref-type="bibr">Brigatti &amp; Guggenheim, 2002</xref>, <xref rid="ref97" ref-type="bibr">Munoz, 1984</xref>). <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation343"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Si^{4+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> has a higher <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation344"><![CDATA[$Z/r$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> relative to <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation345"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Al^{3+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, therefore is expected to bond preferentially with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation346"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{F^-}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, which has a higher electronegativity than <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation347"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{OH^-}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The positive correlation between <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation348"><![CDATA[$X^{M}_{\text {Mg}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation349"><![CDATA[$Kd^{\text {Bt-melt}}_{\text {F/OH}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and negative correlation with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation350"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Fe^{3+}/Fe}^{Bt}_{tot}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation351"><![CDATA[$X^{M}_{\text {Fe}^{2+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are consistent with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation352"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Fe^{2+}-F}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> avoidance in silicate minerals (<xref rid="ref39" ref-type="bibr">Finch <italic>et al.</italic>, 1995</xref>, <xref rid="ref42" ref-type="bibr">Fleet, 2003</xref>, <xref rid="ref97" ref-type="bibr">Munoz, 1984</xref>, <xref rid="ref114" ref-type="bibr">Rosenberg &amp; Foit, 1977</xref>), a phenomenon attributed to crystal field theory. The negative correlation between <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation353"><![CDATA[$Kd^{\text {Bt-melt}}_{\text {F/OH}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and biotite <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation354"><![CDATA[$X^{W}_{\text {OH}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> might result from non-ideal mixing of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation355"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{OH^-}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation356"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{F^-}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> on the biotite W-site, or in the silicate melt.</p>
        <fig id="f7">
          <label>
            <sc>Fig.</sc> 9.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Lattice strain parameters for 1+ ions in the A-site of biotite, compared with our fits of published experimental partition coefficients for mafic systems (<xref rid="ref3" ref-type="bibr">Adam &amp; Green, 2006</xref>, <xref rid="ref4" ref-type="bibr">Adam <italic>et al.</italic>, 1993</xref>, <xref rid="ref56" ref-type="bibr">Green <italic>et al.</italic>, 2000</xref>, <xref rid="ref77" ref-type="bibr">LaTourrette <italic>et al.</italic>, 1995</xref>, <xref rid="ref116" ref-type="bibr">Schmidt <italic>et al.</italic>, 1999</xref>) and granitic compositions (<xref rid="ref68" ref-type="bibr">Icenhower &amp; London, 1995</xref>). (a) The latter have smaller A-site sizes (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation259"><![CDATA[$r_{0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) for a given <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation260"><![CDATA[$D_{0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> than our samples and experiments performed with mafic compositions and (b) similar <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation261"><![CDATA[$E_{A}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values. (c) <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation262"><![CDATA[$D_{0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> shows a positive correlation with Na in biotite at Na contents <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation263"><![CDATA[$\leq $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> 0.1 c.f.u., and (d) a positive correlation with inverse temperature. (e) <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation264"><![CDATA[$r_{0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> vs the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation265"><![CDATA[$X^{M}_{Mg}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> of biotite show a positive correlation, (f) <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation266"><![CDATA[$E_{A}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> vs <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation267"><![CDATA[$X^{W}_{F}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> shows no clear correlation. Ionic radii after <xref rid="ref117" ref-type="bibr">Shannon</xref> (<xref rid="ref117" ref-type="bibr">1976</xref>). Uncertainty on all fitted lattice strain parameters is shown at the 1<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation268"><![CDATA[$\sigma $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> level. <italic>a.f.u.</italic> is anions per formula unit, and <italic>c.f.u.</italic> cations, both of which are calculated for a total charge of 22 per formula unit.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" mimetype="image" xlink:href="egag046f9.jpeg">
            <alt-text>Figure nine shows lattice strain parameters for 1 plus cations between the XII-coordinated interlayer of
biotite and silicate melt. The six panels show the fitted
lattice strain parameters plotted against one another,
and against compositional parameters for the biotite, and inverse temperature.</alt-text>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <table-wrap id="TB5">
          <label>
            <sc>Table</sc> 5</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Coefficients for the prediction of element partitioning between biotite and silicate melt. Multiple linear regression reports generated during the calibration of these models are available in the Appendix.</p>
          </caption>
          <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
            <colgroup>
              <col align="left" />
              <col span="2" align="left" />
              <col span="3" align="left" />
              <col span="4" align="left" />
              <col span="5" align="left" />
              <col span="6" align="left" />
              <col span="7" align="left" />
            </colgroup>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th colspan="4">
                  <bold>Model for Ln<italic>Kd</italic> F/OH (n = 229)</bold>
                </th>
                <th colspan="3">
                  <bold>Model for Ln<italic>D</italic></bold>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation280"><![CDATA[$_{0}^{+}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>, <bold><sup>XII</sup>A-site (n = 43)</bold></th>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <th>
                  <bold>Parameter</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>Coefficient</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation282"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{\sigma} $]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
                <td />
                <th>
                  <bold>Parameter</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>Coefficient</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation282a"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{\sigma} $]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Intercept</td>
                <td>-2.27</td>
                <td>1.01</td>
                <td />
                <td>Intercept</td>
                <td>-0.671</td>
                <td>0.274</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Bt <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation284"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Fe^{3+}/Fe_{tot}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
                <td>-1.35</td>
                <td>0.26</td>
                <td />
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation285"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{XII}ANa}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td>3.95</td>
                <td>0.60</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation286"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{VI}MFe^{2+}}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td>-0.565</td>
                <td>0.209</td>
                <td />
                <td>NBO/T melt</td>
                <td>1.72</td>
                <td>0.17</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation287"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{VI}MMg}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td>0.535</td>
                <td>0.158</td>
                <td />
                <td>NK/Al melt</td>
                <td>-0.850</td>
                <td>0.095</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation288"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{IV}TSi}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td>1.54</td>
                <td>0.27</td>
                <td />
                <td>10000/T [K]</td>
                <td>0.179</td>
                <td>0.028</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation289"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{W}OH}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td>-0.472</td>
                <td>0.126</td>
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation290"><![CDATA[$R^{2}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>; PRESS</td>
                <td>0.640</td>
                <td>0.632</td>
                <td />
                <td />
                <td>0.798</td>
                <td>0.777</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td colspan="4">
                  <bold>Model for <italic>r</italic></bold>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation291"><![CDATA[$_{0}^{+}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>  <bold>[Å], <sup>XII</sup>A-site (n = 43, weighted)</bold></td>
                <td colspan="3">
                  <bold>Model for <italic>E</italic><sup>+</sup> [GPa], <sup>XII</sup>A-site (n = 43)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>
                  <bold>Parameter</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Coefficient</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation282b"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{\sigma} $]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td />
                <td>
                  <bold>Parameter</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Coefficient</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation282c"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{\sigma} $]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Intercept</td>
                <td>1.592</td>
                <td>0.018</td>
                <td />
                <td>Intercept</td>
                <td>114</td>
                <td>17</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation297"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{VI}MFe^{2+}}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td>0.0650</td>
                <td>0.0172</td>
                <td />
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation298"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{XII}AK}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td>-103</td>
                <td>22</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation299"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{VI}MMg}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td>0.0603</td>
                <td>0.0078</td>
                <td />
                <td>Bt <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation300"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Fe^{3+}/Fe_{tot}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
                <td>70.3</td>
                <td>8.9</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation301"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{VI}MTi}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td>-0.143</td>
                <td>0.056</td>
                <td />
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation302"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{VI}MFe^{3+}}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td>-92.4</td>
                <td>23.0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation303"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{W}F}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td>-0.0214</td>
                <td>0.0082</td>
                <td />
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation304"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{VI}MTi}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td>345</td>
                <td>39</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation305"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{W}O^{2-}}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td>-110</td>
                <td>15</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation306"><![CDATA[$R^{2}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>; PRESS</td>
                <td>0.823</td>
                <td>0.805</td>
                <td />
                <td />
                <td>0.721</td>
                <td>0.683</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td colspan="4">
                  <bold>Model for Ln<italic>D</italic><sub>Li</sub> (best; n = 43)</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="3">
                  <bold>Model for Ln<italic>D</italic><sub>Li</sub> (No T term; n = 43)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>
                  <bold>Parameter</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Coefficient</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation282d"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{\sigma} $]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td />
                <td>
                  <bold>Parameter</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Coefficient</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation282e"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{\sigma} $]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Intercept</td>
                <td>-7.21</td>
                <td>0.89</td>
                <td />
                <td>Intercept</td>
                <td>-26.36</td>
                <td>2.16</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>NK/Al melt</td>
                <td>3.56</td>
                <td>0.41</td>
                <td />
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation311"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{VI}MFe^{2+}}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td>4.89</td>
                <td>0.76</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>10000/T [K]</td>
                <td>0.377</td>
                <td>0.095</td>
                <td />
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation312"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{VI}MMg}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td>3.05</td>
                <td>0.58</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation313"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{W}F}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td>1.25</td>
                <td>0.31</td>
                <td />
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation314"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{IV}TSi}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td>6.08</td>
                <td>0.65</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation315"><![CDATA[$R^{2}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>; PRESS</td>
                <td>0.859</td>
                <td>0.848</td>
                <td />
                <td />
                <td>0.799</td>
                <td>0.784</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td colspan="4">
                  <bold>Model for Ln<italic>D</italic><sub>Li</sub> (No F term; n = 43)</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="3">
                  <bold>Model for Ln<italic>D</italic><sub>Nb</sub> (n = 47)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>
                  <bold>Parameter</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Coefficient</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation282f"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{\sigma} $]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td />
                <td>
                  <bold>Parameter</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Coefficient</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation282g"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{\sigma} $]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>Intercept</td>
                <td>-7.01</td>
                <td>1.06</td>
                <td />
                <td>Intercept</td>
                <td>12.5</td>
                <td>2.4</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation320"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{VI}MFe^{3+}}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td>-4.29</td>
                <td>1.35</td>
                <td />
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation321"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{VI}MFe^{2+}}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td>-5.17</td>
                <td>1.20</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>NK/Al melt</td>
                <td>4.18</td>
                <td>0.41</td>
                <td />
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation322"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{VI}MMg}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td>-5.42</td>
                <td>0.90</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>10000/T [K]</td>
                <td>0.407</td>
                <td>0.104</td>
                <td />
                <td>NBO/T melt</td>
                <td>1.15</td>
                <td>0.23</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td />
                <td>P [MPa]</td>
                <td>-0.0011</td>
                <td>0.0002</td>
              </tr>
              <tr valign="top">
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation323"><![CDATA[$R^{2}$]]></tex-math>
                  </inline-formula>; PRESS</td>
                <td>0.840</td>
                <td>0.828</td>
                <td />
                <td />
                <td>0.716</td>
                <td>0.689</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>As model equation <xref rid="deqn05" ref-type="disp-formula">5</xref> includes biotite compositional terms only it can be applied to biotite grains from natural igneous systems where one cannot directly determine melt composition, and the pressure and temperature of equilibration. The multiple linear regression procedure did not identify temperature, pressure or melt compositional terms as strong predictors for F/OH exchange, relative to the biotite compositional parameters shown above.</p>
        <p>An empirical model to predict F/OH exchange between biotite and melt was recently presented by <xref rid="ref143" ref-type="bibr">Zhang <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref143" ref-type="bibr">2022</xref>), and was calibrated using experiments on alkaline-silicate bulk compositions, though most were not peralkaline (grey circles on <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">Fig. 9</xref>e). On a measured vs predicted diagram (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f14">Fig. 10</xref>d), we note that the <xref rid="ref143" ref-type="bibr">Zhang <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref143" ref-type="bibr">2022</xref>) model accurately reproduces some of our calibration data set; for example <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation357"><![CDATA[$Kd$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values for our experiments with peralkaline bulk compositions are predicted to within a factor of 2–3 of measured values. However, the Zhang model systematically under-estimates <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation358"><![CDATA[$Kd^{\text {Bt-melt}}_{\text {F/OH}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values for some peraluminous granite experiments (e.g., <xref rid="ref68" ref-type="bibr">Icenhower &amp; London</xref>, <xref rid="ref68" ref-type="bibr">1995</xref>) and for our Canary Islands natural biotite-melt pairs, in extreme cases by over an order of magnitude (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f14">Figs 10</xref>d, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="sup1">A18a</xref>). The peraluminous granite experiments of <xref rid="ref68" ref-type="bibr">Icenhower &amp; London</xref> (<xref rid="ref68" ref-type="bibr">1995</xref>) have much higher ASI values (mean 1.76 of the melt) than the calibration data set for the model of <xref rid="ref143" ref-type="bibr">Zhang <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref143" ref-type="bibr">2022</xref>)(1.17), which may be why their model predicts such low <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation359"><![CDATA[$Kd^{\text {Bt-melt}}_{\text {F/OH}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values for these compositions.</p>
        <fig id="f14">
          <label>
            <sc>Fig.</sc> 10.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Fitted (or measured) vs predicted model values for (a–c) lattice strain parameters describing partitioning of 1+ cations between the A-site of biotite and silicate melt, (d) F-OH exchange, (e, f) Li and Nb partition coefficients. Model equations are in the main text, with coefficients given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="TB5">Table 5</xref>. Grey lines show 1:1 relationships. Blue and purple coloured lines are robust linear regressions, except for in (b) where the fit is a weighted least-squares based on precision, and in (d) where regression lines are locally-weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) fits. Shaded 68.2% confidence intervals (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation324"><![CDATA[$\sim $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>1<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation325"><![CDATA[$\sigma $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) were generated via bootstrapping.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" mimetype="image" xlink:href="egag046f10.jpeg">
            <alt-text>Figure ten shows the predictive power of our newlyfitted empirical models for element partitioning on a series of measured (or fitted) vs. predicted diagrams.
Panels a-c are for models for lattice strain parameters; (d) is for F/OH exchange coefficients; (e) for Lithium D values; and (f) for niobium.</alt-text>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <fig id="f15">
          <label>
            <sc>Fig.</sc> 11.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Measured vs predicted <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation326"><![CDATA[$D$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values for 1+ between silicate melt and the XII-coordinated biotite A-site. Grey lines are 1:1 fits. Coloured robust regression lines with shaded 95% confidence intervals (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation327"><![CDATA[$\sim $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>2<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation328"><![CDATA[$\sigma $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) were generated via bootstrapping (green use EPMA data, blue use LA-ICP-MS or SIMS data).</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" mimetype="image" xlink:href="egag046f11.jpeg">
            <alt-text>Figure eleven shows the predictive power of our newly-fitted empirical models for 1 plus cation partitioning on a series of measured (or fitted) vs. predicted diagrams. These partition coefficients are computed based on the lattice strain theory models shown in figure ten.</alt-text>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec6b">
        <label>6.2</label>
        <title>A partitioning model for 1+ ions at the biotite A-site</title>
        <p>The partitioning of 1+ cations between silicate melt and the A-site of biotite is described below using empirical models to predict the lattice strain parameters <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation361"><![CDATA[$r^{+}_{0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation362"><![CDATA[$D^{+}_{0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation363"><![CDATA[$E^{+}_{s}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> as a function of pressure, temperature and composition. Firstly, we fitted Onuma curves for the monovalent ions Na–Cs, with weighting based on analytical precision on the experimental and literature reported <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation364"><![CDATA[$D$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values. Uncertainty on the fits was determined via bootstrapping. Where precision on biotite or glass analyses was not reported (e.g., <xref rid="ref35" ref-type="bibr">Evensen &amp; London</xref>, <xref rid="ref35" ref-type="bibr">2002</xref>) we attempted fits using uncertainty determined on other charges from the same study (see Appendix). For several experiments from the literature compilation, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation365"><![CDATA[$D$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values for one or more ions fell outside the 95% confidence interval on the LST parabola. We do not consider these charges further as we suspect issues with either the analytical or experimental procedure. Onuma curves for each experiment, and histograms showing LST parameters determined via bootstrapping are given in the Appendix.</p>
        <p>Lattice strain parameters for 43 experiments were used to fit empirical models that describe partitioning of the monovalent ions Na–Cs. A least-squares multiple linear regression analysis was performed following the method described above for F-OH exchange. The largest number of significant terms was five for the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation366"><![CDATA[$E^{+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> parameter (<xref ref-type="table" rid="TB5">Table 5</xref>). Equations from the multiple linear regression are given below:</p>
        <disp-formula id="deqn06">
          <label>(6)</label>
          <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="DmEquation6"><![CDATA[$$ \begin{align} \begin{split} \text{Ln}D^{A+}_{0} = b_{1} + b_{2}X^{A}_{\text{Na}} + b_{3}\text{NBO/T}^{melt} \\+ b_{4}\text{(Na + K)/Al}^{melt} + b_{5}\times10^{4}/\text{T[K]} \end{split} \end{align}$$]]></tex-math>
        </disp-formula>
        <disp-formula id="deqn07">
          <label>(7)</label>
          <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="DmEquation7"><![CDATA[$$ \begin{align}
\begin{split} r^{A+}_{0} = b_{6} + b_{7}X^{M}_{\text{Fe}^{2+}} + b_{8}X^{M}_{\text{Mg}} + b_{9}X^{M}_{\text{Ti}} + b_{10}X^{W}_{\text{F}} \end{split} \end{align}$$]]></tex-math>
        </disp-formula>
        <disp-formula id="deqn08">
          <label>(8)</label>
          <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="DmEquation8"><![CDATA[$$ \begin{align}
\begin{split} E^{A+} = b_{11} + b_{12}X^{A}_{\text{K}} + b_{13}\text{Fe}^{3+}/\text{Fe}^{Bt}_{tot} \\ + b_{14}X^{M}_{\text{Fe}^{3+}} + b_{15}X^{M}_{\text{Ti}} + b_{16}X^{W}_{\text{O}^{2-}} \end{split} \end{align}$$]]></tex-math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation367"><![CDATA[$b_{i}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are the regression coefficients for each variable (<xref ref-type="table" rid="TB5">Table 5</xref>) <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation368"><![CDATA[$T$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is temperature in Kelvin and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation369"><![CDATA[$P$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is pressure in MPa. The resultant empirical models account well for changes to the lattice-strain parameters over a range of compositions from basanite to peralkaline phonolite to peraluminous granite, reproducing the larger <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation370"><![CDATA[$r_{0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for the interlayer site typical for biotite grown from sodic alkaline silicate melt (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f13">Fig. 8</xref>b). PRESS <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation371"><![CDATA[$R^{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values are similar to overall <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation372"><![CDATA[$R^{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values, indicating that the models are robust and have high predictive power. Fitted vs predicted diagrams for the lattice strain parameters are in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f14">Fig. 10</xref>a–c, and full multiple regression reports are in the Appendix.</p>
        <p>The model for Ln<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation373"><![CDATA[$D_{0}^{A+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> includes a compositional term from the A-site of biotite, two melt compositional terms and a term for inverse temperature. The positive correlation between A-site <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation374"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Na^+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation375"><![CDATA[$D^{A+}_{0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is the largest contribution to the model, indicating that elevated concentrations of large ions other than K on the interlayer site (e.g., Na, Ca, Ba) are associated with higher values of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation376"><![CDATA[$D^{A+}_{0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The relationship between <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation377"><![CDATA[$D^{A+}_{0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and the melt compositional terms NBO/T (non-bonding oxygens per tetrahedral cation; i.e., the degree of melt depolymerisation; <xref rid="ref92" ref-type="bibr">Mills</xref>, <xref rid="ref92" ref-type="bibr">1993</xref>) and the molar (Na + K)/Al ratio, and with inverse temperature are tied to the solubility of the mineral in the melt (<xref rid="ref134" ref-type="bibr">Wood &amp; Blundy, 2003</xref>). These terms are physically grounded as they are consistent with increased stabilisation of biotite in systems with a depolymerised melt structure (with high volatile and alkali content), and at low temperature.</p>
        <p>The model for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation378"><![CDATA[$r_{0}^{A+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> incorporates compositional controls on the M and W sites of biotite. Model fitting was performed with weights for each experiment assigned by <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation379"><![CDATA[$ r_{0, \text {weight}}^{A+} = 1 / (r_{0, \sigma }^{A+} / r_{0}^{A+})^{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. For this reason the model reproduces more accurately the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation380"><![CDATA[$r_{0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for experiments where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation381"><![CDATA[$r_{0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> fits have been determined to higher precision (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f14">10b</xref>). While our <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation382"><![CDATA[$r_{0}^{+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> model has a lower predictive power than our <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation383"><![CDATA[$D_{0}^{+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation384"><![CDATA[$E^{+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> models it still has physical grounding: The positive <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation385"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^M Mg}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation386"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^M Fe^{2+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> terms, and a negative <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation387"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^M Ti}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> term, are consistent with a larger interlayer separation, as determined via X-ray diffraction, in Mg-rich micas relative to Ti-rich ones (<xref rid="ref27" ref-type="bibr">Brigatti &amp; Guggenheim</xref> (<xref rid="ref27" ref-type="bibr">2002</xref>), Fig. <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="sup1">A16</xref>). The model also contains a small negative contribution from <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation388"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{W}F}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, which has a small effective ionic radius relative to hydroxyl anions it substitutes for.</p>
        <p>The model for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation389"><![CDATA[$E_{A}^{+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> has compositional terms from the A, M and W sites of biotite, as well as the iron oxidation state in biotite. The negative <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation390"><![CDATA[${{}^AK}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> term suggests that the interlayer of K-rich micas is less stiff than those with higher proportions of smaller, and perhaps less readily deformed, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation391"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Na^+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> ions. The compositional term <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation392"><![CDATA[$X^{M}_{\text {Ti}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is positively correlated with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation393"><![CDATA[$E_{A}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, whereas <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation394"><![CDATA[$X^{W}_{\text {O}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> has a strong negative correlation. The polarity of these terms are physically grounded, as <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation395"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Ti^{4+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is a small ion that form bonds that are not as readily deformed, compared to bonds including larger Mg and Fe cations. Similarly, the large <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation396"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{O^{2-}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> anion will form relatively less stiff bonds than the smaller W-site <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation397"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{F^-}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation398"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{OH^-}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> anions that it substitutes for.</p>
        <p>Diagrams of measured vs predicted <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation399"><![CDATA[$D$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values for individual <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation400"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{R^+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> cations are given in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f15">Fig. 11</xref>. For the A site all of the measured <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation401"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{R^+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> partition coefficients, except for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation402"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Na^+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, are reproduced to better than a factor two. <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation403"><![CDATA[$D$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values for the elements K and Rb are reproduced most faithfully because their XII-coordinated ionic radius is closer to the biotite <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation404"><![CDATA[$r_{0}^{A}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and therefore prediction of their partitioning behaviour is influenced less strongly by inaccuracies in predicted <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation405"><![CDATA[$E_{A}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values. Partitioning behaviour for Na is not predicted accurately by our lattice strain model, with the lowest measured <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation406"><![CDATA[$D_{\text {Na}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values being underpredicted (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f13">Fig. 8</xref>a). As the effect is of similar magnitude for EPMA and higher-precision LA and SIMS measurements this bias is unlikely to be an analytical artefact. It may reflect incorporation of a small amount of Na cations on the biotite M sites.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec6c">
        <label>6.3</label>
        <title>Three models for lithium partitioning</title>
        <p>Using the methodology described above, we fitted three empirical models that describe the partitioning behaviour of Li between silicate melt and the M-sites of biotite. The same training data set described above was used, with 43 entries for lithium. Partitioning was explored directly, rather than in the frame of lattice strain theory, owing to the lack of other 1+ cations with radii similar to the biotite M-sites. The <italic>‘Best fit’</italic> equation for the partitioning of lithium, as obtained from multiple linear regression, is given below:</p>
        <disp-formula id="deqn09">
          <label>(9)</label>
          <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="DmEquation9"><![CDATA[$$ \begin{align} \begin{split} \text{Ln}D_{\text{Li}} = c_{1} + c_{2}(\text{Na} + \text{K})/\text{Al}^{melt} + c_{3} \times 10^{4}/\text{T[K]} + c_{4}X^{W}_{\text{F}} \end{split}\end{align}$$]]></tex-math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation407"><![CDATA[$c_{i}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are the regression coefficients for each variable (<xref ref-type="table" rid="TB5">Table 5</xref>). Measured vs predicted <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation408"><![CDATA[${D_{Li}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f14">Figs 10</xref>e and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="sup1">A19</xref>.</p>
        <p>The first model for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation411"><![CDATA[${D_{Li}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> includes one melt composition term, a term for inverse temperature, and a term for biotite composition and reproduces accurately the two order of magnitude range of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation412"><![CDATA[${D_{Li}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values in the training data set (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f14">Fig. 10</xref>e; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="sup1">A19</xref>). The positive <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation413"><![CDATA[$(\text {Na} + \text {K})/\text {Al}^{melt}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> term is consistent with the low whole-rock lithium content of peralkaline magmatic rocks (e.g., <xref rid="ref127" ref-type="bibr">Teng <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref127" ref-type="bibr">2009</xref>)), and the association between lithium-caesium-tantalum pegmatites and peraluminous granites (<xref rid="ref45" ref-type="bibr">Gardiner <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024</xref>). The positive correlation between <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation414"><![CDATA[${D_{Li}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and inverse temperature likely results from broad variations in melt and mineral composition that are correlated with temperature. It is consistent with the observation that F-Li rich micas form at low temperatures in evolved granitic systems (<xref rid="ref28" ref-type="bibr">Černý <italic>et al.</italic>, 2005</xref>, <xref rid="ref43" ref-type="bibr">Förster <italic>et al.</italic>, 1999</xref>) and that silicate minerals from slowly-cooled alkaline and calc-alkaline lavas and ignimbrites are enriched in Li relative to rapidly cooled portions of the same volcanic deposits (<xref rid="ref100" ref-type="bibr">Neukampf <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023</xref>). Correlations between the fluorine and lithium content of micas are widely reported from rare metal granites, pegmatites and metamorphic rocks (<xref rid="ref25" ref-type="bibr">Breiter <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023</xref>, <xref rid="ref75" ref-type="bibr">Kunz <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022</xref>, <xref rid="ref89" ref-type="bibr">Martins <italic>et al.</italic>, 2012</xref>).</p>
        <p>A second temperature-free model for lithium partitioning was calibrated, as when interrogating minerals from natural systems, the temperature of equilibration and melt composition can be challenging to constrain. The above procedure was used, but only biotite compositional terms were included in the list of permitted intensive variables. The temperature- and melt-free equation for the partitioning of lithium is as follows:</p>
        <disp-formula id="deqn10">
          <label>(10)</label>
          <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="DmEquation10"><![CDATA[$$ \begin{align} \begin{split} \text{Ln}D_{\text{Li}} = c_{5} + c_{6}X^{M}_{\text{Fe}^{2+}} + c_{7}X^{M}_{\text{Mg}} + c_{8}X^{T}_{\text{Si}} \end{split}\end{align}$$]]></tex-math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>The predictive power of the temperature-free model for lithium partitioning is slightly weaker than that our ‘best fit’ model (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation415"><![CDATA[$R^{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> = 0.799 vs 0.859), but reproduces all measured and compiled <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation416"><![CDATA[$D_{\text {Li}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values to within a factor of two (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f14">Fig. 10</xref>e, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="sup1">A19</xref>). The fit coefficients are physically grounded: <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation417"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Mg^{2+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation418"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Fe^{2+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> have relatively low charge compared to <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation419"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Fe^{3+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation420"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Ti^{4+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and their positive fit coefficients indicate their relative readiness to substitute for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation421"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Li^+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Additionally, increasing the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation422"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Si^{4+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> content of the T-site of biotite over <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation423"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Al^{3+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> may promote incorporation of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation424"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Li^+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in place of more highly-charged M-site cations such as <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation425"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Mg^{2+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation426"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Fe^{2+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation427"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Ti^{4+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> (cf. <xref rid="ref25" ref-type="bibr">Breiter <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref25" ref-type="bibr">2023</xref>).</p>
        <p>A third empirical biotite partitioning model is designed for integration directly with the current generation of phase equilibrium model systems that do not include fluorine (e.g., MELTS family, HPx-eos; as implemented in Gibbs energy minimisation software such as <sc>thermocalc</sc>, and MAGEMin; <xref rid="ref10" ref-type="bibr">Asimow <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref10" ref-type="bibr">2004</xref>, <xref rid="ref46" ref-type="bibr">Ghiorso <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref46" ref-type="bibr">2002</xref>, <xref rid="ref55" ref-type="bibr">Green <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref55" ref-type="bibr">2025</xref>, <xref rid="ref58" ref-type="bibr">Gualda <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref58" ref-type="bibr">2012</xref>, <xref rid="ref132" ref-type="bibr">Weller <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref132" ref-type="bibr">2024</xref>). For this reason, our best-fit model cannot currently be applied to forward model lithium behaviour in silicate magmatic systems. Instead, we recommend using the following empirical relationship:</p>
        <disp-formula id="deqn11">
          <label>(11)</label>
          <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="DmEquation11"><![CDATA[$$ \begin{align} \begin{split} \text{Ln}D_{\text{Li}} = c_{9} + c_{10}X^{M}_{\text{Fe}^{3+}} + c_{11}(\text{Na} + \text{K})/\text{Al}^{melt} \\ + c_{12}10^{4}/T [K] \end{split}\end{align}$$]]></tex-math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>The predictive power of this fluorine-free model for lithium partitioning is intermediate between that of our ‘best fit’ model and temperature-free model (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation428"><![CDATA[$R^{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> = 0.840 vs 0.799 and 0.859; <xref ref-type="table" rid="TB5">Table 5</xref>). The fit coefficients in model <xref rid="deqn11" ref-type="disp-formula">11</xref> are physically grounded, with a negative <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation429"><![CDATA[$X^{M}_{\text {Fe}^{3+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> term tracking an increasingly positive charge of the biotite M-site, and corresponding increased difficulty of incorporating monovalent <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation430"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Li^+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> cations. The positive <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation431"><![CDATA[$(\text {Na} + \text {K})/\text {Al}^{melt}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation432"><![CDATA[$10^{4}/T$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> coefficients follow mechanisms discussed for our best fit model (Equation <xref rid="deqn09" ref-type="disp-formula">9</xref>) above.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec6d">
        <label>6.4</label>
        <title>A model for niobium partitioning</title>
        <p>We fitted an empirical model to describe Nb partitioning between biotite and silicate melt. The <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation433"><![CDATA[${D_\text{Nb}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> model has physical grounding with a compositional term for the M-sites of biotite, and an inverse temperature term:</p>
        <disp-formula id="deqn12">
          <label>(12)</label>
          <tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="DmEquation12"><![CDATA[$$ \begin{align} \begin{split} \text{Ln}D_{\text{Nb}} = d_{1} + d_{2}X^{M}_{\text{Fe}^{2+}} + d_{3}X^{M}_{\text{Mg}} + d_{4}\text{NBO/T}^{melt} \\ + d_{5}\text{P[MPa] } \end{split}\end{align}$$]]></tex-math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>The coefficients <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation434"><![CDATA[$d_{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation435"><![CDATA[$d_{3}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> describe a negative correlation between <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation436"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Nb^{5+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> incorporation in biotite and the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation437"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Fe^{2+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and Mg content of biotite. The substitution of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation438"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Nb^{5+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation439"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Fe^{2+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation440"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Mg^{2+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> incurs a charge penalty of 3+ that must be balanced elsewhere within the biotite structure, a larger penalty than if Nb replaced <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation441"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Fe^{3+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation442"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Ti^{4+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The positive correlation between <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation443"><![CDATA[${D_\text{Nb}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and melt NBO/T suggests that Nb activity in the silicate melt might rise with increasing depolymerisation of the silicate melt. However, this finding is reverse to that of <xref rid="ref9" ref-type="bibr">Aseri <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref9" ref-type="bibr">2015</xref>) who report increases to solubility of HFSE oxide and silicate minerals with increasing melt alkalinity. We suggest the correlation incorporated into our model reflects broad variation activity of Nb in the silicate melt as well as that of biotite composition, which across our calibration data set may be stronger than the melt activity effect alone. The subtle negative correlation with pressure also likely results from broad correlations with melt and mineral composition. A second model fit was attempted where no melt, pressure or temperature terms were permitted to facilitate application to biotite grains from natural systems. However, a satisfactory fit was not possible.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec7">
      <label>7</label>
      <title>Implications for mineralisation of Li and REE-HFSE in magmatic systems</title>
      <p>Biotite has the highest lithium concentration of rock-forming mineral phases in both alkaline and calc-alkaline volcanic rocks globally (<xref rid="ref34" ref-type="bibr">Ellis <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022</xref>, <xref rid="ref100" ref-type="bibr">Neukampf <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023</xref>), and represents an important reservoir for lithium in metamorphic and plutonic environments (e.g., <xref rid="ref45" ref-type="bibr">Gardiner <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref45" ref-type="bibr">2024</xref>, <xref rid="ref75" ref-type="bibr">Kunz <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref75" ref-type="bibr">2022</xref>). Together, this indicates that biotite-melt partitioning is a major control on the lithium budget of many evolved crustal magmas. We note a wide range of partitioning behaviour for lithium that spans incompatible to strongly compatible behaviour (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">Fig. 6</xref>). The composition of biotite in residua generated during crustal melting, and the composition of biotite generated during subsequent crystallisation of silicate melts therefore has a strong influence on the lithium budget of magmas. Ultimately, element budgets control the ability of igneous systems to develop economic concentrations of metals, for example in lithium-caesium-tantalum pegmatites (e.g., <xref rid="ref24" ref-type="bibr">Breasley <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref24" ref-type="bibr">2024</xref>, <xref rid="ref52" ref-type="bibr">Goodenough <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref52" ref-type="bibr">2025</xref>, <xref rid="ref74" ref-type="bibr">Koopmans <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref74" ref-type="bibr">2024</xref>, <xref rid="ref82" ref-type="bibr">Linnen <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref82" ref-type="bibr">2012</xref>, <xref rid="ref86" ref-type="bibr">London</xref>, <xref rid="ref86" ref-type="bibr">2018</xref>, <xref rid="ref136" ref-type="bibr">Wu <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref136" ref-type="bibr">2026</xref>).</p>
      <p>First, we note a positive correlation between <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation444"><![CDATA[$D_{\text {Li}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and inverse temperature (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">Fig. 6</xref>b). During progressive heating and melt extraction from crustal rocks (e.g., <xref rid="ref83" ref-type="bibr">Loiselle &amp; Wones</xref>, <xref rid="ref83" ref-type="bibr">1979</xref>), this would initially produce a residual mineral assemblage containing Li-rich biotite, with a Li-poor silicate melt, a scenario consistent with field observations that Li and F-rich pegmatites are often notably younger than spatially associated granites (<xref rid="ref45" ref-type="bibr">Gardiner <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024</xref>, <xref rid="ref120" ref-type="bibr">Simons <italic>et al.</italic>, 2016</xref>).</p>
      <p>A granite chronology of increasing Li abundance is also easier to explain if the effect of fluorine is considered: Fluorine can stabilise biotite to higher temperatures (<xref rid="ref97" ref-type="bibr">Munoz, 1984</xref>, <xref rid="ref106" ref-type="bibr">Peterson <italic>et al.</italic>, 1991</xref>), and is positively correlated with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation445"><![CDATA[$D_{\text {Li}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">Fig. 6</xref>c), therefore emphasises the temperature effect described above. Progressive melting of a fluorinated metasediment or granitoid precursor could therefore stabilise in the residual mineral assemblage biotite that becomes more fluorine-rich with an increasing degree of melt extraction (<xref rid="ref40" ref-type="bibr">Finch &amp; Tomkins, 2017</xref>). Multi-stage melt extraction (from an individual source volume) and eventual heating to F-biotite-out would release a Li and F-enriched silicate melt (cf. <xref rid="ref96" ref-type="bibr">Morris <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref96" ref-type="bibr">2026</xref>). Such a mechanism provides a possible origin for LCT pegmatites contrasting with that of <xref rid="ref74" ref-type="bibr">Koopmans <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref74" ref-type="bibr">2024</xref>) where granites derived from metasedimentary rock anatexis are themselves remelted.</p>
      <p>Fractional crystallisation is also important for enriching incompatible trace-elements in magmatic systems. Because biotite-melt <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation446"><![CDATA[${D_{Li}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values are positively correlated with the molar (Na + K)/Al ratio of silicate melt (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">Fig. 6</xref>a), the residual enrichment of Li should be most efficient during crystallisation of magmatic systems with high Al/Si ratios. Such a model is compatible with the association between lithium-caesium-tantalum (LCT) pegmatites and peraluminous granites (<xref rid="ref45" ref-type="bibr">Gardiner <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024</xref>, <xref rid="ref82" ref-type="bibr">Linnen <italic>et al.</italic>, 2012</xref>, <xref rid="ref86" ref-type="bibr">London, 2018</xref>). By contrast biotite crystallisation in peralkaline systems (high molar (Na + K)/Al) would efficiently deplete the residual melt of lithium.</p>
      <p>Our results also have implications for REE-HFSE mineralisation in alkaline-silicate (and associated carbonatite) intrusions. Biotite is a major host of fluorine in evolved muscovite and fluorite-free igneous rocks (<xref rid="ref39" ref-type="bibr">Finch <italic>et al.</italic>, 1995</xref>, <xref rid="ref124" ref-type="bibr">Speer, 1984</xref>), and fluorine affects REE-HFSE behaviour. Synchrotron experiments on silicate melt structure resolve REE-F complexes (<xref rid="ref108" ref-type="bibr">Ponader &amp; Brown, 1989</xref>), and an effect of fluorine on the medium-range structural environment around <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation447"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{HFSE^{4+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> cations (<xref rid="ref38" ref-type="bibr">Farges, 1996</xref>). Both phenomena reduce the activity of these cations, and thus hinder their incorporation into minerals (<xref rid="ref15" ref-type="bibr">Beard <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020</xref>, <xref rid="ref138" ref-type="bibr">Xue <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024</xref>). Fluorine therefore promotes the residual enrichment of REE and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation448"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{HFSE^{4+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> during crystallisation of both alkaline-silicate and carbonatite magmas.</p>
      <p>To quantify the fluorine budget of evolved silicate magmas, we constrained the physicochemical controls on the exchange of hydroxyl and fluoride anions between biotite and silicate melt. Biotite can then be used as a mineral record or ‘probe’ for the fluorine content of the melts from which it formed, as has been calibrated for apatite (cf. <xref rid="ref79" ref-type="bibr">Li &amp; Costa, 2020</xref>, <xref rid="ref91" ref-type="bibr">McCubbin <italic>et al.</italic>, 2015</xref>, <xref rid="ref113" ref-type="bibr">Riker <italic>et al.</italic>, 2018</xref>). The range of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation449"><![CDATA[$Kd^{Bt-melt}_{\text {F/OH}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values across our new dataset and that compiled from experimental studies is <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation450"><![CDATA[$\sim $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>0.76–51.10. Where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation451"><![CDATA[$Kd^{Bt-melt}_{\text {F/OH}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values are high, crystallisation of even a small amount of biotite can effectively strip fluorine from the melt. This scenario occurs where biotite has high Si and Mg, and low <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation452"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Fe^{2+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation453"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Fe^{3+}/Fe}_{tot}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> ratios (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">Fig. 9</xref>). The same concepts hold for apatite, where F-OH exchange coefficients vary in the range <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation454"><![CDATA[$\sim $]]></tex-math></inline-formula>3–500 (<xref rid="ref113" ref-type="bibr">Riker <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref113" ref-type="bibr">2018</xref>). In silica-undersaturated peralkaline systems, such as those associated with REE-HFSE mineralisation, the Fe/Mg ratio is commonly high. Biotite-melt <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation455"><![CDATA[$Kd_{\text {F/OH}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values should therefore be low, facilitating residual enrichment of fluorine during crystallisation. Here, variations in biotite mode represents a major control on the fluorine concentration of residual melts.</p>
      <p>Glimmerite, a biotite-rich rock formed through interaction between silicate or carbonate melts and their host rocks (<xref rid="ref8" ref-type="bibr">Anenburg &amp; Walters, 2024</xref>, <xref rid="ref49" ref-type="bibr">Giebel <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019</xref>, <xref rid="ref101" ref-type="bibr">O’Brien <italic>et al.</italic>, 2015</xref>, <xref rid="ref131" ref-type="bibr">Vasyukova &amp; Williams-Jones, 2022</xref>), therefore represents a potential trap for REE. By drawing down the fluorine concentration of the melt, massive crystallisation of biotite increases the activity of REE, which can trigger saturation of REE mineral phases. This may have occurred at the Longbaoshan prospect, China, where multiple stages of metasomatism formed glimmerite containing an assemblage with the REE-bearing minerals chevkinite-(Ce), fluoroapatite, fluorobritholite-(Ce), synchysite-(Ce) and parisite-(Ce) (<xref rid="ref142" ref-type="bibr">Yang <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025</xref>). Similar processes may occur during formation of glimmerite (or PIC: phlogopite, ilmenite, clinopyroxene) veins in the lithospheric mantle (e.g., <xref rid="ref41" ref-type="bibr">Fitzpayne <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref41" ref-type="bibr">2018</xref>, <xref rid="ref126" ref-type="bibr">Tappe <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref126" ref-type="bibr">2025</xref>).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Conclusions and possible applications</title>
      <p>Twelve IHPV crystallisation experiments and four natural biotite-glass pairs from Tenerife, Canary Islands, were used to constrain biotite-melt partitioning of minor- and trace-elements in sodic alkali-rich magmas and together with a compilation from the literature, constrain empirical models to predict F-OH exchange; partitioning of the monovalent ions Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs; and Nb partitioning over a broad range of silicate magmatic systems.</p>
      <p>Our fluorine-bearing charges contain biotite offset to higher Mg and lower Ti content relative to equivalent fluorine-free experiments. This finding confirms that the Ti-in-biotite thermometer of <xref rid="ref62" ref-type="bibr">Henry <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref62" ref-type="bibr">2005</xref>) is not calibrated for use in fluorine-bearing systems.</p>
      <p>Most minor- and trace-elements are incompatible in biotite with the exception of Rb, Ba, Ga, Tiand in Si-F-rich biotite, Li. The LIL elements Na, Cs, Sr and Pb, and HFS elements Zr, Hf, Nb and Ta are incompatible to weakly compatible (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation456"><![CDATA[$D_{i}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> = 0.008–1.6), whereas the REE, Y and actinides U and Th are strongly incompatible (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation457"><![CDATA[$D_{i} \approx $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> 0.0001–0.01).</p>
      <p>To facilitate application of partition coefficients across a wide range of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation458"><![CDATA[$P$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation459"><![CDATA[$T$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation460"><![CDATA[$X$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> conditions, we calibrated empirical models that describe partitioning with continuous functions, rather than as discrete points. Empirical models for F-OH exchange show preferential uptake of fluorine into Mg-rich biotite with high <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation461"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{T}Si}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and low <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation462"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Fe^{2+}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Biotite grown from evolved, Mg-poor peralkaline magmatic systems have a weaker preference for fluorine, therefore are predisposed to develop melts with high fluorine/water ratios during fractional crystallisation of a biotite-bearing assemblage. As fluorine and the REE have strong chemical interactions, the residual enrichment of F promotes the residual enrichment of REE.</p>
      <p>Our empirical models for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation463"><![CDATA[${D_\text{Li}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> show a large positive correlation with biotite fluorine content and with melt alkalinity. As fluorine stabilises biotite to higher temperature the progressive melting of crustal rocks, for example during orogenesis, will eventually release F and Li together during a biotite-out reaction. Once in the melt, lithium can be enriched or depleted by crystallisation. In peraluminous systems the biotite has a low affinity for lithium, therefore evolved peraluminous granites are most likely to develop high concentrations of lithium.</p>
      <p>Partition coefficients for the large 1+ cations Na–Cs define Onuma parabolae with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation464"><![CDATA[$r_{0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation465"><![CDATA[$E_{s}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values consistent with independent estimates from XRD and nanoindentation studies for the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation466"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{XII}A}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-site. A further empirical model, based on lattice strain theory, can be used to determine partition coefficients for large 1+ cations over a wide range of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation467"><![CDATA[$P$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation468"><![CDATA[$T$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation469"><![CDATA[$X$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. For convenience we provide an EXCEL spreadsheet of the empirical partitioning models (see Appendix).</p>
      <p>New constraints on element partitioning between biotite and melt may be used to forward model the crystallisation of magmatic systems and test mechanisms for the petrogenesis of mineral deposits, including for Li-bearing pegmatites and alkaline-silicate associated REE and HFSE mineralisation. Phase equilibrium modelling tools (e.g., <xref rid="ref47" ref-type="bibr">Ghiorso &amp; Sack</xref>, <xref rid="ref47" ref-type="bibr">1995</xref>, <xref rid="ref55" ref-type="bibr">Green <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref55" ref-type="bibr">2025</xref>, <xref rid="ref61" ref-type="bibr">Heinonen <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref61" ref-type="bibr">2020</xref>, <xref rid="ref64" ref-type="bibr">Holland <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref64" ref-type="bibr">2018</xref>, <xref rid="ref65" ref-type="bibr">Holland &amp; Powell</xref>, <xref rid="ref65" ref-type="bibr">2011</xref>, <xref rid="ref111" ref-type="bibr">Riel <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref111" ref-type="bibr">2022</xref>, <xref rid="ref132" ref-type="bibr">Weller <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref132" ref-type="bibr">2024</xref>) can be coupled with empirical models that describe the saturation behaviour of accessory phases, facilitating modelling of various key elements outside of the model system used for activity-composition relations (cf. <xref rid="ref139" ref-type="bibr">Yakymchuk <italic>et al.</italic></xref>, <xref rid="ref139" ref-type="bibr">2017</xref>). A similar approach, layering distribution coefficients between melt and major minerals permits forward modelling of the halogen, volatile, and trace-element budgets of magmatic systems across <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation470"><![CDATA[$P$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation471"><![CDATA[$T$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation472"><![CDATA[$X$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> space (<xref rid="ref67" ref-type="bibr">Humphreys <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021</xref>, <xref rid="ref98" ref-type="bibr">Nathwani <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023</xref>, <xref rid="ref123" ref-type="bibr">Soderman <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025</xref>).</p>
      <p>Our partitioning models also facilitate the interrogation of mineral grains, with or without compositional zoning, from natural igneous systems to determine the concentration of trace-elements in their parental melts (cf. <xref rid="ref16" ref-type="bibr">Bédard</xref>, <xref rid="ref16" ref-type="bibr">2001</xref>). By combining biotite/melt partition coefficients with our recent studies of clinopyroxene/melt element partitioning (<xref rid="ref14" ref-type="bibr">Beard <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019</xref>, <xref rid="ref15" ref-type="bibr">2020</xref>), one can determine the concentration of a broad range of geologically important trace-elements in the parental melts for silicate-dominated magmatic systems.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>List of supplementary files</title>
      <sec id="sec8">
        <label>.1</label>
        <title>Electronic appendix A (.kml):</title>
        <p>A waypoint file for field localities for the Canary Islands pyroclastic rock samples</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec9">
        <label>.2</label>
        <title>Electronic appendix B (.xlsx):</title>
        <p>A spreadsheet containing (1) Compositions of starting materials for the IHPV experiments; (2) Experiment run conditions; (3) Electron microprobe (EPMA) major-element data for experiment and Canary Islands biotite; (4) EPMA major-element data for experiment and Canary Islands glass; (5) EPMA reference material measurements, including comparison to values retrieved from the GeoReM database (<xref rid="ref70" ref-type="bibr">Jochum <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref70" ref-type="bibr">2005</xref>); compiled values from <xref rid="ref53" ref-type="bibr">Govindaraju</xref> (<xref rid="ref53" ref-type="bibr">1994</xref>)); (6) Laser ablation ICP-MS measurements of Canary Islands biotite and glass; (7) Laser ablation measurements of experimental run products; (8) Laser ablation analyses of reference materials compiled across several measurement sessions, including comparison to compiled values retrieved from the GeoReM database (<xref rid="ref70" ref-type="bibr">Jochum <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref70" ref-type="bibr">2005</xref>, <xref rid="ref71" ref-type="bibr">2016</xref>, <xref rid="ref72" ref-type="bibr">2011</xref>), <xref rid="ref122" ref-type="bibr">Smith</xref> (<xref rid="ref122" ref-type="bibr">1995</xref>); John Stix 2015 compilation) (9) Deconvolved analyses of biotite and glass via LA-ICP-MS; (10) Nernst partition coefficients (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation474a"><![CDATA[$D$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values) for major- and trace-elements as determined from EPMA and LA-ICP-MS analyses; (11) and finally a spreadsheet for assigning biotite major-element ions to lattice sites following <xref rid="ref81" ref-type="bibr">Li <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref81" ref-type="bibr">2020</xref>) modified after <xref rid="ref143" ref-type="bibr">Zhang <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref143" ref-type="bibr">2022</xref>), for calculating silicate melt water speciation following <xref rid="ref19" ref-type="bibr">Behrens</xref> (<xref rid="ref19" ref-type="bibr">2020</xref>), and subsequently melt <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation473"><![CDATA[$X$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>F and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation474"><![CDATA[$X$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>OH values, melt NBO/T following <xref rid="ref92" ref-type="bibr">Mills</xref> (<xref rid="ref92" ref-type="bibr">1993</xref>), and for determining modelled F-OH and Cl-OH exchange coefficients following <xref rid="ref143" ref-type="bibr">Zhang <italic>et al.</italic></xref> (<xref rid="ref143" ref-type="bibr">2022</xref>), and F-OH exchange, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation475"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{XII}A}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-site lattice strain parameters, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation476"><![CDATA[$D$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values for Na, K, Rb, Cs, Li and Nb using our new empirical partitioning models.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec10">
        <label>.3</label>
        <title>Electronic appendix C (.zip):</title>
        <p>A folder containing MATLAB scripts for reduction of laser-ablation trace-element measurements from both unmixed and mixed analyses of silicate glass and biotite. These codes require installation of the MATLAB machine learning and curve fitting toolbox. All input files required by these codes containing EPMA and LA-ICP-MS data are included in this folder. The codes generate a series of robust regression diagrams of biotite or glass proportion, constrained by the Mg/Al and Na/Al ratio respectively, a diagram showing the determined biotite and glass trace-element concentrations with their associated uncertainty and finally a diagram of trace-element <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation477"><![CDATA[$D$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec11">
        <label>.4</label>
        <title>Electronic appendix D (.zip):</title>
        <p>A folder containing (1) a subfolder of Onuma diagrams (<xref rid="ref102" ref-type="bibr">Onuma <italic>et al.</italic>, 1968</xref>) for the biotite <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation478"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{{}^{XII}A}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-site per experiment showing 1<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation479"><![CDATA[$\sigma $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> uncertainty on 1+ partition coefficients and a 1<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation480"><![CDATA[$\sigma $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> error envelope on the lattice strain curve. The folder also contains histograms for fitted lattice strain parameters as determined via bootrapping; (2) multiple regression reports for empirical element partitioning models as generated using the NCSS software.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ack id="ack1">
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>We thank the Geo.X partners GFZ and Universität Potsdam for access to the HP-GeoMatS Lab, Max Wilke, Hans Peter Nabein, Eleanor Berryman, Maria Stuff, Julia Pohlenz and Melanie Sieber for assistance with HP experimental equipment, Lang Shi and Glenn Poirier for assistance with electron probe analyses and Anna Jung for assistance with laser ICP-MS analyses. The manuscript benefited from discussions with Longbo Yang, Adrian Finch, Julia Neukampf, Tania Martins, Bob Linnen, Matt Morris, Marie Edmonds and Nicolas Riel. We thank three anonymous reviewers for their encouraging and insightful reviews, and the journal editors Julia Hammer and Georg Zellmer for deftly handling this manuscript.</p>
    </ack>
    <ack id="ack1a">
      <title>Funding</title>
      <p>This work was funded by PhD scholarships to C.D.B. from Geotop, DIVEX and the SEG Canada Foundation, and operating grants to V.J.v.H. and J.S. from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (grant numbers RGPIN-2014-05955, RGPAS-462335-2014) and the FQRNT team research project program. C.D.B., O.M.W. and C.R.S. were supported by UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship grant MR/V02292X/1.</p>
    </ack>
    <sec>
      <title>Author contributions</title>
      <p>C.D.B., V.J.v.H. and J.S. conceived the experiments, C.D.B. conducted the experiments, wrote the first draft of the manuscript, analysed the results, fitted the models and prepared the figures. J.H.B. contributed part of the compiled literature data set. All authors discussed the implications, edited and reviewed the manuscript.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>Major- (EPMA) and trace-element determinations (LA-ICP-MS) that underpin this study, along with data treatment procedures and empirical element partitioning models, are provided in the Supplementary material. The data are further available at the GFZ data repository <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5880/fidgeo.2025.073">https://doi.org/10.5880/fidgeo.2025.073</ext-link>.</p>
    </sec>
    <ref-list id="bib1">
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Abdel-Rahman</surname>, <given-names>A. F. M.</given-names></string-name>
          </person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Nature of biotites from alkaline, calc-alkaline, and peraluminous magmas</article-title>. <source><italic>Journal of Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>35</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>525</fpage>–<lpage>541</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/petrology/35.2.525</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Ablay</surname>, <given-names>G. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Ernst</surname>, <given-names>G. G. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Marti</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Sparks</surname>, <given-names>R. S. J.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>The 2 ka subplinian eruption of Montaña Blanca, Tenerife</article-title>. <source><italic>Bulletin of Volcanology</italic></source>  <volume>57</volume>(<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>337</fpage>–<lpage>355</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Adam</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Green</surname>, <given-names>T.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Trace element partitioning between mica- and amphibole-bearing garnet lherzolite and hydrous basanitic melt: 1. Experimental results and the investigation of controls on partitioning behaviour</article-title>. <source><italic>Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>152</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>–<lpage>17</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00410-006-0085-4</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Adam</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Green</surname>, <given-names>T. H.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Sie</surname>, <given-names>S. H.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Proton microprobe determined partitioning of Rb, Sr, Ba, Y, Zr, Nb and Ta between experimentally produced amphiboles and silicate melts with variable F content</article-title>. <source><italic>Chemical Geology</italic></source>  <volume>109</volume>(<issue>1–4</issue>), <fpage>29</fpage>–<lpage>49</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0009-2541(93)90060-V</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Aiuppa</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Baker</surname>, <given-names>D. R.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Webster</surname>, <given-names>J. D.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Halogens in volcanic systems</article-title>. <source><italic>Chemical Geology</italic></source>  <volume>263</volume>(<issue>1–4</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>–<lpage>18</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.10.005</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Albert</surname>, <given-names>H.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Costa</surname>, <given-names>F.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Martí</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Timing of magmatic processes and unrest associated with mafic historical monogenetic eruptions in Tenerife Island</article-title>. <source><italic>Journal of Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>56</volume>(<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>1945</fpage>–<lpage>1966</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/petrology/egv058</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Andújar</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Scaillet</surname>, <given-names>B.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Experimental constraints on parameters controlling the difference in the eruptive dynamics of phonolitic magmas: the case of Tenerife (Canary Islands)</article-title>. <source><italic>Journal of Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>53</volume>(<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>1777</fpage>–<lpage>1806</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/petrology/egs033</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Anenburg</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Walters</surname>, <given-names>J. B.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Metasomatic ijolite, glimmerite, silicocarbonatite, and antiskarn formation: carbonatite and silicate phase equilibria in the system Na<sub>2</sub>O–CaO–K<sub>2</sub>O–FeO–MgO–Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>–SiO<sub>2</sub>–H<sub>2</sub>O–O<sub>2</sub>–CO<sub>2</sub></article-title>. <source><italic>Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>179</volume>(<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>40</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00410-024-02109-0</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Aseri</surname>, <given-names>A. A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Linnen</surname>, <given-names>R. L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Che</surname>, <given-names>X. D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Thibault</surname>, <given-names>Y.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Holtz</surname>, <given-names>F.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Effects of fluorine on the solubilities of Nb, Ta, Zr and Hf minerals in highly fluxed water-saturated haplogranitic melts</article-title>. <source><italic>Ore Geology Reviews</italic></source>  <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>736</fpage>–<lpage>746</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.oregeorev.2014.02.014</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Asimow</surname>, <given-names>P. D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Dixon</surname>, <given-names>J. E.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Langmuir</surname>, <given-names>C. H.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>A hydrous melting and fractionation model for mid-ocean ridge basalts: application to the mid-Atlantic ridge near the Azores</article-title>. <source><italic>Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems</italic></source>  <volume>5</volume>(<issue>1</issue>). <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2003GC000568</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Azadbakht</surname>, <given-names>Z.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Lentz</surname>, <given-names>D. R.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>High-resolution LA-ICP-MS trace-element mapping of magmatic biotite: a new approach for studying syn-to post-magmatic evolution</article-title>. <source><italic>The Canadian Mineralogist</italic></source>  <volume>58</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>293</fpage>–<lpage>311</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3749/canmin.1900101</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Beard</surname>, <given-names>C. D.</given-names></string-name>
          </person-group> (<year>2018</year>) <article-title>Mineral-melt trace element partitioning in alkaline magmatic systems</article-title>. <comment>Ph.D. thesis</comment>, <publisher-loc>Montreal, Canada</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>McGill University</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Beard</surname>, <given-names>C. D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Goodenough</surname>, <given-names>K. M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Borst</surname>, <given-names>A. M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Wall</surname>, <given-names>F.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Siegfried</surname>, <given-names>P. R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Deady</surname>, <given-names>E. A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Pohl</surname>, <given-names>C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Hutchison</surname>, <given-names>W.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Finch</surname>, <given-names>A. A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Walter</surname>, <given-names>B. F.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Elliott</surname>, <given-names>H. A.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Brauch</surname>, <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Alkaline-silicate REE-HFSE systems</article-title>. <source><italic>Economic Geology</italic></source>  <volume>118</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>177</fpage>–<lpage>208</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5382/econgeo.4956</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Beard</surname>, <given-names>C. D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>van Hinsberg</surname>, <given-names>V. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Stix</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Wilke</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Clinopyroxene/melt trace element partitioning in sodic alkaline magmas</article-title>. <source><italic>Journal of Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>60</volume>(<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>1797</fpage>–<lpage>1823</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/petrology/egz052</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Beard</surname>, <given-names>C. D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>van Hinsberg</surname>, <given-names>V. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Stix</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Wilke</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The effect of fluorine on clinopyroxene/melt trace-element partitioning</article-title>. <source><italic>Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>175</volume>(<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>44</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00410-020-1672-5</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Bédard</surname>, <given-names>J. H.</given-names></string-name>
          </person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Parental magmas of the Nain plutonic suite anorthosites and mafic cumulates: a trace element modelling approach</article-title>. <source><italic>Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>141</volume>(<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>747</fpage>–<lpage>771</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s004100100268</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Bédard</surname>, <given-names>J. H.</given-names></string-name>
          </person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Parameterizations of calcic clinopyroxene—melt trace element partition coefficients</article-title>. <source><italic>Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems</italic></source>  <volume>15</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>303</fpage>–<lpage>336</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/2013GC005112</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Bédard</surname>, <given-names>J. H.</given-names></string-name>
          </person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Trace element partitioning coefficients between terrestrial silicate melts and plagioclase feldspar: improved and simplified parameters</article-title>. <source><italic>Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta</italic></source>  <volume>350</volume>, <fpage>69</fpage>–<lpage>86</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gca.2023.04.010</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Behrens</surname>, <given-names>H.</given-names></string-name>
          </person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Water speciation in oxide glasses and melts</article-title>.
<source><italic>Chemical Geology</italic></source>  <volume>558</volume>, <fpage>119850</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119850</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Berndt</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Liebske</surname>, <given-names>C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Holtz</surname>, <given-names>F.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Freise</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Nowak</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Ziegenbein</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Hurkuck</surname>, <given-names>W.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Koepke</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>A combined rapid-quench and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation486"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{H_2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-membrane setup for internally heated pressure vessels: description and application for water solubility in basaltic melts</article-title>. <source><italic>American Mineralogist</italic></source>  <volume>87</volume>(<issue>11–12</issue>), <fpage>1717</fpage>–<lpage>1726</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2138/am-2002-11-1222</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Blundy</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Wood</surname>, <given-names>B.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Prediction of crystal–melt partition coefficients from elastic moduli</article-title>. <source><italic>Nature</italic></source>  <volume>372</volume>(<issue>6505</issue>), <fpage>452</fpage>–<lpage>454</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/372452a0</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Blundy</surname>, <given-names>J. D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Robinson</surname>, <given-names>J. A. C.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Wood</surname>, <given-names>B. J.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Heavy REE are compatible in clinopyroxene on the spinel lherzolite solidus</article-title>. <source><italic>Earth and Planetary Science Letters</italic></source>  <volume>160</volume>(<issue>3–4</issue>), <fpage>493</fpage>–<lpage>504</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0012-821X(98)00106-X</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Botcharnikov</surname>, <given-names>R. E.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Behrens</surname>, <given-names>H.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Holtz</surname>, <given-names>F.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Solubility and speciation of C–O–H fluids in andesitic melt at T = 1100–1300<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation487"><![CDATA[${}^{\circ }$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>C and P = 200 and 500 MPa</article-title>. <source><italic>Chemical Geology</italic></source>  <volume>229</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>125</fpage>–<lpage>143</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref24">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Breasley</surname>, <given-names>C. M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Groat</surname>, <given-names>L. A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Martins</surname>, <given-names>T.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Linnen</surname>, <given-names>R. L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Larson</surname>, <given-names>K. P.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Henry</surname>, <given-names>R. E.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Mineralogy and petrology of the petalite-subtype Prof pegmatite, Revelstoke, British Columbia, Canada</article-title>. <source><italic>Mineralogical Magazine</italic></source>  <volume>88</volume>(<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>698</fpage>–<lpage>720</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1180/mgm.2024.49</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref25">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Breiter</surname>, <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Galiová</surname>, <given-names>M. V.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Korbelová</surname>, <given-names>Z.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Hložková</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Can lithium contents in mica be correctly calculated? Tischendorfs proposal (mineralogical magazine 61/1997) 25 years after</article-title>. <source><italic>Mineralogical Magazine</italic></source>  <volume>87</volume>(<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>878</fpage>–<lpage>886</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1180/mgm.2023.72</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref26">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Brice</surname>, <given-names>J. C.</given-names></string-name>
          </person-group> (<year>1975</year>). <article-title>Some thermodynamic aspects of the growth of strained crystals</article-title>. <source><italic>Journal of Crystal Growth</italic></source>  <volume>28</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>249</fpage>–<lpage>253</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0022-0248(75)90241-9</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref27">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Brigatti</surname>, <given-names>M. F.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Guggenheim</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Mica crystal chemistry and the influence of pressure, temperature, and solid solution on atomistic models</article-title>. <source><italic>Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry</italic></source>  <volume>46</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>–<lpage>97</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2138/rmg.2002.46.01</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref28">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Černý</surname>, <given-names>P.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Masau</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Goad</surname>, <given-names>B. E.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Ferreira</surname>, <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>The Greer Lake leucogranite, Manitoba, and the origin of lepidolite-subtype granitic pegmatites</article-title>. <source><italic>Lithos</italic></source>  <volume>80</volume>(<issue>1–4 SPEC. ISS</issue>), <fpage>305</fpage>–<lpage>321</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref29">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Cherniak</surname>, <given-names>D. J.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Dimanov</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Diffusion in pyroxene, mica and amphibole</article-title>. <source><italic>Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry</italic></source>  <volume>72</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>641</fpage>–<lpage>690</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2138/rmg.2010.72.14</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref30">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Deer</surname>, <given-names>W. A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Howie</surname>, <given-names>R. A.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Zussman</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>) <source><italic>An Introduction to the Rock-Forming Minerals</italic></source>. <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Longman Group Ltd</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref31">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Dingwell</surname>, <given-names>D. B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Scarfe</surname>, <given-names>C. M.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Cronin</surname>, <given-names>D. J.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>The effect of fluorine on viscosities in the system Na<sub>2</sub>O–Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>–SiO<sub>2</sub>: implications for phonolites, trachytes and rhyolites</article-title>. <source><italic>American Mineralogist</italic></source>  <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>80</fpage>–<lpage>87</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref32">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Dolejš</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Baker</surname>, <given-names>D. R.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Fluorite solubility in hydrous haplogranitic melts at 100 MPa</article-title>. <source><italic>Chemical Geology</italic></source>  <volume>225</volume>(<issue>1–2</issue>), <fpage>40</fpage>–<lpage>60</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.08.007</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref33">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Dolejš</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Baker</surname>, <given-names>D. R.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Liquidus equilibria in the system K<sub>2</sub>O–Na<sub>2</sub>O–Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>–SiO<sub>2</sub>–F<sub>2</sub>O<sup>-1</sup>–H<sub>2</sub>O to 100 MPa: II. Differentiation paths of fluorosilicic magmas in hydrous systems</article-title>. <source><italic>Journal of Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>48</volume>(<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>807</fpage>–<lpage>828</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/petrology/egm002</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref34">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Ellis</surname>, <given-names>B. S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Neukampf</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Bachmann</surname>, <given-names>O.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Harris</surname>, <given-names>C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Forni</surname>, <given-names>F.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Magna</surname>, <given-names>T.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Laurent</surname>, <given-names>O.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Ulmer</surname>, <given-names>P.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Biotite as a recorder of an exsolved Li-rich volatile phase in upper-crustal silicic magma reservoirs</article-title>. <source><italic>Geology</italic></source>  <volume>50</volume>(<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>481</fpage>–<lpage>485</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1130/G49484.1</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref35">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Evensen</surname>, <given-names>J. M.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>London</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Experimental silicate mineral/melt partition coefficients for beryllium and the crustal be cycle from migmatite to pegmatite</article-title>. <source><italic>Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta</italic></source>  <volume>66</volume>(<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>2239</fpage>–<lpage>2265</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0016-7037(02)00889-X</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref36">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Ezad</surname>, <given-names>I. S.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Foley</surname>, <given-names>S. F.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Experimental partitioning of fluorine and barium in lamproites</article-title>. <source><italic>American Mineralogist</italic></source>  <volume>107</volume>(<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>2008</fpage>–<lpage>2019</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2138/am-2022-8289</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref37">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Fabbrizio</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Carroll</surname>, <given-names>M. R.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Experimental constraints on the differentiation process and pre-eruptive conditions in the magmatic system of Phlegraean fields (Naples, Italy)</article-title>. <volume>171</volume>, <fpage>88</fpage>–<lpage>102</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2007.11.002</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref38">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Farges</surname>, <given-names>F. F.</given-names></string-name>
          </person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Does Zr-F “complexation” occur in magmas</article-title>? <source><italic>Chemical Geology</italic></source>  <volume>127</volume>(<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>253</fpage>–<lpage>268</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0009-2541(95)00132-8</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref39">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Finch</surname>, <given-names>A. A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Parsons</surname>, <given-names>I.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Mingard</surname>, <given-names>S. C.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Biotites as indicators of fluorine fugacities in late-stage magmatic fluids: the Gardar Province of South Greenland</article-title>. <source><italic>Journal of Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>36</volume>(<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1701</fpage>–<lpage>1728</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/oxfordjournals.petrology.a037271</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref40">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Finch</surname>, <given-names>E.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Tomkins</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Fluorine and chlorine behaviour during progressive dehydration melting: consequences for granite geochemistry and metallogeny</article-title>. <source><italic>Journal of Metamorphic Geology</italic></source>  <volume>35</volume>(<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>739</fpage>–<lpage>757</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jmg.12253</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref41">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Fitzpayne</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Giuliani</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Phillips</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Hergt</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Woodhead</surname>, <given-names>J. D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Farquhar</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Fiorentini</surname>, <given-names>M. L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Drysdale</surname>, <given-names>R. N.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Wu</surname>, <given-names>N.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Kimberlite-related metasomatism recorded in marid and pic mantle xenoliths</article-title>. <source><italic>Mineralogy and Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>112</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>71</fpage>–<lpage>84</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00710-018-0573-z</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref42">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Fleet</surname>, <given-names>M. E.</given-names></string-name>
          </person-group> (<year>2003</year>) <source>Rock-Forming Minerals, vol. 3A. Sheet Silicates: Micas</source>, 2nd edn. <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>The Geological Society</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref43">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Förster</surname>, <given-names>H. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Tischendorf</surname>, <given-names>G.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Trumbull</surname>, <given-names>R. B.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Gottesmann</surname>, <given-names>B.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Late-collisional granites in the Variscan Erzgebirge, Germany</article-title>. <source><italic>Journal of Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>40</volume>(<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>1613</fpage>–<lpage>1645</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/petroj/40.11.1613</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref44">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Frost</surname>, <given-names>B. R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Barnes</surname>, <given-names>C. G.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Collins</surname>, <given-names>W. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Arculus</surname>, <given-names>R. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Ellis</surname>, <given-names>D. J.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Frost</surname>, <given-names>C. D.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>A geochemical classification for granitic rocks</article-title>. <source><italic>Journal of Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>42</volume>(<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>2033</fpage>–<lpage>2048</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/petrology/42.11.2033</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref45">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Gardiner</surname>, <given-names>N. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Palin</surname>, <given-names>R. M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Koopmans</surname>, <given-names>L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Mangler</surname>, <given-names>M. F.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Robb</surname>, <given-names>L. J.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>On tin and lithium granite systems: a crustal evolution perspective</article-title>. <source><italic>Earth-Science Reviews</italic></source>  <volume>258</volume>, <fpage>104947</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104947</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref46">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Ghiorso</surname>, <given-names>M. S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Hirschmann</surname>, <given-names>M. M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Reiners</surname>, <given-names>P. W.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Kress</surname>, <given-names>V. C.</given-names>, III</string-name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>The pMELTS: a revision of MELTS for improved calculation of phase relations and major element partitioning related to partial melting of the mantle to 3 GPa</article-title>. <source><italic>Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems</italic></source>  <volume>3</volume>(<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>–<lpage>35</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2001GC000217</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref47">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Ghiorso</surname>, <given-names>M. S.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Sack</surname>, <given-names>R. O.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Chemical mass transfer in magmatic processes IV. A revised and internally consistent thermodynamic model for the interpolation and extrapolation of liquid-solid equilibria in magmatic systems at elevated temperatures and pressures</article-title>. <source><italic>Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>119</volume>(<issue>2–3</issue>), <fpage>197</fpage>–<lpage>212</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00307281</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref48">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Gianfagna</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Scordari</surname>, <given-names>F.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Mazziotti-Tagliani</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Ventruti</surname>, <given-names>G.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Ottolini</surname>, <given-names>L.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Fluorophlogopite from Biancavilla (Mt. Etna, Sicily, Italy): crystal structure and crystal chemistry of a new F-dominant analog of phlogopite</article-title>. <source><italic>American Mineralogist</italic></source>  <volume>92</volume>(<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>1601</fpage>–<lpage>1609</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2138/am.2007.2502</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref49">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Giebel</surname>, <given-names>R. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Marks</surname>, <given-names>M. A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Gauert</surname>, <given-names>C. D.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Markl</surname>, <given-names>G.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>A model for the formation of carbonatite-phoscorite assemblages based on the compositional variations of mica and apatite from the Palabora carbonatite complex, South Africa</article-title>. <source><italic>Lithos</italic></source>  <volume>324–325</volume>, <fpage>89</fpage>–<lpage>104</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.lithos.2018.10.030</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref50">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Giehl</surname>, <given-names>C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Marks</surname>, <given-names>M. A. W.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Nowak</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>An experimental study on the influence of fluorine and chlorine on phase relations in peralkaline phonolitic melts</article-title>. <source><italic>Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>167</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>–<lpage>21</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref51">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Giordano</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Nichols</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Dingwell</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Glass transition temperatures of natural hydrous melts: a relationship with shear viscosity and implications for the welding process</article-title>. <source><italic>Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research</italic></source>  <volume>142</volume>(<issue>1–2</issue>), <fpage>105</fpage>–<lpage>118</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2004.10.015</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref52">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Goodenough</surname>, <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Shaw</surname>, <given-names>R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Borst</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Nex</surname>, <given-names>P.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Kinnaird</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Van Lichtervelde</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Essaifi</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Koopmans</surname>, <given-names>L.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Deady</surname>, <given-names>E.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Lithium pegmatites in Africa: a review</article-title>. <source><italic>Economic Geology</italic></source>  <volume>120</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>513</fpage>–<lpage>539</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5382/econgeo.5133</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref53">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Govindaraju</surname>, <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>
          </person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>1994 compilation of working values and sample description for 383 geostandards</article-title>. <source><italic>Geostandards Newsletter</italic></source>  <volume>18</volume>(<issue>S1</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>–<lpage>158</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2494.1998.53202081.x-i1</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref54">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Gray</surname>, <given-names>W.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Glazner</surname>, <given-names>A. F.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Coleman</surname>, <given-names>D. S.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Bartley</surname>, <given-names>J. M.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Long-term geochemical variability of the late cretaceous Tuolumne intrusive suite, Central Sierra Nevada, California</article-title>. <source><italic>Geological Society, London, Special Publications</italic></source>  <volume>304</volume>, <fpage>183</fpage>–<lpage>201</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1144/SP304.10</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref55">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Green</surname>, <given-names>E. C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Holland</surname>, <given-names>T. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Powell</surname>, <given-names>R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Weller</surname>, <given-names>O. M.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Riel</surname>, <given-names>N.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Corrigendum to: melting of peridotites through to granites: a simple thermodynamic model in the system KNCFMASHTOCr, and, a thermodynamic model for the subsolidus evolution and melting of peridotite</article-title>. <source><italic>Journal of Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>66</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>egae079</fpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref56">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Green</surname>, <given-names>T. H.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Blundy</surname>, <given-names>J. D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Adam</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Yaxley</surname>, <given-names>G. M.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>SIMS determination of trace element partition coefficients between garnet, clinopyroxene and hydrous basaltic liquids at 2–7.5 GPa and 1080–1200C</article-title>. <source><italic>Lithos</italic></source>  <volume>53</volume>(<issue>3–4</issue>), <fpage>165</fpage>–<lpage>187</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0024-4937(00)00023-2</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref57">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Grégoire</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Bell</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Le Roex</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Trace element geochemistry of phlogopite-rich mafic mantle xenoliths: their classification and their relationship to phlogopite-bearing peridotites and kimberlites revisited</article-title>. <source><italic>Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>142</volume>(<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>603</fpage>–<lpage>625</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00410-001-0315-8</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref58">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Gualda</surname>, <given-names>G. A. R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Ghiorso</surname>, <given-names>M. S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Lemons</surname>, <given-names>R. V.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Carley</surname>, <given-names>T. L.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Rhyolite-MELTS: a modified calibration of MELTS optimized for silica-rich, fluid-bearing magmatic systems</article-title>. <source><italic>Journal of Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>53</volume>(<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>875</fpage>–<lpage>890</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/petrology/egr080</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref59">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Guo</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Green</surname>, <given-names>T. H.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Experimental study of barium partitioning between phlogopite and silicate liquid at upper-mantle pressure and temperature</article-title>. <source><italic>Lithos</italic></source>  <volume>24</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>83</fpage>–<lpage>95</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0024-4937(90)90018-V</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref60">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Hammouda</surname>, <given-names>T. Y.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Cherniak</surname>, <given-names>D. J.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Diffusion of Sr in fluorphlogopite determined by Rutherford backscattering spectrometry</article-title>. <source><italic>Earth and Planetary Science Letters</italic></source>  <volume>178</volume>, <fpage>339</fpage>–<lpage>349</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00089-3</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref61">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Heinonen</surname>, <given-names>J. S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Bohrson</surname>, <given-names>W. A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Spera</surname>, <given-names>F. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Brown</surname>, <given-names>G. A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Scruggs</surname>, <given-names>M. A.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Adams</surname>, <given-names>J. V.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Diagnosing open-system magmatic processes using the magma chamber simulator (MCS): part II—trace elements and isotopes</article-title>. <source><italic>Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>175</volume>(<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>–<lpage>21</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref62">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Henry</surname>, <given-names>D. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Guidotti</surname>, <given-names>C. V.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Thomson</surname>, <given-names>J. A.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>The Ti-saturation surface for low-to-medium pressure metapelitic biotites: implications for geothermometry and Ti-substitution mechanisms</article-title>. <source><italic>American Mineralogist</italic></source>  <volume>90</volume>(<issue>2–3</issue>), <fpage>316</fpage>–<lpage>328</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2138/am.2005.1498</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref63">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Hirschmann</surname>, <given-names>M. M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Ghiorso</surname>, <given-names>M. S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Davis</surname>, <given-names>F. A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Gordon</surname>, <given-names>S. M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Mukherjee</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Grove</surname>, <given-names>T. L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Krawczynski</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Medard</surname>, <given-names>E.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Till</surname>, <given-names>C. B.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Library of experimental phase relations (LEPR): a database and web portal for experimental magmatic phase equilibria data</article-title>. <source><italic>Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems</italic></source>  <volume>9</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>–<lpage>15</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref64">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Holland</surname>, <given-names>T. J. B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Green</surname>, <given-names>E. C. R.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Powell</surname>, <given-names>R.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Melting of peridotites through to granites: a simple thermodynamic model in the system KNCFMASHTOCr</article-title>. <source><italic>Journal of Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>59</volume>(<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>881</fpage>–<lpage>900</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/petrology/egy048</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref65">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Holland</surname>, <given-names>T. J. B.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Powell</surname>, <given-names>R.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>An improved and extended internally consistent thermodynamic dataset for phases of petrological interest, involving a new equation of state for solids</article-title>. <source><italic>Journal of Metamorphic Geology</italic></source>  <volume>29</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>333</fpage>–<lpage>383</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1525-1314.2010.00923.x</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref66">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Horányi</surname>, <given-names>B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Gion</surname>, <given-names>A. M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Gaillard</surname>, <given-names>F.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Gloaguen</surname>, <given-names>É.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Plunder</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Melleton</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Moradell-Casellas</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Garde</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Erdmann</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Di Carlo</surname>, <given-names>I.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Experimental constraints on the sources of lithium-rich granites and pegmatites</article-title>. <source><italic>Communications Earth &amp; Environment</italic></source>  <volume>6</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>966</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s43247-025-02923-9</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref67">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Humphreys</surname>, <given-names>M. C. S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Smith</surname>, <given-names>V. C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Coumans</surname>, <given-names>J. P.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Riker</surname>, <given-names>J. M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Stock</surname>, <given-names>M. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>de Hoog</surname>, <given-names>J. C. M.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Brooker</surname>, <given-names>R. A.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Rapid pre-eruptive mush reorganisation and atmospheric volatile emissions from the 12.9 ka Laacher see eruption, determined using apatite</article-title>. <source><italic>Earth and Planetary Science Letters</italic></source>  <volume>576</volume>, <fpage>117198</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117198</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref68">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Icenhower</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>London</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>An experimental study of element partitioning among biotite, muscovite, and coexisting peraluminous silicic melt at 200 MPa (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation492"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{H_2O}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>)</article-title>. <source><italic>American Mineralogist</italic></source>  <volume>80</volume>(<issue>11–12</issue>), <fpage>1229</fpage>–<lpage>1251</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2138/am-1995-11-1213</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref69">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Icenhower</surname>, <given-names>J. P.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>London</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Partitioning of fluorine and chlorine between biotite and granitic melt: experimental calibration at 200 MPa <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation493"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{H_2O}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></article-title>. <source><italic>Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>127</volume>(<issue>1–2</issue>), <fpage>17</fpage>–<lpage>29</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s004100050262</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref70">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Jochum</surname>, <given-names>K. P.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Nohl</surname>, <given-names>U.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Herwig</surname>, <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Lammel</surname>, <given-names>E.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Stoll</surname>, <given-names>B.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Hofmann</surname>, <given-names>A. W.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>GeoReM: a new geochemical database for reference materials and isotopic standards</article-title>. <source><italic>Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research</italic></source>  <volume>29</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>333</fpage>–<lpage>338</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1751-908X.2005.tb00904.x</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref71">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Jochum</surname>, <given-names>K. P.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Weis</surname>, <given-names>U.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Schwager</surname>, <given-names>B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Stoll</surname>, <given-names>B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Wilson</surname>, <given-names>S. A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Haug</surname>, <given-names>G. H.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Andreae</surname>, <given-names>M. O.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Enzweiler</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Reference values following ISO guidelines for frequently requested rock reference materials</article-title>. <source><italic>Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research</italic></source>  <volume>40</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>333</fpage>–<lpage>350</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1751-908X.2015.00392.x</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref72">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Jochum</surname>, <given-names>K. P.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Weis</surname>, <given-names>U.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Stoll</surname>, <given-names>B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Kuzmin</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Yang</surname>, <given-names>Q.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Raczek</surname>, <given-names>I.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Jacob</surname>, <given-names>D. E.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Stracke</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Birbaum</surname>, <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Frick</surname>, <given-names>D. A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Günther</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Enzweiler</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Determination of reference values for NIST SRM 610–617 glasses following ISO guidelines</article-title>. <source><italic>Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research</italic></source>  <volume>35</volume>(<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>397</fpage>–<lpage>429</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1751-908X.2011.00120.x</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref73">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Jugo</surname>, <given-names>P. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Wilke</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Botcharnikov</surname>, <given-names>R. E.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Sulfur K-edge XANES analysis of natural and synthetic basaltic glasses: implications for S speciation and S content as function of oxygen fugacity</article-title>. <source><italic>Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta</italic></source>  <volume>74</volume>(<issue>20</issue>), <fpage>5926</fpage>–<lpage>5938</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gca.2010.07.022</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref74">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Koopmans</surname>, <given-names>L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Martins</surname>, <given-names>T.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Linnen</surname>, <given-names>R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Gardiner</surname>, <given-names>N. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Breasley</surname>, <given-names>C. M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Palin</surname>, <given-names>R. M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Groat</surname>, <given-names>L. A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Silva</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Robb</surname>, <given-names>L. J.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>The formation of lithium-rich pegmatites through multi-stage melting</article-title>. <source><italic>Geology</italic></source>  <volume>52</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>7</fpage>–<lpage>11</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1130/G51633.1</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref75">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Kunz</surname>, <given-names>B. E.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Warren</surname>, <given-names>C. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Jenner</surname>, <given-names>F. E.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Harris</surname>, <given-names>N. B.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Argles</surname>, <given-names>T. W.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Critical metal enrichment in crustal melts: the role of metamorphic mica</article-title>. <source><italic>Geology</italic></source>  <volume>50</volume>(<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>1219</fpage>–<lpage>1223</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1130/G50284.1</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref76">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Lanin</surname>, <given-names>E. S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Sone</surname>, <given-names>H.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Yu</surname>, <given-names>Z.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Liu</surname>, <given-names>Q.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Wang</surname>, <given-names>B.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Comparison of biotite elastic properties recovered by spherical nanoindentations and atomistic simulations—influence of nano-scale defects in phyllosilicates</article-title>. <source><italic>Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth</italic></source>  <volume>126</volume>(<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>e2021JB021902</fpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref77">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>LaTourrette</surname>, <given-names>T.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Hervig</surname>, <given-names>R. L.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Holloway</surname>, <given-names>J. R.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Trace element partitioning between amphibole, phologopite, and basanite melt</article-title>. <source><italic>Earth and Planetary Science Letters</italic></source>  <volume>l35</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>13</fpage>–<lpage>30</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref78">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Le Maitre</surname>, <given-names>R. W.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Streckeisen</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Zanettin</surname>, <given-names>B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Le Bas</surname>, <given-names>M. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Bonin</surname>, <given-names>B.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Bateman</surname>, <given-names>P.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>) <source><italic>Igneous Rocks: A Classification and Glossary of Terms: Recommendations of the International Union of Geological Sciences Subcommission on the Systematics of Igneous Rocks</italic></source>. <publisher-name>Cambridge University Press</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref79">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Li</surname>, <given-names>W.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Costa</surname>, <given-names>F.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>A thermodynamic model for F-Cl-OH partitioning between silicate melts and apatite including non-ideal mixing with application to constraining melt volatile budgets</article-title>. <source><italic>Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta</italic></source>  <volume>269</volume>, <fpage>203</fpage>–<lpage>222</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gca.2019.10.035</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref80">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Li</surname>, <given-names>X.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Zhang</surname>, <given-names>C.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Machine learning thermobarometry for biotite-bearing magmas</article-title>. <source><italic>Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth</italic></source>  <volume>127</volume>(<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>e2022JB024137</fpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref81">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Li</surname>, <given-names>X.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Zhang</surname>, <given-names>C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Behrens</surname>, <given-names>H.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Holtz</surname>, <given-names>F.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Calculating biotite formula from electron microprobe analysis data using a machine learning method based on principal components regression</article-title>. <source><italic>Lithos</italic></source>  <volume>356–357</volume>, <fpage>105371</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.lithos.2020.105371</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref82">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Linnen</surname>, <given-names>R. L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Van Lichtervelde</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Černý</surname>, <given-names>P.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Granitic pegmatites as sources of strategic metals</article-title>. <source><italic>Elements</italic></source>  <volume>8</volume>(<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>275</fpage>–<lpage>280</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2113/gselements.8.4.275</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref83">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Loiselle</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Wones</surname>, <given-names>D. R.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>1979</year>). <article-title>Characteristics and origin of anorogenic granites</article-title>. <source><italic>Geological Society of America</italic></source>  <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>468</fpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref84">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>London</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name>
          </person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>Internal differentiation of rare-element pegmatites: effects of boron, phosphorus, and fluorine</article-title>. <source><italic>Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta</italic></source>  <volume>51</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>403</fpage>–<lpage>420</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0016-7037(87)90058-5</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref85">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>London</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name>
          </person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Estimating abundances of volatile and other mobile components in evolved silicic melts through mineral–melt equilibria</article-title>. <source><italic>Journal of Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>38</volume>(<issue>12</issue>),
<fpage>1691</fpage>–<lpage>1706</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref86">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>London</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name>
          </person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Ore-forming processes within granitic pegmatites</article-title>. <source><italic>Ore Geology Reviews</italic></source>  <volume>101</volume>, <fpage>349</fpage>–<lpage>383</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.oregeorev.2018.04.020</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref87">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Lukkari</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Holtz</surname>, <given-names>F.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Phase relations of a F-enriched peraluminous granite: an experimental study of the Kymi topaz granite stock, southern Finland</article-title>. <source><italic>Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>153</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>273</fpage>–<lpage>288</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00410-006-0146-8</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref88">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Marks</surname>, <given-names>M. A.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Markl</surname>, <given-names>G.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>A global review on agpaitic rocks</article-title>. <volume>173</volume>, <fpage>229</fpage>–<lpage>258</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.06.002</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref89">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Martins</surname>, <given-names>T.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Roda-Robles</surname>, <given-names>E.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Lima</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>de Parseval</surname>, <given-names>P.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Geochemistry and evolution of micas in the Barroso–Alvão pegmatite field, Northern Portugal</article-title>. <source><italic>The Canadian Mineralogist</italic></source>  <volume>50</volume>(<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>1117</fpage>–<lpage>1129</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3749/canmin.50.4.1117</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref90">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Masotta</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Pontesilli</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Mollo</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Armienti</surname>, <given-names>P.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Ubide</surname>, <given-names>T.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Nazzari</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Scarlato</surname>, <given-names>P.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The role of undercooling during clinopyroxene growth in trachybasaltic magmas: insights on magma decompression and cooling at Mt. Etna volcano</article-title>. <source><italic>Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta</italic></source>  <volume>268</volume>, <fpage>258</fpage>–<lpage>276</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gca.2019.10.009</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref91">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>McCubbin</surname>, <given-names>F. M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Vander Kaaden</surname>, <given-names>K. E.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Tartèse</surname>, <given-names>R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Boyce</surname>, <given-names>J. W.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Mikhail</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Whitson</surname>, <given-names>E. S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Bell</surname>, <given-names>A. S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Anand</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Franchi</surname>, <given-names>I. A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Wang</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Hauri</surname>, <given-names>E. H.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Experimental investigation of F, Cl, and OH partitioning between apatite and Fe-rich basaltic melt at 1.0–1.2 GPa and 950–1000ºC</article-title>. <source><italic>American Mineralogist</italic></source>  <volume>100</volume>(<issue>8–9</issue>), <fpage>1790</fpage>–<lpage>1802</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2138/am-2015-5233</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref92">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Mills</surname>, <given-names>K. C.</given-names></string-name>
          </person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>The influence of structure on the physico-chemical properties of slags</article-title>. <source><italic>ISIJ International</italic></source>  <volume>33</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>148</fpage>–<lpage>155</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2355/isijinternational.33.148</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref93">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Möller</surname>, <given-names>V.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Williams-Jones</surname>, <given-names>A. E.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Petrogenesis of the Nechalacho layered suite, Canada: magmatic evolution of a REE-Nb-rich nepheline syenite intrusion</article-title>. <source><italic>Journal of Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>57</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>229</fpage>–<lpage>276</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/petrology/egw003</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref94">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Mollo</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Blundy</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Scarlato</surname>, <given-names>P.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Vetere</surname>, <given-names>F.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Holtz</surname>, <given-names>F.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Bachmann</surname>, <given-names>O.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Gaeta</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>A review of the lattice strain and electrostatic effects on trace element partitioning between clinopyroxene and melt: applications to magmatic systems saturated with Tschermak-rich clinopyroxenes</article-title>. <source><italic>Earth-Science Reviews</italic></source>  <volume>210</volume>, <fpage>103351</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103351</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref95">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Morgan vi</surname>, <given-names>G. B.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>London</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Effect of current density on the electron microprobe analysis of alkali aluminosilicate glasses</article-title>. <source><italic>American Mineralogist</italic></source>  <volume>90</volume>(<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>1131</fpage>–<lpage>1138</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2138/am.2005.1769</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref96">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Morris</surname>, <given-names>M. C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Weller</surname>, <given-names>O. M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Soderman</surname>, <given-names>C. R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Edmonds</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Beard</surname>, <given-names>C. D.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Yeomans</surname>, <given-names>C. M.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2026</year>). <article-title>Melting of fluorine-rich biotite as a mechanism for generating lithium-rich granites</article-title>. <source><italic>Nature Communications Earth and Environment</italic></source>  <volume>7</volume>(<issue>358</issue>). <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s43247-026-03361-x</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref97">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Munoz</surname>, <given-names>J. L.</given-names></string-name>
          </person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>F-OH and Cl-OH exchange in micas with applications to hydrothermal ore deposits</article-title>. <source><italic>Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry</italic></source>  <volume>13</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>469</fpage>–<lpage>493</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref98">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Nathwani</surname>, <given-names>C. L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Large</surname>, <given-names>S. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Brugge</surname>, <given-names>E. R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Wilkinson</surname>, <given-names>J. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Buret</surname>, <given-names>Y.</given-names></string-name>, <collab>EIMF</collab></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Apatite evidence for a fluid-saturated, crystal-rich magma reservoir forming the Quellaveco porphyry copper deposit (southern Peru)</article-title>. <source>Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology</source>  <volume>178</volume>(<issue>8</issue>): <fpage>49</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00410-023-02034-8</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref99">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Nesbitt</surname>, <given-names>H. W.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Young</surname>, <given-names>G. M.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Prediction of some weathering trends of plutonic and volcanic rocks based on thermodynamic and kinetic considerations</article-title>. <source><italic>Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta</italic></source>  <volume>48</volume>(<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>1523</fpage>–<lpage>1534</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0016-7037(84)90408-3</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref100">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Neukampf</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Ellis</surname>, <given-names>B. S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Magna</surname>, <given-names>T.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Laurent</surname>, <given-names>O.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Marrocchi</surname>, <given-names>Y.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Partitioning and isotopic fractionation of li between mineral phases and alkaline to calc-alkaline melts of explosive and effusive eruptions</article-title>. <source><italic>Chemical Geology</italic></source>  <volume>636</volume>, <fpage>121628</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2023.121628</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref101">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>O’Brien</surname>, <given-names>H.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Heilimo</surname>, <given-names>E.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Heino</surname>, <given-names>P.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>) <article-title>The Archean Siilinjärvi carbonatite complex</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><surname>Maier</surname>  <given-names>W. D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Lahtinen</surname>  <given-names>R.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>O’Brien</surname>  <given-names>H.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (eds) <source>Mineral Deposits of Finland</source>. <publisher-loc>Amsterdam</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Elsevier Inc.</publisher-name>, pp. <fpage>327</fpage>–<lpage>343</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref102">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Onuma</surname>, <given-names>N.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Higuchi</surname>, <given-names>H.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Wakita</surname>, <given-names>H.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Nagasawa</surname>, <given-names>H.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>1968</year>). <article-title>Trace element partition between two pyroxenes and the host lava</article-title>. <source><italic>Earth and Planetary Science Letters</italic></source>  <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>47</fpage>–<lpage>51</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0012-821X(68)80010-X</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref103">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Patiño Douce</surname>, <given-names>A. E.</given-names></string-name>
          </person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Titanium substitution in biotite: an empirical model with applications to thermometry, O<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>O barometries, and consequences for biotite stability</article-title>. <source><italic>Chemical Geology</italic></source>  <volume>108</volume>(<issue>1–4</issue>), <fpage>133</fpage>–<lpage>162</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0009-2541(93)90321-9</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref104">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Patiño Douce</surname>, <given-names>A. E.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Johnston</surname>, <given-names>A. D.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Rice</surname>, <given-names>J. M.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Octahedral excess mixing properties in biotite: a working model with applications to geobarometry and geothermometry</article-title>. <source><italic>American Mineralogist</italic></source>  <volume>78</volume>(<issue>1–2</issue>), <fpage>113</fpage>–<lpage>131</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref105">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Paton</surname>, <given-names>C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Hellstrom</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Paul</surname>, <given-names>B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Woodhead</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Hergt</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Iolite: freeware for the visualisation and processing of mass spectrometric data</article-title>. <source><italic>Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry</italic></source>  <volume>26</volume>(<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>2508</fpage>–<lpage>2518</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1039/c1ja10172b</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref106">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Peterson</surname>, <given-names>J. W.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Chacko</surname>, <given-names>T.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Kuehner</surname>, <given-names>S. M.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>The effects of fluorine on the vapor-absent melting of phlogopite + quartz; implications for deep-crustal processes</article-title>. <source><italic>American Mineralogist</italic></source>  <volume>76</volume>(<issue>3–4</issue>), <fpage>470</fpage>–<lpage>476</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref107">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Pichavant</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Villaros</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Deveaud</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Scaillet</surname>, <given-names>B.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Lahlafi</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The influence of redox state on mica crystallization in leucogranitic and pegmatitic liquids</article-title>. <source><italic>The Canadian Mineralogist</italic></source>  <volume>54</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>559</fpage>–<lpage>581</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3749/canmin.1500079</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref108">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Ponader</surname>, <given-names>C. W.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Brown</surname>, <given-names>G. E.</given-names>, Jr.</string-name></person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>Rare earth elements in silicate glass/melt systems: II. Interactions of La, Gd, and Yb with halogens</article-title>. <source><italic>Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta</italic></source>  <volume>53</volume>(<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>2905</fpage>–<lpage>2914</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0016-7037(89)90167-1</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref109">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Rayner</surname>, <given-names>J. H.</given-names></string-name>
          </person-group> (<year>1974</year>). <article-title>The crystal structure of phlogopite by neutron diffraction</article-title>. <source><italic>Mineralogical Magazine</italic></source>  <volume>39</volume>(<issue>308</issue>), <fpage>850</fpage>–<lpage>856</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1180/minmag.1974.039.308.04</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref110">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Rieder</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Cavazzini</surname>, <given-names>G.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>D’yakonov</surname>, <given-names>Y. S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Frank-Kamenetskii</surname>, <given-names>V. A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Gottardi</surname>, <given-names>G.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Guggenheim</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Koval</surname>, <given-names>P. W.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Mueller</surname>, <given-names>G.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Neiva</surname>, <given-names>A. M. R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Radoslovich</surname>, <given-names>E. W.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Robert</surname>, <given-names>J.-L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Sassi</surname>, <given-names>F. P.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Takeda</surname>, <given-names>H.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Weiss</surname>, <given-names>Z.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Wones</surname>, <given-names>D. R.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Nomenclature of the micas</article-title>. <source><italic>The Canadian Mineralogist</italic></source>  <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>41</fpage>–<lpage>48</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref111">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Riel</surname>, <given-names>N.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Kaus</surname>, <given-names>B. J. P.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Green</surname>, <given-names>E. C. R.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Berlie</surname>, <given-names>N.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>MAGEMin, an efficient Gibbs energy minimizer: application to igneous systems</article-title>. <source><italic>Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems</italic></source>  <volume>23</volume>(<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>e2022GC010427</fpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref112">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Righter</surname>, <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Carmichael</surname>, <given-names>I. S. E.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Phase equilibria of phlogopite lamprophyres from western Mexico: biotite-liquid equilibria and P-T estimates for biotite-bearing igneous rocks</article-title>. <source><italic>Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>123</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>–<lpage>21</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s004100050140</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref113">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Riker</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Humphreys</surname>, <given-names>M. C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Brooker</surname>, <given-names>R. A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>De Hoog</surname>, <given-names>J. C.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Eim</surname>, <given-names>F.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>First measurements of OH-C exchange and temperature-dependent partitioning of OH and halogens in the system apatite-silicate melt</article-title>. <source><italic>American Mineralogist</italic></source>  <volume>103</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>260</fpage>–<lpage>270</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2138/am-2018-6187CCBY</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref114">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Rosenberg</surname>, <given-names>P. E.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Foit</surname>, <given-names>F. F.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>1977</year>). <article-title>Fe<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation495"><![CDATA[${}^{2+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-F avoidance in silicates</article-title>. <source><italic>Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta</italic></source>  <volume>41</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>345</fpage>–<lpage>346</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0016-7037(77)90243-5</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref115">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Rubatto</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Hermann</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Experimental zircon/melt and zircon/garnet trace element partitioning and implications for the geochronology of crustal rocks</article-title>. <source><italic>Chemical Geology</italic></source>  <volume>241</volume>(<issue>1–2</issue>), <fpage>38</fpage>–<lpage>61</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2007.01.027</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref116">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Schmidt</surname>, <given-names>K. H.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Bottazzi</surname>, <given-names>P.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Vannucci</surname>, <given-names>R.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Mengel</surname>, <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Trace element partitioning between phlogopite, clinopyroxene and leucite lamproite melt</article-title>. <source><italic>Earth and Planetary Science Letters</italic></source>  <volume>168</volume>(<issue>3–4</issue>), <fpage>287</fpage>–<lpage>299</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0012-821X(99)00056-4</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref117">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Shannon</surname>, <given-names>R.</given-names></string-name>
          </person-group> (<year>1976</year>). <article-title>Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides</article-title>. <source><italic>Acta Crystallographica Section A</italic></source>  <volume>32</volume>(<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>751</fpage>–<lpage>767</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1107/S0567739476001551</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref118">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Siegel</surname>, <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Vasyukova</surname>, <given-names>O. V.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Williams-Jones</surname>, <given-names>A. E.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Magmatic evolution and controls on rare metal-enrichment of the strange Lake A-type peralkaline granitic pluton, Québec-Labrador</article-title>. <source><italic>Lithos</italic></source>  <volume>308–309</volume>, <fpage>34</fpage>–<lpage>52</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.lithos.2018.03.003</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref119">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Sievwright</surname>, <given-names>R. H.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Wilkinson</surname>, <given-names>J. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>O’Neill</surname>, <given-names>H. S. C.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Berry</surname>, <given-names>A. J.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Thermodynamic controls on element partitioning between titanomagnetite and andesitic–dacitic silicate melts</article-title>. <source><italic>Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>172</volume>(<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>62</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00410-017-1385-6</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref120">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Simons</surname>, <given-names>B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Shail</surname>, <given-names>R. K.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Andersen</surname>, <given-names>J. C.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The petrogenesis of the early Permian Variscan granites of the Cornubian batholith: lower plate post-collisional peraluminous magmatism in the Rhenohercynian zone of SW England</article-title>. <source><italic>Lithos</italic></source>  <volume>260</volume>, <fpage>76</fpage>–<lpage>94</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.lithos.2016.05.010</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref121">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Sliwinski</surname>, <given-names>J. T.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Ellis</surname>, <given-names>B. S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Dávila-Harris</surname>, <given-names>P.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Wolff</surname>, <given-names>J. A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Olin</surname>, <given-names>P. H.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Bachmann</surname>, <given-names>O.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The use of biotite trace element compositions for fingerprinting magma batches at las Cañadas volcano, Tenerife</article-title>. <source><italic>Bulletin of Volcanology</italic></source>  <volume>79</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref122">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Smith</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name>
          </person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <comment>USGS certificate of analysis, rhyolite, Glass Mountain, RGM-1</comment>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref123">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Soderman</surname>, <given-names>C. R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Weller</surname>, <given-names>O. M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Beard</surname>, <given-names>C. D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Riel</surname>, <given-names>N.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Green</surname>, <given-names>E. C. R.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Holland</surname>, <given-names>T. J. B.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>A mid-crustal tipping point between silica-undersaturated and silica-oversaturated magmas</article-title>. <source><italic>Nature Geoscience</italic></source>  <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>555</fpage>–<lpage>562</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41561-025-01695-3</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref124">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Speer</surname>, <given-names>J. A.</given-names></string-name>
          </person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Micas in igneous rocks</article-title>. <source><italic>Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry</italic></source>  <volume>13</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>299</fpage>–<lpage>356</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref125">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Sun</surname>, <given-names>C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Graff</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Liang</surname>, <given-names>Y.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Trace element partitioning between plagioclase and silicate melt: the importance of temperature and plagioclase composition, with implications for terrestrial and lunar magmatism</article-title>. <source><italic>Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta</italic></source>  <volume>206</volume>, <fpage>273</fpage>–<lpage>295</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gca.2017.03.003</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref126">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Tappe</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Beard</surname>, <given-names>C. D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Borst</surname>, <given-names>A. M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Humphreys-Williams</surname>, <given-names>E. R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Walter</surname>, <given-names>B. F.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Yaxley</surname>, <given-names>G. M.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2025</year>) <article-title>Kimberlite, carbonatite and alkaline magmatic systems: definitions, origins, and strategic mineral resources</article-title>. In: <source>Encyclopedia of Volcanoes, Third Edition, chapter 8.2.2</source>. <publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>, p. <fpage>26</fpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref127">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Teng</surname>, <given-names>F.-Z.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Rudnick</surname>, <given-names>R. L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>McDonough</surname>, <given-names>W. F.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Wu</surname>, <given-names>F.-Y.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Lithium isotopic systematics of A-type granites and their mafic enclaves: further constraints on the Li isotopic composition of the continental crust</article-title>. <source><italic>Chemical Geology</italic></source>  <volume>262</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>370</fpage>–<lpage>379</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.02.009</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref128">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Ubide</surname>, <given-names>T.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Mollo</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <string-name><surname>Zhao</surname>, <given-names>J.-x.</given-names></string-name>, <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><surname>Nazzari</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><surname>Scarlato</surname>, <given-names>P.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Sector-zoned clinopyroxene as a recorder of magma history, eruption triggers, and ascent rates</article-title>. <source>Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta</source>, <volume>251</volume>, <fpage>265</fpage>, <lpage>283</lpage>, <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gca.2019.02.021</pub-id></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref129">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>van Hinsberg</surname>, <given-names>V. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Migdisov</surname>, <given-names>A. A.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Williams-Jones</surname>, <given-names>A. E.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Reading the mineral record of fluid composition from element partitioning</article-title>. <source><italic>Geology</italic></source>  <volume>38</volume>(<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>847</fpage>–<lpage>850</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1130/G31112.1</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref130">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Vasyukova</surname>, <given-names>O.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Williams-Jones</surname>, <given-names>A. E.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The evolution of immiscible silicate and fluoride melts: implications for REE ore-genesis</article-title>. <source><italic>Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta</italic></source>  <volume>172</volume>, <fpage>205</fpage>–<lpage>224</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gca.2015.09.018</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref131">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Vasyukova</surname>, <given-names>O. V.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Williams-Jones</surname>, <given-names>A. E.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Constraints on the genesis of cobalt deposits: part II. Applications to natural systems</article-title>. <source><italic>Economic Geology</italic></source>  <volume>117</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>529</fpage>–<lpage>544</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref132">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Weller</surname>, <given-names>O. M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Holland</surname>, <given-names>T. J. B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Soderman</surname>, <given-names>C. R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Green</surname>, <given-names>E. C. R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Powell</surname>, <given-names>R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Beard</surname>, <given-names>C. D.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Riel</surname>, <given-names>N.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>New thermodynamic models for anhydrous alkaline-silicate magmatic systems</article-title>. <source><italic>Journal of Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>65</volume>(<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>egae098</fpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref133">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Wood</surname>, <given-names>B. J.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Blundy</surname>, <given-names>J. D.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>A predictive model for rare earth element partitioning between clinopyroxene and anhydrous silicate melt</article-title>. <source><italic>Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology</italic></source>  <volume>129</volume>(<issue>2–3</issue>), <fpage>166</fpage>–<lpage>181</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s004100050330</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref134">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Wood</surname>, <given-names>B. J.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Blundy</surname>, <given-names>J. D.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>) <article-title>Trace element partitioning under crustal and uppermost mantle conditions: the influences of ionic radius, cation charge, pressure, and temperature</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><surname>Carlson</surname>  <given-names>R. W.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (ed.) <source>The Mantle and Core: Treatise on Geochemistry, volume 2, chapter 2.09</source>. <publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>, pp. <fpage>395</fpage>–<lpage>424</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref135">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Wood</surname>, <given-names>B. J.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Blundy</surname>, <given-names>J. D.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>) <article-title>Trace element partitioning: the influences of ionic radius, cation charge, pressure, and temperature</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><surname>Carlson</surname>  <given-names>R. W.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (ed.) <source>The Mantle and Core: Treatise on Geochemistry</source>, 2nd edn, <comment>chapter 3.11</comment>. <publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>, pp. <fpage>421</fpage>–<lpage>445</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref136">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Wu</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Samson</surname>, <given-names>I. M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Borst</surname>, <given-names>A. M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Diao</surname>, <given-names>X.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Beard</surname>, <given-names>C. D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Zheng</surname>, <given-names>X.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Fan</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Hou</surname>, <given-names>Z.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Qiu</surname>, <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2026</year>). <article-title>Quartz-petalite intergrowths in the Yichun pegmatite: formation from late-stage Li-rich melts and implications for Li mineralization in rare-metal granites</article-title>. <source><italic>American Mineralogist</italic></source>  <volume>111</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>231</fpage>–<lpage>245</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2138/am-2025-9818</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref137">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Wyllie</surname>, <given-names>P. J.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Tuttle</surname>, <given-names>O. F.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>1961</year>). <article-title>Experimental investigation of silicate systems containing two volatile components; part 2, the effects of and HF, in addition to <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation496"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{NH_3}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>H<sub>2</sub>O on the melting temperatures of albite and granite</article-title>. <source><italic>American Journal of Science</italic></source>  <volume>259</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>128</fpage>–<lpage>143</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2475/ajs.259.2.128</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref138">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Xue</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Dasgupta</surname>, <given-names>R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Ling</surname>, <given-names>M.-X.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Sun</surname>, <given-names>W.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Lee</surname>, <given-names>C.-T. A.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>The effect of fluorine on mineral-carbonatitic melt partitioning of trace elements–implications for critical mineral deposits</article-title>. <source><italic>Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta</italic></source>  <volume>379</volume>, <fpage>53</fpage>–<lpage>75</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gca.2024.06.028</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref139">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Yakymchuk</surname>, <given-names>C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Clark</surname>, <given-names>C.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>White</surname>, <given-names>R. W.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Phase relations, reaction sequences and petrochronology</article-title>. <source><italic>Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry</italic></source>  <volume>83</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>13</fpage>–<lpage>53</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2138/rmg.2017.83.2</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref140">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Yang</surname>, <given-names>L.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>van Hinsberg</surname>, <given-names>V. J.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Liquid immiscibility in the CaF<sub>2</sub> -granite system and trace element partitioning between the immiscible liquids</article-title>. <source><italic>Chemical Geology</italic></source>  <volume>511</volume>(<issue>September 2018</issue>), <fpage>28</fpage>–<lpage>41</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref141">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Yang</surname>, <given-names>L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>van Hinsberg</surname>, <given-names>V. J.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Samson</surname>, <given-names>I. M.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>A new method to deconvolute binary mixture in LA-ICP-MS analyses to quantify the composition of phases smaller than the laser spot size</article-title>. <source><italic>Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry</italic></source>  <volume>33</volume>(<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>1518</fpage>–<lpage>1528</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1039/C8JA00078F</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref142">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Yang</surname>, <given-names>Z.-Y.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Wu</surname>, <given-names>M.-Q.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Li</surname>, <given-names>S.-S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Yu</surname>, <given-names>H.-C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Diao</surname>, <given-names>X.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Gao</surname>, <given-names>Y.-X.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Ma</surname>, <given-names>J.-D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Zhi</surname>, <given-names>C.-L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Shang</surname>, <given-names>Z.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Xi</surname>, <given-names>J.-K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Huang</surname>, <given-names>Y.-Q.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Qiu</surname>, <given-names>K.-F.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>The origin of glimmerite and its significance to rare earth element mineralization: insights from the Longbaoshan deposit in North China craton</article-title>. <source><italic>Ore Geology Reviews</italic></source>  <volume>184</volume>, <fpage>106698</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.oregeorev.2025.106698</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref143">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <string-name>
              <surname>Zhang</surname>, <given-names>C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Li</surname>, <given-names>X.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Behrens</surname>, <given-names>H.</given-names></string-name> &amp; <string-name><surname>Holtz</surname>, <given-names>F.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Partitioning of OH-F-Cl between biotite and silicate melt: experiments and an empirical model</article-title>. <source><italic>Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta</italic></source>  <volume>317</volume>, <fpage>155</fpage>–<lpage>179</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gca.2021.10.031</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>